In this article, I contribute to the discourse on building theory within the context of action research. Specifically, drawing on advaita (non-dualism) philosophy from Hinduism, I describe a holistic framework which views life as holistic, that is, comprising both subjective and objective views of reality and thus promoting interplay between ontological subjectivity and epistemological objectivity. I illustrate with examples, how anchored in a holistic paradigm, I used principles of constant comparison in developing the theoretical category of sacredness in its various dimensions. I also describe two dimensions that characterized this process: researcher as insider-outsider and researcher's affirmations and ambivalences.
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2001). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: SAGE.
2.
Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination . Public Culture, 12(1), 1-19.
3.
Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action: Individual and organizational. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Baldwin, M. (2001). Working together, learning together: Co-operative inquiry in the development of complex practice by teams of social workers . In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 287-293). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Benefiel, M. (2005). The second half of the journey: Spiritual leadership for organizational transformation. The Leadership Quarterly , 16, 723-747.
7.
Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Hassocks: Harvester Press.
8.
Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2001). Conclusion: Broadening the bandwidth of validity: Issues and choicepoints for improving the quality of action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 447-456). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10.
Cooperrider, D.L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change & Development, 1, 129-169.
11.
Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell & Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2), 191-207.
12.
Dick, B. (2004). Action research literature, themes & trends . Action Research, 2(4), 425-444.
13.
Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (1996). Action research for management research. British Journal of Management, 7, 75-86.
14.
Esteva, G., & Madhu, S.P. (2000). Grassroots post modernism - Remaking the soil of cultures. London: Zed Books.
15.
Fals-Borda, O., & Mora-Osejo, L.E. (2003). Context and diffusion of knowledge: A critique of Eurocentricism. Action Research, 1(1), 29-37.
16.
Glaser, B.G., & Struass, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
17.
Grush, R. (2000). Self, world and spaces: The meanings and mechanisms of ego and allocentric representation. Brain and the Mind , I, 59-62.
18.
Gustavsson, B. (2001). Toward a transcendent epistemology of organizations: New foundations for organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14(4), 352-378.
19.
Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas . In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.) Handbook of Action Research: Participative inquiry and practice. (pp. 91-102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Ladkin, D. (2005). The enigma of subjectivity: How might phenomenology help action researchers negotiate the relationship between `self', `other' and `truth'?Action Research, 3(1), 108-126.
21.
Long, J. (1999). A feminist approach to telling women's lives. New York: New York University Press.
22.
Marshall, J. (2001). Self reflexive inquiry practices. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 433-439). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
Radhakrishnan, S. (1999). Indian philosophy, Volumes 1 & 2. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
24.
Saravanamuthu, K. (2006). Emancipatory accounting and sustainable development: A Gandhian-Vedic theorization of experimenting with truth. Sustainable Development, 14(4), 234-244.
25.
Sachs, W. (Ed.) (1992). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power. London: Zed Books.
26.
Schulze, U. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 3-41.
27.
Steingard, D.S. (2005). Spiritually-informed management theory - Toward profound possibilities for inquiry and transformation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(3), 227-241.
28.
Swami Vivekananda (1907). Complete works of Swami Vivekananda. Retrieved from: www.ramakrishnavivekananda.info/vivekananda/complete_works.htm .
29.
Torbert, W.R. (2001). The practice of action inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 250-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W.H. (2000). Ecological embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1265-1282.
