Of all EU member states the three Baltic countries were hit the hardest by the economic crises in 2008–2010 but they recovered relatively quickly, with all three countries even being able to qualify for EMU membership (Estonia joined the Eurozone in 2011, Latvia in 2014 and Lithuania in 2015). The speed and determination with which the Baltic countries carried out austerity measures is often put forward as an example for other E(M)U member states. This paper critically assesses the validity of various models of austerity (expansionary fiscal contractions, internal devaluation and fiscal devaluation) when applied to the case of the Baltic States. It is argued that in the case of the Baltic countries more complex economic mechanisms were at play then these models suggest. In the paper specific attention is paid to the way fiscal consolidation was shaped in the three countries, and to the role of EU structural funding. The paper concludes with a discussion of the lessons that can be learned for other EU countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AidukaiteJ. (2014) “Transformation of the welfare state in Lithuania: Towards globalization and Europeanization”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47:59–69.
2.
AigingerK. (2011) “Why performance differed across countries in the recent crisis”, Revista economica, 55(2): 20–27.
3.
AlesinaA. and ArdagnaS. (1998) “Tales of fiscal adjustments”, Economic Policy27:489–545.
AlesinaA. and PerottiR. (1995) “Fiscal expansions and adjustments in OECD countries”, Economic Policy21:207–247.
6.
AlesinaA. and PerottiR. (1997) “Fiscal adjustments in OECD countries: composition and macroeconomic effects”, IMF Staff Papers44:210–248.
7.
AlesinaA., PerottiR. and TavaresJ. (1998) “The political economy of fiscal adjustments”, Brookings Paper on Economic Activity (1):197–266.
8.
ÅslundA. (2012a) “Lessons from Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis”, Working Paper12–7, Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
9.
ÅslundA. (2012b) “Southern Europe Ignores Lessons from Latvia at Its Peril”, Working Paper12–17, Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
10.
BideleuxR. (2011) “Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–2011 in the 11 CIS Countries and in the 10 Post-Communist EU Member Countries”, Journal of Communist and Transition Studies, 27(3–4):338–363.
11.
BitinasA. and MaccioniA. F. (2014) “Lithuanian Pension System's Reforms Transformations and Forecasts”, Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2(1):13–23.
12.
BrixiovaZ. and ÉgertB. (2012) “Labor market reforms and outcomes in Estonia”, University of Michigan: William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number1027.
13.
BrixiovaZ., VartiaL. and WörgötterA. (2010) “Capital flows and the boom-bust cycle: The case of Estonia”, Economic Systems34, 55–72.
14.
ButiM. and CarnotN. (2013) “The debate on fiscal policy in Europe: beyond the austerity myth”, ECFIN Economic Brief No. 20.
15.
CalmforsL. (1998) “Macroeconomic policy, wage setting, and employment – what difference does the EMU make?”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(3):125–151.
16.
Dellepiane-AvellanedaS. (2014) “The Political Power of Economic Ideas: The Case of 'Expansionary Fiscal Contractions”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (early view).
17.
DerooseS., FloresE., GuidiceG. and TuriniA. (2010) “The Tale of the Baltics: Experiences, Challenges Ahead and Main Lessons”, ECFIN Economic Brief.
EEAG (2013) “The EEAG Report on the European Economy, Recommendations for Europe”, Munich: CESifo, 6–7.
20.
EEAG (2014) “The EEAG Report on the European Economy, Austerity: Hurting but Helping”, Munich: CESifo, 75–90.
21.
PankEesti (2011) “Eesti maksebilansi aastaraamat 2010”, Eesti Pank 2011.
22.
PankEesti (2012) “Eesti maksebilansi aastaraamat 2011”, Eesti Pank 2012.
23.
PankEesti (2013) “Eesti maksebilansi aastaraamat 2012”, Eesti Pank 2012.
24.
EpsteinR. (2014) “Overcoming ‘Economic Backwardness’ in the European Union”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1):17–34.
25.
European Commission (2009a) “Estonia: Macro Fiscal Assessment. An Analysis of the December 2008 Update of the Convergence Programme”, Brussels, 4 March 2009.
26.
European Commission (2009b) “Latvia: Macro Fiscal Assessment. An Analysis of the January 2009 Update of the Convergence Programme”, Brussels, 4 March 2009.
27.
European Commission (2009c) “Lithuania: Macro Fiscal Assessment. An analysis of the January 2009 Update of the Convergence Programme”, Brussels, 11 March 2009.
28.
European Commission (2010a) “Cohesion Policy: responding to the economic crisis”, Commsission Staff Working Paper, Brussels, SEC(201) 1291 final.
29.
European Commission (2010b) “Estonia: Macro Fiscal Assessment. An Analysis of the January 2010 Update of the Convergence Programme”, Brussels, 31 March 2010.
30.
European Commission (2010c) “Latvia: Macro Fiscal Assessment. An Analysis of the December 2008 Update of the Convergence Programme”, Brussels, 7 April 2010.
31.
European Commission (2010d) “Lithuania: Macro Fiscal Assessment. An Analysis of the February 2010 Update of the Convergence Programme”, 7 April 2010.
32.
European Commission (2012) “The distributional effects of fiscal consolidation in nine EU countries”, Research note 01/2012.
33.
European Commission (2013) “Alert Mechanism Report 2014”, COM(2013) 790 final.
34.
European Commission (2014a) “European Economic Forecast Winter 2014”, European Economy 2/2014.
35.
European Commission (2014b) “EU BOP Assistance to Latvia. Fourth Review under Post-Programme Surveillance”, DG ECFIN, Brussels, 20 January 2014.
36.
European Commission (2014c) “Consolidation of the revenue side and growth-friendly tax structures: an indicator based approach”, Economic papers513, February 2014.
37.
European Commission (2014d) “European Economic Forecast Autumn 2014”, European Economy 7/2014.
38.
Eurostat (2013) “Taxation trends in the European Union. Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway” in: Eurostat Statistical books, 2013 edition.
39.
GiavazziF. and PaganoM. (1990) “Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries”, NBER Macroecoomics Annual5, 75–111.
40.
GiavazziF. and PaganoM. (1996) “Non-Keyesian effects of fiscal policy changes: International evidence and the Swedish experience”, Swedish Economic Policy Review3(3):67–103.
41.
HallP. (2013) “The political origins of our economic discontents: Contemporary adjustment problems in historical perspective” in: KahlerM. and LakeD. (eds), Politics in the new Hard Times: The Great Recession in Comparative Perspective, pp. 120–149, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
HemmingR., KellM. and MahfouzS. (2002) “The effectiveness of fiscal policy in stimulating economic activity: A review of the literature”, Washington: IMF Working Paper WP/02/208.
43.
HermannC. (2013) “Crisis, structural reform and the dismantling of the European Social Model(s)”, Working paper, Institute for International Political Economy Berlin, No 26/2013.
44.
HeylenF. and EveraertG. (2000) “Success and failure of fiscal consolidation in the OECD: A multivariate analysis”, Public Choice105(1–2):103–124.
45.
International Monetary Fund (2013) “Republic of Lithuania: Selected Issues”, IMF Country Report no 13/82.
46.
JacobyW. (2014) “The EU Factor in Fat Times and in Lean: Did the EU Amplify the Boom and Soften the Bust?”, Journal of Common Market Studies52(1):52–70.
47.
JõgisteK., PedaP. and GrossiG. (2012) “Budgeting in a Time of Austerity: The Case of the Estonian Central Government”, Public Administration and Development, 32 (2):181–195.
48.
KallasteE. and WoolfsonC. (2013) “Negotiated responses to the crisis in the Baltic countries”, Transfer: European Review of Labor and Research19(2):253–266.
49.
KattelR. and RaudlaR. (2013) “The Baltic Republics and the Crisis of 2008–2011”, Europe-Asia Studies, 65(3): 426–449.
50.
KickertW., Randma-LiivT. and SaviR. (2013) “Fiscal Consolidation in Europe: A Comparative Analysis”, COCOPS Trend Report.
51.
KolevG. and MatthesJ. (2013) “Smart Fiscal Consolidation. A Strategy for Achieving Sustainable Publioc Finance and Growth”, Brussels: Centre for European Studies/EPP.
52.
KoskeI. (2013) “Fiscal Devaluation – Can it Help to Boost Competitiveness?”, Paris: OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1089.
53.
KrugmanP. (1995) “Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations”, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
54.
KumarM., LeighD. and PlekhanovA. (2007) “Fiscal adjustments: Determinants and macroeconomic consequences”, Washington: IMF Working Paper WP/07/178.
55.
KuokštisV. and VilpišauskasR. (2010) “Economic Adjustment to the Crisis in the Baltic States in Comparative Perspective”, Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University, paper prepared for the 7th Pan-European International Relations Conference, September 2010, Stockholm.
56.
LindnerA. (2011) “Macroeconomic Adjustment: the Baltic States versus Euro Area Crisis Countries”, Intereconomics, 6:340–345.
57.
MassoJ. & KrilloK. (2011) “Labor Markets in the Baltic States During the Crisis 2008–2009: the Effect on Different Labor Market Groups”, University of Tartu.
58.
McDermottJ. and WescottR. (1996) “An empirical analysis of fiscal adjustments”, IMF Staff papers, 43(4):723–753.
59.
Medve-BálintG. (2014) “The Role of the EU in Shaping FDI Flows to East Central Europe”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1):35–51.
60.
MezöJ. and BagiÁ. (2012) “Crisis Management in the Baltic States”, MPRA Paper No. 40366.
61.
Ministry of Finance of Estonia (2008) “Updated convergence programme 2008”, Tallinn, 4 December 2008.
62.
Ministry of Finance of Estonia (2010) “Updated convergence programme 2010”, Tallinn, 28 January 2010.
63.
Ministry of Finance of Estonia (2011) “Stability Programme 2011”, Tallinn, April 2011.
64.
Ministry of Finance of Republic of Latvia (2010) “Convergence Programme of the Republic of Latvia 2009–2012”, Latvijas Respublikas Finanšu Ministrija.
65.
Ministry of Finance of Republic of Latvia (2011) “Convergence Programme of the Republic of Latvia 2011–2014”, April 2011.
66.
de MooijR and KeenM. (2012) “Fiscal Devaluation and Fiscal Consolidation: The VAT in Troubled Times”, Washington: IMF Working Paper no. 12/85.
67.
Mulas-GranadosC. (2004) “Voting against spending cuts: The electoral costs of fiscal adjustments in Europe”, European Union Politics, 5:467–493.
68.
Mulas-GranadosC. (2006) “Economics, Politics and Budgets: The Political Economy of Fiscal Consolidations in Europe”, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmil-lan.
69.
OECD (2011) “Restoring Public Finances”, Special Issue of the OECD Journal on Budgeting.
OECD (2012b) “Restoring Public Finances, 2012 Update”, Special Issue of the OECD Journal on Budgeting.
72.
OrtizI. and CumminsM. (2013) “The Age of Austerity: A Review of Public Expenditures and Adjustment Measures in 181 Countries”, New York: Initiative for Policy Dialogue/Geneva: The South Centre.
73.
PerottiR. (1996) “Fiscal consolidation in Europe: Composition matters”, American Economic Review, 86(2): 105–110.
74.
PerottiR. (1998) “The political economy of fiscal consolidations”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 100: 367–394.
75.
PurfieldC. and RosenbergC.B. (2010) “Adjustment Under a Currency Peg: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania During the Global Financial Crisis 2008–2009”, IMF Working Paper 10/213.
