This article reports the development of a Bayesian method for assessing the damage status of railway ballast under a concrete sleeper based on vibration data of the in situ sleeper. One of the important contributions of the proposed method is to describe the variation of stiffness distribution of ballast using Lagrange polynomial, for which the order of the polynomial is decided by the Bayesian approach. The probability of various orders of polynomial conditional on a given set of measured vibration data is calculated. The order of polynomial with the highest probability is selected as the most plausible order and used for updating the ballast stiffness distribution. Due to the uncertain nature of railway ballast, the corresponding model updating problem is usually unidentifiable. To ensure the applicability of the proposed method even in unidentifiable cases, a computational efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo–based Bayesian method was employed in the proposed method for generating a set of samples in the important region of parameter space to approximate the posterior (updated) probability density function of ballast stiffness. The proposed ballast damage detection method was verified with roving hammer test data from a segment of full-scale ballasted track. The experimental verification results positively show the potential of the proposed method in ballast damage detection.
ZengSG. Dynamic tests for heavy haul railway tracks. J China Railw Soc1988; 10: 66–77.
2.
LamHFWongMTYangYB. A feasibility study on railway ballast damage detection utilizing measured vibration of in situ concrete sleeper. Eng Struct2012; 45: 284–298.
3.
LamHFHuQWongMT. The Bayesian methodology for the detection of railway ballast damage under a concrete sleeper. Eng Struct2014; 81: 289–301.
4.
FriswellMIPengJETWilsonDAL. Using vibration data and statistical measures to locate damage in structures. Modal Anal1994; 9(4): 239–254.
5.
LamHFNgCTLeungAYT. Multicrack detection on semirigidly connected beams utilizing dynamic data. J Eng Mech: ASCE2008; 134(1): 90–99.
6.
YinTLamHFChowHM. A Bayesian probabilistic approach for crack characterization in plate structures. Comput-Aided Civ Inf2010; 25: 375–386.
ChingJBeckJL. New Bayesian model updating algorithm applied to a structural health monitoring benchmark. Struct Health Monit2004; 3(4): 313–332.
9.
JohnsonEALamHFKatafygiotisLSet al. Phase I IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark problem using simulated data. J Eng Mech: ASCE2004; 130(1): 3–15.
10.
FanWQiaoPZ. Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct Health Monit2011; 10(1): 83–111.
11.
SalawuOS. Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng Struct1997; 19(9): 718–723.
12.
JeffreysH. Theory of probability. 3rd ed.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.
13.
BoxGEPTiaoGC. Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
14.
YuenKV. Bayesian methods for structural dynamics and civil engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
15.
AnDChoiJHKimNH. Identification of correlated damage parameters under noise and bias using Bayesian inference. Struct Health Monit2011; 11(3): 293–303.
16.
BeckJLKatafygiotisLS. Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech: ASCE1998; 124(4): 455–461.
17.
VanikMWBeckJLAuSK. Bayesian probabilistic approach to structural health monitoring. J Eng Mech: ASCE2000; 126(7): 738–745.
18.
AuSKNiYCZhangFLet al. Full-scale dynamic testing and modal identification of a coupled floor slab system. Eng Struct2012; 37: 167–178.
19.
LamHFPengHYAuSK. Development of a practical algorithm for Bayesian model updating of a coupled slab system utilizing field test data. Eng Struct2014; 79: 182–194.
20.
FriswellMIMottersheadJE. Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media, 1995.
21.
MaresCFriswellMIMottersheadJE. Model updating using robust estimation. Mech Syst Signal Pr2002; 16(1): 169–183.
22.
KatafygiotisLSLamHF. Tangential-projection algorithm for manifold representation in unidentifiable model updating problems. Earthq Eng Struct D2002; 31(4): 791–812.
23.
LamHFYangJHAuSK. Bayesian model updating of a coupled-slab system using field test data utilizing an enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm. Eng Struct2015; 102(1): 144–155.
24.
GeyerCJThompsonEA. Annealing Markov chain Monte Carlo with applications to ancestral inference. J Am Stat Assoc1995; 90: 909–920.
25.
TierneyL. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Ann Stat1994; 22: 1701–1762.
26.
BeckJLAuSK. Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. J Eng Mech: ASCE2002; 128(4): 380–391.
27.
ChingJYChenYC. Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging. J Eng Mech: ASCE2007; 133(7): 816–832.
BeckJLYuenKV. Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach. J Eng Mech: ASCE2004; 130(2): 192–203.
30.
HuQLamHF. Identification of the degradation of railway ballast under a concrete sleeper. In: Proceedings of the 2013 world congress on advances in structural engineering and mechanics (ASEM-13), Jeju, Korea, 8–12 September 2013.
31.
KrenkS. Mechanics and analysis of beams, columns and cables – a modern introduction to the classic theories. 2nd ed.Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Science and Business Media, 2001.
32.
PrzemienieckiJS. Theory of matrix structural analysis. Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation, 1985.
33.
PapadimitriouCNtotsiosEGiagopoulosDet al. Variability of updated finite element models and their predictions consistent with vibration measurements. Struct Control Hlth2012; 19(5): 630–654.
34.
KatafygiotisLSLamHFPapadimitriouC. Treatment of unidentifiability in structural model updating. Adv Struct Eng2000; 3(1): 19–39.
35.
HastingsWK. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika1970; 57(1): 97–109.
36.
MetropolisNRosenbluthARosenbluthMNet al. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys1953; 21(6): 1087–1091.
37.
AuSKBeckJL. A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations. Struct Saf1999; 21: 135–158.
38.
RobertCPCasellaG. Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2013.
39.
CheungSHBeckJL. Calculation of posterior probabilities for Bayesian model class assessment and averaging from posterior samples based on dynamic system data. Comput-Aided Civ Inf2010; 25(5): 304–321.
40.
MutoMBeckJL. Bayesian updating and model class selection for hysteretic structural models using stochastic simulation. J Vib Control2008; 14(1–2): 7–34.
41.
BeckJL. Determining models of structures from earthquake records. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1978.
42.
MTR. HK MTR materials and workmanship specification for track work. Hong Kong: MTR Corporation Limited, 2009.
43.
KumaranGMenonDNairKK. Dynamic studies of railtrack sleepers in a track structure system. J Sound Vib2003; 268: 485–501.
44.
XiaYHaoHZanardoGet al. Long term vibration monitoring of an RC slab: temperature and humidity effect. Eng Struct2006; 28(3): 441–452.
