The purpose of the research was to develop a substantive theory to describe the coping of myocardial infarction (MI) patients’ spouses. The theory describes spousal coping experiences at 4 and 12 months after the patient’s MI.
Methods:
The data were collected by means of theme interviews from 28 spouses in the years 2006 and 2007 and analysed using Strauss and Corbin’s grounded theory method.
Results:
The substantive theory describes four main categories of spousal coping. The categories are: serene and balanced coping; action-centred coping; illness-centred coping; and coping based on denial of illness.
Conclusions:
The theory can be useful when developing support and counselling interventions for the spouses of MI patients. The study provides new knowledge about the spouses’ coping experiences and about the factors that influence their coping over a longer period of time. The theory also discusses causal, contextual, and concurrent factors, which affect the coping experience and whose identification is important when seeking to support the spouses. Another application of the theory can be found in nursing education.
NelsonDVBaerPEClevelandSE. Family stress management following acute myocardial infarction: an educational and skills training intervention program. Patient Educ Couns1998; 34(2): 135–145.
2.
Åstedt-KurkiPLehtiKTarkkaM-T. Determinants of perceived health in families of patients with heart disease. J Adv Nurs2004; 48(5): 115–123.
3.
HallPSanfordJTDemiAS. Patterns of decision making by wives of patients with life threatening cardiac disease. J Fam Nurs2008; 14(3): 347–362.
4.
LazarusRFolkmanS. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York. Springer Publishing, 1984.
5.
BennettPConnellH. Couples coping with myocardial infarction: the partner’s experience. Coronary Health Care1998; 2, 140–144.
6.
KettunenSSolovievaSLaamanenR. Myocardial infarction spouses’ reactions and their need of help. J Adv Nurs1999; 30(2): 479–488.
7.
TheobaldK. The experience of spouses whose partners who have suffered a myocardial infarction: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs1997; 26(3): 595–601.
8.
DalyJJacksonDDavidsonPM. The experiences of female spouses of survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a pilot study of Lebanese-born women in south-western Sydney, Australia. J Adv Nurs1998; 28(6): 1199–1206.
9.
O’FarrellPMurrayJHoltzSB. Psychologic distress among spouses of patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. Heart Lung2000; 29(2): 97–104.
10.
SvedlundMAxelssonI. Acute myocardial infarction in middle-aged women: narrations from their partners during rehabilitation. Intensive Crit Care Nurs2000; 16(4): 256–265.
11.
SantavirtaNKettunenNSolovievaS. Coping in spouses of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the early phase of recovery. J Cardiovasc Nurs2001; 16: 34–46s.
12.
WebsterRAThompsonDRMayouRA. The experiences and needs of Gujarati Hindu patients and partners in the first month after a myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2002; 1(1): 69–76.
13.
MaxwellKEStuenkelDSaylorC. Needs of family members of critically ill patients: A comparison of nurse and family perceptions. Heart Lung2007; 36(5): 367–376.
14.
ÅgrenSHollman FrismanGBergS. Addressing spouses’ unique needs after cardiac surgery when recovery is complicated by heart failure. Heart Lung2009; 38(4): 284–291.
15.
BohnUWrightLMMoulesNJ. A family systems nursing interview following a myocardial infarction: the power of commendations. J Fam Nurs2003; 9(2): 151–165.
16.
AntonovskyA. Unraveling the mystery of health. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1987.
17.
FeeleyNGottliebLN. Nursing approaches for working with family strengths and resources. J Fam Nurs2000; 6(1): 9–24.
18.
FokSKChairSYLopezV. Sense of coherence, coping and quality of life following a critical illness. J Adv Nurs2005; 49(2): 173–181.
19.
NyamathiAJacobyAConstanciaP. Coping and adjustment of spouses of critically ill patients with cardiac disease. Heart Lung1992; 21(2): 160–166.
20.
CasariniKAGorayebRFilhoAB. Coping by relatives of critical care patients. Heart Lung2009; 38: 217–227.
21.
FleuryJMooreSM. Family-centered care after acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Nurs1999; 13(3): 73–82.
22.
KettunenSSolovievaSLaamanenR. Myocardial infarction, spouses’ reactions and their need of support. J Adv Nurs1999; 30(2): 479–488.
23.
KnollSJohnsonJ. Uncertainty and expectations: taking care of a cardiac surgery patient at home. J Cardiovasc Nurs2000; 14(3): 64–75.
24.
StewartMDavidsonKMeadeD. Myocardial infarction: survivors and spouses’ stress, coping and support. J Adv Nurs2000; 31(6): 1351–1360.
25.
SchweikertBHungerMMeisingerC. Quality of life several years after myocardial infarction: comparing the MONICA/KORA registry to the general population. Eur Heart J2009; 30(4): 436–443.
26.
ArefjordKHallarakerEHavikOE. Life after a myocardial infarction – the wives’ point of view. Psych Rep1998; 83(3): 1203–1216.
27.
BakasTPresslerSJohnsonE. Family caregiving in heart failure. Nurs Res2006; 55(3): 180–188.
28.
NauserJABakasTWelchJL. A new instrument to measure quality of life of heart failure family caregivers. J Cardiovasc Nurs2011; 26(1): 53–64.
29.
ErikssonMAsplundKSvedlundM. Patients’ and their partners’ experiences of returning home after hospital discharge following acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2009; 8(4): 267–273.
30.
LukkarinenHKyngäsH. Experiences of the onset of coronary artery disease in a spouse. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2003; 2(3): 189–194.
31.
TheobaldKMcMurrayA. Issues and innovations in nursing practice. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery: discharge planning for successful recovery. J Adv Nurs2004; 47(5): 483–491.
32.
MoserDKDracupK. Role of spousal anxiety and depression in patients’ psychosocial recovery after a cardiac event. Psychosom Med2004; 66(4): 527–532.
33.
RantanenAKaunonenMTarkkaM. Patients’ and significant others’ health-related quality of life one month after coronary artery bypass grafting predicts later health-related quality of life. Heart Lung2009; 38(4): 318–329.
34.
RohrbaughMJShohamVClearyAA. Health consequences of partner distress in couples coping with heart failure. Heart Lung2009; 38(4): 298–305.
35.
HalmMATreat-JacobsonDLindquistR. Correlates of caregiver burden after coronary artery bypass surgery. Nurs Res2006; 55(6): 426–436.
36.
HalmMATreat-JacobsonDLindquistR. Caregiver burden and outcomes of caregiving of spouses of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung2007; 36(3): 170–187.
37.
ÅgrenSEvangelistaLStrömbergA. Do partners of patients with chronic heart failure experience caregiver burden?Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2010; 9(4): 254–262.
38.
TarkkaM-TPaavilainenELehtiK. 2003. In-hospital social support for families of heart patients. J Clin Nurs2003; 12(5): 736–743.
39.
BarryLCKaslSVLichtmanJ. Social support and change in health related quality of life 6 months after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Psychos Res2006; 60(2): 185–193.
40.
SvedlundMDanielsonE. Myocardial infarction: narrations by afflicted women and their partners of lived experiences in daily living following an acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Nurs2004; 13(4): 438–446.
41.
KnaflKAGillissCL. Families and chronic illness: a synthesis of current research. J Fam Nurs2002; 8(3): 178–198.
42.
CorbinJStraussA. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks. California: Sage, 2008.
43.
McCannTClarkE. Grounded theory in nursing research: part 1 – methodology. Nurs Res2003; 11(2): 7–18.
44.
RantanenAKaunonenMAstedt-KurkiP. Coronary artery bypass grafting: social support for patients and their significant others. J Clin Nurs2004; 13(2): 158–166.
45.
TappDM. Dilemmas of family support during cardiac recovery, nagging as a gesture of support. West J Nurs Res2004; 26(5): 561–580.
46.
Mahrer-ImhofRHoffmanAFroelicherES. Impact of cardiac disease on couple’s relationship. J Adv Nurs2007; 57(5): 513–521.
47.
BlackKLoboM. A conceptual review of family resilience factors. J Fam Nurs2008; 14(1): 33–35.
48.
BennettPConnellH. Dyadic processes in response to myocardial infarction. Psychol Health Med1999; 4(1): 45–55.
49.
BakasTPresslerSJJohnsonEA. Family caregiving in heart disease. Nurs Res2006; 55(3): 180–188.
50.
PaavilainenELehtiKÅstedt-KurkiP. Family functioning assessed by family members in Finnish families of heart patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2006; 5(1): 54–59.
51.
PorterS. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. J Adv Nurs2007; 60(1): 79–86.
52.
CheslaCA. Nursing science and chronic illness: articulating suffering and possibility in family life. J Fam Nurs2005; 11(4): 371–387.
