Based on a naturalistic study of an intergenerational art program at a colocated
child and long-term care facility, the purpose of this article is to discuss the
implications of the program’s learning opportunities, primarily for young
children, in light of current conceptualizations of childhood, aging and disability.
Through a critical, postmodern framework which sees childhood, aging and disability
as situated phenomena which are produced as objects in relation to power, I argue
that programs such as this one are radical in their de-pathologization of these
three social groups.
Baker, B.
(2002)
‘The hunt for disability: the new eugenics and the normalization
of school children’
. Teachers College Record104(4):
663–703
.
2.
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1981) ‘Discourse in the
novel’, in
M. Holquist
(ed.) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays(Trans. C. Emerson and
M. Holquist), pp. 259–422.
Austin, TX: University of Austin Press
.
3.
Bennell, P.
(1998)
‘Rates of return to education in Asia: a review of the evidence’
. Education Economics6(2):
107–120
.
4.
David, T.
,
Raban, B.
,
Ure, C.
,
Goouch, K.
,
Jago, M.
and
Barriere, I.
(2000) Making Sense of Early Literacy: A
Practitioner’s Perspective.
Stoke on Trent: Trentham
.
5.
Gallagher, D. J.
(2004)
‘The importance of constructivism and constructivist pedagogy for
disability studies in education’
. Disability Studies Quarterly[online]24(2). Available at:
http://www.dsq-ds.org/_articles_html/2004/spring/dsq_spr04_gallagher.html
(accessed 12 July 2005).
6.
Government of Canada
(1999a) Federal, Provincial and Territorial Governments
Launch Dialogue Process for National Children’s Agenda[online].
Available at: http://socialunion.gc.ca/news/99may7e.html (accessed 27
February 2004).
7.
Government of Canada
(1999b) Notes for an Address by the Honourable Pierre
Pettigrew Minister of Human Resources Development Canada: A National
Children’s Agenda: Developing a Shared Vision Measuring Child
Well-Being and Monitoring Progress [online]. Available at:
http://socialunion.gc.ca/nca/may7-speech_e.html (accessed 27 February 2004).
8.
Government of Canada
(2004) Supporting Families and Children: Government of Canada
Initiatives[online]. Available at:
http://socialunion.gc.ca/nca/supporting_e.html (accessed 27 February 2004).
9.
Guba, E. G.
and
Lincoln, S.
(1985) Naturalistic Inquiry.
Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE
.
10.
Habermas, J.
(1972) Knowledge and Human Interests. (J. J. Shapiro,
Trans.).
Boston, MA: Beacon Press
.
11.
Heydon, R.
(2002)
‘Review’ [Review of the book Getting Children Back to
School: Case Studies in Primary Education]
. Canadian Journal of Education27(2/3):
315–318
.
12.
Heydon, R.
(in press)
‘Making meaning together: multimodal literacy learning
opportunities in an intergenerational art program’
. Journal of Curriculum Studies.
13.
Heydon, R.
(2005)
‘The theory and practice of pedagogical ethics: features for an
ethical praxis in/out of special education’
. Journal of Curriculum Studies37(4):
381–394
.
14.
Heydon, R.
and
Iannacci, L.
(2005)
‘Biomedical literacy: two curriculum teachers challenge the
treatment of dis/ability in contemporary literacy education’
. Language & Literacy7(2) [online]. Available at:
http://www.langandlit.ualberta.ca/current.html (accessed 26 July 2005).
15.
Hunniford, B. (2004) Early identification procedures in Ontario school
boards: a descriptive analysis. Unpublished thesis (M. Ed.), University of Western Ontario.
16.
Jenks, C.
(2004) ‘Constructing childhood
sociologically’, in
M. J. Kehily
(ed.) An Introduction to Childhood Studies, pp.
77–95.
Maidenhead: Open University Press
.
17.
Jewitt, C.
and
Kress, G.
(2003) ‘Introduction’, in
C. Jewitt
and
G. Kress
(eds) Multimodal Literacy, pp.
1–18.
New York: Peter Lang
.
18.
Lather, P.
(1991) Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in
the Postmodern.
New York: Routledge
.
19.
Learning Disabilities Association of Ontario
(n.d.) Promoting Early Intervention[online]. Available at:
http://ldao.ca/ldao_projects/pei/index.html (accessed 12 May 2004).
20.
McCain, M.
and
Mustard, F.
(1999) Reversing the Real Brain Drain: Early Years Study,
Final Report.
Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Institute for
Advanced Research
.
21.
Ministry of Education and Training
(1982) Policy/program memorandum No. 11: Early Identification
of Children’s Learning Needs.
Toronto, Ontario: Author
.
22.
Rage Against the Darkness: Aging, a Canadian Snapshot(2004)
Television broadcast. Directed by J. Kastner.
Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
.
23.
Rogers, W. S.
(2004) ‘Promoting better childhoods:
constructions of child concern’, in
M. J. Kehily
(ed.) An Introduction to Childhood Studies, pp.
125–144.
Maidenhead: Open University Press
.
24.
Skrtic, T. M.
(1995) ‘The functionalist view of special
education and disability: deconstructing the conventional knowledge
tradition’, in
T. M. Skrtic
(ed.) Disability and Democracy: Reconstructing (Special) Education for
Postmodernity, pp. 65–103.
New York: Teachers College Press
.
25.
Stooke, R.
(2003)
‘(Re)Visioning the Ontario early years study: almost a fairy tale
– but not quite’
. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing19(2):
91–101
.
26.
Stooke, R.
(2004) ‘Healthy, wealthy and ready-for-school:
reading the Ontario Early Years Study as a fractured fairy
tale’, in
S. Deluca
(ed.) Risky Business, Shifting Paradigms: Teaching-learning in a
Phenomenological Curriculum: The Western-Fanshawe Collaborative BScN Program
Faculty Development Retreat, 29–30 April 2004,
Ingersoll, Ontario
.
27.
Thomson, G. R.
(1997) Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in
American Culture and Literature.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
