A fair educational standard

Abstract

In this article, I propose and defend a certain model of a fair Educational Standard, where this represents the minimally adequate threshold conditions and resources that any just society will devote to the grade school education of its youth. Starting with suggestions made by Harry Frankfurt, I argue that this Standard may be initially founded upon the norm of ‘sufficiency‘, so that the Standard comes to require the provision of whatever educational resources are needed to enable children to lead minimally decent lives as adults. Largely because of the social inequities that it would allow, however, I argue that this norm of sufficiency is not enough, by itself, to constitute the Educational Standard, but that the norm of ‘equal educational opportunity’ (EEO) must also be incorporated. And I defend a certain conception of EEO, from among various competing conceptions. Ultimately, then, this article seeks to establish these twin components (a set of sufficiency conditions and a certain conception of EEO) as being individually necessary and jointly sufficient for any truly just and complete educational standard.

Keywords

educational standard equal educational opportunity sufficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura, A. (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. NY: W.H. Freeman & Co .

Blackstone, W.T. , ed. (1969) The Concept of Equality. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Co .

Fishkin, J.S. (1983) Justice, Equal Opportunity, and the Family. New Haven: Yale University Press .

Frankfurt, H. (1987) ‘Equality as a moral ideal’ , Ethics 98: 21-43 .

Frankfurt, H. (2000) ‘The moral irrelevance of equality’ , Public Affairs Quarterly 14(2): 87-103 .

Goodin, R. (1982) Political Theory and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .

Gutmann, A. (1980) ‘Children, paternalism and education: A liberal argument’ , Philosophy & Public Affairs 9(4): 338-358 .

Gutmann, A. (1999) Democratic Education (With a New Preface and Epilogue). Princeton: Princeton University Press .

Jencks, C. (1972) Inequality, Basic Books, NY.

10.

Jencks, C. (1988) ‘Whom must we treat equally for educational opportunity to be equal?’ Ethics 98: 18-33 .

11.

Kozol, J. (1992) Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools. NY: Harper Perennial .

12.

LaFollette, H. (1980) ‘Parental licensing’ , Philosophy and Public Affairs 9(2): 182-197 .

13.

Macedo, S. and Young, I.M. , eds (2003) Child, Family, and the State, NOMOS XLIV. NY: NYU Press .

14.

Narayan, U. and Bartkowiak, J.J. , eds (1999) Having and Raising Children, University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press .

15.

Rawls, J. (1971) Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

16.

Roemer, J. (1998) Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

17.

Ryan, A. (1998) Liberal Anxieties and Liberal Education. NY: Hill and Wang .

18.

Sher, G. (1987) Desert. Princeton: Princeton University Press .

19.

Singer, P. (1975) Animal Liberation. NY: New York Review .

20.

Williams, B. (1969) ‘The idea of equality’, in W.T. Blackstone (ed.) The Concept of Equality, pp. 35-53. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co .

21.

Zimmerman, B.J. (1995) ‘Self-efficacy and educational development’, in Albert Bandura (ed.) Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .