Test–retest reliability and responsiveness to change of clinical tests of physical fitness in patients with acute coronary syndrome included in the SWEDEHEART register

Abstract

Background:

To maximise the benefits obtainable from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation, an evaluation of physical fitness using reliable, clinically relevant tests is strongly recommended. Recently, objective tests of physical fitness have been implemented in the SWEDEHEART register. The reliability of these tests has, however, not been examined for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to assess the test–retest reliability and responsiveness to change of the symptom-limited bicycle ergometer test, the dynamic unilateral heel-lift test and the unilateral shoulder-flexion test in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Methods:

In a longitudinal study design, a total of 40 patients (mean age 63.8 ± 9.5 years, five women), with ACS, aged < 75 years, were included at a university hospital in Sweden. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval, standard error of measurement (SEM) and responsiveness in terms of the minimal detectable change were calculated.

Results:

Excellent reliability was found, showing ICC values of 0.98 (0.96–0.99), SEM 4.71 for the bicycle ergometer test, ICC 0.87 (0.75–0.93), SEM 4.62 for the shoulder-flexion test and ICC 0.84 (0.71–0.91), SEM 2.24 for the heel-lift test. The minimal detectable change was 13 W, 13 and 6 repetitions for the bicycle ergometer test, shoulder-flexion and heel-lift tests respectively.

Conclusions:

The test–retest reliability of clinical tests evaluating physical fitness in patients with acute coronary syndrome included in the SWEDEHEART register was excellent. This makes the future comparison and evaluation of treatment effects in large unselected clinical populations of acute coronary syndrome possible.

Keywords

Aerobic capacity exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation exercise test muscle endurance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. Fact sheet no. 310. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/ (2017, accessed 24 November 2017).

Bjorck

Rosengren

Bennett

et al . Modelling the decreasing coronary heart disease mortality in Sweden between 1986 and 2002. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1046–1056.

Libby

Ridker

Hansson

GK.

Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature 2011; 473: 317–325.

Piepoli

Corra

Adamopoulos

et al . Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery: A policy statement from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. Endorsed by the Committee for Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014; 21: 664–681.

Balady

Williams

Ades

et al . Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2007; 115: 2675–2682.

Perk

de Backer

Gohlke

et al . European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1635–1701.

Haykowsky

Scott

Esch

et al . A meta-analysis of the effects of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarction: Start early and go longer for greatest exercise benefits on remodeling. Trials 2011; 12: 92.

Lawler

Filion

Eisenberg

MJ.

Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J 2011; 162: 571–584 e2.

Anderson

Thompson

Oldridge

et al . Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 1: CD001800.

10.

Whalley

Thompson

Taylor

RS.

Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Med 2014; 21: 109–121.

11.

Kavanagh

Mertens

Hamm

et al . Prediction of long-term prognosis in 12 169 men referred for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation 2002; 106: 666–671.

12.

Piepoli

Corra

Benzer

et al . Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 1–17.

13.

Marzolini

Brooks

Effect of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training alone in individuals with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012; 19: 81–94.

14.

Fletcher

Ades

Kligfield

et al . Exercise standards for testing and training: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 128: 873–934.

15.

Mezzani

Agostoni

Cohen-Solal

et al . Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: A report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2009; 16: 249–267.

16.

Arena

Myers

Williams

et al . Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research settings: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation 2007; 116: 329–343.

17.

Guazzi

Arena

Halle

et al . 2016 focused update: Clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation 2016; 133: e694–e711.

18.

Barron

Dhutia

Mayet

et al . Test–retest repeatability of cardiopulmonary exercise test variables in patients with cardiac or respiratory disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014; 21: 445–453.

19.

Exercise tests in relation to cardiovascular function. Report of a WHO meeting. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1968; 388: 1–30.

20.

Katch

McArdle

et al . Essentials of exercise physiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, 2011.

21.

Cider

Carlsson

Arvidsson

et al . Reliability of clinical muscular endurance tests in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006; 5: 122–126.

22.

Jernberg

. SWEDEHEART annual report 2016. Uppsala: Matador Kommunikation AB; 2016.

23.

Michelsen

Reproducibility of cumulative work, heart rate and blood pressure response during stepwise versus continuous load increment during a maximal bicycle ergometer test. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1990; 50: 409–415.

24.

Borg

Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998.

25.

Strandell

Circulatory studies on healthy old men. With special reference to the limitation of the maximal physical working capacity. Acta Med Scand Suppl 1964; 414(Suppl. 414): 1–44.

26.

Koo

MY.

A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155–163.

27.

Streiner

Norman

Cairney

Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

28.

Portney

Watkins

MP.

Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.

29.

Bland

Altman

DG.

Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

30.

Walter

Eliasziw

Donner

Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998; 17: 101–110.

31.

Balady

Arena

Sietsema

et al . Clinician’s Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010; 122: 191–225.

32.

Bennett

Parfitt

Davison

et al . Validity of submaximal step tests to estimate maximal oxygen uptake in healthy adults. Sports Med 2016; 46: 737–750.

33.

Mezzani

Hamm

Jones

et al . Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: A joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2012; 32: 327–350.

34.

Mielke

Housh

Malek

et al . The development of rating of perceived exertion-based tests of physical working capacity. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 293–302.

35.

Ross

Fontenot

Test–retest reliability of the standing heel-rise test. J Sport Rehabil 2000; 9: 117–123.

36.

Carter

Lubinsky

Domholdt

Rehabilitation research: Principles and applications. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2011.

37.

Brehm

Self

EA.

The intensity of motivation. Annu Rev Psychol 1989; 40: 109–131.

38.

Gendolla

Richter

Ego-involvement and the difficulty law of motivation: Effects on performance-related cardiovascular response. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2006; 32: 1188–1203.

39.

Back

Cider

Herlitz

et al . The impact on kinesiophobia (fear of movement) by clinical variables for patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167: 391–397.

40.

Balady

Ades

Bittner

et al . Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond: A presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 124: 2951–2960.