When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation

Abstract

In this paper we will test one of the key assumptions of Situational Action Theory: that individuals’ (law-relevant) morality is more fundamental to their crime involvement than their ability to exercise self-control. We specifically hypothesize that, for individuals with a strong morality, their capability to exercise self-control plays less of a role in their crime involvement than it does for individuals with a weak morality, whose capability to exercise self-control may substantially influence their engagement in crime. To test this hypothesis we use data from the Peterborough Youth Study (PYS), a cross-sectional survey of 1957 adolescents aged 14—15 from the UK city of Peterborough. The findings support the main hypothesis: young people with a strong (law-relevant) morality do not engage in crime, regardless of their ability to exercise self-control. However, among those with a weaker (law-relevant) morality, their ability to exercise self-control is an important factor in their crime involvement.

Keywords

adolescent offending crime interaction effects morality Peterborough Youth Study self-control situational action theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew R. ( 2003) The interactive effects of social control variables on delinquency. In: Britt CL, Gottfredson MR (eds) Control Theories of Crime and Delinquency. Advances in criminological theory, vol. 12. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 53-76.

Aiken LS , West SG ( 1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions . Newbury Park. CA: Sage Publications .

Antonaccio O. , Tittle CR ( 2008) Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology 46: 479-510.

Baron SW ( 2003). Self-control, social consequences, and criminal behavior: Street youth and the General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 40: 403-425.

Blalock HM, Jr ( 1965). Theory building and the statistical concept of interaction . American Sociological Review 30: 374-380.

Brownfield D. , Sorensen AM ( 1993) Self-control and juvenile delinquency: Theoretical issues and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a General Theory of Crime . Deviant Behavior 4: 243-264.

Chapple CL , McQuillan JA , and Berdahl TA ( 2005) Gender, social bonds, and delinquency: A comparison of boys’ and girls’ models. Social Science Research 34: 357-383.

Cohen J. , Cohen P. ( 1983) Applied Multiple Regression for the Behavioural Sciences . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

De Li S. ( 2004) The impacts of self-control and social bond on juvenile delinquency in a national sample of mid-adolescents. Deviant Behavior 25: 351-373.

10.

Farrington DP ( 1998) Predictors, causes, and correlates of male youth violence . In: Tonry M (ed.) Youth violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 421-476.

11.

Finkel EJ , Campell KW ( 2001) Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: an interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 263-277.

12.

Friedrich RJ ( 1982) In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science 26: 797-833.

13.

Gibbs JJ , Giever D. , and Martin JS ( 1998) Parental management and self control: an empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 35: 40-70.

14.

Gibbs JJ , Giever D. , and Higgins GE ( 2003) A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory using structural equation modelling. Criminal Justice and Behavior 30: 441-458.

15.

Gottfredson MR , Hirschi T. ( 1990) A General Theory Of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

16.

Grasmick HG , Tittle CR , Bursik RJ , and Arneklev BJ ( 1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30: 5-29.

17.

Hawkins DJ , Herrenkohl T. , Farrington DP , Brewer D. , Catalano RF , and Harachi TW ( 1998) In: Loeber R , Farrington DP (eds) Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 106-146.

18.

Hay C. ( 2001) Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: a test of self-control theory. Criminology 39: 707-736.

19.

Herrenkohl TI , Huang B. , Kosterman R. , Hawkins DJ , Catalano RF , and Smith BH ( 2001) A comparison of social development processes leading to violent behavior in late adolescence for childhood initiators and adolescent initiators of violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 38: 45-63.

20.

Hirschi T. ( 1969) Causes of delinquency. Berkeley : University of California Press.

21.

Jaccard J. , Turrisi R. , and Wan CK ( 1990) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

22.

Jan Stams G. , Brugman D. , Deković M. , van Rosmalen L. , van der Laan P. , and Gibbs JC ( 2006) The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis . Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 34:697-713.

23.

LaGrange TC , Silverman RA ( 1999) Low self-control and opportunity: Testing the General Theory of Crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology 37: 41-72.

24.

Loeber R. , Farrington DP , Stouthamer-Loeber M. , and Van Kammen WB ( 1998) Antisocial Behavior and Mental Health Problems: Explanatory Factors in Childhood and Adolescence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

25.

Longshore D. ( 1998) Self-control and criminal opportunity: a prospective test of the General Theory of Crime. Social Problems 45: 102-113.

26.

Longshore D. , Chang E. , Hsieh S-C. , and Messina N. ( 2004) Self-control and social bonds: a combined control perspective on deviance. Crime and Delinquency 50: 542-564.

27.

MacCallum RC , Zhang S. , Preacher KJ , and Rucker DD ( 2002) On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables . Psychological Methods 7: 19-40.

28.

Pratt TC and Cullen FT ( 2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime: a meta analysis. Criminology 38: 931-964.

29.

Shoepfer A. , Piquero AR ( 2006) Self-control, moral beliefs, and criminal activity . Deviant Behavior 27: 51-71.

30.

Svensson R. ( 2004) Shame as a consequence of parent-child relationship: a study of gender differences in juvenile delinquency. European Journal of Criminology 1: 477-504.

31.

Tittle CR , Ward DA , and Grasmick HG ( 2003) Gender, age, and crime/deviance: a challenge to self-control theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 40: 426-453.

32.

Vazsonyi AT , Pickering LE , Junger M. , and Hessing D. ( 2001) An empirical test of a General Theory of Crime: a four nation comparative study of self-control and prediction of deviance . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 38: 91-131.

33.

Wikström P-O H ( 2004) Crime as alternative. Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In: Joan McCord (ed.) Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1-37.

34.

Wikström P-O H ( 2005) The social origins of pathways in crime: Towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes . In: Farrington DP (ed.) Testing Integrated Developmental/Life Course Theories of Offending. Advances in Criminological Theory. New Brunswick: Transaction, 211-245.

35.

Wikström P-O H ( 2006) Individuals, settings and acts of crime: situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In: Wikström P-O H , Sampson RJ (eds) The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61-107.

36.

Wikström P-O H ( 2009). Crime propensity, criminogenic exposure and crime involvement in early to mid adolescence. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtreform 92: 253-266.

37.

Wikström P-O H ( 2010a) Situational Action Theory. In: Cullen F , Wilcox P (eds) Encyclopaedia of Criminological Theory. Beverly Hills, CA. SAGE Publications.

38.

Wikström P-O H ( 2010b) Explaining crime as moral actions. In: Hitlin S , Vaysey S (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. New York . Springer Verlag.

39.

Wikström P-O H , Butterworth DA ( 2006) Adolescent Crime: Individuals Differences and Lifestyles . Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing .

40.

Wikström P-O H , Treiber K. ( 2007) The role of self-control in crime causation. Beyond Gottfredson Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. European Journal of Criminology 4: 237-264.

41.

Wikström P-O H , Treiber K. ( 2009a) What drives persistent offending? The neglected and unexplored role of the social environment. In: Savage J (ed.) The Development of Persistent Criminality . Oxford: Oxford University Press , 389-422.

42.

Wikström P-O H , Treiber K. ( 2009b) Violence as situational action. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 3: 75-96.

43.

Wikström P-O H , Ceccato V. , Hardie B. , and Treiber K. ( 2010) Activity fields and the dynamics of crime. Advancing knowledge about the role of the environment in crime causation. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25: 55-87.