This article presents a simple mathematical model for predicting the running attitude of warped planing boats fixed in a heel angle and free to trim and sinkage. The proposed model is based on asymmetric 2D+T theory utilizing a pressure equation which is previously introduced in the literature to compute the hydrodynamic force acting on a heeled planing hull. Integration of pressure distribution on the asymmetric wedge sections enables the suggested model to compute trim angle, center of gravity rise, resistance, and heeling moment acting on the heeled planing boat in calm water. The hydrostatic force in addition to two drag forces acting on the pressure area and spray area are also taken into account. Finally, a computational algorithm is introduced to find the running attitude of the heeled planing boats. The validity of the proposed model is examined by comparing the obtained running attitudes for two planing hulls series with zero heel angle and computed lift force and heeling moment of a heeled planing boat against available experimental data. Based on the comparisons, favorable accuracy is observed for both symmetrical and asymmetrical conditions. Moreover, it is shown that existence of a heel angle can lead to a decrease in trim angle and resistance, while it intensifies the center of gravity rise of planing boats. It is also observed that as the beam Froude number increases, the heeling moment of the heeled boat reduces.
Von KarmanT. The impact on seaplane floats during landing (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics no. 321). Washington, DC: NACA Translation, 1929.
2.
WagnerH.Phenomena associated with impacts and sliding on liquid surfaces. Washington, DC: NACA Translation, 1932.
3.
SavitskyD.Hydrodynamic design of planing hull. Mar Tech1964; 1: 71–95.
4.
BlountDCodegaL. Dynamic stability of planing hulls. In: Proceedings of the 4th biennial power boat symposium, Miami, FL, February 1991. Alexandria, VA: SNAME.
5.
ToyomaY.Two-dimensional water impact of unsymmetrical bodies. J Soc Nav Archit Jpn1993; 173: 285–295.
6.
LewandowskiEM.Prediction of the dynamic roll stability of hard-chine planing craft. J Ship Res1996; 40: 144–149.
XuLTroeschAW. A study on the hydrodynamics of asymmetric planing surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST 1999), Seattle, WA, 31 August–2 September 1999.
9.
KatayamaTFujimotoMIkedaY. A study on transverse stability loss of planing craft at super high forward speed. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on stability of ships and ocean vehicles, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 25–29 September 2006. Alexandria, VA: SNAME.
10.
TascónOTroeschAWMakiKJ. Numerical computation of the hydrodynamic forces acting on a maneuvering planing hull via slender body—SBT and 2-D impact theory. In: Proceedings of 10th international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST 2010), Athens, 5–8 October 2010. Alexandria, VA: SNAME.
11.
BrogliaRIafritiA. Hydrodynamics of planing hulls in asymmetric conditions. In: Proceedings of 28th symposium in naval hydrodynamics, Pasadena, CA, 12–17 September 2010. Arlington, VA: U.S. Office of Naval Research
12.
WangSSuYWangZ. Numerical and experimental analyses of transverse static stability loss of planing craft sailing at high forward speed. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2014; 8: 44–54.
13.
GhadimiPDashtimaneshADjeddiR. Development of a mathematical model for simultaneous heave, pitch and roll motions of planing vessel in regular waves. Int J Sci World2013; 1: 44–56.
14.
GhadimiPDashtimaneshAFaghrfour-MaghrebiY.Initiating a mathematical model for prediction of 6-DOF motion of planing crafts in regular waves. Int J Eng Math2013; 2013: 1–15.
15.
SebastianiLBruzzoneDGualeniP. A practical method for the prediction of planing craft motions in regular and irregular waves. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering (OMAE 2008), Estoril, 15–20 June 2008. New York: ASME.
16.
TavakoliSGhadimiPDashtimaneshA. Determination of hydrodynamic coefficients in roll motion of high-speed planing hulls. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST 2015), Washington, DC, 1–4 September 2015. Alexandria, VA: SNAME.
17.
GhadimiPTavakoliSDashtimaneshA.An analytical procedure for time domain simulation of roll motion of the warped planing hulls. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment. Epub ahead of print 17 November 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1475090215613536.
18.
JudgeCQ.Comparisons between prediction and experiment for lift force and heel moment for a planing hull. J Ship Prod Des2013; 29: 36–46.
19.
JudgeCQ.Empirical methods for predicting lift and heel moment for a heeled planing hull. J Ship Prod Des2014; 30: 175–183.
20.
SmileyRA.Theoretical and experimental investigation of the effects of yaw on pressures, forces and moments during seaplanes landing and planing. NACA technical note 2817, 1November1952. Washington, DC: NACA Translation.
21.
AlgarínABRTascónO. Hydrodynamic modeling of planing boats with asymmetry and steady condition. In: Proceedings of the 9th conference on high speed marine vehicles (IX HSMV), Naples, 25–27 May 2011. Naples: University of Naples Federico II.
22.
GhadimiPDashtimaneshADjeddiSR.Study of water entry of circular cylinder by using analytical and numerical solution. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2012; 34(3): 225–232.
23.
GhadimiPFeizi ChekabMADashtimaneshA.A numerical investigation of the water impact of an arbitrary bow section. ISH J Hydraul Eng2013; 19(3): 186–195.
24.
GhadimiPFeizi ChekabMADashtimaneshA.Numerical simulation of water entry of different arbitrary bow sections. J Nav Archit Mar Eng2014; 11(2): 117–129.
25.
GhadimiPFarsiM.Simulation of 2D symmetry and asymmetry wedge water entry by smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2014; 37(3): 821–835.
26.
FarsiMGhadimiP.Effect of flat deck on catamaran water entry through smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment. Epub ahead of print 6 January 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1475090214563960.
27.
FarsiMGhadimiP.Finding the best combination of numerical schemes for 2-D SPH simulation of wedge water entry for a wide range of deadrise angles. Int J Nav Archit Mar Eng2014; 6(3): 638–651.
28.
GhadimiPSaadatkhaADashtimaneshA.Analytical solution of wedge water entry by using Schwartz–Christoffel conformal mapping. Int J Model Simul Sci Comput2011; 2(3): 1–18.
29.
GarmeK.Improved time domain simulation of planing hulls by correction of the near-transom lift. Int Shipbuild Prog2005; 52(3): 201–230.
30.
BegovicEBertorelloC.Resistance assessment of warped hullform. Ocean Eng2012; 56: 28–42.
31.
KimDJKimSYYouYJ. Design of high-speed planing hulls for the improvement of resistance and seakeeping performance. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng2013; 5: 161–177.
32.
SavitskyDDeLormeMFDatlaR.Inclusion of whisker spray in performance prediction method for high-speed craft. Mar Tech2007; 44: 35–56.
33.
GhadimiPTavakoliSDahstimaneshA. Developing a computer program for detailed study of planing hull’s spray based on Morabito’s approach. J Mar Sci Appl2014; 13(4): 402–415.
34.
GhadimiPTavakoliSFeizi ChekabMA. Introducing a particular mathematical model for predicting the resistance and performance of prismatic planing hulls in calm water by means of total pressure distribution. J Nav Archit Mar Eng2015; 12(2): 73–94.
