Guidelines have concluded that there is a great need for new models of integrated care, e.g. heart failure and palliative care, in order to facilitate equality of care for dying patients, regardless of diagnosis. We found no evidence in the literature concerning the advantages and effects of integrated heart failure and palliative advanced home care for patients with severe chronic heart failure.
Aim:
The primary aim is to study the effects of integrated Palliative advanced homecarRE and heart FailurE caRE (PREFER) on patients’ symptom burden, quality of life, and activities of daily living (ADL) as compared to usual care.
Method:
Prospective, randomized study with an open-evaluation PROBE design. Optimally treated outpatients with chronic heart failure of varying aetiologies in New York Heart Association classes III−IV will be eligible to participate.
Conclusion:
The PREFER study is designed to investigate whether a new concept of managing patients with severe chronic heart failure by integrating palliative homecare and active heart failure treatment will reduce symptom burden, increase quality of life and ADL, and reduce the number of hospitalizations in patients with severe chronic heart failure.
DicksteinKCohen-SolalAFilippatosG. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail2008; 10(10): 933–989.
2.
O’LearyNMurphyFNO’LoughlinC. A comparative study of the palliative care needs of heart failure and cancer patients. Eur J Heart Failure2009; 11(4): 406–412.
3.
O’LearyN. The comparative palliative care needs of those with heart failure and cancer patients. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care2009; 3(4): 241–246.
4.
BrännströmMHägglundLFürstCJ. Unequal care of dying patients in Sweden – a comparative registry study of deaths in heart disease and cancer. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs [Epub ahead of print].
5.
McDonaghATBlueLClarkLA.; on behalf of Heart failure Association Committee on patient care. European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association standards for delivering heart failure care. Eur J Heart Fail2011; 13(3): 235–241.
6.
JaarsmaTBeattieJMRyderM.; on behalf of the Advanced Heart failure study Group of the HFA of the ESC. Palliative care in heart failure: a position statement from the palliative care workshop of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail200911(5): 433–443.
7.
TernestedtBM. A dignified death and identity-promoting care. In: NordenfeltL (ed). Dignity in care for older people. Sussex: Blackwell Publishing, 2010, pp.146–165.
8.
EkmanISwedbergKTaftC. Person-centered care – ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2011; 10(4): 248–251.
9.
SonnUTörnqvistKSvenssonE. The ADL taxonomy – from individual categorical data to ordinal categorical data. Scand J Occ Therapy1999; 6(1): 11–20.
10.
ChangVTHwangSSFeuermanM. Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer2000; 88(9): 2164–2171.
11.
BrueraEKuehnNMillerMJ. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Pall Care1991; 7(2): 6–9.
12.
The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facilty for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy1990; 16(13): 199–208.
13.
HaywoodKLGarrattAMFitzpatrickR. Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Qual Life Res2005; 14(7): 1651–1668.
14.
StarkRGReitmeirPLeidlR. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in inflammatory bowel disease in Germany. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010; 16(1): 42–51.
15.
EllisJEEagleKAKline-RogersEM. Validation of the EQ-5D in patients with a history of acute coronary syndrome. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005; 21(8): 1209–1216.
16.
PatelHEkmanISpertusJA. Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in a chronic heart failure population. EurJ Cardiovasc Nurs2008; 7(3): 214–221.
17.
NibjoerCTriemstraMTempelaarR. The caregiver reaction assesment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairments. Soc Sci Med1999; 48(9): 1259–1269.
18.
PerssonCWennman-larsenASundinK. Assessing informal caregivers’ experiences: a qualitative and psychometric evaluation of the caregiver reaction Assessment Scale (CRA). Eur J Cancer Care2008; 17(2): 189–199.
19.
WildeBStarrinBLarssonG. Quality of care from a patient perspective: a grounded theory study. Scand J Caring Sci1993; 7(2): 113–120.
20.
WildeBLarssonGLarssonM. Quality of care: Development of a patient-centered questionaire based on a grounded theory model. Scand J Caring Sci1994; 8(1): 39–48.
21.
LarssonGWilde LarssonBWMunckIM. Refinement of the questionnaire ‘quality of care from the patient’s perspective’ using structural equation modelling. Scand J Caring Sci1998; 12(2): 111–118.
22.
GraneheimU-HLundmanB. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today2004; 24(2): 105–112.
23.
FollwellMBurmanDLeLW. Phase II study of an outpatient palliative care intervention in patients with metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol2009; 27(2): 206–213.
24.
BrännströmMBrulinCNorbergA. Being a palliative nurse for persons with severe congestive heart failure in advanced homecare. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2005: 4(4): 314–323.
25.
BrännströmMForssellAPetterssonB. Physicians’ experiences of palliative care for heart failure patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2011; 10(1): 64–69.
26.
HanrattyBHibbertDMairF. Doctors’ perceptions of palliative care for heart failure: focus group study. BMJ2002; 325(7364): 581–585.
27.
BrännströmMEkmanINorbergA. Living with severe chronic heart failure in palliative advanced home care. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2006; 5(4): 295–302.
28.
World Health Organization. National cancer control programs: policies and managerial guidelines. 2nd ed.WHO: Geneva, 2002.
