Mapping policy influence in a contemporary education ecosystem: A conceptual study utilizing social network analysis to visualize relationships between the Florida Empowerment Scholarship Program (FESP) and sources of capital
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Mapping policy influence in a contemporary education ecosystem: A conceptual study utilizing social network analysis to visualize relationships between the Florida Empowerment Scholarship Program (FESP) and sources of capital
This study utilizes social network analysis (SNA) to trace the flow of influence and capital within Florida’s evolving public-private education marketplace. Drawing from theories in communications, organizational behavior, and policy analysis, we examine the development and legislative passage of Florida’s Empowerment Scholarship Program (FESP), one of the most expansive ESA initiatives in the United States. Using a multi-tiered SNA framework, we analyze the political sponsorship, lobbying engagement, and financial contributions tied to 19 FESP-related bills introduced between 2017 and 2023. Our analysis is structured around three network layers: Primary (direct political and lobbying tiers), Secondary (financial contributions to policymakers), and Tertiary (indirect affiliations such as shared organizational leadership). Findings reveal a tightly connected network of recurring actors—most notably specific legislators, lobbying firms, and education advocacy organizations—who exerted consistent influence across all three tiers. These results underscore the complexity of policy formation in decentralized education systems and highlight the value of SNA in exposing patterns of influence that are not readily visible through traditional policy analysis.
AppleMW (2006) Educating the “Right” Way: Markets, Standards, God, and Inequality. 2nd edition. Routledge.
2.
BallSJ (2012) Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neo-Liberal Imaginary. Routledge.
3.
BallSJBoweRGerwitzS (1996) School choice, social class, and distinction: The realization of social advantage in education. Journal of Education Policy11(1): 89–112. doi: 10.1080/0268093960110105, In press.
4.
BalserWColemanH (2020) Beyond the public-private nexus: a framework for examining school partnership governance in a blended capital reality. Journal of Transformative Leadership & Policy Studies8(2): 34–46.
5.
BavelasA (1950) Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America22(6): 725–730.
6.
BiestaGGulsonKNLingardB, et al. (2022) Philosophy of education in a new key: publicness, social justice, and education; a South–North conversation. Educational Philosophy and Theory54(3): 263–273.
7.
BorgattiSPMehraABrassDJ, et al. (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science323(5916): 892–895.
8.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, 241–258.
9.
BulkleyKEBurchP (2011) Going private? The role of privatization in education. In: AppleMBallSGandinL (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education. Routledge, 444–452.
10.
CastellsM (2000) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Blackwell, Vol. I.
11.
ChubbJEMoeTM (1990) Politics, Markets and America’s Schools. Brookings Institution Press.
12.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94. doi: 10.1086/228943.
13.
ContractorNSMongePR (2002) Managing knowledge networks. Management Communication Quarterly16(2): 249–258.
14.
CsardiGNepuszT (2006) The Igraph software package for complex network research. Complex Systems, In press.
15.
CurryAHodgsonA (2008) Seeing in multiple Horizons: connecting futures to strategy. Journal of Futures Studies13(1): 1–20.
FriedmanM (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
18.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469, In press.
19.
HarrisDHerringWAlbeeA (2008) The future of vouchers: lessons from the adoption, design, and court challenges of Florida’s voucher programs. Educational Policy22(1): 56–87.
20.
HeaneyMT (2006) Brokering health policy: coalitions, parties, and interest group influence. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law31(5): 887–944.
21.
HeiligJVBrewerTJAdamsonF (2019a) The comingling of neoliberal ideology, methods, and funding in school choice politics and research. In: BerendsMPrimusASpringerM (eds) Handbook of Research on School Choice. 2nd edition. Routledge, 335–350.
22.
HeiligJVBrewerTJAdamsonF (2019b) The politics of market-based school choice research: a comingling of ideology, methods, and funding. In: BerendsMPrimusASpringerM (eds) Handbook of Research on School Choice. 2nd edition. Routledge, 335–350.
23.
HolmeJJ (2002) Buying homes, buying schools: school choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review72(2): 177–206.
HuertaLd’EntremontC (2017) Strengthening Oversight of Education Savings Account (ESA) Programs. National Education Policy Center.
26.
KeimDAAndrienkoGFeketeJD, et al. (2008) Visual analytics: definition, process, and challenges. In: KerrenAStaskoJTFeketeJ, et al. (eds) Information Visualization: Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives. Springer, 154–175.
27.
KnokeD (1990) Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge University Press, In press.
28.
LabareeDF (1997) How to Succeed in School Without Really Learning. Yale University Press.
29.
LareauAGoyetteK (eds) (2014) Choosing Homes, Choosing Schools. Russell Sage Foundation.
30.
LaumannEOKnokeD (1987) The organizational state: School choice and national policy domains. University of Wisconsin Press, In press.
31.
LazegaESnidjersT.A.B. (2016) Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences: Theory, methods, and applications. Springer, In press.
32.
LubienskiC (2005a) School choice as a civil right: district responses to competition and equal educational opportunity. Equity & Excellence in Education38(4): 331–341.
33.
LubienskiC (2005b) Public schools in marketized environments: shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition-based educational reforms. American Journal of Education111(4): 469–514.
34.
LubienskiC (2006) School choice and privatization in education: an alternative analytical framework. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies4(1): 1–26.
35.
LubienskiCBrewerTJLa LondePG (2016) Orchestrating policy ideas: philanthropies and think tanks in US education policy advocacy networks. Australian Educational Researcher43(1): 55–73.
36.
MarsdenPV (2002) Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social Networks24(4): 407–422.
37.
MazzoniT (1991) Analyzing state school policy making: an arena model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis13: 115–138.
38.
MillerP (2001) Governing by numbers: Why ranking ystems matter. Social Research: An International Quarterly68(2): 379–396, In press.
MintromMVergariS (1998) Policy networks and innovation diffusion: the case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics60(1): 126–148.
41.
Newman (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences98(2): 404–409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404, In press.
42.
PadillaLMCreem-RegehrSHHegartyM, et al. (2018) Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications3: 29.
43.
PapastephanouMZembylasMBurbulesNC, et al. (2022) Philosophy of education in a new key: education for justice now. Educational Philosophy and Theory54(3): 274–288.
44.
PetersMAArndtSTesarM, et al. (2020) Philosophy of education in a new key: a collective project of the PESA executive. Educational Philosophy and Theory1-22: 2–3, A return of political philosophy.
45.
PetridouEMintromM (2021) A research agenda for the study of policy entrepreneurs. Policy Studies Journal49(4): 943–967.
46.
PiccianoAGSpringJ (2013) The Great American Education-Industrial Complex: Ideology, Technology, and Profit. Routledge.
47.
ReckhowS (2013) Follow the Money: How Foundation Dollars Change Public School Politics. Oxford University Press.
48.
ScottJ (2013) School choice as a civil right: the political construction of a claim and its implications for school desegregation. In: FrankenbergEDeBrayE (eds) Integrating Schools in a Changing Society. University of North Carolina Press, 32–52.
49.
ScottJJabbarH (2014) The rise of market-oriented advocacy. In: LaytonABrewerTL (eds) American Education and the Demography of the US Student Population. Palgrave Macmillan, 151–178.
50.
SengeP (1997) The fifth discipline: Building Learning Organizations. Currency Doubleday, In press.
51.
SengeP (2014) The dance of change: The challenge of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. Crown Business, In press.
52.
WalkerK. (2022). Network visualization and interpretation in applied policy research. [Working paper].
53.
WassermanSFaustK (2012) Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, In press.
54.
WickhamH, et al. (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software.
55.
WilliamsonBHoganA (2020) Commercialisation and privatisation in/of education in the context of COVID-19. Education International Research Paper.
