Action research on marginalization and exclusion often seeks to examine relations between recognition, respect, and inclusion, but addressing these topics is difficult. Theatre-based action research opens up a new way to communicate and make visible knowledge and experiences from below that have difficulties reaching the public agenda or influencing structures of power. In this article we follow the creation of a play and of scenes that address the life, sufferings, and wishes of unemployed people. The skills of actors, writers, and producers are worked into a critical utopian action research project and used to highlight and enlarge both critique and dreams in life outside the labor market. The article also discusses some of the reactions the plays received and the formation of knowledge linked to these processes.
<CF f="AdvTimes" n="8.970000"/> Andersen, N. Å. (2007). Creating the client who can create himself and his own fate: The tragedy of the citizen’s contract. Qualitative Sociology Review, 3(2), 5-29.
2.
Boal, A. ( 1995). The rainbow of desire. London: Routledge.
3.
Brecht, B. ( 1964). Brecht on theater. London: Methuen Drama.
4.
Flyvbjerg, B. ( 1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
5.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. ( 1994). The new production of knowledge. London: SAGE.
6.
Guharthakurta, M. ( 2008). Theatre in participatory action research: Experiences from Bangladesh. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 510-522). London: SAGE.
7.
Gustavsen, B. ( 1996). Development and the social science: An uneasy relationship . In S. Toulmin & B. Gustavsen (Eds.), Beyond theory: Changing organizations through participation (pp. 5-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
8.
Hoff, K. ( 2007). De små Marginaler [Small Margins]. Copenhagen: Forlaget Drama.
9.
Honneth, A. ( 1992). Kampf um Anerkennung: Ein Theorieprogramm im Anschluss an Hegel und Mead. [Fight for recognition. A theory program building on Hegel and Mead]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag .
10.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.W. ( 1997). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1944).
11.
Husted, M., & Tofteng ( 2007a). Nye muligheder for langtidsledige - Kulturhistoriske planter og grøntsager [New possibilities for long term unemployed - Heritage plants]. Nakskov: Baltic Sea Solutions (http://diggy.ruc.dk:8080/retrieve/9649 ).
12.
Husted, M., & Tofteng, D. ( 2007b). Respekt og realiteter: Bevægelse mellem arbejde og udstødning [Respect and realities: Motions between work and social exclusion]. Coordinated PhD thesis, Teksam forlag, Roskilde, Denmark. Retrieved from: http://rudar.ruc.dk/bitstream/1800/1622/1/respekt%20og%20realiteter.pdf .
13.
Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. (1996). Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. London: Institute for Social Inventions.
14.
Mathiesen, T. ( 1971). Det ufærdige [The unfinished]. Oslo: PAX forlaget A/S.
15.
Mik-Meyer, N. ( 2006). Identities and organizations: Evaluating the personality traits of clients in two Danish rehabilitation organizations. Out-lines. Critical Social Studies, 8(1), 32-48.
16.
Negt, O. ( 1984). Lebendige Arbeit, enteignete Zeit [Lively work, expropriated time]. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag .
17.
Negt, O. ( 1997). Globalisering, ekspropriation og det moderne problem ‘Conditio Humana’ [Globalization, expropriation and the modern problem of ‘Conditio Humana’]. Social Kritik, 52, 28-40.
18.
Nielsen, B.S., Nielsen, K.A., & Olsén, P. (2003). Demokrati og bæredygtighed: Social fantasi og samfundsmæssig rigdomsproduktion [Democracy and sustainability: Social imagination and societal production of wealth]. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
19.
Nielsen, K. A. & Svensson, L. (Eds.) (2006). Action research and interactive research. London: Shaker Publishing .
20.
Quinlan, E. ( 2010). New action research techniques: Using participatory theatre with health care workers. Action Research, 8(2), 117-133.
21.
Sennett, R. ( 1999). The corrosion of character. London : W.W. Norton.
22.
Sennett, R. ( 2004). Respect: The formation of character in an age of inequality . London: Penguin Books.
23.
Tofteng, D., & Husted, M. ( 2006). The common third: The researcher, the participants and their common creation. In K. A. Nielsen & L. Svensson (Eds.), Action research and interactive Research (pp. 259-277). London: Shaker Publishing.
24.
Willig, R. ( 2009). Umyndiggørelse [Dehumanization]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
25.
Zur Lippe, R. ( 1974). Subjektivitet en objektiv faktor [Subjectivity an objective factor]. In B. S. Nielsen & E. Nielsen (Eds.), Socialisationsforskning: Senkapitalisme og subjektivtet (pp. 100-150). Copenhagen: Borgen/Basis, Borgens forlag.
