Second language study in French universities includes both modern language (literary) and foreign language (communicative) approaches, although teaching is dominated by the literary strand. Traditional educational models based on the transmission of knowledge are unable to accommodate recent progress in our understanding of learning theory, which offers cognitivist and constructivist approaches to learning and teaching. Similar advances specific to second language learning and teaching cannot be reconciled with the standard grammar-translation method, but instead call for communicative, task-oriented classrooms. This article traces the development of learning theory and second language teaching with respect to the roles of teacher and learner, conceptions of language as process or product, and individual versus group learning. It recommends an activity-oriented, project-based approach to second language teaching, learning and evaluation as an appropriate foundation for foreign (non-literary) language learners, including future school teachers, and calls for greater academic recognition of second language research.
Absalom, A. ( 2004) ‘Editorial: Languages in higher education’ , Arts and Humanities in Higher Education3(2): 123-4.
2.
Boshier, R. and Huang, Y. ( 2008) ‘In the house of scholarship of teaching and learning, teaching lives upstairs and learning in the basement’, Teaching in Higher Education13(6): 645-56.
3.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1984) Homo academicus. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
4.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1990) Homo academicus, trans. P. Collier. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Brown, R. ( 1973) A First Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Buck, J. and Narcy-Combes, M-F. ( 2008) ‘Dispositif hybride d’enseignement et apprentissage de l’anglais en milieu universitaire: apports et limites de la didactique.’Paper presented at RANACLES, 16, Nice, 20-22 November.
7.
Chomsky, N. ( 1959) ‘Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner’ , Language35: 26-58.
8.
Cobb, T. ( 2007) ‘Constructivism, applied linguistics, and language education’, in K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 3, Foundations of linguistics , 2nd edition, pp. 85-88. Oxford : Elsevier. Available at: http://www.lextutor.ca/cv/constructivism_entry.htm (accessed 27 January 2009).
9.
Coleman, J.A. ( 2004) ‘Modern languages in British universities: past and present’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education3(2): 149-64.
10.
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment.Council of Europe. Available at: http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/CADRE_EN.asp.
11.
Decarie, G. ( 2007) ‘Teaching? What teaching?’Canadian Association of University Teachers Bulletin54. Available at: http://www.cautbulletin.ca/en_article.asp?articleid=335 (accessed 27 January 2009).
12.
Dulay, H., Burt, M. and Krashen, S. ( 1982) Language Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Ellis, R. ( 1997) SLA Research and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Elton, L. ( 2009) ‘Continuing professional development in higher education: the role of the scholarship of teaching and learning’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education8(3): 247-58.
15.
Firth, A. and Wagner, J. ( 2007 [1997]) ‘On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research’, Modern Language Journal91(s1):757-72, republished from 81(3): 285-300.
16.
Fries, C.C. and Lado, R. ( 1958) English Pattern Practices: Establishing the Patterns as Habits. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Gass, S. ( 1997) Input, Interaction and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
Hulstijn, J. ( 2007) ‘Fundamental issues in the study of second language acquisition’, EUROSLA Yearbook7. Available at: home.medewerker.uva.nl/j.h.hulstijn/bestanden/Publications_Hulstijn.pdf (accessed 27 January 2009).
19.
Lantolf, J. ( 2000) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Long, M.H. ( 2000) ‘Focus on form in task-based language teaching’ , in Lambert, R.L. and Shohamy, E. (eds) Language Policy and Pedagogy . pp. 179-92, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21.
Macaire, D. ( 2008) ‘Le développement de compétences spécifiques en formation d’enseignants d’allemand: un exemple de ‘‘mobile teaching education’’.’Paper presented at RANACLES, 16, Nice, 20-22 November.
22.
McVeigh, B. ( 2004) ‘Foreign language instruction in Japanese higher education’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education3(2): 211-27.
23.
Papert, S. ( 1980) Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
24.
Riordan, T. ( 2008) ‘Disciplinary expertise revisited: The scholarship of teaching and learning philosophy’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education7(3): 262-75.
25.
Rivers, W. ( 1964) The Psychologist and the Foreign Language Teacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Rogoff, B.( 1990) Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Sawyer, R.K. ( 2007) ‘Optimizing learning: Implications of learning sciences research’, in OECD/CERI, Focus in Learning: Searching for Alternatives. Paris: OECD/ CERI. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/39/52/40554221.pdf (accessed 7 July 2010).
28.
Searle, J. ( 1972) ‘Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics’ . Available at: www.chomsky.info/onchomsky/19720629.htm (accessed 27 January 2009).
29.
Selinker, L. ( 1972) ‘Interlanguage’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching10(3): 209-31.
30.
Skehan, P. ( 1998) A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Skinner, B.F. ( 1957) Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31.
Willis, J. ( 2004) ‘The challenge of the 21st century agenda for foreign language learning in England’s universities’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education3(2): 175-93.
