Unveiling Political (Dis)trust Building across Different Life Stages: A Focus Group Analysis on Trust and Distrust to COVID-Related Restrictions in Italy
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2026
Unveiling Political (Dis)trust Building across Different Life Stages: A Focus Group Analysis on Trust and Distrust to COVID-Related Restrictions in Italy
Why did citizens trust (or not trust) political actors making binding decisions? How did levels of trust vary with age, and why? This article addresses these questions by examining the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy as a natural experiment. Drawing on focus groups from different age cohorts and conducting a qualitative thematic analysis, we aim to determine whether and how citizens’ appraisals—and, crucially, their justifications—vary across age groups, with particular focus on youth perspectives. Our findings suggest that younger citizens based their assessments on the perceived governmental “responsibility,” whereas older citizens evaluated it on the basis of the government’s perceived “rationality.”
AcocellaI (2012) The Focus Groups in Social Research: Advantages and Disadvantages. Quality and Quantity46: 1125–1136.
2.
AlteriLParksRRaffiniL, et al. (2021) Covid-19 and the Structural Crisis of Liberal Democracies. Determinants and Consequences of the Governance of Pandemic. Partecipazione e Conflitto14 (1): 1–37.
3.
AmatFArenasAFalcó-GimenoA, et al. (2020) Pandemics Meet Democracy. Experimental Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in Spain (OSF Preprints). Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/dkusw/ (accessed 30 June 2024).
4.
ArnettJJ (2000) Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development from the Late Teens through the Twenties. American Psychologist55 (5): 469–480.
5.
BaierA (1986) Trust and Anti-Trust. Ethics96 (2): 231–260.
6.
BelchiorAMTeixeiraCP (2023) Determinants of Political Trust during the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Putting Policy Performance into Evidence. Political Studies Review21 (1): 82–98.
7.
BertuzziNLagalisseELelloEGoboGSenaB (2022) Investigating Vaccine Controversies during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Partecipazione e Conflitto15 (3): 507–529.
8.
BiSBuyukcan-TetikAMaesM, et al. (2022) Changes in Late Adolescents’ Trust before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth27 (1): 385–399.
9.
BickertonCInvernizziC (2017) Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements?Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 (2): 186–206.
10.
BleichEPekkanenR (2013) How to Report Interview Data. In MosleyL (ed.) Interview in Political Science Research. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp.84–108.
11.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3 (2): 77–101.
12.
BullM (2021) The Italian Government Response to Covid-19 and the Making of a Prime Minister. Contemporary Italian Politics13 (2): 149–165.
13.
CapelosTChronaSSalmelaM, et al. (2021) Reactionary Politics and Resentful Affect in Populist Times. Politics and Governance9 (3): 186–190.
14.
CarstensJ (2023) Unpacking Political Trust: A Review of Conceptualisations, Determinants, and Consequences. French Politics21: 295–314.
15.
CeccobelliDVaccariC (2021) A Virus in the Hybrid Media System: How the Conte Government Communicated the Coronavirus Crisis. Contemporary Italian Politics13 (2): 259–274.
16.
ChoiWJungJHKimHH (2023) Political Trust, Mental Health, and the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Cross-National Study. Research on Aging45 (2): 133–148.
17.
CrabuSGiardulloPSciandraA, et al. (2021) Politics Overwhelms Science in the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the Whole Coverage of the Italian Quality Newspapers. PLoS ONE16 (5): e0252034.
18.
de LeónEMakhortykhMGil-LopezT, et al. (2023) News, Threats, and Trust: How COVID-19 News Shaped Political Trust, and How Threat Perceptions Conditioned This Relationship. The International Journal of Press/Politics28 (4): 952–974.
19.
De MoorJDe VydtMUbaK, et al. (2020) New Kids on the Block: Taking Stock of the Recent Cycle of Climate Activism. Social Movement Studies20 (5): 619–625.
20.
Della PortaD (2005) Deliberation in Movement: Why and How to Study Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements. Acta Politica40: 336–350.
21.
Della PortaDLavizzariA (2022) Waves in Cycle: The Protests against Anti-Contagion Measures and Vaccination in Covid-19 Times in Italy. Partecipazione e Conflitto15 (3): 720–740.
22.
DevineDGaskellJJenningsW, et al. (2021) Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What Are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature. Political Studies Review19 (2): 274–285.
23.
EastonD (1965) A System Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
24.
EichengreenBSakaOAksoyC (2020) The Political Scar of Pandemics. NBER Working Papers. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w27401 (accessed 30 June 2024).
25.
EsaiassonPSohlbergJGhersettiM, et al. (2021) How the Coronavirus Crisis Affects Citizen Trust in Institutions and in Unknown Others: Evidence from “the Swedish Experiment.”European Journal of Political Research60 (3): 748–760.
26.
FarjamMBianchiFSquazzoniF, et al. (2021) Dangerous Liaisons: An Online Experiment on the Role of Scientific Experts and Politicians in Ensuring Public Support for Anti-COVID Measures. Royal Society Open Science, 8: 201310.
27.
FiedlerCMarcos-MarneHMrossK (2024) COVID-19 and Political Trust in Local Governments: Evidence from Nepal. Political Studies Review22 (4): 930–947.
28.
GajserT (2008) Online Focus Groups. In: FieldingIBlankGLeeRM (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: Sage, pp.290–307.
29.
GoboGCampoESerafiniL (2023) Trust and Distrust in Science: Embedding the Interplay among Scientists, Mass Media and Public in Italy during the SARS-Cov-2 Outbreak. Social Science Information62 (3): 367–389.
30.
HarambamJVossE (2023) The Corona Truth Wars: Epistemic Disputes and Societal Conflicts around a Pandemic—An Introduction to the Special Issue. Minerva61 (3): 299–313.
31.
HetheringtonM (1998) The Political Relevance of Political Trust. American Political Science Review92 (4): 791–808.
32.
HoogheMWilkenfeldB (2008) The Stability of Political Attitudes and Behaviors across Adolescence and Early Adulthood: A Comparison of Survey Data on Adolescents and Young Adults in Eight Countries. Journal of Youth Adolescence37: 155–167.
33.
HortonR (2020) Offline: Covid-19 Is Not a Pandemic. The Lancet396: 874–874.
34.
IntawanCNicholsonSP (2018) My Trust in Government Is Implicit: Automatic Trust in Government and System Support. The Journal of Politics80 (2): 601–614.
35.
JedlowskiP (2012) Il Senso Del Futuro. I Quadri Sociali Della Capacità Di Aspirare. In: De LeonardisODeriuM (eds) Il Futuro Nel Quotidiano. Studi Sociologici Sulla Capacità di Aspirare. Milano: Egea, pp.1–18.
36.
KruegerR (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London: Sage.
37.
LelloE (2020) Young People and Politics in Italy in Times of Populism. In CuzzocreaVBelloBGKazepovY (eds) Italian Youth in International Context. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.23–40.
LelloEBertuzziNPedroniM, et al. (2022) Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy: Individualistic Claims or Repoliticisation?Partecipazione e Conflitto15 (3): 672–696.
40.
MuellerJ (1970) Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review 64 (1): 18–34.
41.
O’ReillyMDograN (2017) Interviewing Children and Young People for Research. London: Sage.
42.
PellizzoniL (2011) The Politics of Facts: Local Environmental Conflicts and Expertise. Environmental Politics20 (6): 765–785.
43.
PellizzoniLSenaB (2021) Preparedness as Governmentality. Probing the Italian Management of the Covid-19 Emergency. Sociologica15 (3): 61–83.
44.
PilatiFMiconiA (2022) The “Green Pass” Controversy in the Italian Twittersphere: A Digital Methods Mapping. Partecipazione e Conflitto15 (3): 549–566.
45.
PostSBienzeislerNLohöfenerM (2022) A Desire for Authoritative Science? How Citizens’ Informational Needs and Epistemic Beliefs Shaped Their Views of Science, News, and Policymaking in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Public Understanding of Science30 (5): 496–514.
46.
QadirASyvateraJ (2021) The Moral Authority of Science: Evidence from Parliamentary Debates in Seven Countries. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology8 (3): 265–293.
47.
RekkerRKeijsersLBranjeS, et al. (2015) Political Attitudes in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: Developmental Changes in Mean Level, Polarization, Rankorder Stability, and Correlates. Journal of Adolescence41: 136–147.
48.
SarracinoFGreylingTO’ConnorKJ, et al. (2021) Trust Predicts Compliance to Covid-19 Containment Policies: Evidence from Ten Countries Using Big Data. PLoS ONE18 (2): 101412.
49.
SchraffD (2021) Political Trust during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Rally around the Flag or Lockdown Effects?European Journal of Political Research60 (4): 1007–1017.
50.
SeraniD (2023) The Covid Pandemic Enters the Ballot Box: The Impact of Conspiracy Theories on Italians’ Voting Behaviour during the COVID-19 Crisis. Italian Political Science Review53 (1): 50–67.
51.
ŠerekJJuhováDSLomičováL (2022) The Legitimizing Roles of Respectful Treatment and Direct Democracy in Collective Decision-Making: A School-Based Study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology52 (2): 95–105.
52.
SiegristMZinggA (2014) The Role of Public Trust during Pandemics: Implications for Crisis Communication. European Psychologist19 (1): 23–32.
53.
TafuriSStefanizziPBianchiFP, et al. (2021) Vaccination Strategies between Compulsion and Incentives. The Italian Green Pass Experience. Expert Review of Vaccines21 (4): 423–425.
54.
Van ElsasE (2015) Political Trust as a Rational Attitude: A Comparison of the Nature of Political Trust across Different Levels of Education. Political Studies63: 1158–1178.
55.
WeinbergJ (2022) Can Political Trust Help to Explain Elite Policy Support and Public Behaviour in Times of Crisis? Evidence from the United Kingdom at the Height of the 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic. Political Studies70 (3): 655–679.
56.
YeagerDPurdie-VaughnsVHooperSY, et al. (2017) Loss of Institutional Trust among Racial and Ethnic Minority Adolescents: A Consequence of Procedural Injustice and a Cause of Life-Span Outcomes. Child Development88 (2): 658–676.
57.
ZamponiLBauklohACBertuzziN, et al. (2022) (Water) Bottles and (Street) Barricades: The Politicisation of Lifestyle-Centred Action in Youth Climate Strike Participation. Journal of Youth Studies25 (6): 854–875.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
