We address the design of a predictive power-split management system for the transient and fluctuating propeller load sharing. Modeling of the power system was carried out based on experimental data gathered from the hybrid plant and on first principles for the diesel engine behavior and battery charging. Propulsion plant and wave disturbance models are employed to simulate realistic marine load application that affects the powerplant operation. A propeller observer is developed to provide the propeller law parameter to the controller, in order to perform load estimation and prediction based on shaft speed elevation. A Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller (NMPC) is designed for the optimal transient power-split problem of a hybrid diesel-electric marine propulsion plant. The NMPC scheme directly controls the torque output of the diesel engine and the electric motor generator ensuring that certain constraints concerning the system overloading are met, avoiding fast accelerations, and load fluctuations of the diesel engine that affect engine performance. The control system was experimentally tested in real-time operation in a physical testbed. Results showed that controller rejected successfully load disturbances and maintained the desired rotational speed of the powertrain as well as the desirable state of charge in battery within the power plant limits, achieving smooth power transitions and compensation of power fluctuations of the diesel engine.
JaurolaMHedinATikkanenS, et al. Optimising design and power management in energy-efficient marine vessel power systems: a literature review. J Mar Eng Technol2019; 18(2): 92–101.
2.
MartelliMVivianiMAltosoleM, et al. Numerical modelling of propulsion, control and ship motions in 6 degrees of freedom. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2014; 228(4): 373–397.
3.
GeertsmaRNegenbornRVisserK, et al. Pitch control for ships with diesel mechanical and hybrid propulsion: modelling, validation and performance quantification. Appl Energy2017; 206: 1609–1631.
4.
YumKKTaskar B, SkjongS, et al. Simulation of a hybrid marine propulsion system in waves. In: 28th CIMAC World Congress, Helsinki, Finland, 6–10 June 2016. CIMAC.
5.
BordinCMoO.Including power management strategies and load profiles in the mathematical optimization of energy storage sizing for fuel consumption reduction in maritime vessels. J Energy Storage2019; 23: 425–441.
MiyazakiMRSørensenAJVartdalBJ.Reduction of fuel consumption on hybrid marine power plants by strategic loading with energy storage devices. IEEE Power Energy Technol Syst J2016; 3(4): 207–217.
8.
BennabiNCharpentierJFBillardJY, et al. Modeling and simulation of a series hybrid propulsion chain for small ships. In: 2017 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference (VPPC), Belfort, France, 11–14 December 2017, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
9.
YuanLCTjahjowidodoTLeeGS, et al. Equivalent consumption minimization strategy for hybrid all-electric tugboats to optimize fuel savings. In: 2016 American control conference (ACC), Boston, MA, 6–8 July 2016; pp.6803–6808. New York: IEEE.
10.
VuTLAyuAADhupiaJS, et al. Power management for electric tugboats through operating load estimation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2015; 23(6): 2375–2382.
11.
DinhTQBuiTMMarcoJ, et al. Optimal energy management for hybrid electric dynamic positioning vessels. IFAC PapersOnLine2018; 51(29): 98–103.
12.
ZhuLHanJPengD, et al. Fuzzy logic based energy management strategy for a fuel cell/battery/ultra-capacitor hybrid ship. In: 2014 first international conference on green energy ICGE 2014, Sfax, Tunisia, 25–27 March 2014, pp.107–112. New York: IEEE.
13.
KalikatzarakisMGeertsmaRBoonenE, et al. Ship energy management for hybrid propulsion and power supply with shore charging. Control Eng Pract2018; 76: 133–154.
14.
AlfieriLMottolaFPaganoM. An energy saving management strategy for battery-aided ship propulsion systems. In: 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech, Milan, Italy, 23–27 June 2019, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
15.
SteensonLVTurnockSRPhillipsAB, et al. Model predictive control of a hybrid autonomous underwater vehicle with experimental verification. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2014; 228(2): 166–179.
16.
DijuGWangXWangT, et al. An energy optimization strategy for hybrid power ships under load uncertainty based on load power prediction and improved nsga-ii algorithm. Energies2018; 11: 1699.
17.
HaseltalabANegenbornRR.Model predictive maneuvering control and energy management for all-electric autonomous ships. Appl Energy2019; 251: 113308.
18.
DahlARThoratLSkjetneR.Model predictive control of marine vessel power system by use of structure preserving model. IFAC PapersOnLine2018; 51(29): 335–340.
19.
BoTIVaktskjoldEPedersenE, et al. Model predictive control of marine power plants with gas engines and battery. IEEE Access2019; 7: 15706–15721.
20.
HouJSongZParkH, et al. Implementation and evaluation of real-time model predictive control for load fluctuations mitigation in all-electric ship propulsion systems. Appl Energy2018; 230: 62–77.
21.
ParkHSunJPekarekS, et al. Real-time model predictive control for shipboard power management using the ipa-sqp approach. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2015; 23(6): 2129–2143.
22.
PlanakisNKarystinosVPapalambrouG, et al. Nonlinear model predictive control for the transient load share management of a hybrid diesel-electric marine propulsion plant. In: 2020 American control conference (ACC), Denver, CO, 1–3 July 2020, pp.1955–1960. New York: IEEE.
23.
SivertssonMErikssonL.Optimal transient control trajectories in diesel–electric systems—part I: modeling, problem formulation, and engine properties. J Eng Gas Turb Power2014; 137(2): 021601.
24.
GuzzellaLSciarrettaA.Vehicle propulsion systems: introduction to modeling and optimization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2013.
25.
GodjevacMDrijverJde VriesL, et al. Evaluation of losses in maritime gearboxes. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2016; 230(4): 623–638.
26.
TaskarBYumKKSteenS, et al. The effect of waves on engine-propeller dynamics and propulsion performance of ships. Ocean Eng2016; 122: 262–277.
27.
CarltonJ.Marine propellers and propulsion. 4th ed.London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2018.
28.
DangJBrouwerJBosmanR, et al. Quasi-steady two-quadrant open water tests for the wageningen propeller c- and d-series. In: 29th symposium on naval hydrodynamics (ONR), Gothenburg, Sweden, 26–31 August 2012. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
29.
MacphersonDMPuleoVRPackardM. Estimation of entrained water added mass properties for vibration analysis. New England: SNAME, 2007.
30.
ParkJSLeeSM.Characteristics of resistance performance on tugboat in still water and waves. J Korean Soc Mar Environ Saf2012; 18: 597–603.
31.
SmogeliO. Control of marine propellers: from normal to extreme conditions. PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 2006.
32.
LiSYangJChenW, et al. Generalized extended state observer based control for systems with mismatched uncertainties. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2012; 59(12): 4792–4802.
33.
PannocchiaG. Offset-free tracking mpc: a tutorial review and comparison of different formulations. In: 2015 European control conference (ECC), Linz, Austria, 15–17 July 2015, pp.527–532. New York: IEEE.
34.
Di CairanoSLiangWKolmanovskyIV, et al. Power smoothing energy management and its application to a series hybrid powertrain. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2013; 21(6): 2091–2103.
35.
GrondinOThibaultLQuérelC.Energy management strategies for diesel hybrid electric vehicle. Oil Gas Sci Technol2014; 70: 125–141.
36.
HouskaBFerreauHDiehlM.ACADO Toolkit – an open source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization. Optim Control Appl Methods2011; 32(3): 298–312.
37.
FerreauJKirchesCPotschkaA, et al. qpOASES: a parametric active-set algorithm for quadratic programming. Math Program Comput2014; 6: 327–363.
38.
GrosSZanonMQuirynenR, et al. From linear to nonlinear MPC: bridging the gap via the real-time iteration. International Journal of Control2016; 93(1): 62–80.
39.
LiuXLiWZhouA.Pngv equivalent circuit model and soc estimation algorithm for lithium battery pack adopted in agv vehicle. IEEE Access2018; 6: 23639–23647.
40.
CapassoCVeneriO.Experimental analysis on the performance of lithium based batteries for road full electric and hybrid vehicles. Appl Energy2014; 136: 921–930.
41.
PerezTSmogeliOFossenT, et al. An overview of the marine systems simulator (MSS): a simulink toolbox for marine control systems. Model Identif Control2006; 27: 259–275.
