Enhanced detection through low-order stochastic modeling for guided-wave structural health monitoring

Abstract

Guided wave structural health monitoring offers the potential for efficient defect detection and localization on large plate-like structures. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that the performance of guided wave structural health monitoring on complex structures can be quantified, predicted, and enhanced through basic stochastic modeling and application of a likelihood-based detector. These are necessary steps in enabling such structural heath monitoring techniques to be used more robustly on safety-critical structures. Extensive ensembles of measurements were taken using a sparse array of transducers on an aluminum plate with geometric complexities (stiffeners), before and after introducing several sizes of damage at several locations, and in the presence of large noise processes. This enabled a full statistical treatment of performance evaluation using a modification of the standard receiver operating characteristic curve. The incorporation of stochastic modeling produced on average a 44% reduction in missed detections among the damage modes tested, with up to a 95% reduction in some cases.

Keywords

guided waves detection theory stochastic modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Giurgiutiu

Zagrai

Bao

. Piezoelectric wafer embedded active sensors for aging aircraft structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monitor 2002; 1(1): 41–41.

Cawley

Lowe

Alleyne

Paviakovic

Wilcox

. Practical long range guided wave testing. Mater Eval 2003; 61(1): 66–74.

Chimenti

. Guided waves in plates and their use in materials characterization. Appl Mech Rev 1997; 50(5): 247–284.

Michaels

Croxford

Wilcox

. Imaging algorithms for locating damage via in situ ultrasonic sensors. Sensors Applications Symposium. Atlanta, GA: 63–67.

Ihn

Chang

. Pitch-catch active sensing methods in structural health monitoring for aircraft structures. Struct Health Monitor 2008; 7(1): 5–5.

Zhao

Gao

Zhang

Ayhan

Yan

Kwan

. Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Defect detection, localization and growth monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 2007; 16(4): 1208–1217.

Michaels

. Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors. Smart Mater Struct 2008; 17(3): 035035–035035.

Clarke

Cawley

Wilcox

Croxford

. Evaluation of the damage detection capability of a sparse-array guided-wave SHM system applied to a complex structure under varying thermal conditions. IEEE Trans Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics Freq Control 2009; 56(12): 2666–2678.

Cheng

Wang

Zhou

. Predicting delamination of composite laminates using an imaging approach. Smart Mater Struct 2009; 18(7): 074002–074002.

10.

Wang

. A damage diagnostic imaging algorithm based on the quantitative comparison of Lamb wave signals. Smart Mater Struct 2010; 19(6): 065008–065008.

11.

Fromme

. Structural health monitoring of plates with surface features using guided ultrasonic waves [Internet]. In: Kundu

(ed.) Health monitoring of structural and biological systems. San Diego, CA, USA: SPIE, 729517–8. http://link.aip.org/link/?PSI/7295/729517/1 (2009, accessed June 2011).

12.

Flynn

Todd

. Optimal placement of piezoelectric actuators and sensors for detecting damage in plate structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2010; 21(3): 265–274.

13.

Flynn

Todd

. A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing. Mech Syst Signal Process 2010; 24(4): 891–903.

14.

Kay

. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing Volume 2: Detection theory Indianapolis, IN: Prentice Hall PTR, 1998.

15.

Croxford

Moll

Wilcox

Michaels

. Efficient temperature compensation strategies for guided wave structural health monitoring. Ultrasonics 2010; 50(4–5): 517–528.

16.

. Turin GL. Communication through noisy, random-multipath channels [Internet], http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/42557 (1956, accessed June 2011).

17.

McDonough

. Detection of signals in noise, 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995.

18.

Hippenstiel

. Detection theory: applications and digital signal processing Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2002.

19.

Michaels

Hall

Hickman

Krolik

. Sparse array imaging of change-detected ultrasonic signals by minimum variance processing. Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation (Chicago, USA) 2008; 28: 642–649.

20.

Van Trees

. Optimum array processing New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2002.

21.

Michaels

Croxford

Wilcox

. Imaging algorithms for locating damage via in situ ultrasonic sensors. IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium. Atlanta, GA, 2008, 63–67.

22.

Wilcox

Velichko

. Efficient frequency-domain finite element modeling of two-dimensional elastodynamic scattering. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 127(1): 155–165.

23.

Croxford

Wilcox

Drinkwater

Konstantinidis

. Strategies for guided-wave structural health monitoring. Proc R Soc A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 2007; 463(2087): 2961–2981.

24.

Lopez-Sanchez

Kim

Schmerr

Sedov

. Measurement models and scattering models for predicting the ultrasonic pulse-echo response from side-drilled holes. J Nondestruct Eval 2005; 24(3): 83–96.

25.

Fawcett

. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 2006; 27(8): 861–874.

26.

Nichols

Trickey

Seaver

Motley

. Using ROC curves to assess the efficacy of several detectors of damage-induced nonlinearities in a bolted composite structure. Mech Syst Sig Process 2008; 22(7): 1610–1622.

27.

Yinghui

Michaels

. Feature extraction and sensor fusion for ultrasonic structural health monitoring under changing environmental conditions. Sensors Journal, IEEE 2009; 9(11): 1462–1471.