Glare and mounting height of high-beam headlamps used as daytime running lamps

Abstract

This analytical study examined the effects of mounting height on discomfort glare from reduced-power high-beam headlamps used as automotive daytime running lamps. Of interest were the effects for mounting heights between 0.864 m (34 in) and 1.372 m (54 in) - the range in which full-power low beams are currently allowed, but reduced-power high beams are not. Three analyses were performed. The first analysis involved estimating the illuminance reaching a preceding driver via rearview mirrors. The second analysis compared glare illuminance from reduced-power high beams with that from full-power low beams. The third analysis evaluated the expected changes in discomfort-glare ratings from reduced-power high beams as a function of increased mounting height. The analyses were based on photometric information from five high beams and 43 low beams from lamps manufactured for the United States market. They were performed for five following distances and three lateral offsets of the vehicles. The results indicate that allowing reduced-power high beams with mounting heights between 0.864 m and 1.372 m would not appreciably increase discomfort glare for preceding drivers as compared with (a) glare from reduced-power high beams at a mounting height of 0.864 m, or with (b) glare from currently allowed full-power low beams.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment Standard 108 in Code of Federal Regulations (Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register) (1994)

Kirkpatrick M. , Baker C C and Heasly C C A study of daytime running light design factors Report No. DOT HS 807 193 (Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) (1987)

Kirkpatrick M. and Marshall R.K. Evaluation of glare from daytime running lights Report No. DOT HS 807 502 (Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) (1989)

Schmidt-Clausen H.J. and Bindels J T H

Assessment of discomfort glare in motor vehicle lighting

Lighting Res. Technol. 6 79-88 (1974)

Sivak M. , Simmons C.J. and Flannagan M.J.

Effect of headlamp area on discomfort glare

Lighting Res. Technol. 22 49-52 (1990)

Sivak M. , Flannagan M.J. , Ensing M. and Simmons C.J.

Discomfort glare is task dependent

Int. J. Vehicle Design 12 152-159 (1991)

Huey R. , Dekker D and Lyons R Driver perception ofjust-noticeable differences of automotive signal lamp intensities Report No. DOT HS 808 209 (Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ) (1994)

de Boer J.B. Visual perception in road traffic and the field of vision of the motorist in J B de Boer (ed.) Public lighting (Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Philips Technical Library) (1967)

Sivak M. , Olson P.L. and Zeltner K.A.

Effect of prior headlighting experience on ratings of discomfort glare

Human Factors 31 391-395 (1989)

10.

Platzer G. The geometry of automotive rearview mirrors: Why blind zones exists and strategies to overcome them in Human factors in vehicle design Special Publication SP-1088 (Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers) (1995)

11.

Ward's Automotive Yearbook 1995 (Southfield, MI: Ward's Communications) (1995 )

12.

Sivak M. , Flannagan M.J. and Sato T.

Light output of US, European and Japanese low-beam headlamps

Transportation Research Record 1456 99-111(1994)