Structural health monitoring–based methodologies for managing uncertainty in aircraft structural life assessment

Abstract

Aircraft maintenance approaches that rely on only scheduled inspections have an intrinsic amount of uncertainty and risk because intervals do not reflect the loading and damage history of individual aircraft. This risk is more pronounced in composite aircraft, because damage is often not visually apparent. This work presents two case studies of complementary structural health monitoring methods that are designed to reduce the risk in aircraft maintenance, as well as the cost of frequent, lengthy inspections. The first is an impact identification system which is capable of locating impacts to a full-scale fuselage using only three sensors. This impact identification method is able to quantify the severity of impacts, allowing maintenance personnel to focus inspections on areas that have sustained frequent and/or high-amplitude impacts. Using this method, over 97% of impacts to a heavy-lift helicopter fuselage are located within 9 in of the true impact location. The second case study details the development of a noncontact wide-area inspection method, which has the potential to reduce inspection times and uncertainty as compared to labor-intensive inspection methods such as coin tap testing. This inspection method exploits the nonlinear forced vibration characteristics of damaged areas through surface velocity measurements acquired by a scanning laser vibrometer. By comparing the structure’s response to forcing functions of differing magnitudes, the local nonlinear characteristics of damage are identified. This automated inspection method is shown to be effective in locating subsurface damage in composite helicopter panels and has the potential to reduce both labor costs and damage detection uncertainty.

Keywords

Structural health monitoring rotorcraft composites wide-area inspection impact identification uncertainty management aircraft maintenance risk reduction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Diamanti

Soutis

. Structural health monitoring techniques for aircraft composite structures. Prog Aerosp Sci 2010; 46(8): 342–352.

Perez

Diulio

Maley

. Structural health management in the NAVY. Struct Health Monit 2010; 9(3): 199–207.

Stolz

Neumair

. Structural health monitoring, in-service experience, benefit and way ahead. Struct Health Monit 2010; 9(3): 209–217.

Burchill

Barter

Amsterdam

. Improved fatigue life predictions for combat aircraft fatigue life from a novel testing program. In: AIAC15: 15th Australian International Aerospace Congress, 25–28 February 2013, pp. 74–84. Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Shook

Millwater

Enright

. Simulation of recurring automated inspections of probability-of-fracture estimates. Struct Health Monit 2008; 7(4): 293–307.

Molent

Barter

Foster

. Verification of an individual aircraft fatigue monitoring system. Int J Fatigue 2012; 43: 128–133.

Glaessgen

Stargel

. The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. Air Force vehicles. In: Proceedings of 53rd structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Honolulu, HI, 23–26 April 2012.

Kapoor

Braun

Boller

. Modeling and optimization of maintenance intervals to realize structural health monitoring applications on aircraft. In: Proceedings of 5th European workshop on structural health monitoring, 28 June–4 July, 2010, Sorento, Naples, Italy, pp. 55–62.

Gobbato

Conte

Kosmatka

. A reliability-based framework for fatigue damage prognosis of composite aircraft structures. Probabilist Eng Mech 2012; 29: 176–188.

10.

Rashid

HSJ

Place

Braithwaite

. Investigating the investigations: a retrospective study in the aviation maintenance error causation. Cognit Tech Work 2013; 15(2): 171–188.

11.

Bartelds

. Aircraft structural health monitoring, prospects for smart solutions from a European viewpoint. In: Structural health monitoring, current status and perspectives, Stanford, CA, 18–20 September 1997, CRC Press, pp. 293–300.

12.

Inoue

Reid

. Review of inverse analysis for indirect measurement of impact force. Appl Mech Rev 2001; 54: 503.

13.

Guyomar

Lallart

Monnier

. Passive impact location estimation using piezoelectric sensors. Struct Health Monit 2009; 8(5): 357–368.

14.

Wang

Chiu

. Determination of unknown impact force acting on a simply supported beam. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2003; 17(3): 683–704.

15.

Ciampa

Meo

Barbieri

. Impact localization in composite structures of arbitrary cross section. Struct Health Monit 2012; 11(6): 643–655.

16.

. Impact detection and location for a plate structure using least squares support vector machines. Struct Health Monit 2014; 13(1): 5–18.

17.

Seydel

Chang

. Impact identification of stiffened composite panels. I: system development. Smart Mater Struct 2001; 10(2): 354.

18.

Seydel

Chang

. Impact identification of stiffened composite panels. II: implementation studies. Smart Mater Struct 2001; 10(2): 370–379.

19.

Park

Chang

. Monitoring impact events using a system-identification method. AIAA J 2009; 5758: 189–200.

20.

Fukunaga

. A new approach for health monitoring of composite structures through identification of impact force. J Adv Sci 2005; 17(3): 82–89.

21.

Fukunaga

Matsumoto

. An efficient approach for identifying impact force using embedded piezoelectric sensors. Int J Impact Eng 2007; 34(7): 1258–1271.

22.

Atobe

Fukunaga

. Impact force identification of CFRP structures using experimental transfer matrices. CMC: Comput Mater Con 2011; 26(1): 67.

23.

Stites

Escobar

White

. Quasi-active, minimal-sensing load and damage identification and quantification techniques for filament-wound rocket motor casings. Proc SPIE 2007; 6532: 65321E.

24.

Yoder

Adams

. Multidimensional sensing for impact load and damage evaluation in a carbon filament wound canister. Mater Eval 2008; 66(7): 756–763.

25.

Budde

Yoder

Adams

. Impact detection for fiberglass composite rotor blade. In: Proceedings of the annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Grapevine, TX, 27–29 May 2009.

26.

Bond

Adams

. Uncertainty in impact identification applied to a commercial wind turbine blade. In: Annual conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, New Orleans, LA, 16 October 2013.

27.

Hylton

Crandall

Koester

. Helicopter rotor blade impact detection and characterization: formulation and application of a data-driven model for the operational environment. In: Proceedings of the AHS international 69th annual forum, Phoenix, AZ, 21–23 May, 2013.

28.

Crandall

Hylton

Adams

. Compensation for boundary condition effects of a helicopter blade droop stop using frequency domain impedance modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Vibration Institute training conference, Williamsburg, VA, 19–22 June, 2012.

29.

Doebling

Farrar

Prime

. Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Technical Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.

30.

Carden

Fanning

. Vibration based condition monitoring: a review. Struct Health Monit 2004; 3(4): 355–377.

31.

Kosmatka

Ricles

. Damage detection in structures by modal vibration characterization. J Struct Eng 1999; 125: 1384–1392.

32.

Thyagarajan

Shultz

Pai

. Detecting structural damage using frequency response functions. Sound Vib 1998; 210(1): 162–170.

33.

Ghoshal

Chattopadhyay

Schultz

. Experimental investigation of damage detection in composite material structures using a laser vibrometer and piezoelectric actuators. J Intel Mat Syst Str 2002; 14: 521–537.

34.

Kessler

Spearing

Atalla

. Damage detection in composite materials using frequency response methods. Compos Part B: Eng 2001; 33: 87–95.

35.

Underwood

Adams

. Composite damage detection using laser vibrometry with nonlinear response characteristic. Nonlinear Model Appl 2011; 2: 181–187.

36.

Underwood

. Subsurface damage detection in sandwich composites using three-dimensional laser vibrometry measurements with nonlinear vibration response characteristics. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, August 2012.

37.

Dittman

. Identification and quantification of nonlinear behavior in a disbonded aluminum honeycomb panel using single degree-of-freedom models. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, December 2013.

38.

Dittman

Adams

. Detection and quantification of a disbonded aluminum honeycomb panel using nonlinear superharmonic frequencies. In: Proceedings of 9th international workshop on structural health monitoring, 10–12 September, 2013, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.