Galston’s dilemmas and Wisconsin v. Yoder

Abstract

William Galston posed two dilemmas about parental rights and education in Liberal Purposes.The first of these arises from conflict between the proper ends of civic education in a liberal society and the values that some parents will want to honor in the way they rear their children; the second arises from conflict between how the basic interests of the child are understood by the wider society and the dissident views of some parents. Galston’s approach to the dilemmas strongly emphasized deference to parental choice. Galston returns to these dilemmas in his recent Liberal Pluralism and endorses the approach he had earlier defended within the context of a theory of the ethical foundations of liberal politics. He uses the US Supreme Court’s decision in Wisconsin v.Yoder as a test case for his argument. This article offers an internal critique of Galston’s treatment of the two dilemmas in Liberal Pluralism and finds it unsatisfactory in some respects.

Keywords

autonomy children’s rights civic education parents’ rights

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dworkin, R. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

Galston, W. A. (1991) Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .

Galston, W. A. (2002) Liberal Pluralism: the Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .

Galston, W. A. (2005) The Practice of Liberal Pluralism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .

Peters, W. A. (2003) The Yoder Case: Religious Freedom, Education, and Parental Rights. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press) .

Wisconsin v. Yoder. 406 U.S. 205 (1972) (US Supreme Court).