The academic study of religion at the public university often presents itself as a secular, non-religious, scientific endeavor. The identity of the study is thus firmly rooted within one of the central secular—religious divides, namely that between science and religion. Based on the assumption that such distinctions between religion and the secular (in this case science) are by no means naturally given, but continuously need to be produced and sanctioned in social practice in order to sustain themselves, the article shows how the distinction between religion and science is produced in daily academic practices at two departments for the Study of Religion at Danish universities.
Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., eds (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
2.
Asad, T. ( 1993) Genealogies of Religion. Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. London and Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Asad, T. ( 2003) Formations of the Secular. Christianity, Islam, Modernity . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
4.
Baird, R. ( 1998) ‘How religion became scientific’, in A. L. Molendijk and P. Pels (eds) Religion in the Making:. The Emergence of the Science of Religion, pp. Leiden: Brill.
5.
Barth, F. ( 2002) ‘An anthropology of knowledge’, Current Anthropology43(1): 1-18.
6.
Berger, P. ( 1973) ‘Some second thoughts on substantive versus functional definitions of religion’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion13(2): 125-34.
7.
Berger, P. ( 1999) ‘The desecularization of the world: A global overview’ , in P. Berger (ed.) The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, pp. 1-18. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans.
8.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W. and Krathwohl, D. ( 1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
9.
Bruce, S. ( 2002) God is Dead: Secularization in the West. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
10.
Casanova, J. ( 1993) Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
11.
Delanty, G. ( 2001) Challenging Knowledge: The University in the Knowledge Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
12.
De Vries, H. ( 2006) ‘Introduction: Before, around, and beyond the theologico-political’ , in H. De Vries (ed.) Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-secular World, pp. 1-88. New York : Fordham University Press.
13.
Douglas, M. ( 1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Purity and Taboo. London: Routledge.
14.
Fitzgerald, T. ( 2000) The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Fitzgerald, T., ed. (2007) Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations. London : Equinox.
16.
Greil, A.L. and Bromley, D.G. ( 2003) ‘Introduction’, in A. L. Greil and D. G. Bromley (eds) Defining Religion: Investigating the Boundaries between Sacred and Secular . Religion and the Social Order , Vol. 10, pp. 3-17. New York: Elsevier.
17.
Hoffmann, J. ( 1988) State, Authority, Democracy. Brighton : Wheatsheaf.
18.
Hurd, E. ( 2004) ‘The political authority of secularism in international relations’, European Journal of International Relations10(2): 235-62.
19.
Johansen, B.S. ( 2008) ‘Legitimizing Islamic theology at European universities’ , in W. B. Drees and P. S. van Koningsveld (eds) The Study of Religion and the Training of Muslim Clergy in Europe, pp. 445-67. Leiden : Leiden University Press.
20.
King, R. ( 1999) Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India and ‘The Mystic East’. London: Routledge.
21.
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. ( 1991) ‘Post-Marxism without apologies’, in E. Laclau (ed.) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, pp. 97-132. London: Verso.
22.
Lyotard, J.F. ( 1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
23.
Massey, D. ( 2005) For Space. London: SAGE.
24.
Parker, M. and Jary, P. ( 1995) ‘The McUniversity: Organization, management, and academic subjectivity’, Organization2(2): 319-38.
25.
Roy, O. ( 2003) Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
Saler, B. ( 1993) Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories. Leiden : Brill.
27.
Sharp, E. ( 1986) Comparative Religion: A History. London : Duckworth.
28.
Taylor, C. ( 2007) A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
29.
Weber, M. ( 1978) Economy and Society, vols 1and2, ed. G. Roth and C. Wittich.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
