Over the last two decades the UK health service has endeavoured to place patient and public involvement at the heart of its modernisation agenda. Despite these aspirations the role of patients in the development of nursing curricula remains limited.
Aim:
A descriptive qualitative design was used to explore the views of cardiac patients about the educational preparation of cardiac nurses.
Method:
Eight participants attending an annual conference of a patient and carer support group were recruited to the study. A focus group was conducted to explore their views on how the educational preparation of cardiac nurses in the UK should develop. Tape-recorded data were transcribed and a thematic analysis was undertaken.
Findings:
Four themes were identified: contradictions around practice and education; demonstrating compassion; delivering rehabilitation expertise; leadership in practice. Participants perceived that they had a valuable role in the educational development of nurses, enhancing nurses’ understanding of how individuals live and adjust to living with cardiovascular disease.
Conclusion:
Cardiac patients believe that the education of cardiac nurses should be driven by experiences in practice, nevertheless they want nurses to be equipped to deliver care that is underpinned by a strong knowledge base and skills combined with an ability to engage, educate and deliver high quality care that is both compassionate and individualised.
JhaVQuintonNBekkerH. Strategies and interventions for the involvement of real patients in medical education: A systematic review. Med Educ2009; 43: 10–20.
2.
Department of Health. Patient and public involvement in the new NHS. London: Department of Health, 1999.
3.
Department of Health. The NHS plan. A plan for investment: A plan for reform. London: Department of Health, 2000.
4.
Department of Health. The expert patient: A new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London: Department of Health, 2001.
RudmanMJ. User involvement in the nursing curriculum: Seeking users’ views. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs1996; 3: 195–200.
7.
SimpsonA. Creating alliances: The views of users and carers on the education and training needs of community mental health nurses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs1999; 6: 347–356.
8.
ForrestSRiskIMastersH. Mental health service user involvement in education. Exploring the issues. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs2000; 7: 51–57.
9.
Le VarRMH. Patient involvement in education for enhanced quality of care. Int Nurs Rev2002; 49: 219–225.
10.
LockyerLAlbarranJMannsS. An evaluation of the British Heart Foundation education pathway for nurses. Report, University of the West of England, UK, 2010.
11.
CurtisC. The British Heart Foundation education pathway. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing2008; 3: 364–366.
12.
RileyJBullockIWestS. Practical application of educational rhetoric: A pathway to expert cardiac nurse practice. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2003; 2: 283–290.
13.
British Association for Nursing in Cardiac Care (BANCC). Cardiac nursing – acute/episodic care career pathway. Competency statements. London: BANCC, 2004.
KruegerRACaseyMA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed.London: Sage, 2000.
16.
PolitDBeckC. Essentials of nursing research. Methods, appraisal, and utilization. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
17.
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ (2008, accessed 12 July 2012).
AuyeungAPatelGMcRobbieD. Information about medicines to cardiac in-patients: Patient satisfaction alongside the role perceptions and practices of doctors, nurses and pharmacists. Patient Educ Couns2011; 83: 360–366.
20.
KingR. Nurses’ perceptions of their pharmacology educational needs. J Adv Nurs2004; 45: 392–400.
LatterSYerrellPRycroft-MaloneJ. Nursing, medication education and the new policy agenda: The evidence base. Int J Nurs Stud2000; 37: 469–479.
23.
ManiasEAitkenRDunningT. Graduate nurses’ communication with health professionals when managing patients’ medications. J Clin Nurs2005; 14: 354–362.
24.
CheesmanS. Promoting concordance: Implications for prescribers. Nurse Prescribing2006; 4: 205–208.
25.
AlbertN. Improving medication adherence in chronic cardiovascular disease. Crit Care Nurse2008; 28: 54–64.
26.
JohnsonMGoodacreSTodA. Patients’ opinions of acute chest pain care: A qualitative evaluation of chest pain units. J Adv Nurs2008; 65: 120–129.
27.
SandelowskiM. A case of conflicting paradigms: Nursing and reproductive technology. ANS Adv Nurs Sci1988; 8: 27–37.
28.
LocsinR. Technology competency as caring in nursing. A model for practice. Indianapolis: Centre Nursing Press, 2005.
29.
WaltersAJ. A Heideggarian hermeneutic study of the practice of critical care nurses. J Adv Nurs1995; 21: 492–497.
30.
LittleC. Technological competence as a fundamental structure of learning in critical care nursing: A phenomenological study. J Clin Nurs2000; 9: 391–398.
31.
ScottJTThompsonDR. Assessing the information needs of post-myocardial infarction patients: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns2003; 50: 167–177.
32.
TaylorRBrownAEbrahimS. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med2004; 116: 682–692.
PembreyS. The ward sister – key to nursing. London: Royal College of Nursing, 1980.
35.
RedfernS. Hospital sisters. London: Royal College of Nursing, 1981.
36.
StapletonM. Ward sisters – another perspective. London: Royal College of Nursing, 1983.
37.
CunninghamGKitsonA. An evaluation of the RCN clinical leadership development programme: Part 1. Nurs Stand2000; 15: 34–37.
38.
Royal College of Nursing (RCN). Breaking down barriers, driving up standards. The role of the ward sister and charge nurse. London: RCN, 2009.
39.
Menzies LythI. The functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety. In: Containing Anxiety in Institutions. London: Free Associations, 1988, pp.43–85.
BradshawA. Is the ward sister role still relevant to the quality of patient care? A critical examination of the ward sister role past and present. J Clin Nurs2010; 19: 3555–3563.
42.
SpenceleySO’LearyKChizaskyL. Sources of information used by nurses to inform practice: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud2008; 45: 954–970.
43.
ThompsonCMcCaughanDCullumN. The accessibility of research-based knowledge for nurses in the United Kingdom acute care settings. J Adv Nurs2001; 36: 11–22.
44.
Profetto-McgrathJNegronKHugoK. Clinical nurse specialists’ approaches in selecting and using evidence to improve practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs2010; 7: 36–50.
45.
PearceyP. The role perceptions of auxiliary nurses: An exploratory study. Nursing Times Research2000; 5: 55–64.
46.
WakefieldA. Tensions experienced by student nurses in a changed NHS culture. Nurse Educ Today2000; 20: 571–578.
47.
SpilsburyKMeyerJ. Making claims on nursing work: Exploring the work of healthcare assistants and the implications for registered nurses’ roles. J Res Nurs2005; 10: 65–83.
48.
McKennaHHassonFKeeneyS. Student nurses’ experiences and perceptions of the role of the health care assistant: Executive summary. Research Report, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, 2006.
49.
PearceyP. Shifting roles in nursing - does role extension require role abdication?J Clin Nurs2008; 17: 1320–1326.
50.
AlahlafiABurgeS. What should undergraduate medical students know about psoriasis? Involving patients in curriculum development: Modified Delphi technique. Brit Med J2005; 330: 633–636.
51.
World Health Organisation (WHO). Health promotion in hospital: Evidence and quality management. Copenhagen: WHO, 2005.
52.
Department of Health. Modern matrons in the NHS. A progress report. London: Stationery Office, 2002.
53.
Department of Health. Patient and public involvement in health: The evidence for policy implementation. London: Stationery Office, 2004.
