Hooked by Design: How Cognitive Biases in Nicotine Marketing Influence Young Adults’ Choices

Abstract

Background

Nicotine consumption among young adults remains a critical public health concern despite advances in tobacco control. The rapid rise of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products has introduced marketing practices that frame nicotine use as modern, innovative, and less harmful. These strategies often leverage cognitive biases and digital environments to appeal to younger audiences, contributing to the normalization of nicotine consumption and challenging prevention efforts.

Focus of the Article

This manuscript reports Research and Evaluation emphasizing target audience orientation, competition, and behavior change. It examines how commercial marketing strategies exploit cognitive biases to influence perceptions and decision-making, and how these mechanisms can inform social marketing responses. By integrating behavioral economics and social marketing, the study contributes to understanding how marketing shapes health-related behaviors.

Research Question

The study investigates how cognitive biases embedded in marketing for new nicotine delivery devices influence young adults’ perceptions, evaluations, and decision-making processes. It explores which biases—such as framing, halo/horn, decoy, and zero-price effects—most strongly shape perceived risk and product attractiveness.

Program Design/Approach

A social marketing lens is applied to analyze how commercial “competition” operates through cognitive mechanisms that shape behavior. Marketing mix elements—including product design, promotional strategies, pricing structures, and digital environments—are examined as interacting components that reinforce biased perceptions and normalize nicotine use among young adults.

Importance to the Social Marketing Field

This study advances social marketing theory by conceptualizing cognitive biases as a form of “competition” that influences behavior. It provides a framework for understanding how marketing communication shapes decision-making and offers insights for developing more effective counter-marketing and public health interventions.

Methods

A qualitative, exploratory design was employed with 15 young adults aged 22–28 in Spain. Participants were recruited through university networks and social media. Semi-structured interviews explored perceptions of nicotine marketing, awareness of persuasive strategies, and behavioral responses. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Participants demonstrated awareness of persuasive marketing tactics but remained influenced by them. Marketing emphasizing design, innovation, and reduced harm activated multiple cognitive biases—particularly framing, halo effects, and decoy mechanisms—leading to more favorable evaluations and reduced perceived risk. A key finding is the tension between awareness and influence, where recognition of manipulation does not necessarily translate into resistance.

Recommendations for Research or Practice

Social marketing interventions should move beyond information provision and explicitly address the cognitive biases embedded in commercial marketing. Strategies that reframe risk, disrupt misleading associations, and account for heuristic processing may enhance the effectiveness of counter-marketing and regulatory approaches.

Limitations

As a qualitative study, findings are not statistically generalizable. The sample is limited to Spanish young adults and relies on self-reported experiences. Future research could employ mixed-method approaches and cross-cultural designs to extend these findings.

Keywords

social marketing nicotine marketing communication e-cigarettes young adults cognitive biases decision-making behavioral economics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackary

Cabrera

P. J.

Santiago

A. J.

Amul

G. G. H.

(2025). Examining the flavor descriptors of E-Cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches in the Philippines: Regulatory challenges and opportunities. PLOS Global Public Health, 5(2), e0004248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004248

Almestahiri

Rundle-Thiele

Parkinson

Arli

(2017). The use of the major components of social marketing: A systematic review of tobacco cessation programs. Social Marketing Quarterly, 23(3), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500417704813

Almodarresi

S. M. A.

Rasty

(2019). The moderating effect of emotion regulation on the relationship between risk aversion and brand sensitivity. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 28(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-09-2017-1581

Ariely

(2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. HarperCollins.

Ariely

Shampan’er

(2007). How small is zero price? The true value of free products. Marketing Science, 26(6), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0233

Berg

C. J.

Stratton

Schauer

G. L.

Lewis

Wang

Windle

Kegler

M. C.

(2014). Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and Marijuana among young adults: Marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.958857

Braca

Dondio

(2022). Developing Persuasive Systems for Marketing: The Interplay of Persuasion Techniques, Customer Traits and Persuasive Message Design. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1932699/v2

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cheney

Gowin

Wann

T. F.

(2015). Marketing practices of vapor Store owners. American Journal of Public Health, 105(6), e16–e21. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302610

10.

Christensen

J. F.

Farahi

Vartanian

Yazdi

S. H. N.

(2022). Choice hygiene for “consumer neuroscientists”? Ethical considerations and proposals for future endeavours. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 612639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.612639

11.

Collins

Glasser

Abudayyeh

Pearson

Villanti

A. C.

(2018). E-Cigarette marketing and communication: How E-Cigarette companies market E-Cigarettes and the public engages with E-Cigarette information. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 21(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx284

12.

Corsello

Ferraro

Reali

Venditto

Spatuzzo

Cicco

M. D.

Ghezzi

Indinnimeo

Grutta

S. L.

(2025). Novel nicotine and tobacco products in pediatric age: A joint position paper. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 51(1), 270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-025-02116-2

13.

Creswell

J. W.

Clark

V. P.

(2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA.

14.

Dowling

Guhl

Klapper

Spann

Stich

Yegoryan

(2019). Behavioral biases in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00699-x

15.

Ermeç

(2022). How Effective Are Social Media Influencers’ Recommendations? The Effect of Message Source on Purchasing Intention and e-Word of Mouth (WOM) from a Para-Social Interaction Perspective. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 14(1), 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2022.1428

16.

ESOMAR . (2022). ESOMAR guideline for ethical market research.

17.

Evoy

K. E.

Yett

E. S.

Ramey

Lodise

(2025). Evidence regarding e‐cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy and treatment for e‐cigarette cessation: An overview and guide for clinicians. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 8(9), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.70092

18.

Fauzi

Areesantichai

(2022). Factors associated with electronic cigarettes use among adolescents in Jakarta, Indonesia. Journal of health research, 36(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhr-01-2020-0008

19.

Feeney

Rossetti

Terrien

(2022). E-Cigarettes—A review of the evidence—Harm versus harm reduction. Tobacco Use Insights, 15, 1179173X221087524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221087524

20.

Fielding‐Singh

Epperson

A. E.

Prochaska

J. J.

(2020). Tobacco product promotions remain ubiquitous and are associated with use and susceptibility to use among adolescents. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(2), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa136

21.

Fitzpatrick

Dance

Silver

Violini

Hird

T. R.

(2022). Tobacco industry messaging around harm: Narrative framing in PMI and BAT press releases and annual reports 2011 to 2021. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 958354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.958354

22.

Glantz

S. A.

(2018). Heated tobacco products: The example of IQOS. Tobacco Control, 27(Suppl 1), s1–s6. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054601

23.

Glantz

S. A.

(2019). The evidence of electronic cigarette risks is catching up with public perception. JAMA Network Open, 2(3), e191032. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1032

24.

Lohrenz

Salas

Baldwin

P. R.

Soltani

Kirk

Cinciripini

P. M.

Montague

P. R.

(2016). Belief about nicotine modulates subjective craving and insula activity in deprived smokers. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00126

25.

Harrell

P. T.

England

Barnett

T. E.

Simmons

V. N.

Handel

R. W.

Paulson

A. C.

(2024). Adolescent E-Cigarette expectancies: Measure development and preliminary validity of the electronic nicotine vaping outcomes measure for youth. Tobacco Use Insights, 17, 1179173X241266563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173x241266563

26.

Hastings

(2003). Competition in social marketing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 9(3), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15245000309109

27.

Hennink

Kaiser

B. N.

(2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

28.

Hori

Tabuchi

Kunugita

(2021). Rapid increase in heated tobacco product (HTP) use from 2015 to 2019: From the Japan ‘society and new tobacco’Internet survey (JASTIS). Tobacco Control, 30(4), 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055652

29.

Huang

Duan

Kwok

Binns

Vera

Kim

Szczypka

Emery

(2018). Vaping versus JUULing: How the extraordinary growth and marketing of JUUL transformed the US retail E-Cigarette market. Tobacco Control, 28(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054382

30.

Isip

Calvert

(2020). Analyzing big tobacco’s global youth marketing strategies and factors influencing smoking initiation by Nigeria youths using the theory of triadic influence. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 377. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8451-0

31.

Jackler

R. K.

Ramamurthi

(2019). Nicotine arms race: JUUL and the high-nicotine product market. Tobacco Control, 28(6), 623–628. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054796

32.

John

D. R.

Pechmann

Chaplin

L. N.

(2024). Understanding the past and preparing for tomorrow: Children and adolescent consumer behavior insights from research in our field. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 9(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1086/729274

33.

Jordt

S. E.

Jabba

S. V.

(2024). Introduction of nicotine analogue-containing oral pouch products in the United States. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation, 10(November), 61. https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/195621

34.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341

35.

Kahraman

Kazançoğlu

İ.

(2019). Understanding Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Toward Natural‐claimed Products: A Qualitative Research in Personal Care Products. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1218–1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2312

36.

Kim

A. E.

Arnold

K. Y.

Makarenko

(2014). E-cigarette advertising expenditures in the US, 2011–2012. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(4), 409–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.003

37.

Kim

Watkins

S. L.

Koester

K. A.

Mock

Kim

H. C.

Olson

S. J.

Harvanko

A. M.

Ling

P. M.

(2020). Unboxed: US young adult tobacco users’ responses to a new heated tobacco product. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218108

38.

Koo

D.-W.

(2018). The Impact of Risk Perceptions of Food Ingredients on the Restaurant Industry: Focused on the Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 10(9), 3132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093132

39.

Kostygina

Tran

Kim

Czaplicki

Kierstead

Kreslake

Emery

Schillo

(2022). Heating Up: How Early Twitter Marketing Gave Rise to Organic Word-of-Mouth About Heated Tobacco Products. Social Media + Society, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221141851

40.

Kreitzberg

D. S.

Hinds

J. T.

Pasch

K. E.

Loukas

Perry

C. L.

(2019). Exposure to ENDS advertising and use of Marijuana in ENDS among college students. Addictive Behaviors, 93, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.012

41.

Krippendorff

(2026). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

42.

Kudenga

Vorster

Yang

(2023). Knowledge and attitude of adolescents regarding E-Cigarettes: A scoping review. South African Dental Journal, 78(08), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v78i08.16095

43.

Lavoie

(2024). Strengthening the evidence base to support stronger regulation of social media based advertising of E-Cigarette products to youth. Thorax, 79(7), 595–596. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2023-221169

44.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

45.

Ling

P. M.

Hrywna

Talbot

E. M.

Lewis

M. J.

(2023). Tobacco-derived nicotine pouch brands and marketing messages on internet and traditional media: Content analysis. JMIR Form Res, 7, e39146. https://doi.org/10.2196/39146

46.

Ling

P. M.

Kim

Egbe

C. O.

Patanavanich

Pinho

Hendlin

Y. H.

(2022). Moving targets: How the rapidly changing tobacco and nicotine landscape creates advertising and promotion policy challenges. Tobacco Control, 31(2), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056552

47.

Lyu

J. C.

Ozga

J. E.

Stanton

C. A.

Hrywna

Ganz

Cornacchione Ross

Sharma

Ling

P. M.

(2025). Advertising the leading US nicotine pouch brand: A content analysis of ZYN advertisements from 2019 to 2023. Tobacco Control. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-059145

48.

Market Research Society . (2021). Code of conduct.

49.

Marron

(2017). Smoke gets in your eyes: What is sociological about cigarettes? The Sociological Review, 65(4), 882–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.12404

50.

Marynak

Wang

Borowiecki

Kim

Tynan

M. A.

Emery

King

B. A.

(2021). Nicotine pouch unit sales in the US, 2016-2020. JAMA, 326(6), 566–568. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.10366

51.

McDermott

Reichmann

Mason

Fearon

I. M.

O’Connell

Nahde

(2023). An assessment of nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of the pulze heated tobacco system compared with cigarettes. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 9037. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36259-1

52.

Miller

B. J.

Meshnick

A. B.

Lushniak

B. D.

(2023). Electronic nicotine delivery systems: The need for continued regulatory innovation. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

53.

Mishra

M. K.

Kesharwani

Das

(2016). The relationship between risk aversion, brand trust, brand affect and loyalty. Journal of Indian Business Research, 8(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-04-2015-0045

54.

Mullainathan

Thaler

R. H.

(2008). Behavioral economics (2nd, Ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

55.

Nisbett

R. E.

Wilson

T. D.

(1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 35(4), 250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250

56.

Noar

S. M.

Gottfredson

N. C.

Kieu

Rohde

J. A.

Hall

M. G.

Fendinger

N. J.

Brewer

N. T.

(2022). Impact of vaping prevention advertisements on US adolescents. JAMA Network Open, 5(10), e2236370. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36370

57.

Padamwar

P. K.

Dawra

(2024). An Integrative Review of the Decoy Effect on Choice Behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 41(11), 2657–2676. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22076

58.

Peón

Antelo

Calvo-Silvosa

(2017). An inclusive taxonomy of behavioral biases. European Journal of Government and Economics, 6(1), 24–58. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2017.6.1.4322

59.

Reed

K. L.

Harvey

E. M.

Everly

C. J.

(2021). The intersection of behavioral economics and the general medicine literature. The American Journal of Medicine, 134(11), 1350–1356.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.06.041

60.

Rockloff

Hing

(2012). The impact of jackpots on EGM gambling behavior: A review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(4), 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9336-7

61.

Romijnders

K. A. G. J.

van Osch

de Vries

Talhout

(2018). Perceptions and reasons regarding e-cigarette use among users and non-users: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061190

62.

Rubio

R. S.

Nicolau

J. L.

(2015). Testing the Decoy Effect in the Presence of Store Brands. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-07-2013-0144

63.

Scheffels

(2008). A difference that makes a difference? Young adult smokers’ perceptions of snus and cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 17(6), 422–426. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol.2007.025104

64.

Seabrook

J. A.

Twynstra

Gilliland

(2021). Correlates of lifetime and past month vape use in a sample of Canadian university students. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 15, 11782218211052059. https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218211052059

65.

Shadel

W. G.

Niaura

Abrams

D. B.

(2001). How do adolescents process smoking and antismoking advertisements? A social cognitive analysis with implications for understanding smoking initiation. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.429

66.

Siegel

R. M.

Gordon

Dynan

(2021). Behavioral economics: A primer and applications to the UN sustainable development goal of good health and well-being. Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos, 4(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports4020016

67.

Sternquist

Chen

(2006). Food Retail Buyer Behaviour in the People’s Republic of China: A Grounded Theory Model. Qualitative Market Research an International Journal, 9(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750610671671

68.

Subramaniam

G. A.

Nolan

Huntley

Corbin

Crenshaw

Mandell

Linton

Blackeney

(2023). National institute on drug abuse: Dissemination of scientific knowledge to improve adolescent health. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 32(1), 157–167.

69.

Sun

Lim

C. C.

Chung

Cheng

Davidson

Tisdale

Leung

Gartner

C. E.

Connor

Hall

W. D.

Chan

G. C. K.

(2023). Vaping on TikTok: A systematic thematic analysis. Tobacco Control, 32(2), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056619

70.

Tanner

E. C.

Tanner

J. F.

Velasco

Yang

(2022). Vaping and dynamic risk construction: Toward a model of adolescentrisk‐relatedschema development. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(3), 1244–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12470

71.

Thapa

Pandey

S. C.

Panda

Paswan

A. K.

Ghimire

(2022). Vaping among youth: Reasons, realization and intention to quit. Young Consumers, 23(4), 512–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-12-2021-1429

72.

Tisdell

E. J.

Merriam

S. B.

Stuckey-Peyrot

H. L.

(2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

73.

Tosakoon

Romm

K. F.

Berg

C. J.

(2023). Nicotine pouch awareness, use and perceptions among young adults from six metropolitan statistical areas in the United States. Tob. Prev. Cessation, 9(June), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/163243

74.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

75.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

76.

Wackowski

O. A.

Gratale

S. K.

Jeong

Delnevo

C. D.

Steinberg

O’Connor

R. J.

(2022). Over 1 year later: Smokers’ EVALI awareness, knowledge and perceived impact on E-Cigarette interest. Tobacco Control, 32(e2), e255–e259. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057190

77.

Watts

McGill

Rose

Yazidjoglou

Chapman

Dessaix

Freeman

(2024). ‘It’ll save your lungs’: Early insights into nicotine pouch use and perceptions among young Australians. Health Promotion International, 39(6), daae159. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae159

78.

Yang

Velasco

Tanner

E. C.

Tanner

J. F.

(2023). How do vape advertising campaigns affect consumers’ vaping tendency? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Marketing & Public Policy, 43(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156231189181

79.

Zhang

(2022). The effects of availability heuristic cues on online related purchasing decisions. In: Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture (ICEDBC 2022), (pp. 662–669). Springer Nature.