How First-Generation College Students Adjust to College

Abstract

This study explored the perceived barriers and supports related to college adjustment for first-generation college students at a large public university in the southeastern United States. Using social cognitive career theory as a framework, 15 college students participated in focus groups to discuss their adjustment to college and what they believed would have helped them better prepare for college. A qualitative analysis of themes resulted in identification of various barriers and supports, provided a multifaceted understanding of college adjustment, and highlighted the importance of preparing for college. Implications for career and school counselors are provided.

Keywords

first-generation college students social cognitive career theory college adjustment focus groups

First-generation college students (FGCs), those who are the first in their family to pursue postsecondary education, often lack information about the career development process (Tate et al., 2015). Additional studies are thus needed that explore student strengths and deficits and how programs are meeting the unique needs of FGCs. The current study served this purpose by exploring social-cognitive constructs of barriers to and supports for college adjustment and success among first-generation college students.

First-Generation College Students

FGCs represent about one quarter of all traditional college-aged students (Horn & Nunez, 2000), and they present with unique needs and strengths. They are more likely to be students of color, tend to be from lower income families, and have higher attrition rates from college (Nunez & Cuccaro-Alamin, 1998). They come to college with slightly lower ACT scores and typically rely on scholarships, grants, and loans to pay for schooling (Martinez, Sher, Krull, & Wood, 2009). In addition, FGCs are less likely to achieve their original educational aspirations than their peers from college-educated families (McCarron & Inkelas, 2006), often because they have to work part-time or full time during college (Pascarella, Pierson, Wolniak, & Terenzini, 2004).

FGCs also struggle with college adjustment. Some students believe they do not matter to their university and often feel disconnected from peers due to their FGC status (DeRosa & Dolby, 2014). Lower self-esteem or an external locus of control also appears to directly influence levels of adjustment (Aspelmeier, Love, McGill, Elliott, & Pierce, 2012). Many FGCs feel underprepared for college, citing difficulties with time management (Reid & Moore, 2008) and challenges understanding college culture (Collier & Morgan, 2007). Several studies (Bradbury & Mather, 2009; Stephens, Fryberg, Markus, Johnson, & Covarrubius, 2012) noted the need for more research on best practices for college adjustment or how first-generation students adapt in the face of these issues.

Most of the research on FGCs focuses on current college students and how they are progressing through school. For example, helpful and supportive mentors appear to increase college success (Stephens, Hameddani, & Destin, 2014). Other factors also seem to increase FGC success as well. In another study, Bryan and Simmons (2009) noted the importance of family support and positive peer influences, while Dennis, Phinney, and Chuateco (2005) identified the value of personal motivation to attend college. Finally, Tate et al. (2015) learned that student support programs in college were helpful for students as they moved toward a career goal. Although few studies consider what can be done prior to college to increase student success, one article that focused on prospective first-generation college students was Gibbons & Borders (2010), who found that seventh-grade students from families without college education already perceived a high number of barriers to college-going, so activities before college seem necessary. Taken together, the past research makes clear that FGCs appear to need assistance both before and during college.

Social Cognitive Career Theory

Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994) offers a model to explain why individuals make specific career and educational choices. According to SCCT, background characteristics, such as family income or parent education level, influence learning experiences, which in turn directly influence perceptions about ability to complete relevant tasks (self-efficacy) or what might happen if one did successfully complete a career-related task (outcome expectation). Career interests and actions are directly influenced by self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and perceived barriers and supports (Lent et al., 1994).

In their update of SCCT, Lent, Brown, and Hackett (2000) specifically highlighted the role of barriers and supports in the career development process. They suggested that research on perceived barriers, in particular, shift focus to better consider specific developmental tasks, to be considered as related to supports, and to view barriers as issues over time rather than solely in the immediate future. Subsequent research has consistently shown that contextual barriers and supports have direct effects on educational goals and persistence (e.g., within a specific major), as well as indirect effects via self-efficacy (e.g., Lent et al., 2001).

SCCT appears to accurately predict career development for diverse populations, including (prospective) FGCs (Gibbons & Borders, 2010; Tate et al., 2015), students from low-income families (Hsieh & Huang, 2014; Metheny & McWhirter, 2013), and students of color (Gonzalez, 2012; Navarro, Flores, Lee, & Gonzalez, 2014). SCCT also is a useful framework for understanding academic persistence and achievement (see Brown et al., 2008). As such, it is a particularly useful framework for understanding the college adjustment of FGCs.

The purpose of this study was to learn how FGCs adapted and adjusted to college life and learn what resources they felt would have helped them as they prepared to enter college. Limited research exists on the actual activities that most help FGCs adjust to college (Garriott, Hudyma, Keene, & Santiago, 2015) , so this study addressed a gap in the available research on specific successful high school interventions that colleges might build on to increase college adjustment. We used SCCT as a framework for focus group interviews with participants. Specifically, we wanted to know, as students who were the first in their families to attend college, students’ views on the specific barriers and supports that affected their college adjustment—both those that occurred prior to enrolling in college and those they experienced after enrolling.

Method

Participants

Participants (see Table 1) were 15 college students (11 women, 4 men) from a large, public state university in the southeastern United States. According to institutional data, the percentage of first-time freshmen at this university who received Pell grants (an indicator of familial financial need) their first fall of entry ranges from 26% to 34%, which is higher than at other comparable universities in the region. Approximately 25% of the university’s freshmen cohort self-identify as first-generation students with neither parent possessing a 4-year degree; roughly 7% of students in these cohorts were from families with neither parent progressing to college. The participants in the current study were the first 15 to respond to an e-mail request sent to a student listserv for first-generation and minority college students. The use of this listserv was intentional because we wanted only FGCs to participate in this study. Five (33%) self-identified as Black or African American, six (40%) as White, one (7%) as Asian, and three (20%) as bi- or multiracial. This compares to an undergraduate student population that was 6.9% Black or African American, 80.2% White, 2.7% Asian, and 2.5% bi- or multiracial (Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, n.d.). Over half of the participants (n = 8) were first-year students, six were second-year students, and one was a junior. The average age of the participants was 18.53 years, and ranged from 18 to 20. All participants planned to return to college next semester and planned, at least at this point, to continue to graduation.
Table 1.
Demographic Characteristics of the Focus Group Participants.

Self-reported race or ethnicity Class standing
Gender

First-year Sophomore Junior Senior All Women Men

Asian American 1 0 0 0 1 1 0

African American or Black 2 2 1 0 5 2 3

European American or White 2 4 0 0 6 5 0

Bi- or multiracial 3 0 0 0 3 3 1

All 8 6 1 0 15 11 4

Procedure

Focus groups were facilitated by the authors and an additional doctoral student. The first and third authors facilitated one group and the second author facilitated the second group with the additional doctoral student. Students self-selected into one of the two focus groups based on their scheduling availability. In each focus group, one researcher served as the primary facilitator and the other served as the recorder and back-up interviewer (Bender & Ewbank, 1994). All four researchers were White females trained in working with college-aged students in general and the interview protocol in particular.

All participants learned of the focus group through an email sent through an academic support center on campus, which focuses on assisting first-generation and minority college students. In the email invitation, FGCs who were in their first or second year in college were asked to e-mail the first author if they were interested in participating. The first 15 students to indicate interest in the focus group were invited to participate. The number of participants in each group was kept between 6 and 10, as suggested by Rabiee (2004). As noted by Gibbs (1997), the number of focus groups for research purposes can vary from one to more than four; the current study included two focus groups.

The interview protocol was designed by the first and third authors specifically for this study. Focus groups lasted 1 hour each, and all participants received a gift card for their participation. All interviews were audiotaped and then transcribed after being conducted. Prior to analysis, all transcripts were scrubbed of identifying information to protect participant identities.

Focus Group Protocol

We used focus groups in order to allow students to share experiences with their peers, modify their opinions during the group experience, and build on the ideas presented by others (Kidd & Parshall, 2000). According to Kidd and Parshall (2000), focus groups may be a more valuable way to collect information when studying marginalized groups. Because we used this approach, we considered the group, rather than each individual in the group, the focus of analysis, thereby acknowledging the power of the group process on the beliefs of the individuals who comprised the group (Kidd & Parshall, 2000). The focus group questions were designed using SCCT (Lent et al., 1994, 2013) constructs. SCCT was selected because we wanted to explore adjustment, perceived barriers, and supports to college-going constructs directly addressed in SCCT. Specifically, we asked about college adjustment (“How has the adjustment to college been for you?”), perceived barriers (“What barriers, or things that have made college-going difficult, have you faced, both before coming to college and now?”), perceived supports (“Who has been a support for you as you have navigated the college-going process?”), and recommendations for helping first-generation college-bound high school students in their college-going preparation (“What is your advice to us about creating a college planning program?”). Questions were followed up with probing and paraphrasing to elicit deep meaning (Bender & Ewbank, 1994).

Data Analysis

According to Rabiee (2004), the purpose of the study drives the analysis, and the analysis begins by returning to the intention of the study. In other words, focusing and refocusing on the purpose of the study assists in the analysis of the data. We followed the focus group data analysis procedures described by Rabiee (2004) and informed by Hsieh and Shannon (2005). In our first step, the two facilitators of each focus group met immediately following the interview to reflect on the experience and capture any reactions that may have emerged. Next, the first three authors read through the transcripts multiple times in order to immerse ourselves in the details as well as obtain a sense of the whole of the interview. As we read the transcripts, we considered the focus group as a focus for analysis rather than separating the individuals in the group into separate cases.

Our third step was to identify emerging themes by attaching descriptive statements to the various quotes in the transcripts. In this step, we also used the ideas of directed content analysis provided by Hsieh and Shannon (2005). Because our initial coding was concept-driven, or drawn from theory (Schreier, 2012), we had preconceived themes. These were all SCCT variables, including college self-efficacy, outcome expectations, barriers, and supports. We intentionally inquired about (most of) these constructs in the focus group interviews and purposely tried to identify them in our thematic analysis. Hsieh and Shannon (2005) noted that most analyses include a combination of concept- and data-driven themes, allowing us the opportunity to consider additional themes that emerged from the data itself. From this step onward, we met repeatedly to compare our coding and to reach consensus. Our fourth step involved categorizing the various quotes by category or theme to fully review the data for emerging and concept-driven themes (Rabiee, 2004). Finally, we considered the various quotes by theme and for overall meaning.

Trustworthiness and Credibility

Tracy (2010) offered various criteria for ensuring that qualitative analysis was credible, and we followed these recommendations to increase the trustworthiness of our research. First, we selected a relevant and significant topic. Second, we included a well-researched theory, SCCT, as the frame for our research questions, adding to the overall rigor. Third, prior to conducting the focus groups, we each considered our own biases and preconceived notions about the research topic. Fourth, we increased credibility by considering thick description, and we considered the voices of all participants. Fifth, we completed our research in an ethical manner, obtaining institutional review board approval and informed consent from participants and ensuring that participation was voluntary and nonpenalizing. In addition to Tracy’s (2010) recommendations, we also considered transferability and confirmability as suggested by Lincoln and Guba (1985). For transferability, we are ensuring that readers were informed the theoretical context of our research and that we assumed SCCT variables explained our findings. To offer confirmability, we each individually reviewed and coded the transcripts prior to meeting together, and we regularly returned to the original data to reconfirm our findings.

Findings

Questions asked during the focus group were formulated using concepts from SCCT. The concept-driven themes identified using SCCT that were supported by participants in this study were adjustment, barriers, and supports of going to college as a FGC. During our analysis, another theme, called double-edged sword, emerged. Additionally, two overarching themes, spanning across all question categories, developed: prepare yourself for change and prepare for college early. Each theme category is explicated and supported using participants’ words.

Adjustment to College

Adjustment to college, as reported by the participants, involved learning about self, academic adjustment, balance, and self-care. All of these behaviors seemed to affect overall adjustment to and satisfaction with college. Participants described their subjective experiences with each of these four subtheme categories given here.

Learning about self

One theme related to adjustment was learning about self. Self-growth involved gaining independence and developing a personal and professional identity. For example, one participant noted, “It was first kind of hard to adjust to the responsibility of having to do everything on your own. And it is just now you and the world, and you have to take care of yourself in it.” Another individual added,
I can really relate to that because going into college you think you have it all figured out, but it takes a lot of courage to realize that, hey, this is kind of a mess, and I need to take it one step at a time. Just find yourself and who you want to be.
Participants explained that they were exploring their place in the world and how adjusting to college involved personal insight and understanding.

Academic adjustment

Another of theme of adjustment related to academics. Academic adjustment consisted of managing expectations, meeting deadlines, and seeking assistance to succeed in coursework. Participants described having to adjust to academic rigor in college. For example, one person mentioned,
The hardest adjustment, for me, was that in high school, I never really had to study anything. Everything really came easy. And then I got here, and it was a really big adjustment in time management, to buckle down and get my priorities straight.
Another said,
I think the hardest thing for me was that I never had to have tutoring in high school. It just sort of came naturally and now I’m learning things that are so far beyond my comprehension, but I know they are so important that I have to learn them. So I guess going to tutoring, finding a tutor that I work well with, and making a schedule with him … … That was hard for me to find people that I could work with to learn from.
Overall, the students did not feel prepared for the shift from high school academics to college-level coursework but were managing to succeed.

Balance

As the participants spoke of adjusting to college as FGCs, they also discussed balance. They found themselves torn between visiting home often and focusing on school, while experiencing a wide range of emotions regarding the shift. For example, one student said,
I think not going home is the hardest part. I have been home almost every other weekend, and I’m deciding that’s not how I want to do college so I just stopped. But it is kind of hard, because your parents are like, “Hey I miss you, you should come [home].” You are like “I can’t.”
Another explained, “I don’t go home much, because if you go home you miss home, and you get distracted.” Within this subtheme, participants agreed on the need for balance between staying connected to their families for support and avoiding visiting home too often to lessen distractions.

Self-care

The final subtheme that emerged within adjustment was self-care. This involved having healthy sleep patterns, properly managing money, and maintaining physical health. One participant explained,
Last year I slept so much. I would have so much stuff to do but I’d just go to sleep because I felt like … you ever have so much stuff to do that you get stressed about it so you just take a nap? That’s what I did all the time … So get your sleep patterns in order. Prioritize. Either sleep or flunk out. Lose a little bit of sleep and go to class. I had to adjust my bedtime.
Another person spoke of her experiences attending to self-care while providing some advice, “Keep mindful of your money. If you’re not financially stable or don’t know how to deal with money, seek help. Seek immediate help because you will be broke and hungry.” A third participant added, “You have to take care of yourself. You won’t make it if you don’t make yourself a priority above everything else.” Participants spoke often of the adjustments to self-care they experienced during their first years of college. They often framed their experience with words of advice regarding physical health, money management, and prioritization.

Adjustment to college as a FGC is a multifaceted process. Participants described situations in which they developed their personal identities. They altered their expectations regarding the rigorous nature of college courses. The students also developed a balance between their family lives and their academic responsibilities and learned to take care of themselves physically and financially.

Barriers

Although it is likely for a prospective college student to encounter some challenges as they prepare for and embark upon their first years of college, the FGCs in this study spoke of specific situations they considered barriers to coming to college. Barriers to coming to college were situations or events that caused the student to pause or reconsider attending school. They also mentioned college barriers while enrolled in college-level courses. More specifically, barriers identified here are family, finances, and lack of information.

Family

Family as a barrier primarily included their parents’ difficulty letting go as the students moved away from home and gained more independence, as well as their inability to provide complete understanding of the transition to college. One student reported,
My parents actually didn’t want me to come to [college], because it is so far away. I am the youngest in my family. I’m like the baby, and my parents really didn’t want me to go. I just kind of basically kept on telling them every single year in high school like “Hey, I want to go here because of the Vet program.” Then they finally said okay. They keep on calling saying like “Hey, I’ll come pick you up in the weekend.” And I am like you don’t have to come pick me up, especially when it’s not like a three-day weekend, cause I really don’t want to go home then.
Another participant spoke of his parent’s lack of experience as a barrier for support, saying “My parents were kind of like if that is what you want to do then you can do it, but they didn’t ever give me any advice with it, because they didn’t really go to college.” Although, for the most part, students remained connected to their parents, a shift occurred in that connection as the students embarked upon the journey of stepping out of the box to go to a large university.

Money

When describing barriers to coming to college, participants mentioned money to pay for college as a barrier. This barrier not only affected some of their decisions regarding college but also influenced their level of interest in applying. For example, one participant noted “I think money is a huge factor; the biggest factor” and another noted the desire not to attend a community college but that she was fearful of the financial strain,
I didn’t want to go to community, because you go there and you never get out of the area, and you don’t go anywhere … I am from [town] and a lot of people go to [community college] there … you get two years of free tuition … My mom wanted me to go there, but I didn’t want to go there.
Another student spoke about family struggles related to finances,
My mom had lost her job the day I came up here … Barring all of my student scholarships and loans I had gotten, it was still kind of hard seeing my mom and dad struggling so hard while I’m just sitting up her wondering what I can do.
Participants reported financial obligations and stress related to those obligations were barriers in coming to college. Finances were a major barrier to college-going for these participants.

Lack of information

As they considered going to, prepared for, and started college, participants described lacking information in various situations. Lack of information included uncertainty regarding obtaining and renewing financial aid, as well as involvement in additional activities to get the most out of the college experience. For example, one student described the college application experience,
I will agree that it gets kinds of hectic, as far as when you are trying to meet all those deadlines and the essays and all that stuff. It kind of freaks you out just to know that you have to do it, and you have to figure out when everything has to be turned in. it just becomes a lot to worry about when it gets to that point.
Another participant discussed his lack of knowledge about loans, “Make sure you understand those loans too. Some people will go out and spend it and not understand that you have to pay those back with interest on them.” Similarly, another participant mentioned not understanding about needing to reapply for loans yearly, “no one tells you to reapply for scholarships, so a lot of people lose them.” A fourth participant noted a lack of information about entering college, explaining “I had orientation the day before class started because I didn’t know I was supposed to do it.” Family influences, financial considerations, and lack of information create barriers for participants as they anticipated applying to college and managing their lives as college students. Although the challenges participants faced may have caused them stress, they were able to find supports as they overcame those challenges.

Supports to Going to College

FGCs make the transition to college with a number of barriers. However, the participants of this study spoke of hope and encouragement as they pressed on through the challenges. Supports to college-going included money, family, mentors, and other types of support.

Money

The first subtheme identified within supports was money. Participants spoke of scholarship awards as primary factors in their decisions to go to college. One participant explained, “I am here just for scholarships. I got a full ride year, so no parental contributions.”

Another individual spoke of the joy she felt when she realized the financial support changed her possibilities, “It is crazy. It was like a little kid going to Disney World for the first time, I kid you not. I cried, because it was just something I never thought would happen.” Financial support through scholarship money allowed participants to realize their dreams of going to college. Money also served as motivation to pursue those dreams, even when the students experienced some doubt. Participants also spoke of family support as they considered their possibilities.

Family

A second subtheme that emerged within supports was family. Although family may have caused some distractions, as seen in the barrier category, students also moved forward with emotional and instrumental support from their families. One participant spoke of his primary support continuing through the transition from high school to college, “My mom has always been behind me, like in high school.” Another student explained her parents’ devotion as support,
It actually started with my mom … They were like they wanted me go. They were like if that’s where you want to go, they were going to figure out how to do it regardless. How I don’t know, but they told me they would.
Although their parents did not go to college and could offer very little relatable experiences, participants’ families provided the emotional foundations necessary for students to press on through the unknown.

Mentors

Individuals close to participants, with more college experience, also provided support as participants went to college. Mentors included former teachers, school counselors, and friends. One student elaborated on a connection with a professor that provided practical support before she came to college,
One of my old professors, she was my dual enrollment professor … We just became very good friends after class … I kept her up to date, as I would my other teachers. We would meet and have coffee over the summer and stuff … So she has been a lot of my support, because my mother didn’t know. She is kind of like that aunt that did go to college that kind of knew.
Another participant spoke of her school counselor as a support as she considered going to college,
My guidance counselor was the same for me. She actually went to all my teachers that I ever had in high school and got every one of them to write me recommendation letters. So I didn’t know, and I come in and there is a like a pile of recommendation letters for me. Even the teachers I didn’t know like I cried a little bit; oh, they like me. She was really helpful in the whole process.
Participants were able to locate and utilize other adults who could help them through the college-going process.

Other supports

Not only did participants receive support from their families and mentors, they also sought support from student services, faith, and friends. One student described his experience seeking academic support outside the classroom,
I would say even if you don’t feel like you need it your first year, [college] has academic coaching in the student success center, and I just started going. Seriously, it does wonders, and they help you so much with everything.
Another participant spoke of various types of support, “My parents motivate me but when I need someone who really understands me, it’s either G-d or my friends. You need to surround yourself with people who you know will be there for you through ups and downs.”

Knowing what kind of support was needed and where to find that support was an essential factor in the success of the participants in this study. When they did find what they needed in family or mentors, they sought guidance through campus-based services, faith, and loyal friends.

Participants were able to find support in many areas as they prepared for and attended college as first-generation college students. Despite having a lack of experience, participants’ families offered emotional support. Informational support came from their mentors and student services provided academic support. Participants also experienced additional forms of support from their friends.

Double-Edged Sword

One unexpected theme that emerged, which reflected both barriers and supports, was the double-edged sword category. Participants mentioned things that were simultaneously both positive and negative, so it became its own category. For example, one student said,
My mom is a really big support, but she doesn’t like understand the college process … I feel like a bunch of my friends, their parents did everything for them. I did all my applications. I did the FAFSA and found all the information for it and stuff. She’s supportive, but
Another participant spoke of simultaneous motivation and pressure regarding her experience,
My mom and dad had worked so hard going through multiple jobs just to put me and my three other siblings through school. I am the first one to actually go to a university [out] of four [kids] so it’s really on my shoulders. I can prove that all their work is not in vain.
Additionally, one individual spoke of having money and managing it,
I had to learn to manage money really quickly last year. I was given a set amount, and that had to last me a semester. Then I got another set amount that lasted me the next semester. It’s kind of like what do you need, what do you want?
Participants noted emotional support from their parents coupled with their lack of understanding as a double-edged sword. They felt motivated and pressured by expectations placed on them as first-generation college students. They also experienced relief from scholarship awards, but stress in managing their money throughout the year.

Overarching Themes

In addition to the preconceived themes established by the SCCT-based questions and the double-edged sword category, two overarching themes emerged. Participants repeatedly discussed the change process during their transition to college. They also emphasized preparing for college early related to academics and managing finances. The participants visited these themes with words of advice to future FGCs.

Prepare yourself for change

Woven throughout their discussions, participants spoke of changing. Preparing yourself for change included experiencing personal growth, maintaining balance, and adjusting to the academic rigor of college courses. For example, one participant recommended, “Prepare yourself for change. At the end of your freshman year, you are not going to be the same person you were when you graduated high school.” Another insisted, “I would say don’t be scared. A lot of people were like ‘you’re going to [city], that’s a big city.’ I would say don’t be scared because you can do it. Don’t be afraid to step outside the box.” One student considered balance during the adjustment to college,
I think you really need to focus on, yes you have freedom, but you have responsibility. In college, your mom is not here saying, “Did you go to class? Did you do your homework?” so it is really easy to roll over and say I’m not getting up this morning … it is really easy to get distracted. Then you lose scholarships.
Although the participants prepared for and entered college feeling somewhat anxious and doubtful, not knowing what to expect, they were able to persevere. In fact, retrospective thinking allowed them the space to offer advice for students preparing the experience those personal and academic shifts.

Prepare early

As participants spoke of their barriers and supports to entering college as first-generation students, they realized preparing early was one of the most important factors to coming to college. Their advice for preparing early included academic preparation, setting deadlines, and getting organized. When considering academic adjustment, one participant said,
As soon as you can, register for classes, pick out your classes. As soon as you can, meet with your advisor. As soon as you can, meet with your coach. As soon as you can, do all of those things.
Another student spoke of preparing for financial barriers and becoming well-rounded,
I would tell them to start whatever they’re doing to start now. I didn’t get serious until the second semester of my eleventh grade year when the seniors started to leave … If I would’ve started way before then I would have gotten so much more money. Stuff would have been so much more easier for me to have to deal with.
Further considering academic preparation, an individual added,
I would tell them to take more challenging classes, because a lot of my friends took—they had senioritis … I decided that I was going to take harder classes, and I think that’s what prepared me for college better. Taking dual enrollment and AP, that’s what really helped. Without those classes I would not be making it right now I think.
Overall, participants described entering a whole new world as they transitioned to college. They reflected upon their change processes and offered some insight into navigating these shifts. They also offered encouragement using the lessons they learned about academic rigor and money management. They offered encouragement and inspiration for high school students preparing to be first-generation college students. It is possible to succeed, and getting support during the challenging times will ensure that success, regardless of any barriers that may stand in the way.

Discussion

In this study, we completed two focus groups with first-generation college students. In response to several prompts informed by SCCT, the participants described preparing for and succeeding in college in a variety of ways. They discussed adjusting to college, addressing perceived barriers, and utilizing supports. They also discussed how some aspects of their experience were both positive and negative, and offered suggestions for future college students related to preparing early for college-going and being primed for life changes. Using the findings presented here, we identified two avenues for supporting FGCs as they adapt and adjust to college life. Considering adjustment to college, navigating barriers and supports, and preparing for college going, we identified ways in which career counselors and student support programs may actively foster success in FGCs during their college experiences (as recommended by Tate et al., 2015), as well as prepare them before they attend college.

Adjustment to college

SCCT (Lent et al., 1994) describes adjustment as directly related to satisfaction; those who manage to adjust to college feel a sense of increased satisfaction with their educational pursuits, directly affecting their intentions to complete their education. In this study, our participants noted the complexities of adjusting to college. In their experiences, participants learned about self, academic adjustment, balance, and self-care. As they described initial difficulty and eventual satisfaction related to increased functioning in these areas, they highlighted the need to prepare students going into college and support students during college to successfully navigate these adjustments.

Our results were similar to previous research in some ways but unique in others. Like the participants in Reid and Moore’s (2008) study, our participants also noted difficulties with time management, related to meeting deadlines and balancing multiple responsibilities, and understanding how to study effectively, related to academic rigor in college. Our participants, like FGCs in another qualitative study (Bryan & Simmons, 2009), similarly identified feeling disconnected from their families and struggled with balancing home and school responsibilities. For example, they mentioned being torn between being at school and going home, and they discussed the difficulty in explaining college life to their noncollege educated families. Unlike other studies of FGCs, our participants noted the importance of self-care and how self-exploration and growth were primary components of the college adjustment process. These students identified how they were developing their own unique identity as a result of being in college. This unique identity related to beliefs about self-care, as they realized that they needed to care for themselves and that their choices affected their school and future success. Overall, college adjustment was viewed as a complex and complicated process for these students.

Navigating barriers and using supports

Our participants identified multiple barriers to college-going as well as noted support systems to help them navigate through these barriers. Sometimes, things were both a barrier and a support for these students, causing confusion or new challenges. As in other research (e.g., McCarron & Inkelas, 2006; Wange, 2012), family influence was powerful for these students. Family provided emotional and tangible support but lacked the ability to provide concrete information on college-going to our participants. Similarly, money served as both a support and a barrier. Money has been consistently identified as a barrier for FCGs (Soria, Weiner, & Lu, 2014), but our participants also saw scholarships and financial assistance as a positive factor for them. Scholarships helped the participants be able to attain their dream of attending college, but also created an ongoing struggle as they tried to support themselves financially.

Other issues were either a barrier or a support, but not both. Lack of information was a significant barrier for our participants. Our participants could not rely on obtaining concrete information about college-going from their parents, so they mentioned it as a barrier to attending and completing college. Other research (Bui, 2002; Collier & Morgan, 2007) highlights this lack of information for FGCs, which for our students affected their entire college planning process and continued once they entered college. It may be that our participants were uncertain where to find this information or whom to ask for help. One avenue of support that was frequently mentioned was formal mentors. Our participants sought out others with college experience to help them navigate the college application process, so they seemed to find one way to address their barrier of lack of information, but it seemed that this may not have been sufficient for some of them.

Preparing for college-going

One major finding related to preparing for the college-going process: Participants wished they had started planning earlier and wished they fully understood that college-going was more than taking classes and preparing for a career. The process also involved personal growth and a new sense of self. Our participants expressed a desire to better understand the college experience. They spoke of wanting a better understanding of college norms and procedures and how to successfully monitor their time once in college. It may be that college adjustment would go more smoothly if some of this information was available to them earlier, before they arrived at college. At minimum, our participants felt unprepared for the many changes facing them and uniformed that college would be so different that high school had been for them.

Limitations and Implications

Several limitations must be noted regarding this study. First, all of our participants were from a single university and a single southeastern state, so generalizability is limited as a result. Also, because we intentionally recruited participants from an academic support center on campus with a strong outreach presence among racial or ethnic minority students, minority students were overrepresented in our sample, compared with the minority rates of the university as a whole. FGCs are more likely to be people of color, so this was not unexpected, but it does affect how one views our findings. Relatedly, because we considered the focus group as our primary focus for analysis (as opposed to the individuals in the focus group), attention was not given to whether there were differences of opinion by race or ethnicity. Therefore, we cannot know for certain if the experiences of the focus groups represent first-generation college students from all types of backgrounds. However, this is typically the case when researching this population, because the overlap of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and first-generation status is quite typical.

Our procedures and data analysis may also serve as limitations. We used a focus group model to collect our information, so it is possible that participants felt unable to share their own feelings due to being in a group format. We tried to ensure diversity in responses by encouraging feedback from everyone, but some participants talked more than others. Also, as this was a qualitative study, it is possible that our analysis was affected by preconceived biases or opinions. We followed strict protocols to increase the trustworthiness of the data, but it is possible that someone else might identify different themes from our groups.

Implications for Theory

SCCT (Lent et al., 1994) proved a useful theoretical framework for understanding the adjustment of these FGCs. However, our results also have important implications for SCCT, notably related to the double-edged sword category that emerged from our focus groups. SCCT conceptualizes barriers and supports as separate influences on individuals’ interests, goals, and actions; yet, many of our participants highlighted ways in which family and money were simultaneously barriers and supports. Just as some ambivalent stimuli can simultaneously elicit both positive and negative affect (Larsen, McGraw, & Cacioppo, 2001), our results suggest the existence of ambivalent contextual factors that simultaneously are experienced a helpful and hindering, a possibility not heretofore considered by SCCT theory or research. Just as with ambivalent emotions, such ambivalent experiences may be uncommon, but quite meaningful (Larsen et al., 2001). Future research grounded in SCCT should explore the existence, prevalence, and impacts of such simultaneously helping and hindering contextual factors in these and other populations.

Implications for Practice

The results suggest several ideas for ways that universities can better meet the needs of first-generation college students. As noted earlier, more research is needed on what actual activities help FGCs in their adjustment to college (Garriott et al., 2015), and these results help begin to fill this gap. Research might explore how well current programs aimed at increasing college adjustment for FGCs improve the college adjustment process by measuring college adjustment changes before, during, and after programming. Preparing FGCs to adjust well and achieve success may start before they enter and as they begin college. Using student support programs, helping professionals may encourage students to explore new ways of being and achieve insight as they learn about themselves in the early years of college. Self-reflection and processing activities may promote this endeavor. Support programs may also benefit FGCs as they adjust to the academic rigor in college coursework by offering clear parameters for time management (Reid & Moore, 2008), study skills, and encouragement to seek tutoring services. Beyond academic adjustment, support in learning to balance family connections and academic responsibilities, as well as the provision of clear self-care strategies, including physical and financial wellness, are essential in ensuring success as FGCs adjust to college. College counseling centers might partner with academic advising centers on campus, for example, to proactively offer workshops on self-care, time management, and study habits. For each of these areas, concrete examples, opportunities for goal setting, and space to process emotions related to autonomy, change, and responsibility may be beneficial.

Student support programs may promote success by helping FGCs work through their perceived barriers, access their supports, and manage ambiguity between the two as they prepare for, begin, and continue college. Counselors and advisors working with prospective FGCs also need to be aware of the ways in which barriers to college-going affect barriers to career exploration; they must directly explore students’ perceptions of their access to the postsecondary education needed to pursue their career goals.

Recognizing family as both a barrier and a support, it seems fitting to actively involve family members in the first-generation student’s adjustment to and success in college. Programming for prospective students might more actively involve families and provide them with tools to help their student during the college application process. Helping professionals may work with families toward a more comprehensive understanding of the college-going experience, as well as ways in which family members may individually and collectively actively engage in supporting, encouraging, and accepting the student’s autonomy and pursuit of life outside the established family or community norms. For example, a parent may offer care and encouragement by checking in on the student, but also allowing the student to come to them first. Another way a family member might serve as a support while eliminating a barrier is to ask the student about the transition experience and how college-going may be different than what they both had previously expected.

As money was also described as both a barrier and support, interventions focused on navigating the nuances of scholarship attainment and management, as well as processing decision making related to finances may reduce stress and allow students to fully reap the benefits of financial support. Helping professionals may offer support and encourage responsibility by having students document their scholarship requirements and deadlines for reapplying for scholarships awarded. They may also engage students in decision making regarding their careers and personal lives as they align with their scholarship opportunities, budget, and potential to obtain money beyond direct financial support, including other types of financial aid and avenues for earning money that are flexible and present minimal distractions.

The participants in this study also offered sound advice regarding the timing of preparation for college, which may serve efforts to provide support to prospective FGCs during middle and high school. Postsecondary institutions may become involved in these interventions, which would help demonstrate their concern for prospective FGCs as well as make connections for these students prior to their arrival at college. For example, encouraging personal motivation, which is related to success (Dennis et al., 2005), may be achieved by having students establish a real connection to the opportunities FGCs have to thrive academically, supported by grants and scholarships. Illuminating these opportunities emphasizing necessary organization and hard work may personally motivate students who are otherwise discouraged or unrealistic about their responsibility. Such programs could be offered as early as middle school, in light of the evidence that perceived barriers to college-going are reported as early as seventh grade (Gibbons & Borders, 2010). Providing concrete information on college-going would help decrease this potential barrier. For example, programming could be offered for students and parents on the college application process, financial aid, scholarships, and life in college.

Finally, student support programs may benefit FGCs by offering more information about support services on campus and understanding college culture, as recommended by Collier and Morgan (2007), as well as encouraging students to pursue their personal support systems beyond family relationship and finances. For example, a helping professional may assess a student’s religious or spiritual preferences and identify possibly beneficial student organizations and activities that may continue that type of support beyond high school in to college. FGCs may also continue to seek support from established mentors, such as their former teachers, school counselors, and friends. Knowing that those connections do not necessarily end upon high school graduation may provide a sense of relief and bolstered personal identity as the students experience monumental changes in multiple areas of their lives.

Successfully adjusting to college goes beyond career decision making, involving preparation for the personal change process, acclimation to college coursework requirements, and managing finances. Career counseling and other student support programs may raise students’ awareness of the personal change process by having them identify minor shifts in their identity or major transitions in their lives that may have affected them in the past. Being able to relate to the emotions surrounding that process and encouraging a positive outlook on successfully working through change while balancing autonomy and responsibility may eliminate anxiety and engender well-informed expectations for college-going. Future studies involving prospective FGCs may offer a more holistic understanding of the transition to college-going. Additional studies including students attending or transferring from community colleges may also add depth and breadth. Information regarding the implementation of the previously discussed implications may serve to obtain and maintain viable funding options for first-generation student support programs prior to and during college. Finally, research illuminating students’ adjustment processes following involvement in such programs may offer understanding of areas not covered by participants in this study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate how first-generation college students adapted and adjusted to college life. Using SCCT, we framed their experiences within the contexts of barriers and supports to college going. We utilized focus groups to illuminate students’ views on being the first in their families to attend college. The findings related to the participants’ objective experiences of navigating the transition to college have implications for offering career counseling and other student support programs prior to and during the college-going experience for this population. Recommendations for action included support in adjusting to personal change and academic rigor, navigating barriers, and using supports, as well as preparing early.

Self-reported race or ethnicity	Class standing	Gender
Asian American	1	0	0	1	1	0
African American or Black	2	2	1	5	2	3
European American or White	2	4	0	6	5	0
Bi- or multiracial	3	0	0	3	3	1
All	8	6	1	15	11	4

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author Biographies

Melinda M. Gibbons is an associate professor of counselor education at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, where she coordinates the PhD in Counselor Education Program. Her research interests focus on career development for underserved populations, including prospective first-generation college students and students with intellectual disabilities.

Alessandra Rhinehart is an assistant professor of counseling at the University of Northern Kentucky. Her research interests include clinical supervision and counselor identity development.

Erin Hardin is a professor and associate department head in the Department of Psychology at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Her research focuses on vocational psychology and the scholarship of teaching and learning.

References

Aspelmeier

J. E.

Love

M. M.

McGill

L. A.

Elliott

A. N.

Pierce

T. W.

(2012) Self-esteem, locus of control, college adjustment, and GPA among first- and continuing-generation students: A moderator model of generational status. Research in Higher Education 53: 755–781. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9252-1.

Bender

D. E.

Ewbank

(1994) The focus group as a tool for health research: Issues in design and analysis. Health Transition Review 4: 63–80.

Bradbury, B. L., & Mather, P. C. (2009). The integration of first-year, first-generation college students from Ohio Appalachia. NASPA Journal, 46, 258–281.

Brown

S. D.

Tramayne

Hoxha

Telander

Fan

X. Y.

Lent

R. W.

(2008) Social cognitive predictors of college students’ academic performance and persistence: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior 72: 298–308. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.09.003.

Bryan

Simmons

L. A.

(2009) Family involvement: Impacts on post-secondary educational success for first-generation Appalachian college students. Journal of College Student Development 50: 391–406. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0081.

Bui

K. V. T.

(2002) First-generation college students at four-year University: Background characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and first-year experiences. College Student Journal 36: 3–11.

Collier

P. J.

Morgan

D. L.

(2007) ‘Is that paper really due today?’ Differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Journal of Higher Education 55: 425–446. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5.

Dennis

J. M.

Phinney

J. S.

Chuateco

L. I.

(2005) The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development 46: 223–236. doi:10.1353/csd.2005.0023.

DeRosa

Dolby

(2014) ‘I don’t think the university knows me’: Institutional culture and lower-income, first-generation college students. InterActions 10(2)): . Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kj6m6r8.

10.

Garriott, P. O., Hudyma, A., Keene, C., & Santiago, D. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first- and non-first-generation college students' academic and life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 253–263. doi: 10.1037/cou0000066.

11.

Gibbons, M. M., & Borders, L. D. (2010). Prospective first-generation college students: A social-cognitive perspective. Career Development Quarterly, 58, 194–208. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2010.tb00186.x.

12.

Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social Research Update, 19. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html.

13.

Gonzalez

L. M.

(2012) College level choice of Latino high school students: A social-cognitive approach. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development 40: 144–155.

14.

Horn, L., & Nunez, A. (2000). Mapping the road to college: First-generation students’ math track, planning strategies, and context of support (NCES Report 00-153). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U. S. Department of Education.

15.

Hsieh

H. H.

Huang

J. T.

(2014) The effects of socioeconomic status and proactive personality on career decision self-efficacy. Career Development Quarterly 62: 29–43. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00068.x.

16.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15: 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.

17.

Kidd

P. S.

Parshall

M. B.

(2000) Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research 10: 293–308. doi:10.1177/104973200129118453.

18.

Larsen

J. T.

McGraw

A. P.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2001) Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 684–696.

19.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(1994) Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior 45(1): 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.

20.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(2000) Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 47: 36–49.

21.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Brenner

Chopra

S. B.

Davis

Talleyrand

Suthakaran

(2001) The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology 48: 474–483.

22.

Lent

R. W.

Miller

M. J.

Smith

P. E.

Watford

B. A.

Lim

R. H.

Hui

Williams

(2013) Social cognitive predictors of adjustment to engineering majors across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior 83: 22–30. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.006.

23.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985) Naturalistic inquiry, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

24.

Martinez

J. A.

Sher

K. J.

Krull

J. L.

Wood

(2009) Blue-collar scholars? Mediators and moderators of university attrition in first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development 50: 87–103. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0053.

25.

McCarron

G. P.

Inkelas

K. K.

(2006) The gap between educational aspirations and attainment for first-generation college students and the role of parent involvement. Journal of College Student Development 47: 534–549. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0059.

26.

Metheny

McWhirter

E. H.

(2013) Contributions of social status and family support to college students’ career decision self-efficacy and outcome expectations. Journal of Career Assessment 21: 378–394. doi:10.1177/1069072712475164.

27.

Navarro

R. L.

Flores

L. Y.

Lee

H. S.

Gonzalez

(2014) Testing a longitudinal social cognitive model of intended persistence with engineering students across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior 85: 146–155. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.05.007.

28.

Nunez, A., & Cuccaro-Alamin, S. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education (NCES Report 98-082). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U. S. Department of Education.

29.

Office of Institutional Research and Assessment (n.d.). University of Tennessee Headcount Enrollment, fall 2016. Retrieved from: https://oira.utk.edu/factbook/enrollment.

30.

Pascarella

E. T.

Pierson

C. T.

Wolniak

G. C.

Terenzini

P. T.

(2004) First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education 75: 249–284. doi:10.1353/jhe.2004.0016.

31.

Rabiee

(2004) Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63: 655–660. doi:10.1079/PNS2004399.

32.

Reid

M. J.

Moore

J. L.

(2008) College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education: Oral histories of first-generation urban college students. Urban Education 43: 240–261. doi:10.1177/0042085907312346.

33.

Schreier

(2012) Qualitative content analysis in practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

34.

Soria

K. M.

Weiner

E. C.

(2014) Financial decisions among undergraduate students from low-income and working-class social class backgrounds. Journal of Student Financial Aid 44: Article 2.

35.

Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1178–1197. doi: 10.1037/a0027143.

36.

Stephens

N. M.

Hamedani

M. G.

Destin

(2014) Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science 25: 943–953.

37.

Tate

K. A.

Caperton

Kaiser

Pruitt

N. T.

White

Hall

(2015) An exploration of first-generation college students’ career development beliefs and experiences. Journal of Career Development 42: 1–17. doi: 10.1177/0894845314565025.

38.

Tracy

S. J.

(2010) Qualitative quality: Eight ‘Big-Tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 16(10): 837–851. doi:10.1177/107780041038121.

39.

Wange

T. R.

(2012) Understanding the memorable messages first-generation college students receive from on-campus mentors. Communication Education 61: 335–357. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.691978.

Self-reported race or ethnicity	Class standing					Gender
Self-reported race or ethnicity	First-year	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	All	Women	Men
Asian American	1	0	0	0	1	1	0
African American or Black	2	2	1	0	5	2	3
European American or White	2	4	0	0	6	5	0
Bi- or multiracial	3	0	0	0	3	3	1
All	8	6	1	0	15	11	4