Timely access to appropriate cardiac care is critical for optimizing positive outcomes after a cardiac event. Attendance at cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains less than optimal (10%–30%). Our aim was to derive an objective, comparable, geographic measure reflecting access to cardiac services after a cardiac event in Australia.
Methods:
An expert panel defined a single patient care pathway and a hierarchy of the minimum health services for CR and secondary prevention. Using geographic information systems a numeric/alpha index was modelled to describe access before and after a cardiac event. The aftercare phase was modelled into five alphabetical categories: from category A (access to medical service, pharmacy, CR, pathology within 1 h) to category E (no services available within 1 h).
Results:
Approximately 96% or 19 million people lived within 1 h of the four basic services to support CR and secondary prevention, including 96% of older Australians and 75% of the indigenous population. Conversely, 14% (64,000) indigenous people resided in population locations that had poor access to health services that support CR after a cardiac event.
Conclusion:
Results demonstrated that the majority of Australians had excellent ‘geographic’ access to services to support CR and secondary prevention. Therefore, it appears that it is not the distance to services that affects attendance. Our ‘geographic’ lens has identified that more research on socioeconomic, sociological or psychological aspects to attendance is needed.
HazinskiMFNolanJPBilliJE. 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation2010; 122: S249.
2.
O’ConnorREBradyWilliamBrooksSC. Part 10: Acute coronary syndromes: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation2010; 122: S787-S817.
National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2006. Med J Aust2006; 184: 1–32.
5.
National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Cardiac rehabilitation GIS: Geographic information system mapping of cardiac rehabilitation services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Canberra: National Health Medical Research Council, 2007. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/ind2.pdf (2007, accessed 7 July 2011).
6.
AndersonJLAdamsCDAntmanEM. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation2007; 50: e1.
7.
Blomström-LundqvistCScheinmanMMAliotEM. ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias*—Executive Summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias). Circulation2003; 108: 1871–1909.
8.
ZipesDPCammAJBorggrefeM. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American. Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol2006; 48: 746–847.
9.
KrumHJelinekMVStewartS. 2011 update to National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guidelines for the prevention, detection and management of chronic heart failure in Australia, 2006. Med J Aust2011; 194: 405–409.
BaladyGJWilliamsMAAdesPA. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation: 2007 update. Circulation2007; 115: 2675–2682.
12.
The Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). 2006 comprehensive heart failure practice guidelines. J Card Fail2006; 12: e1-e122.
13.
DicksteinKCohen-SolalAFilippatosG. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008. Eur J Heart Fail2008; 10: 933–989.
14.
World Health Organization Expert Committee. Rehabilitation after cardiovascular diseases, with special emphasis on developing countries. Technical report series No. 831. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993.
15.
SwansonNMGDevlinGPDutucG. Long-term mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for high-risk myocardial infarction. Heart Lung Circ2010; 19: 19–25.
16.
DudasKLappasG. Trends in out-of-hospital deaths from coronary heart disease in Sweden (1991 to 2006). Circulation2011; 123: 46-52.
17.
Bjarnason-WehrensaBMcGeebHZwislercAD. Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: Results from the European Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory Survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2010; 17: 410–418.
18.
KotsevaKWoodDDe BackerGDe BacquerDPyöräläKReinerZKeilU, EUROASPIRE Study Group. (Oct2010). EUROASPIRE III. Management of cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic high-risk patients in general practice: Cross-sectional survey in 12 European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil17: 530-540.
19.
ClarkAMHartlingLVandermeerB. Meta-analysis: Secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med2005; 143: 659–672.
20.
ScottIALindsayKAHardenHE. Utilisation of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Queensland. Med J Aust2003; 179: 341–345.
21.
BunkerSMcBurneyHCoxH. Identifying participation rates at outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs in Victoria, Australia. J Cardiopulm Rehabil1999; 19: 334–338.
22.
EvensonKRFleuryJ. Barriers to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation participation and adherence. J Cardiopulm Rehabil2000; 20: 241–246.
23.
HarlanWRSandlerSALeeKL. Importance of baseline functional and socioeconomic factors for participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol1995; 76: 36–39.
24.
AdesPAWalmannMLPolkDM. Referral patterns and exercise response in the rehabilitation of female coronary patients aged >62 years. Am J Cardiol1992; 69: 1422–1425.
25.
United States of America Department of the Interior Geological Survey. Geographic information systems. http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/gis_poster/ (2010, accessed 19 October 2010).
26.
CoffeeNTurnerDClarkRA. Measuring national accessibility to cardiac services using geographic information systems. J Appl Geogr2012; 34: 445–455.
27.
BarberKStommelMKrollJ. Cardiac rehabilitation for community-based patients with myocardial infarction: Factors predicting discharge recommendation and participation. J Clin Epidemiol2001; 54: 1025–1030.
28.
GravesBA. Integrative literature review: A review of literature related to geographical information systems, healthcare access, and health outcomes. Perspect Health Inf Manag2008; 5: 11.
29.
ClarkRACoffeeNTurnerD. Application of geographic modeling techniques to quantify spatial access to health services before and after an acute cardiac event: The Cardiac ARIA project. Circulation2012; 125: 2006–2014.
Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. Measuring remoteness: Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA). Revised ed. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2001.
32.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Strengthening cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: A guide for health professionals. Canberra: NHMRC, 2005.
BamfordEJDunneLTaylorDS. Accessibility to general practitioners in rural South Australia – a case study using geographic information system technology. Med J Aust1999; 171: 614–616.
35.
BoersmaEMaasACPDeckersJW. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: Reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet1996; 348: 771–775.
36.
BrualJGravely-WitteSSuskinN. Drive time to cardiac rehabilation: At what point does it affect utilization?Int J Health Geogr2010; 9: 27–38.
37.
ClarkRADriscollANottageJ. Inequitable provision of optimal services for patients with chronic heart failure: A national geo-mapping study. Med J Aust2007; 186: 169–173.
38.
SunderlandVBBurrowsSDJoyceAW. A comparative evaluation of pharmacy services in single and no pharmacy towns. Aust New Zealand Health Policy2006; 3: 8.
PenchanskyRThomasJW. The concept of access. Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care1981; XIX: 127–140.
44.
De AngelisCBunkerSSchooA. Exploring the barriers and enablers to attendance at rural cardiac rehabilitation programs. Aust J Rural Health2008; 16: 137–142.
