This paper presents a pilot study that has investigated the suitability of mean room surface exitance as a predictor of spatial brightness and compared these results with how horizontal illuminance predicts spatial brightness under the same conditions. The experiment took a group of 26 participants and, using a scaled booth, exposed each participant to three levels of mean room surface exitance, each delivered with three different light distributions and three different surface reflectances, resulting in a total of 27 light scenes. Results demonstrated that, under the range of conditions to which participants were exposed, a systematic relationship existed between mean room surface exitance and spatial brightness, but not between horizontal illuminance and spatial brightness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The Society of Light and Lighting. The SLL Code for Lighting, London: SLL, 2009.
2.
Committee of European Standards. EN 12464-1:2011. Light and Lighting – Lighting of Workplaces. Part 1: Indoor Workplaces, London: CEN, 2011.
3.
Boyce PR. Lighting quality for all?: Proceedings of the SLL International Lighting Conference, Dublin, April: 2013.
4.
CuttleC. Lighting by Design, 2nd. Oxford: Architectural Press, 2008.
5.
CuttleC. Towards the third stage of the lighting profession. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42(1): 73–93.
6.
CuttleC. A new direction for general lighting practice. Lighting Research and Technology2013; 45(1): 22–39.
7.
CuttleC. Introduction to a novel perception-based approach to lighting design: Proceedings of the 4th Professional Lighting Design Convention, Copenhagen,2013, pp. 152–154. .
8.
CuttleC. Lighting Design: A Perception-Based Approach, Oxford: Routledge, 2015.
9.
FotiosSAtliDChealCHouserKLogadóttirÁ. Lamp spectrum and spatial brightness at photopic levels: a basis for developing a metric. Lighting Research and Technology2013; 47(3): 80–102.
10.
LoeD. Measuring the lit appearance of a space. Light and Lighting1999; 11: 35–37.
11.
Society of Light and Lighting. Code for Lighting, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.
12.
BulloughJD. Spectral sensitivity modelling and nighttime scene brightness perception. Leukos2015; 11(1): 11–17.
13.
BulloughJDRadetskyLBaseneckerU. Influence of spectral power distribution on scene brightness at different light levels. Leukos2014; 10(1): 3–9.
14.
BoycePR. Investigations of the subjective balance between illuminance and lamp colour properties. Lighting Research and Technology1977; 9: 11–24.
15.
FotiosSALevermoreGJ. The perception of electric light sources of different colour properties. Lighting Research and Technology1997; 29: 161–171.
16.
HuXHouserKWTillerDK. Higher colour temperature lamps may not appear brighter. Leukos2006; 3: 69–81.
17.
AlmanDH. Errors of the standard photometric system when measuring the brightness of general illumination light sources. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1977; 6: 55–62.
18.
JuJChenDLinY. Effects of correlated color temperature on spatial brightness perception. Color Research and Application2012; 37: 450–454.
19.
HarringtonRE. Effect of color temperature on apparent brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America1954; 44: 113–116.
20.
LevermoreGJ. Perception of lighting and brightness from HID light sources. Lighting Research and Technology1994; 26: 145–150.
21.
BermanSMJewettDLFeinGSaikaGAshfordF. Photopic luminance does not always predict perceived room brightness. Lighting Research and Technology1990; 22: 37–41.
22.
ReaMS. New benefit metrics for more valuable lighting. Journal of Light and Visual Environment2013. , doi: IEIJ130000498.
23.
ReaMS. Value Metrics for Better Lighting, Washington: SPIE Press, 2013.
24.
FotiosSAtliDChealCHaraN. Lamp spectrum and spatial brightness at photopic levels: investigating prediction using S/P ratio and gamut area. Lighting Research and Technology2014. , doi: 10.1177/1477153514546784.
25.
RoyerMHouserKW. Spatial brightness perception of trichromatic stimuli. Leukos2012; 9(2): 89–108.
26.
ReaMSMouXBulloughJD. Scene brightness of illuminated interiors. Lighting Research and Technology2015. , doi: 10.1177/1477153515581412.
27.
LoeDLMansfieldKPRowlandsE. Appearance of the lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: experimental study. Lighting Research and Technology1994; 26(3): 119–133.
28.
LoeDLMansfieldKPRowlandsE. A step in quantifying the appearance of a lit scene. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32(4): 213–222.
29.
VenningBPoultonKShawKLoeDLRaynhamPHoggettN. Cuttle's theory, the profession responds. Society of Light and Lighting Newsletter2010; 3(1): 7–9.
30.
MacraeI. Comment 1: A new direction for general lighting practice. Lighting Research and Technology2013; 45(1): 34–36.
31.
BrandstonHM. Comment 3: Towards the third stage of the lighting profession. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42(1): 90–91.
32.
WildeMB. Comment 2: A new direction for general lighting practice. Lighting Research and Technology2013; 45(1): 36–38.
33.
BedocsL. Comment 1: Towards the third stage of the lighting profession. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42(1): 87–89.
34.
MansfieldKP. Comment 2: Towards the third stage of the lighting profession. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42(1): 89–90.
35.
VrabelPLBerneckerCAMistrickRG. Visual performance and visual clarity under electric light sources: Part II – visual clarity. Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society1998; 27(1): 29–41.
36.
FechnerGT. Elementeder Psychopysik, Munich: Breitkopf und Hartel, 1860.
37.
AdamsQECobbPW. The effect of foveal vision on bright and dark surroundings. Journal of Experimental Psychology1992; 5: 39–45.
38.
StevensSS. To honour Fechner and repeal his law. Science1961; 3446: 80–86.
