Kinematics and dynamics of a novel 3-degree-of-freedom wave energy converter

Abstract

A wide range of wave energy converter technologies has been proposed so far. Oscillating body systems are an important class of wave energy converters, which typically harvest wave energy from a single degree-of-freedom response. This article presents a novel 3-degree-of-freedom (heave, pitch and roll) wave energy converter which extracts and converts wave power efficiently. The 3-degree-of-freedom mechanism is invented to absorb and convert wave energy, no matter which direction the waves propagate. The hydraulic power take-off system comprises novel energy conversion devices which can be superposed to realize high-power conversion to produce electricity. First, the power conversion principle of the wave energy converter is proposed, and the kinematics of the 3-degree-of-freedom mechanism is derived. Then, the governing equations of the 3-degree-of-freedom wave energy converter are established. Linear time-domain simulations are performed to calculate instantaneous and mean power outputs. The numerical results show that the rated power absorbed by the wave energy converter is up to 4.2 MW and the efficiency is over 80%. And the power matrix of the wave energy converter is obtained from a range of simulations under different sea states. Finally, directional performance of the wave energy converter is investigated, and the numerical results show that the wave energy converter can operate across a range of incident wave directions, but is most efficient in head, beam and following seas.

Keywords

Wave energy converter 3-degree-of-freedom mechanism hydraulic power take-off kinematics dynamics power matrix

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Isaacs

Schmitt

WR.

Ocean energy: forms and prospects. Science 1980; 207(4428): 265–273.

Chen

Gao

Meng

et al . Design of the wave energy converter array to achieve constructive effects. Ocean Eng 2016; 124: 13–20.

Zhang

Lin

Wave energy in China: Current status and perspectives, Renew Energ, 2009; 34: 2089–2092.

Panicker

. Power resource potential of ocean surface waves. In: Proceedings of the wave and salinity gradient workshop, Newark, DE, 24–26 May 1976; pp. J1–J48.

Salter

SH.

Wave power. Nature 1974; 249(5459): 720–724.

Ocean Power Technologies Inc., www.oceanpowertechnologies.com

Hansen

Kramer

Modelling and control of the wavestar prototype. Southampton: University of Southampton, 2011.

Kramer

Marquis

Frigaard

. Performance evaluation of the wavestar prototype. In: Proceedings of the 9th European wave and tidal energy conference (EWTEC), Southampton, 5–9 September 2011.

Hansen

Kramer

Vidal

Discrete displacement hydraulic power take-off system for the wavestar wave energy converter. Energies 2013; 6(8): 4001–4044.

10.

Falcão

AF.

Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2010; 14(3): 899–918.

11.

Ruehl

Brekken

TKA

Bosma

et al . Large-scale ocean wave energy plant modeling. In: Proceedings of the2010 IEEE conference on innovative technologies for an efficient and reliable electricity supply (CITRES), Waltham, MA, 27–29 September. New York: IEEE.

12.

Weinstein

Fredrikson

Claeson

et al . AquaBuOY-the offshore wave energy converter numerical modeling and optimization. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS ’04. MTTS/IEEE TECHNO-OCEAN ’04, San Diego, CA, 22–26 September 2004. New York: IEEE.

13.

Weber

Mouwen

Parrish

et al . Wavebob–research & development network and tools in the context of systems engineering. In: Proceedings of the eighth European wave and tidal energy conference, Uppsala, 7–10 September 2009; 416–420.

14.

Babarit

Clement

Ruer

. SEAREV: a fully integrated wave energy converter. In: Proceedings of the OWEMES, Rome, 20–22 April 2006.

15.

De Sousa Prado

Gardner

Damen

et al . Modelling and test results of the Archimedes wave swing. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2006; 220(8): 855–868.

16.

Vissio

Valério

Bracco

et al . ISWEC linear quadratic regulator oscillating control. Renew Energ 2017; 103(C): 372–382.

17.

Zhang

Ying

et al . Wave energy converter of inverse pendulum with double action power take off. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt C J Mechan Eng Sci 2013; 227: 2416–2427.

18.

Albert

Berselli

Bruzzone

et al . Mechanical design and simulation of an onshore four-bar wave energy converter. Renew Energ 2017; 114.

19.

Shi

Cao

The latest progress in wave energy conversions in china and the analysis of a heaving buoy considering PTO damping. J Mar Sci Tech 2015; 23: 888–892.

20.

McCabe

Aggidis

Widden

Optimizing the shape of a surge-and-pitch wave energy collector using a genetic algorithm. Renew Energ 2010; 35(12): 2767–2775.

21.

Chaplin

Aggidis

GA.

An investigation into power from pitch-surge point-absorber wave energy converters. In: Proceedings of the international conference on clean electrical power, Capri, 21–23 May 2007. New York: IEEE.

22.

Zhang

Chen

Nielsen

SRK

et al . Gyroscopic power take-off wave energy point absorber in irregular sea states. Ocean Eng 2017; 143: 113–124.

23.

Babarit

Hals

Muliawan

et al . Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters. Renew Energ 2012: 41: 44–63.

24.

Salter

Taylor

Caldwell

Power conversion mechanisms for wave energy. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment 2002; 216(1): 1–27.

25.

Henderson

Design, simulation, and testing of a novel hydraulic power take-off system for the Pelamis wave energy converter. Renew Energ 2006; 31(2): 271–283.

26.

Chen

Gao

Meng

et al . W2P: A high-power integrated generation unit for offshore wind power and ocean wave energy. Ocean Eng 2016;128: 41–47.

27.

Chen

Gao

Meng

et al . Power recovery method for testing the efficiency of the ECD of an integrated generation unit for offshore wind power and ocean wave energy. Sci China Technol Sci 2017; 60: 333–344.

28.

Chen

Gao

Meng

et al . An offshore hydraulic wind turbine generator with variable-diameter rotor: design, modeling and experiment. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment 2016; 231: 521–532.

29.

Cummins

The impulse response function and ship motions. Fort Belvoir, VA: DTIC, 1962.

30.

Vicente

Falcão

Justino

PA.

Nonlinear dynamics of a tightly moored point-absorber wave energy converter. Ocean Eng 2013; 59: 20–36.

31.

Falnes

A review of wave-energy extraction. Mar Struct 2007; 20(4): 185–201.

32.

Taghipour

Perez

Moan

Hybrid frequency–time domain models for dynamic response analysis of marine structures. Ocean Eng 2008; 35(7): 685–705.

33.

Perez

Fossen

Time- vs. frequency-domain identification of parametric radiation force models for marine structures at zero speed. Model Ident Control 2008; 29(1): 1–19.