Retention rates at two-year colleges are consistently lower than those at four-year colleges, likely due to the higher proportion of nontraditional students who must manage academic and non-academic responsibilities. To improve student success at two-year colleges, educators have offered more flexible course formats than traditional face-to-face courses. This study compared student retention and academic performance across three course formats: 16-week face-to-face, 16-week online, and 5-week online. This study also investigated how the effects of student and course characteristics on student outcomes varied across the course formats. Multilevel modeling was used to analyze the retention rate and academic performance of 22,280 students attending seven community colleges in the Western United States. Results demonstrated that the 5-week online course format yielded the highest retention rate and academic performance. Furthermore, this course format benefited male students, part-time students, and students in non-STEM courses the most in terms of student retention and academic performance.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
AnastasiJ. S. (2007). Full-semester and abbreviated summer courses: An evaluation of student performance. Teaching of Psychology, 34(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280709336643
5.
AndradeM. S.Alden-RiversB. (2019). Developing a framework for sustainable growth of flexible learning opportunities. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1564879
6.
AtchleyW.WingenbachG.AkersC. (2013). Comparison of course completion and student performance through online and traditional courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1461
7.
BarrT.LuoT. (2025). HyFlex course design: Outcomes, challenges, and supports for students and instructors. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09452-6
BergaK. A.VadnaisE.NelsonJ.JohnstonS.BuroK.HuR.OlaiyaB. (2021). Blended learning versus face-to-face learning in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 96, 104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104622
11.
BroeckeS.NichollsT. (2007). Ethnicity and degree attainment. Research report RW92. Department for Education and Skills.
12.
BrookshireR. G.PalocsayS. W. (2005). Factors contributing to the success of undergraduate business students in management science courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00054.x
13.
BryantK.CampbellJ.KerrD. (2003). Impact of web based flexible learning on academic performance in information systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(1), 41–50.
14.
BurridgeA. B.MckinneyL.BourdeauG. V.LeeM M.BarnesY. M. (2024). The power of one more course: How different first semester credit loads affect community college student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 95(7), 879–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2023.2251867
15.
BursacZ.GaussC. H.WilliamsD. K.HosmerD. W. (2008). Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code for Biology and Medicine, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-3-17
16.
CarmanC. A.BartschR. A. (2017). Relationship between course length and graduate student outcome measures. Teaching of Psychology, 44(4), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317727912
17.
ChenX. (2013). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics.
18.
ChenX. (2015). STEM Attrition among high-performing college students: Scope and potential causes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 5(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.136
19.
ChizmarJ. F.WalbertM. S. (1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice. Journal of Economic Education, 30(3), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220489909595985
20.
CrewsT.ButterfieldJ. (2014). Data for flipped classroom design: Using student feedback to identify the best components from online and face-to-face classes. Higher Education Studies, 4(3), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n3p38
21.
DanielE. L. (2000). A review of time-shortened courses across disciplines. College Student Journal, 34(2), 298–308.
22.
DaviesW. M. (2006). Intensive teaching formats: A review. Issues in Educational Research, 16(1), 1–20.
23.
DeJongT. L.ChenQ. (2023). Utility of a slopes difference test for probing longitudinal multilevel aptitude treatment interactions: a simulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1156962
24.
DePriestT.DunaganS.MacKewnA.BellE. (2025). Attrition indicators among students in introductory physical geology: Traditional vs. online learning. Journal of Educators Online, 22(4), n4.
25.
EllisR. A. (2022). Strategic directions in the what and how of learning and teaching innovation—A fifty-year synopsis. Higher Education, 84(6), 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00945-2
26.
FeldmanM. J. (1993). Factors associated with one-year retention in a community college. Research in Higher Education, 34, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991857
27.
FiglioD. N.RushM.YinL. (2010). Is It Live or Is It Internet? Experimental Estimates of the Effects of Online Instruction on Student Learning. NBER Working Paper No. 16089. National Bureau of Economic Research.
28.
FikeD. S.FikeR. (2008). Predictors of first-year student retention in the community college. Community College Review, 36(2), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552108320222
29.
GaneshG.PaswanA.SunQ. (2015). Are face-to-face classes more effective than online classes? An empirical examination. Marketing Education Review, 25(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2015.1029851
30.
García-VargasM. C.Rizo-BaezaM.Cortés-CastellE. (2016). Impact of paid work on the academic performance of nursing students. PeerJ, 4, e1838. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1838
31.
GauthierT.GalindoM. (2025). Faculty perceptions of community college student retention and persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 27(2), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251231178019
32.
GilardiS.GuglielmettiC. (2011). University life of non-traditional students: Engagement styles and impact on attrition. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11779084
33.
Gillett-SwanJ. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293
34.
GregoryB. C. (2022). Developing critical listening”: Educational radio and early media literacy, 1933–1949. Resonance: The Journal of Sound and Culture, 3(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1525/res.2022.3.3.309
35.
HagedornL. S. (2005). How to define retention: A new look at an old problem. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 89–105).
36.
HicksW. L. (2014). Pedagogy in the twenty-first century: An analysis of accelerated courses in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2013.853091
37.
HornL. (1998). Stopouts or stayouts?: Undergraduates who leave college in their first year. Diane Publishing.
38.
HoxJ. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge.
39.
ImranR.FatimaA.SalemI. E.AllilK. (2023). Teaching and learning delivery modes in higher education: Looking back to move forward post-COVID-19 era. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100805
JuszkiewiczJ. (2017). Trends in community college enrollment and completion data, 2017. American Association of Community Colleges.
42.
KauderE. (2015). History of marginal utility theory. Princeton University Press.
43.
KentnorH. E. (2015). Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-68123-229-420251014
LeeJ. J.SaxL. J.KimK. A.HagedornL. S. (2004). Understanding students’ parental education beyond first-generation status. Community College Review, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155210403200101
46.
LykeJ.FrankM. (2012). Comparison of student learning outcomes in online and traditional classroom environments in a psychology course. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(3), 245–250.
47.
MilleaM.WillsR.ElderA.MolinaD. (2018). What matters in college student success? Determinants of college retention and graduation rates. Education, 138(4), 309–322.
48.
NakajimaM. A.DemboM. H.MosslerR. (2012). Student persistence in community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(8), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920903054931
NemetzP. L.EagerW. M.LimpaphayomW. (2017). Comparative effectiveness and student choice for online and face-to-face classwork. Journal of Education for Business, 92(5), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1331990
52.
NunezA. M. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education. Diane Publishing.
53.
NussliN.OhK. (2024). Creating a “space in-between”: Learning on the physical–hybrid–virtual continuum. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(4), 471–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241252139
54.
OngC. S.LaiJ. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816–829.
55.
RichardsonJ. T. (2008). Degree attainment, ethnicity and gender: A literature review. Higher Education Academy.
56.
RobertsT.JacksonC.Mohr-SchroederM. J.BushS. B.MaiorcaC.CavalcantiM.Craig SchroederD.DelaneyA.PutnamL.CremeansC. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
SanabriaT.PennerA.DominaT. (2020). Failing at remediation? College remedial coursetaking, failure and long-term student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 61, 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09590-z
59.
SheardM. (2009). Hardiness commitment, gender, and age differentiate university academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X304406
60.
ShehadehH. (2022). Pandemic response: Impact of accelerated English courses on student achievement and withdrawal rates. Summer Academe: A Journal of Higher Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.25894/sa.126
61.
SingellL. D.Jr (2004). Come and stay a while: Does financial aid effect retention conditioned on enrollment at a large public university?Economics of Education Review, 23(5), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.10.006
62.
SinghJ.SteeleK.SinghL. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
63.
SitholeA.ChiyakaE. T.McCarthyP.MupingaD. M.BuckleinB. K.KibirigeJ. (2017). Student attraction, persistence and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n1p46
64.
SolizA. (2025). Improving community college student persistence and degree completion. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322251361761
65.
StaterM. (2009). The impact of financial aid on college GPA at three flagship public institutions. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 782–815. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208329903
66.
StewartS.LimD. H.KimJ. (2015). Factors influencing college persistence for first-time students. Journal of Developmental Education, 38(3), 12–20.
67.
ThieleT.SingletonA.PopeD.StanistreetD. (2016). Predicting students’ academic performance based on school and socio-demographic characteristics. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1424–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.974528
68.
TomkinJ. H.WestM. (2022). STEM Courses are harder: Evaluating inter-course grading disparities with a calibrated GPA model. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1
69.
UrtelM. G. (2008). Assessing academic performance between traditional and distance education course formats. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 322–330.
70.
WalkerS. E. (2017). Developing compressed beginning and intermediate algebra courses. Journal of Developmental Education, 40(2), 30–34.
71.
WladisC.ConwayK.HacheyA. C. (2017). Using course-level factors as predictors of online course outcomes: A multi-level analysis at a US urban community college. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1045478
WladisC.HacheyA. C.ConwayK. (2014b). An investigation of course-level factors as predictors of online STEM course outcomes. Computers & Education, 77, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.015
74.
WlodkowskiR. J. (2003). Accelerated learning in colleges and universities. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(97), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.84
75.
XuD.JaggarsS. S. (2011). The effectiveness of distance education across Virginia’s community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and English courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711413814
76.
XuD.JaggarsS. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777343
