Is the 10 m incremental shuttle walk test a useful test of exercise capacity for patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation?

Abstract

Background:

Field exercise tests are a feasible alternative to the symptom-limited exercise test for measuring exercise capacity in patients attending cardiac rehabilitation.

Aims:

To evaluate the criterion validity of the 10 m incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) as a useful tool for measurement of exercise capacity for patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation.

Methods:

Fifteen patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation completed a treadmill symptom-limited exercise test and two ISWTs with the order of testing randomised. Associations between the symptom-limited exercise test and the ISWT were explored and the ability of the ISWT to predict symptom-limited exercise test duration estimated.

Results:

There was a moderate to high association (r² ⩾0.72) between ISWT duration and distance, and symptom-limited exercise test duration; and a moderate association between ISWT peak heart rate and end of test oxygen saturation and these outcomes on the symptom-limited exercise test (0.47⩽ r² ⩽0.67). However, prediction of symptom-limited exercise test duration based on the ISWT produced wide 95% confidence intervals, for example, ranging from 9.1 to 16.3 minutes for an individual who completes the ISWT. Order of testing did not affect the results and the association between the ISWT and symptom-limited exercise test was similar for both the first (ISWT 1) and second test (ISWT 2) ISWT.

Conclusions:

The results provide support for the ISWT as a convenient field test of exercise capacity in a cardiac rehabilitation population, but not as a surrogate to predict symptom-limited exercise test duration for individuals. A single ISWT may provide as good an estimate of exercise capacity as repeating the test.

Keywords

10 m ISWT criterion validity cardiac rehabilitation exercise test walk test validity of results coronary heart disease symptom-limited exercise test

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s health-related physical fitness assessment manual, 3rd edn. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.

Balady

Williams

Ades

et al . Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2007; 115: 2675–2682.

Palange

Ward

Carlsen

K-H

et al . Recommendations on the use of exercise testing in clinical practice. Eur Respir J 2007; 29: 185–209.

Piepoli

Corra

Benzer

et al . Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 1–17.

Thompson

Arena

Riebe

et al . ACSM’s new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Curr Sports Med Rep 2013; 12: 215–217.

Simms

Myers

Adams

et al . Exercise tolerance testing in a cardiac rehabilitation setting: an exploratory study of its safety and practicality for exercise prescription and outcome data collection. Baylor University Medical Centre Proceedings 2007; 20: 344–347.

Taylor

Bell

Lough

Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention. In: Pryor

Prasad

(eds). Physiotherapy for respiratory and cardiac problems, 4th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2010, pp. 470–494.

American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Performance measure for improvement in functional capacity at completion of cardiac rehabilitation [Internet]. Chicago, IL (USA): American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; 2016 [cited 2017 April 11]. Available from: http://www.aacvpr.org/Portals/0/Program%20Certification/Performance%20Measures/Measures/CR%20Functional%20Capacity%20Performance%20Measure_10.24.16.pdf.

Goble

Worcester

MUC

. Best practice guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention. Melbourne, Australia: Heart Research Centre, on behalf of Department of Human Services Victoria, 1999.

10.

New Zealand Guidelines Group and Heart Foundation. Evidence-based best practice guideline: Cardiac rehabilitation. Wellington: New Zealand Guideline Group, 2002.

11.

Price

Gordon

Bird

et al . A review of guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation exercise programmes: is there an international consensus? Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1715–1733.

12.

Hanson

McBurney

Taylor

NF.

The retest reliability of the six minute walk test in patients referred to a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Physiother Res Intl 2012; 17: 55–61.

13.

Hanson

Taylor

McBurney

The 10 m incremental shuttle walk test is a highly reliable field exercise test for patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: a retest reliability study. Physiotherapy 2016; 102: 243–248.

14.

Singh

Puhan

Andrianopoulos

et al . An official systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: measurement properties of field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1447–1478.

15.

Solway

Brooks

Lacasse

et al . A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest 2001; 119: 256–270.

16.

Jolly

Taylor

Lip

GYH

et al . Reproducibility and safety of the incremental shuttle walking test for cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Cardiol 2008; 125: 144–145.

17.

Mokkink

Terwee

Patrick

et al . The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 737–745.

18.

Green

Watts

Rankin

et al . A comparison of the shuttle and 6 minute walking tests with measured peak oxygen consumption in patients with heart failure. J Sci Med Sport 2001; 4: 292–300.

19.

Keell

Chambers

Francis

et al . Shuttle-walk test to assess chronic heart failure. Lancet 1998; 352: 705.

20.

Lewis

Newal

Townend

et al . Incremental shuttle walk test in the assessment of patients for heart transplantation. Heart 2001; 86: 183–187.

21.

Morales

Martinez

Mendez

et al . A shuttle walk test for assessment of functional capacity in chronic heart failure. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 291–298.

22.

Pulz

Diniz

Alves

et al . Incremental shuttle and six minute walking tests in the assessment of functional capacity in chronic heart failure. Can J Cardiol 2008; 24: 131–135.

23.

Fowler

Singh

Revill

Reproducibility and validity of the incremental shuttle walking test in patients following coronary artery bypass surgery. Physiotherapy 2005; 91: 22–27.

24.

Mandic

Walker

Stevens

et al . Estimating exercise capacity from walking tests in elderly individuals with stable coronary artery disease. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 1853–1858.

25.

Singh

Morgan

Scott

et al . Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Thorax 1992; 47: 1019–1024.

26.

Green

Cohen

Genereux

et al . Relation between six-minute walk test performance and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (from the PARTNER trial). Am J Cardiol 2013; 112: 700–706.

27.

Chatterjee

Sengupta

Nag

et al . Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a review of techniques and applications. Anesth Clin Res 2013; 4: 340–346.

28.

Bruce

Blackmon

Jones

et al . Exercise testing in adult normal subjects and cardiac patients. Pediatrics 1963; 32: 742–756.

29.

Bruce

Hornsten

TR.

Exercise stress testing in evaluation of patients with ischemic heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1969; 11: 371–390.

30.

Howell

DC.

Statistical methods for psychology, 8th edn. Australia: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2012.

31.

Portney

Watkins

MP.

Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health, 2000.

32.

Terwee

Bot

SDM

de Boer

et al . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34–42.

33.

Norman

Streiner

DL.

Biostatistics: the bare essentials, 3rd edn. Hamilton, Ontario: B.C. Decker, 2008.

34.

Tabachnick

Fidell

LS.

Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn. Boston: Pearson Education, 2007.

35.

Bruce

Kusumi

Hosmer

Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 1973; 85: 546–562.

36.

Benhorin

Pinsker

Moriel

et al . Ischemic threshold during two exercise testing protocols and during ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 671–677.

37.

Steele

Timed walking tests of exercise capacity in chronic cardiopulmonary illness. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prevent 1996; 16: 25–33.

38.

American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 8th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2010.

39.

Portney

Watkins

MP.

Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.

40.

Altman

Gardner

MJ.

Regression and correlation. In: Altman

Machin

Bryant

Gardner

(eds). Statistics with confidence, 2nd edn. London: British Medical Journal Books, 2000, pp. 73–92.

41.

Terwee

Mokkink

Knol

et al . Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research 2012; 21: 651–657.

42.

Noonan

Dean

Submaximal exercise testing: clinical application and interpretation. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 782–807.

43.

Chatterjee

Sengupta

Nag

et al . Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a review of techniques and applications. J Anesth Clin Res 2013; 4:340.

44.

National Guideline Centre UK. Preoperative tests (update): Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK), 2016.