Abstract
The shipping industry views ammonia as an appropriate carbon-free option because it contains a high proportion of hydrogen but exhibits low flammability under typical conditions. However, there is limited literature addressing the toxic dispersion risks involved in ship-to-ship bunkering. Here, we performed a non-probabilistic, deterministic evaluation of ammonia leakages in bunkering operations at four South Korean principal ports via ALOHA simulations. The 15%, 20%, and 25% ammonia concentration scenarios were simulated. Simulations yielded AEGL-1 dispersion distances of up to 831 m (Busan), and AEGL-2 and AEGL-3 distances of ≤381 and ≤137 m, respectively. These findings were the foundation for establishing three conservative control zones: toxic (200 m), safety (500 m), and security (1000 m). These findings contribute to port-specific emergency preparedness and maritime safety planning, as well as to the regulatory use of ammonia as a marine fuel with scientific evidence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
