Electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique provides an alternative means of characterizing strength development of early age concrete on a real-time basis. However, most existing studies employing the technique heavily rely on statistical tools for strength development characterization. This article proposes a new impedance-based approach to strength and dynamic modulus assessment of cementitious materials. In this approach, a lead zirconate titanate patch is surfaced-bonded on a customized cementitious material specimen, known as ‘Miniature Prism’, in which the conductance signatures throughout the curing process are acquired. A 3D coupled field finite element (FE) model is then developed to compute the conductance signatures and model updating is performed using the experimental results. The conductance signatures computed by the updated FE model are found to be in good agreement with experimental results. The key contribution of this approach is the use of ‘Miniature Prism’ which ensures consistency of the resonance peaks in the conductance spectrum between identical specimens. This has been very difficult, if not impossible, to achieve with the conventional EMI technique. This merit allows for modelling of the electromechanical system and hence parametrically predicting the dynamic modulus of elasticity of the cementitious material throughout the curing process. Comparative study is also conducted on various conventional and advanced techniques and results indicate that the proposed technique is effective in strength assessment of cementitious materials. In addition, the technique is suitable for autonomous online monitoring purpose, and thus exhibits promising potential to substitute the conventional non-destructive testing methods.
SongGGuHMoY-L.Smart aggregates: multi-functional sensors for concrete structures – a tutorial and a review. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17(3): 033001.
2.
LimYYKwongKZLiewWYH, et al. Practical issues related to the application of piezoelectric based wave propagation technique in monitoring of concrete curing. Constr Build Mater2017; 152: 506–519.
3.
ZhuJHoMPatilD, et al. Underwater pipeline impact localization using piezoceramic transducers. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26: 107002.
4.
LimYYSmithSTSohCK.Wave propagation based monitoring of concrete curing using piezoelectric materials: review and path forward. NDT&E Int2018; 99: 50–63.
5.
ParkGInmanDJ.Structural health monitoring using piezoelectric impedance measurements. Philos T R Soc A2007; 365(1851): 373–392.
6.
LinBGiurgiutiuVPollockP, et al. Durability and survivability of piezoelectric wafer active sensors on metallic structure. AIAA J2010; 48(3): 635.
7.
BhallaSAnnamdasVGMSohCK.Strength and damage assessment of concrete. In: SohC-KYangYBhallaS (eds) Smart materials in structural health monitoring, control and biomechanics. Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp. 187–221.
8.
de Souza RabeloDHobeckJDInmanDJ, et al. Real-time structural health monitoring of fatigue crack on aluminum beam using an impedance-based portable device. J Intel Mat Syst Str2017; 28(20): 3152–3162.
9.
ZuoCFengXZhangY, et al. Crack detection in pipelines using multiple electromechanical impedance sensors. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(10): 104004.
10.
KaurNBhallaSMadduSC.Damage and retrofitting monitoring in reinforced concrete structures along with long-term strength and fatigue monitoring using embedded Lead Zirconate Titanate patches. J Intel Mat Syst Str2019; 30(1): 100–115.
11.
ZhuangYKopsaftopoulosFDugnaniR, et al. Integrity monitoring of adhesively bonded joints via an electromechanical impedance-based approach. Struct Health Monit2018; 17(5): 1031–1045.
12.
AnnamdasVGRadhikaMA.Electromechanical impedance of piezoelectric transducers for monitoring metallic and non-metallic structures: a review of wired, wireless and energy-harvesting methods. J Intel Mat Syst Str2013; 24(9): 1019–1040.
13.
SilvaRNFTsurutaKMNetoRF, et al. The use of electromechanical impedance based structural health monitoring technique in concrete structures. In: Proceedings of the 8th European workshop on structural health monitoring, Bilbao, 5–8 July 2016.
14.
de Souza RabeloDSteffenVFinzi NetoRM, et al. Impedance-based structural health monitoring and statistical method for threshold-level determination applied to 2024-T3 aluminum panels under varying temperature. Struct Health Monit2016; 16(4): 365–381.
15.
GururajaTR. Piezoelectric transducers for medical ultrasonic imaging. In: ISAF ’92. Proceedings of the eighth IEEE international symposium on applications of ferroelectrics, Greenville, SC, 30 August–2 September 1992, pp. 259–265. New York: IEEE.
16.
Finzi NetoRMSteffenVJrRadeDA, et al. A low-cost electromechanical impedance-based SHM architecture for multiplexed piezoceramic actuators. Struct Health Monit2011; 10(4): 391–402.
17.
SohCKBhallaS.Calibration of piezo-impedance transducers for strength prediction and damage assessment of concrete. Smart Mater Struct2005; 14(4): 671.
18.
ShinSWQureshiARLeeJ-Y, et al. Piezoelectric sensor based nondestructive active monitoring of strength gain in concrete. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17(5): 055002.
19.
ShinSWOhTK.Application of electro-mechanical impedance sensing technique for online monitoring of strength development in concrete using smart PZT patches. Constr Build Mater2009; 23(2): 1185–1188.
20.
AnnamdasVRizzoP. Monitoring concrete by means of embedded electromechanical impedance sensors. In: Proceedings of SPIE, sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems, San Diego, CA, 7–11 March 2010, pp. 7647–7671. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
21.
TawieRLeeH.Piezoelectric-based non-destructive monitoring of hydration of reinforced concrete as an indicator of bond development at the steel–concrete interface. Cement Concrete Res2010; 40(12): 1697–1703.
22.
KimWCJoHJParkG.Concrete cure monitoring using piezoelectric admittance measurements. In: Proceedings of the world congress on advances in structural engineering and mechanic, Incheon, Korea, 25–29 August 2015.
23.
NarayananAKocherlaASubramaniamKVL. Embedded PZT sensor for monitoring mechanical impedance of hydrating cementitious materials. J Nondestruct Eval2017; 36(4): 64.
24.
NegiPChakrabortyTKaurN, et al. Investigations on effectiveness of embedded PZT patches at varying orientations for monitoring concrete hydration using EMI technique. Constr Build Mater2018; 169: 489–498.
25.
LuXLimYYSohCK.A novel electromechanical impedance–based model for strength development monitoring of cementitious materials. Struct Health Monit2017; 17: 902–918.
26.
LimYY. Monitoring of concrete hydration using electromechanical impedance technique. In: SmithST (ed.), 23rd Australasian conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM23) (ed SmithST), Byron Bay, NSW, 9–12 December 2018, pp.1155–1160. Lismore: Southern Cross University.
27.
WangZGaoZWangY, et al. A new dynamic testing method for elastic, shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio of concrete. Constr Build Mater2015; 100: 129–135.
28.
MusiałMGroselJ.Determining the Young’s modulus of concrete by measuring the eigenfrequencies of concrete and reinforced concrete beams. Constr Build Mater2016; 121: 44–52.
29.
BS 1881-209:1990. Testing concrete. Recommendations for the measurement of dynamic modulus of elasticity.
30.
LimYYKwongKZLiewWYH, et al. Non-destructive concrete strength evaluation using smart piezoelectric transducer – a comparative study. Smart Mater Struct2016; 25(8): 085021.
31.
LuXLimYYSohCK.Investigating the performance of ‘Smart Probe’ based indirect EMI technique for strength development monitoring of cementitious materials – modelling and parametric study. Constr Build Mater2018; 172: 134–152.
32.
YangYLimYYSohCK.Practical issues related to the application of the electromechanical impedance technique in the structural health monitoring of civil structures: I experiment. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17(3): 035008.
33.
YangYLimYYSohCK.Practical issues related to the application of the electromechanical impedance technique in the structural health monitoring of civil structures: II numerical verification. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17(3): 035009.
34.
LimYYSohCK.Fatigue life estimation of a 1D aluminum beam under mode-I loading using the electromechanical impedance technique. Smart Mater Struct2011; 20(12): 125001.
35.
LimYYSohCK.Towards more accurate numerical modeling of impedance based high frequency harmonic vibration. Smart Mater Struct2014; 23(3): 035017.
36.
FanZLoweM.Interaction of weld-guided waves with defects. NDT&E Int2012; 47: 124–133.
37.
AlleyneDNLoweMJSCawleyP.The reflection of guided waves from circumferential notches in pipes. J Appl Mech1998; 65(3): 635–641.
38.
LimYY.Fatigue life estimation of 1-D aluminum beam using electromechanical impedance technique. PhD Thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2012.
39.
ACI 318-14. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.
40.
SwamyRN.Dynamic Poisson’s ratio of Portland cement paste, mortar and concrete. Cement Concrete Res1971; 1(5): 559–583.
