Patent protection in the marine industry: international legal framework and strategic options

Abstract

Legal protection of intellectual property is becoming increasingly important for developers of new technology, and the highly international marine industry faces some particular challenges in obtaining effective worldwide protection of innovation. Written for engineering professionals and managers in the marine industry, this paper takes a practical look at the international legal framework for patent protection of maritime inventions. A brief introduction to patents is first provided, summarizing important aspects of the patent system. The highly important exception from infringement for ships in international traffic is then reviewed and its practical implications discussed. Finally, some potential strategies for patent protection of maritime inventions in light of the current statutory framework and legal precedent are presented.

Keywords

marine maritime ship patent infringement intellectual property

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Glenn

W. P.

Legal protection of vessel hull designs and related technology. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Offshore Technology Conference (OTC 2000), Houston, Texas, USA, 1–4 May 2000, pp. 1–7.

Ulstein website, 2010, available from http://www.ulsteinlab.com .

HISMAR. Hull identification system for marine autonomous robotics, 2009, available from http://www.hismar.eu .

Cerchione

A. J.

Cerchione

Kelly

J. P.

Yannacone

V. J.

Collection and distribution of maritime data. US Pat. 7,286,914, 23 October 2007.

Armstrong

Black

The identification and protection of intellectual property for the high speed craft industry. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation in high speed marine vessels, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia, 28–29 January 2009 (Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London).

Cali v. Japan Airlines, Inc., 380 F, Suppl. 1120 (United States District Court, Eastern District of New York), 1974.

Anderson

J. J.

Hiding behind nationality: the temporary presence exception and patent infringement avoidance. Mich. Telecommun. Technol. Law Rev., 2008, 15(1), available from http://www.mttlr.org/volfifteen/anderson.pdf.

Sharma

Forrest

A lifeline for infringing ships?

Eur. Intellectual Property Rev., 2003, 25, 430–437.

Rolltrailer. Landgericht Hamburg, GRUR Int., 1973, 12, 703.

10.

Stena Rederi AB v. Irish Ferries Ltd, Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 36 (UK Court of Appeal), 2003.

11.

National Steel Car, Ltd v. Canadian Pacific Railway, Ltd, 357 F, 3d 1319 (US Federal Circuit), 2004.

12.

Moffat

M. A.

Section 23 of the Patent Act and the St. Lawrence Seaway. Canadian Patent Reporter, 1959, 31(27), pp. 28–30.

13.

Liu

Leave my patent alone! Patent, competition and refusal to licence in China. Eur. Intellectual Property Rev., 2009, 31, 423–435.

14.

Muller-Stoy

Patent litigation in the People’s Republic of China. Int. Rev. Intellectual Property Competition Law, 2007, 38, 520–548.

15.

Gao

Patent litigation tips in China. Managing Intellectual Property, 2003, 20, 22–23.

16.

Fabry

Zur Durchsetzbarkeit von Schutzrechten in Korea. Mitt. dt. Patentanwälte, 2005, 3, 105–107.

17.

International Chamber of Shipping, 2011, available from http://www.marisec.org .