We introduce a way to simultaneously measure the light density, light vector and diffuseness of the light field using a cubic illumination meter based on the spherical harmonics representation of the light field. This approach was applied to six light probe images of natural scenes and four real scenes built in our laboratory, and the results were compared to those obtained using Cuttle’s method. We also demonstrated a way to simultaneously and intuitively visualise the global structure of the light distribution using light tubes and colour coding for the light density, light flow and diffuseness variations through the space. Together with Mury’s work, we have a complete way to describe, measure and visualise the local and global low-order properties of light distributions in three-dimensional spaces.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KellyR. Lighting as an integral part of architecture. College Art Journal1952; 12: 24–30.
2.
KellyRNeumannDAddingtonDM. The Structure of Light: Richard Kelly and the Illumination of Modern Architecture, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.
3.
CuttleC. A new direction for general lighting practice. Lighting Research and Technology2013; 45: 22–39.
4.
Boyce P. Lighting quality for all: Proceedings of SLL and CIBSE Ireland International Lighting Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 12 April: 2013.
5.
KellyKDuffJ. Lighting design in Europe: Aligning the demands for lower energy usage with better quality. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture2015; 9: 283–290.
6.
Cuttle C. Perceived adequacy of illumination: A new basis for lighting practice: Proceedings of the 3rd Professional Lighting Design Convention, Professional Lighting Designers Association, Madrid, Spain, Oct 19–22: 2011: 27–31.
7.
CuttleC. Towards the third stage of the lighting profession. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 73–93.
8.
PontSCKoenderinkJJ. Matching illumination of solid objects. Perception and Psychophysics2007; 69: 459–468.
9.
CuttleC. Lighting patterns and the flow of light. Lighting Research and Technology1971; 3: 171–189.
10.
Madsen M, Donn M. Experiments with a digital “light-flow-meter” in daylight art museum buildings: 5th International Radiance Scientific Workshop, Leicester UK, September 13–14: 2006.
11.
KoenderinkJJPontSCvan DoornAJKappersAMLToddJT. The visual light field. Perception2007; 36: 1595–1610.
12.
KoenderinkJJvan DoornAJKappersAMLPontSCToddJT. The perception of light fields in empty space. Journal of Vision2005; 5: 558–558.
13.
Te Pas SF, Pont SC. A comparison of material and illumination discrimination performance for real rough, real smooth and computer generated smooth spheres: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, Spain: ACM, August 26–28: 2005: 75–81.
14.
GershunA. The light field (translated by Moon, PH and Timoshenko, G). Journal of Mathematics and Physics1939; 18: 51–151.
15.
MuryAA. The light field in natural scenes, Delft: Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2009.
16.
Frandsen S. The scale of light – A new concept and its application:Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Architecture, Paris, December 4–9: 1989: 4–8.
17.
HewittHBridgersDSimonsR. Lighting and the environment: Some studies in appraisal and design. Lighting Research and Technology1965; 30: 91–116.
18.
Cuttle C, Valentine W, Lynes J, Burt W. Beyond the working plane. Proceedings of the CIE, Washington, DC, June 19–28: 1967, P-67-12.
19.
MorgensternYGeislerWSMurrayRF. Human vision is attuned to the diffuseness of natural light. Journal of Vision2014; 14: 1–18.
20.
CuttleC. Cubic illumination. Lighting Research and Technology1997; 29: 1–14.
21.
CuttleC. Research note: A practical approach to cubic illuminance measurement. Lighting Research and Technology2014; 46: 31–34.
22.
MuryAAPontSCKoenderinkJJ. Representing the light field in finite three-dimensional spaces from sparse discrete samples. Applied Optics2009; 48: 450–457.
23.
RamamoorthiRHanrahanP. On the relationship between radiance and irradiance: Determining the illumination from images of a convex Lambertian object. Journal of the Optical Society of America A2001; 18: 2448–2459.
24.
Debevec P. Rendering synthetic objects into real scenes: Bridging traditional and image-based graphics with global illumination and high dynamic range photography: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 classes, Los Angeles, CA: ACM, August 11–15: 2008: Vol. 32:1–10.
XiaLPontSCHeynderickxI. The visual light field in real scenes. i-Perception2014; 5: 613–629.
27.
LynesJBurtWJacksonGCuttleC. The flow of light into buildings. Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society (London)1966; 31: 65–91.
28.
DaleNBroadbridgeJCrowtherP. Measuring the direction of the flow of light. Lighting Research and Technology1972; 4: 43–44.
29.
Ashdown I, Eng P. The virtual photometer: Modeling the flow of light: Proceedings of IESNA 1998 Annual Conference Technical Papers, San Antonio, TX, August 10–12: 1998.
30.
BelhumeurPNKriegmanDJYuilleAL. The bas-relief ambiguity. International Journal of Computer Vision1999; 35: 33–44.
31.
KoenderinkJJPontSC. Irradiation direction from texture. Journal of the Optical Society of America A2003; 20: 1875–1882.
32.
FullerMUptonMWhalenJ. The photometry of the flow of light. Lighting Research and Technology1971; 3: 282–284.
33.
SingletonWT. The Body at Work: Biological Ergonomics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
34.
MuryAAPontSCKoenderinkJJ. Light field constancy within natural scenes. Applied Optics2007; 46: 7308–7316.
35.
MuryAAPontSCKoenderinkJJ. The structure of light fields in natural scenes. Applied Optics2009; 48: 5386–5395.
