This article explores the implications of new public sector ‘reforms’ for the culture of higher education. It argues that a culture of carelessness, grounded in Cartesian rationalism, has been exacerbated by new managerialism. The article challenges a prevailing sociological assumption that the character of higher education culture is primarily determined by new managerial values and norms. Carelessness in education has a longer historical trajectory. First, it has its origins in the classical Cartesian view of education, namely that scholarly work is separate from emotional thought and feeling, and that the focus of education is on educating an autonomous, rational person, homo sapiens, whose relationality is not regarded as central to her or his being. Second, it is grounded in the separation between fact and value that is endemic to contemporary positivist norms that govern not only scientific and social scientific thought (Sayer, 2006) but the organization of higher education (Grummell et al., 2009a; Lynch, 2006). What is new about new managerialism in higher education is the moral status it accords to carelessness. Given the moral imperative on women to do care work (O’Brien, 2007) and on men to be care-less, the carelessness of higher education has highly gendered outcomes.1
Acker, J. ( 1990) ‘Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations’, Gender and Society4(2): 139-58.
2.
Acker, J. ( 2006) ‘Inequality regimes: Gender class and race in organizations’ , Gender and Society22(4): 441-64.
3.
Acker, J. ( 2008) ‘Helpful men and feminist support: More than double strangeness’, Gender, Work and Organization15(3): 288-93.
4.
Archer, M.S. ( 2000) Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bagilhole, B. ( 2002) ‘Challenging equal opportunities: Changing and adapting male hegemony in academia’, British Journal of Sociology of Education23(1): 19-33.
6.
Bailyn, L. ( 2003) ‘Academic careers and gender equity: Lessons learned from MIT’, Gender, Work and Organization10(2): 137-53.
7.
Ball, S.J. ( 2003) ‘The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity’ , Journal of Education Policy18(2): 215-28.
8.
Barry, J., Berg, E. and Chandler, J. ( 2006) ‘Academic shape shifting: Gender, management and identities in Sweden and England’, Organization13(2): 275-98.
9.
Benschop, Y. and Brouns, M. ( 2003) ‘Crumbling ivory towers: Academic organizing and its gender effects’, Gender, Work and Organization10(2): 194-212.
10.
Blackmore, J. and Sachs, J. ( 2007) Performing and Reforming Leaders: Gender, Educational Restructuring and Organizational Change. New York: State of New York Press.
11.
Bloom, B.S. ( 1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1Cognitive Domain. London: Longman.
12.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1993) Sociology in Question, trans. Richard Nice. London: SAGE.
13.
Davies, B., Gottsche, M. and Bansel, P. ( 2006) ‘The rise and fall of the neo-liberal university’ , European Journal of Education41(2): 305-19.
14.
Deem, R. ( 2003) ‘Gender, organizational cultures and the practices of manager-academics in UK universities’, Gender, Work and Organization10(2): 239-59.
15.
Deem, R., Hillyard, S. and Reed, M., (2007) Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism . Oxford: Oxford Press.
16.
Dill, D.D. and Soo, M. ( 2005) ‘Academic quality, league tables and public policy: A cross national analysis of university ranking systems’, Higher Education49: 495-533.
17.
Drudy, S., Martin, M., Woods, M. and O’Flynn, J. ( 2005) Men and the Classroom: Gender Imbalances in Teaching. London: Routledge.
18.
Erne, R. ( 2007) ‘On the use and abuse of bibliometric performance indicators: A critique of Hix’s global ranking of political science departments’, European Political Science6: 306-14.
19.
Fineman, M. ( 2008) ‘The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism20(1): 1-23.
20.
Fraser, N. and Gordon, L. ( 1997) ‘A genealogy of "dependency"’, in Nancy Fraser (ed.) Justice Interrupts: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, pp.121-49. New York: Routledge.
21.
Gardner, H. ( 1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Gardner, H. ( 1999) Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books .
23.
Gilligan, C. ( 1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
24.
Gilligan, C. ( 1995) ‘Hearing the difference: Theorizing connection’ , Hypatia10(2): 120-27.
25.
Giroux, H. ( 2002) ‘Neo-liberalism, corporate culture and the promise of higher education’, Harvard Educational Review72(4): 1-31.
26.
Gouldner, A.W. ( 1970) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London: Heinemann.
27.
Grummell, B., Devine, D. and Lynch, K.(2009a) ‘The Care-less Manager: Gender, Care and New Managerialism in Higher Education’, Gender and Education21(2): 191-208.
28.
Grummell, B., Devine, D. and Lynch, K. ( 2009b) ‘Appointing senior managers in education: Homosociability, local logics and authenticity in the selection process’, Educational Management, Administration and Leadership37(3): 329-49.
29.
Gurtler, S. ( 2005) ‘The ethical dimension of work: A feminist perspective’ , Hypatia20(2): 119-36.
30.
Hanlon, N.(2009) ‘Caregiving masculinities: An exploratory analysis’, in K. Lynch, J. Baker and M. Lyons (eds) Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice, pp. 180-98. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
Harding, S. ( 1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
32.
Harkavy, I. ( 2006) ‘The role of the universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century’, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice5: 5-37.
33.
Held, V., ed. (1995) Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.
Henkel, M. ( 2000) Academic Identities and Policy Changes in Higher Education . London: Jessica Kingsley.
35.
Husu, L. ( 2000) ‘Gender discrimination in the promised land of gender equality’, Higher Education in Europe25(1): 221-8.
36.
Kittay, E. ( 1999) Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency . New York: Routledge.
37.
Knights, D. and Richards, W. ( 2003) ‘Sex discrimination in UK academia’, Gender , Work and Organization10(2): 213-38.
38.
Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S. and Masia, B.B. ( 1964) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 2: Affective Domain. London : Longman.
39.
Lanoix, M. ( 2007) ‘Feminist interventions in democratic theory: The citizen in question’, Hypatia22(4): 113-29.
40.
Leathwood, C. ( 2005) ‘Assessment policy and practice in higher education: Purpose, standards, and equity’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education30(3): 307-24.
41.
Lynch, K. ( 2006) ‘Neo-liberalism and marketisation: the implications for higher education’, European Educational Research Journal5(1): 1-17.
42.
Lynch, K. ( 2007) ‘Love labour as a distinct and non-commodifiable form of Care Labour’, Sociological Review55(3): 550-70.
43.
Lynch, K., Grummell, B., Devine, D. and Lyons, M. ( 2006) Senior Appointments in Education: A Study of Management Culture and its Gender Implications. Dublin: Gender Equality Unit, Department of Education and Science.
44.
Lynch, K., Lyons, M. and Cantillon, S. ( 2007) ‘Breaking the silence: Educating for love, care and solidarity’, International Studies in Sociology of Education17(1&2): 1-19.
45.
Lynch, K., Baker, J. and Lyons, M. ( 2009) Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
Marginson, S. ( 2006) ‘Dynamics of global competition in higher education’ , Higher Education52(1): 1-39.
47.
Morley, L. ( 1999) Organising Feminisms: The Micro politics of the Academy . London: Macmillan.
48.
Morley, L. ( 2001) ‘Subjected to review: Engendering quality and power in higher education’, Journal of Education Policy16(5): 465-78.
49.
Morley, L. ( 2003) Quality and Power in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
50.
Moreau, M., Osgood, J. and Halsall, A. ( 2007) ‘Making sense of the glass ceiling in schools: An exploration of women teachers’ discourses’, Gender and Education19(2): 237-53.
51.
Noddings, N. ( 1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education .Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
Noddings, N. ( 2003) Happiness and Education. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
53.
Nussbaum, M.C. ( 1995) ‘Emotions and women’s capabilities’ , in Nussbaum and Glover (eds.) Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities, pp.360-95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
Nussbaum, M.C. ( 2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
O’Brien, M. ( 2007) ‘Mothers’ emotional care work in education and its moral imperative’, Gender and Education19(2): 159-77.
56.
O’Connor, J.S., Orloff, A.S. and Shaver, S. ( 1999) States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Oliver, M. ( 1992) ‘Changing the social relations of research production’ , Disability and Society7(2): 101-14.
58.
Peters, M. ( 2005) ‘The new prudentialism in education: Actuarial rationality and the entrepreneurial self ’, Educational Theory55(2): 123-37.
59.
Probert, B. ( 2005) ‘"I just couldn’t fit it in": Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers’, Gender, Work and Organization12(1): 50-72.
60.
Rutherford, J. ( 2005) ‘Cultural studies in the corporate university’ , Cultural Studies19(3): 297-317.
61.
Saunderson, W. ( 2002) ‘Women, academia and identity: Constructions of equal opportunities in "new managerialism"’, Higher Education Quarterly56(4): 376-406.
62.
Sayer, A. ( 2005) The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
63.
Sayer, A. ( 2006) ‘Language and significance - or the importance of import’, Journal of Language and Politics5(3): 449-71.
64.
Sklair, L. ( 2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.
65.
Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L.L. ( 2001) ‘Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism’, Organization8(2): 154-61.
66.
Smith, D.E. ( 1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
67.
Steier, F.S. ( 2003) ‘The changing nexus: Tertiary education institutions, the marketplace and the state’, Higher Education Quarterly57(2): 158-80.
68.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) ( 2009) Gender Issues: policy areas. Available at: <unece.org/stats.gender/genpols/keyinds/education/>
69.
Weiner, G. ( 2008) ‘Fast policies, fast theories and fast lives: when everything becomes performance’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education29(2): 289-95.
70.
Wenneras, C. and Wold, A. ( 1997) ‘Nepotism and sexism in peer review’, Nature387: 341-3.
