In 2001, a Canadian national study examined the perspectives of childcare directors and parents on the care of mildly ill children in childcare (Polyzoi et al., 2001). A survey was conducted to examine how 328 childcare facilities (centers and family childcare homes) and 742 parents cope with providing care for children with mild illnesses (cold, flu, ear infections,chicken pox, conjunctivitis, etc.). This article briefly compares the preferences of childcare directors and parents for selected models of care for mildly ill children as determined by the 2001 national study. It also examines, in detail, the issues and concerns raised by parents and directors in the qualitative portion of that national study, using grounded theory.A multi-faceted approach is suggested by the data – with involvement of all stakeholders including employers, government, unions, media, parents, and the childcare community – to help alleviate the work-family stress associated with the care of mildly ill children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Babchuk, W. A. (1997) ‘Glaser or Strauss? Grounded theory and adult education’ (winning graduate student research paper). Presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education. Available at: www.anrecs.msu.edu/research/gradpr96.htm (accessed 11 July 2002).
2.
Bartlett, A. V., Orton, P. and Turner, M. (1986) ‘Day care homes: the “silent majority” of child day care’ . Reviews of Infectious Diseases8(4): 663–668 .
3.
Blain, J. (1993) ‘“I can’t come in today, the baby has chickenpox!” Gender and class processes in how parents in the labour force deal with the problem of sick children’ . Canadian Journal of Sociology18(4): 405–429 .
4.
Bogdan, R. C. and Biklen, S. K. (1998) Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. New York: Allyn & Bacon .
5.
Bogues, W. and Tear, S. (1993) ‘I Feel Sick’: Three Words Working Parents Dread – Mildly Ill Care Service: A Development Manual. Kingston, ON: Victorian Order of Nurses .
6.
Buchsbaum, S. (1991) ‘Sending “care” packages to the workplace’ . Business & Health9(5): 56-56 .
7.
The Bureau of National Affairs (1992) Expecting the Unexpected: Sick and Emergency Child Care. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs .
8.
Fernandez, J. P. (1986) Childcare and Corporate Productivity: Resolving Family/Work Conflicts. Toronto: Lexington Books .
9.
Ferson, M. J. (1993) ‘Childcare for mildly sick children’ . Australian Journal of Public Health17(4): 393–394 .
10.
Fredericks, B., Hardman, R., Morgan, G. and Rodgers, F. (1986) A Little Bit Under the Weather: A Look at Care for Mildly Ill Children. Boston, MA: Work/Family Directions, Inc.
11.
Friendly, M., Cleveland, G. and Willis, T. (1989) Flexible Child Care in Canada: A Report on Child Care for Evenings, Overnight and Weekends, Emergencies and Ill Children, and in Rural Areas. Toronto: Child Care Resource and Research Unit .
12.
Giebink, G. S., Chang, A., Koch, P. D., Murray, D. L. and Gonzalez, G. D. (1994) ‘Care of mildly ill children in the day-care setting’ . Pediatrics94: 1024–1026 .
13.
Glaser, B. B. (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press .
14.
Haskins, R. and Kotch, J. (1986) ‘Day care and illness: evidence, costs and public policy’ . Pediatrics77(6): 977-997 .
15.
Hofferth, S. L., Brayfield, A., Deich, S. and Holcomb, P. (1991) National Child Care Survey, 1990. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press .
16.
Irwin, S. H. and Lero, D. S. (1997) In Our Way: Childcare Barriers to Full Workforce Participation Experienced by Parents of Children with Special Needs and Potential Remedies. Cape Breton, Nova Scotia: Breton Books .
17.
Johnson, G. W. (1998) Sick-child Care: The State of the Concept – 1998 Sick-child Care Survey. Atlanta, Georgia: The National Association for Sick Child Daycare .
18.
Jordan, A. E. (1986) ‘The unresolved childcare dilemma: Care for the acutely ill child’ . Reviews of Infectious Diseases8(4): 626–630 .
19.
Kerr, M. K. and Polyzoi, E. (1993) ‘Issues and concerns of licensed family day care providers’, in Translating Research into Practice: Implications for Serving Families with Young Children , p. 374-374 . The second National Head Start Research Conference, Washington, DC
20.
Landis, S. E. and Earp, J. A. (1988) ‘Day care center illness: policy and practice in North Carolina’ . American Journal of Public Health78(3): 311–313 .
21.
Landis, S. E., Earp, J. A. and Sharp, M. (1988) ‘Day-care center exclusion of sick children: Comparison of opinions of day-care staff, working mothers, and pediatricians’ . Pediatrics81(5): 662–667 .
22.
McNeill, M. and Dazeil, J. (1999) ‘There’s life outside work’. Winnipeg Free Press , p. 37-37.
23.
Nuttall, J. G. (1991) ‘A Comparison of the employment experiences of childcare workers in non-profit and privately-owned childcare centres: Some preliminary findings’ , paper presented at the fifth Early Childhood Convention, Dunedin, New Zealand.
24.
Polyzoi, E., Mayer, D. R., Babb, J. C., Babb, J. V., Elfenbaurm, M. L., Kerr, K. M. and Konyk-Pastuck, R. L. (2001) Care of Mildly Ill Children – Issues and National Policy Directions in Childcare. Winnipeg: University of Winnipeg .
25.
SauvÈ, R. (2002) Connections – Tracking the Links between Jobs and Family: Job, Family and Stress among Husbands, Wives and Lone-parents 15–64 from 1999 to 2000. Nepean, Ontario: Vanier Institute of the Family .
26.
Statistics Canada (2001) Women in Canada: Work Chapter Updates. Ottawa: Catalogue no. 89F0133XIE.
27.
Swiss, D. J. and Walker, J. P. (1993) Women and the Work/Family Dilemma: How Today’s Professional Women are Finding Solutions. New York: John Wiley .
28.
Thoms, C., Stapleton, C., Elsing, N., Conners, M. and Hoksch, C. (1997) ‘Columbia county childcare: employee needs and issues’, a report by the Labor Forum Childcare Team. Available at: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/cty/columbia/crd/childcare.html (accessed June 20 2002).
29.
Work and Family Partnerships (1998) Emergency Childcare: Its Impact, Practice and Innovation – A Canadian Story. Ottawa: Work and Family Partnerships .
