Consequences of Assessment Limits 1

Abstract

Assessment limits are a type of tax expenditure that limits or places a cap on the amount a property can increase in assessed value for taxation each year. Few states estimate the consequences of the assessment limit they adopt in annual tax expenditure reports. The paper reviews the prevalence of assessment limits in the U.S. and motivations for adoption, and discusses the potential consequences. Then, an empirical analysis estimates the impact of New Mexico's assessment limit on the tax base, revenue, equity, and distribution of the tax burden in Los Alamos County and San Juan County using property valuation data. It is important for state policy makers to systematically consider the costs of assessment limits, both in foregone revenues for local governments and the distribution of property tax liabilities, which could ultimately impact the legitimacy of the tax.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

N.B

. (2006) “Property tax limitations: an interpretative review”, National Tax Journal, LIX (3) September: 685–694.

Bittker

B.I

. (1969) “Accounting for federal tax subsidies in the national budget”, National Tax Journal 22 (2) 244–261.

Brunori

(2010) “Congress should learn from the Kansas Senate”, State Tax Notes,May17: 525.

California State Board of Equalization. (2003) State Assessment Manual. Accessed March 7, 2012 (http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/pdf/SAM-FINAL2003.pdf).

City-Data Forum New Mexico. (2011) New Mexico Tax Lightning Property Tax. Accessed June 15, 2011 (http://www.city-data.com/forum/new-mexico/734556-new-mexico-tax-lightning-property-tax-25.html#ixzz1PPt0HqWm).

Dye

R.F.

McMillen

D.P.

, and Merriman

D.F.

(2006a) The Economic Effects of the 7% Assessment Cap in Cook County. Chicago: Institute of Government and Affairs Public, University of Illinois.

Dye

R.F.

McMillen

D.P.

, and Merriman

D.F.

(2006b) “Illinois’ response to rising residential property values: An assessment cap in Cook County”, National Tax Journal 59 (3) 707–716.

Eckert

J.K

. (General Editor) and R.J. Gloudemans and R.R. Almy (Technical Editors). (1990) Property Appraisal and Assessment Administration, Chicago: International Association of Assessing Officers.

Ferreira

(2004) “You can take it with you: transferability of Proposition 13 tax benefits, residential mobility, and willingness to pay for housing amenities”, Working Paper 72, Berkeley: Center for Labor Economics, University of California.

10.

Florida. (2010) 2010 Florida Tax Handbook Including Fiscal Impact of Potential Changes, FY 2010–2011, Office of Economic and Demographic Research. Accessed January 16, 2011 (http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/revenues/reports/tax-handbook/taxhandbook2010.pdf).

11.

Harris

(1997) “Tax expenditures: concept and oversight”, in: Golembiewski

R.T.

and Rabin

(eds) Public Budgeting and Finance, 4th ed.pp 385, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

12.

Haveman

and Sexton

T.A.

(2008) “Property tax assessment limits: lessons from thirty years of experience”, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Policy Focus Report: Cambridge, Mass.

13.

Hawkins

(2006) “Four easy steps to a fiscal train wreck: the Florida how-to guide”, Fiscal Research Center Report No. 132. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

14.

Kentucky, (2010) Tax Expenditure Analysis, Fiscal Years 2010–2012, FY2010, Governor's Office of Economic Analysis, October 15, 2010. Accessed January 16, 2011 (http://osbd.ky.gov/nr/rdonlyres/dbc47eb8-fe21-4429-a283-7357388bf39b/0/1012tea_taxexpendituredoc.pdf).

15.

Levitis

Johnson

, and Koulish

(2009) “Promoting state budget accountability through tax expenditure reporting,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, April.

16.

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2012) “Residential Property Tax Relief Programs”, Significant Features of the Property Tax. Accessed March 7, 2012 (http://www.lincolninst.edu/subcenters/significant-features-propertytax/Report_ResidentialRelief.aspx).

17.

Los Alamos County. (2011) Los Alamos Facts. Accessed June 15, 2011 (http://www.losalamosnm.us/gov/Pages/LosAlamosFacts.aspx).

18.

Los Alamos County Reports and Budget. (2011) Fund Statements, General Fund Budget Summary. Accessed June 15, 2011 (http://www.losalamosnm.us/omb/20112012BiennialBudget/04FundStatements.pdf, http://www.losalamosnm.us/omb/Pages/BudgetsandReports.aspx).

19.

Los Alamos National Laboratory. (2010–2011) Laboratory Organization. Accessed June 15, 2011 (http://www.lanl.gov/organization/)

20.

Maryland Office of Budget Analysis. (2010) Tax Expenditures Report: Fiscal Year 2010, FY 2010. Accessed January 21, 2011 (http://www.dbm.maryland.gov/agencies/operbudget/Documents/2010TaxExpendReport.pdf).

21.

Michigan. (2010) Executive Budget Appendix on Tax Credits, Deductions, and Exemptions: Fiscal Year 2010, FY2010, Department of Treasury, December 2009. Accessed January 17, 2011 (http://www.michigan.gov/documents/treasury/ExecBudgAppenTaxCreditsDedExemptsFY10_302899_7.pdf).

22.

Mikesell

J.L

. (2002) “Tax expenditure budgets, budget policy, and policy tax, confusion in the States”, Public Budgeting and Finance, Winter: 34–51.

23.

Minnesota Revenue Department (2006) Limited market value report: 2005 assessment year taxes payable 2006. St. Paul: Tax Research Division. Accessed January 17, 2011 (http://www.taxes.state.mn.us/taxes/legal_policy/index.shtml).

24.

Minnesota (2010) Tax Expenditure Budget Fiscal Years 2010–2013 Minnesota Department of Revenue, Tax Research Division, February 2010. Accessed January 17, 2011 (http://taxes.state.mn.us/legal_policy/Documents/other_supporting_content_2010_tax_expenditure_links.pdf).

25.

Office of Management and Budget. (2002) Executive Office of the President. Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2003 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002).

26.

Oregon. (2009) State of Oregon 2009 – 2011 Tax Expenditure Report, 2009– 2011, Budget and Division Management, Department of Administrative Services and Section Research, Department of Revenue, 2009. Accessed January 21, 2011 (http://egov.oregon.gov/DOR/STATS/docs/ExpR09-11/FullReport.pdf).

27.

O'Sullivan

Sexton

T.A.

, and Sheffrin

S.M.

(1994) “Differential Burdens from the Assessment Provisions of Proposition 13”, National Tax Journal XLVII: 4.

28.

O'Sullivan

Sexton

T.A.

, and Sheffrin

S.M.

(1995a) Property Taxes and Tax Revolts: The Legacy of Proposition 13. New York: Cambridge University Press.

29.

O'Sullivan

Sexton

T.A.

, and Sheffrin

S.M.

(1995b) “Property taxes, mobility, and home ownership”, Journal of Urban Economics, 37: 107–129.

30.

Preston

A.E.

and Ichniowski

(1991) “A national perspective on the nature and effects of the local property tax revolt, 1976–1986”, National Tax Journal, June, 44 (2) 123–45.

31.

Sexton

T.A

. (2009) “Assessment limits as a means of limiting homeowner property taxes”, in: Augustine

Nancy Y.

, Bell

Michael E.

, Brunori

David

and Youngman

Joan M.

(eds), Erosion of the Property Tax Base: Trends, Causes, and Consequences, pp. 117–142, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

32.

Sexton

T.A

. (2008) “Proposition 13 and Residential Mobility”, State Tax Notes, October 6: 29.

33.

Sheffrin

S.M.

and Sexton

T.A.

(1998) Proposition 13 in Recession and Recovery, San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.

34.

Sjoquist

D. L.

and Pandey

(2001) “An analysis of acquisition value property tax assessment for homesteaded property”, Public Budgeting and Finance, Winter: 1–17.

35.

Surrey

S.S.

and McDaniel

P.R.

(1985) Tax Expenditures, Harvard University Press: Cambridge Mass.

36.

Texas. (2009) Tax Exemptions and Tax Incidence (2009 – 2014), CY2009, Office of the Comptroller, February 27, 2009. Accessed January 16, 2011 (http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/incidence09/incidence09.pdf).

37.

University of Florida. (2007) Final report: Analytical services relating to property taxation. Part 1: Assessment component. Gainesville. Accessed January 18, 2011 (http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/special-research-projects/property-tax-study/Report-Assessment.pdf).

38.

U.S. Census Bureau American Factfinder 2010. Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2010 Demographic Profile Data (Los Alamos County). Accessed June 15, 2011.

39.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2005–2009 American Community Survey 5 year Estimates, Custom Table for Los Alamos County and nation. Accessed June 15, 2011 (http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=ACS&_submenuId=&_lang=en&_ts=).

40.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2011) State and Quickfacts County, Los Alamos County, New Mexico. Accessed June 15, 2011. (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/35/35028.html).

41.

Washington. (2010) Tax Exemptions – 2008 (CY 2008 – CY 2011): A Study of Tax Exemptions, Tax Exclusions, Deductions, Deferrals, Differential Rates and Credits for Major Washington State and Local Taxes, CY2010, Department of Revenue, Research Division, January 14, 2008. Accessed January 17, 2011 (http://dor.wa.gov/Content/AboutUs/StatisticsAndReports/2008/Tax_Exemptions_2008/Default.aspx).

42.

Wasi

and White

M.J.

(2005) “Property Tax Limitations and Mobility: Lock-in Effect of California's Proposition 13”, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs: 59–88.