Prevalence,Disclosure,and Help Seeking in Black and Asian Male Survivors of Sexual Violence in the United Kingdom: A Rapid Review

Abstract

Sexual violence against men has been significantly overlooked, and under-researched, with minimal attention paid to the influence of culture and ethnicity on survivors’ experiences of abuse. This rapid review examines prevalence, disclosure, help-seeking, and criminal justice experiences of Black and Asian male survivors in the United Kingdom. Eight empirical studies published since 2003 involving Black and Asian sexual violence survivors were included through comprehensive database searches, including gray literature and reference lists. Findings suggest prevalence data underestimate the true extent of victimization in ethnic minority groups in the United Kingdom. Barriers to disclosure and help-seeking were associated with specific cultural factors unique to Black and Asian male experiences, as revealed by three qualitative studies. However, accessing and reporting to the criminal justice system remains largely unexplored for Black and Asian male survivors. Methodological limitations within existing studies emphasize the urgent need for substantial, high-quality research that addresses issues with inconsistent definitions, measurements, and lack of ethnic-specific approaches across prevalence, disclosure, help-seeking, and criminal justice experiences. Culturally informed professional training emerges as a critical requirement to sensitively address the unique challenges faced by ethnic minority male survivors. Additionally, targeted outreach initiatives hold the potential to engage minority male survivors more effectively. A collaborative, system-wide approach is vital to bring to the forefront the overlooked experiences of ethnic minority males, thereby promoting an environment of support, understanding, and recovery.

Keywords

male rape ethnic minorities disclosure help seeking service provision

Sexual violence is a deeply rooted societal problem that affects individuals of all ages, genders, sexuality, ethnicity, and religious affiliation (Bagwell-Gray, 2019; Bows, 2018; Messinger & Koon-Magnin, 2019; Smith et al., 2021; Stoltenborgh et al., 2011; Torazzi et al., 2021; Vanderwoerd & Cheng, 2017), which can occur at the hand of current and past intimate partners, family members, figures of authority, acquaintances, and/or strangers (Bagwell-Gray et al., 2015). However, understanding and determining the scope of the problem is challenging since there does not appear to be a universally accepted definition that fully captures this multifaceted phenomenon.¹ Nevertheless, the consequences of sexual violence are well documented and clear, including severe and wide-ranging physio-psychological harms, particularly among women (Jina & Thomas, 2013).

The immediate and radiating effects of sexual violence pose a significant challenge for practitioners and policy makers who strive to accurately determine the prevalence of such crimes within society while working toward establishing pathways that facilitate victims’ help seeking and reporting to the criminal justice system. In the United Kingdom, there has been a notable surge in demand for political accountability and action, particularly in relation to addressing Violence Against Women and Girls (see Home Office, 2021; Mayor of London, 2022), who remain the victim group with highest prevalence of sexual (Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2021b) and domestic violence (Office for National Statistics, 2022a) compared to men across all ages and ethnicities. However, third-sector services and academics have highlighted the importance of broadening the scope of political intervention to other groups affected by sexual violence, such as men and boys (Widanaralalage, Hine, & Murphy 2022) who experience unique barriers to disclosure, help seeking, and access to the criminal justice system. Barriers include fear of not being believed, shame and embarrassment, lack of awareness of available resources, concerns about retaliation or further harm, and systemic/institutional barriers (Abdullah-Khan, 2008; Langdridge et al., 2023; Weare et al., 2024; Widanaralalage, Hine, Murphy, et al., 2022) Thus, it is imperative to widen the conversation to men and boys to ensure comprehensive support for all survivors of sexual violence.

The Scope of Men’s Sexual Victimization in the UK

Data from the Office for National Statistics (2021a, 2021b) reveals approximately 5% of men in England and Wales have experienced sexual assault after the age of 16. Additionally, year-on-year data, which combines information from the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)and police records, indicates that around 155,000 experienced some form of sexual violence within a 12-month period (Office for National Statistics, 2021a). Recent findings from the CSEW (Office for National Statistics, 2023a) reveal that 25% of all victims of sexual violence are men. These figures are likely underestimates due to the barriers men face when disclosing sexual victimization. Campaigners suggest that as many as 1 in 6 boys and 1 in 4 men have experienced unwanted sexual contact during their lifetime (1in6, n.d.; Dube et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2018) (Dube et al., 2005). Data from the support organization Survivors UK suggest that these figures are as high as 45% in a sample of gay and bisexual men (N = 505) when disclosing experiences of unwanted sexual contact (Survivors UK, 2021). These data reveal a substantial proportion of male sexual victimization remains unreported, highlighting the ongoing struggle men face in acknowledging and disclosing their experiences of victimization (Easton et al., 2014; Sorsoli et al., 2008; Widanaralalage, Hine, Murphy, et al., 2022).

It is important to note that the prevalence of sexual violence against men is influenced by complex dynamics of perpetrator gender (Widanaralalage, Reed et al., 2022). While the available data from the ONS does not explicitly outline the gender of perpetrators per victim group, past UK evidence highlights a higher prevalence of male perpetrators on male victims (96.1% Hickson et al., 1994). Hickson et al.’s work, however, focused specifically on examining the experiences of gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex, which might, in part, explain male perpetrators’ overrepresentation in the sample. Indeed, analysis of forced-to-penetrate incidents across 37 police forces in England and Wales reveals a more nuanced picture, with men found to be the most recorded offenders (60.1%) and women comprising a significant proportion (39.1%) of forced-to-penetrate cases against men (Weare, 2020). These findings highlight how, while men are likely to remain the predominant perpetrators of male sexual victimization, the involvement and prevalence of female perpetrators reflect many of the barriers encountered by men to disclose and recognize their victimization of crimes that are stereotypically seen as “female only” crimes (Willmott & Widanaralalage, 2024), particularly in contexts and communities where male sexual victimization is silenced and taboo.

Sexual violence inflicts long-term and profound effects on male victims, including the development of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, suicidal ideation, anxiety disorders, dissociation, shame and guilt, self-esteem and body image issues, trust and intimacy difficulties, substance abuse, and sexual dysfunction (Bullock & Beckson, 2011; Coxell & King, 2010; Davies et al., 2010; Lowe & Rogers, 2017; Monk-Turner & Light, 2010; Peterson et al., 2011; Walker et al., 2005). Although attempts to compare men’s symptoms with those of other victim groups have yielded mixed results (Peterson et al., 2011), there is a growing consensus that men experience post-assault sequelae of comparable magnitude yet qualitatively different in nature (Javaid, 2018; Smith et al., 2021; Widanaralalage, Reed et al., 2022).

One significant aspect of male survivors’ experiences is the intense emotional turmoil they often encounter, including feelings of emasculation and confusion over their identity, accompanied by profound shame, guilt, and self-blame (Hlavka, 2017; Widanaralalage, Hine, Murphy, Murji et al., 2022, Widanaralalage et al., 2023). These emotions draw attention to the role played by gendered stereotypes and narratives in shaping men’s reluctance to seek mental health support and engage in legal processes and with law enforcement officers (Dim & Lysova, 2022; Lysova et al., 2020). Men, in general, face challenges with help-seeking and self-caring behaviors (Addis & Mahalik, 2003) due to societal expectations associated with masculinity, which prescribe gender-appropriate behaviors such as being strong, assertive, independent, resilient, and stoic (Thompson & Bennett, 2015). Consequently, these expectations influence how male survivors perceive their mental health and subsequent post-incident behaviors, leading to risk-taking behaviors and compensatory coping strategies such as self-blame, substance abuse, and violence (Bullock & Beckson, 2011; Ellis et al., 2020; Widanaralalage et al., 2023). Acknowledging vulnerability and seeking help after sexual assault can be challenging for many men, as it goes against traditional masculine norms (Pearson & Barker, 2018). As a result, male survivors often resort to avoidance, social withdrawal, denial, and self-medication rather than disclosing the assault or reaching out for support services (Easton et al., 2014; Sable et al., 2006; Walker, 2004).

Homophobia also plays a significant role as a barrier for male victims seeking help (Abdullah-Khan, 2008; Rumney, 2008). Fear of being perceived as gay and the associated stereotypes (Diefendorf & Bridges, 2020) prevents men from reporting the assault or seeking help, perpetuating a harmful silence around their experiences. Such barriers reflect the intersectional nuances of male sexual victimization, whereby a survivor’s gender and sexual identity shape their engagement with key services in the health and criminal justice sector (Jamel et al., 2008; Javaid, 2017; Widanaralalage et al., 2023). While research examining survivors’ post-abuse experiences under an intersectional lens is limited, past research clearly highlights how men from sexual minority groups are reluctant to disclose their abuse for fear of ridicule and dismissal. Underpinning these expected reactions are biases and falsehoods that surround male sexual victimization (Turchik & Edwards, 2012).

Male rape myths are widespread beliefs that deny male sexual victimization, portray male survivors as complicit to their victimization, and minimize and trivialize the emotional consequences of sexual violence for male victims (Struckman-Johnson & Struckman-Johnson, 1992). Examples of male rape myths include: “men cannot be raped,” “only gay men are raped”; “men are only raped in prisons”; “men are too strong to be raped”; “men who are sexually aroused cannot be raped”; “men lie about being raped to hide their sexuality”; “men are not traumatised by rape” (Turchik & Edwards, 2012; Willmott & Widanaralalage, 2024). The existence and experiences of male rape myths leave many male survivors fearing they will not be believed or taken seriously (Hine et al., 2022; Lowe & Rogers, 2017; Turchik & Edwards, 2012). Male rape myths are commonly found in the healthcare system and criminal justice processes and discourage male victims from coming forward (Widanaralalage et al., 2023). For example, many service providers harbor misconceptions that sexual violence only happens to women and lack training on how to respond sensitively to male disclosure (Donnelly & Kenyon, 1996; NHS England, 2022). Poor police attitudes and insensitivity can further traumatize victims and undermine engagement with the legal process (Hine, Murphy, Yesberg et al., 2021; Rumney, 2008). Together, these findings indicate social stigma, stereotypes about masculinity, and institutional biases come together to silence male survivors and inhibit help-seeking. Targeted efforts are needed to promote disclosure and gender-informed approaches across health, social services, and criminal justice agencies.

The Need for an Intersectional Lens

Despite significant growth in research on male sexual victimization and calls for recognizing the intersections of gender and sexuality in shaping male survivors’ experiences of sexual victimization, there remains a notable gap in understanding how ethnicity and culture intersect with gendered expectations to shape the experiences of minoritized men. Particularly in the UK context, studies have tended to overlook male sexual victimization within minoritized ethnic groups. Two of the largest ethnic minority groups in the UK are individuals of Asian and Black African/Caribbean background, comprising approximately 9.3% and 4% of the population, respectively (Office for National Statistics, 2022b). While having important cultural differences, these communities share the fear of dishonoring oneself and family, which shapes how individuals respond to trauma and disclosure (Gilbert et al., 2004; Gilligan & Akhtar, 2006). Individuals from minoritized ethnicities’ decision to conceal their experiences of sexual trauma is often motivated by pressures to not bring shame to their families (Rehal & Maguire, 2014). Moreover, families frequently cover up such incidents, fearing that they may discredit their status in the community (Gill & Harrison, 2019; Harrison & Gill, 2018). Consequently, the sociocultural context creates substantial barriers to disclosure and help-seeking for minoritized men who experienced sexual abuse. This is despite research indicating that sexual victimization is particularly prevalent among minority ethnic men who have sex with men in the UK, with 27% of men from these communities reporting sexual abuse (Jaspal et al., 2017). However, previous studies suggest that these numbers are likely underestimates due to the influence of collectivist norms and patriarchal values prevalent in many minoritized cultures (Sawrikar & Katz, 2017).

Collectivist cultures, commonly found in Black and Asian communities, place significant emphasis on family reputation and honor, playing a pivotal role in social life (Gilbert et al., 2004). Upholding family honor becomes a major preoccupation that refrains sexual violence survivors from disclosing and seeking help, as the stigma associated with male sexual victimization brings shame upon the entire family. Moreover, the expectations of masculinity deeply rooted in the patriarchal values of many minority cultures pressure men to embody traits like dominance, stoicism, and being the family provider (Simkhada et al., 2021). Consequently, admitting vulnerability through the disclosure of sexual trauma may be perceived as a sign of weakness and failure to fulfill the male gender role (Gill & Begum, 2023). These sociocultural barriers further exacerbate the self-stigma, shame, and isolation already felt by male survivors. It is imperative, therefore, to adopt an intersectional lens that considers the complex interplay of ethnicity, culture, and gendered expectations to better understand and address the challenges faced by minoritized male victims of sexual abuse. While primary research with female survivors supports these claims (Armstrong et al., 2018), only a few studies explicitly explore the narratives of adult male survivors from ethnic minority groups.

Recent studies have illuminated the nuanced role of ethnicity in shaping attitudes toward sexual violence. Willmott and Widanaralalage’s (2024) investigation revealed that participants from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds exhibited significantly higher acceptance of male rape myths compared to Caucasian participants, corroborating previous findings by Rosenstein (2015). This highlights the influence of cultural norms and societal perceptions on the endorsement of harmful beliefs surrounding sexual assault. Similarly, Willmott et al., (2024) demonstrated that both male and BAME participants expressed more problematic attitudes toward sexual violence, emphasizing the intersecting identities that contribute to varying degrees of myth acceptance. Furthermore, Lilley et al. (2023) exploration of juror decision-making uncovered significant disparities based on juror ethnicity, with Caucasian jurors demonstrating a propensity for leniency compared to their minority ethnic counterparts. These studies collectively underscore the need for intersectional analyses when examining attitudes toward sexual violence, emphasizing the complex interplay between ethnicity, gender, and societal perceptions in shaping beliefs surrounding rape myths.

Understanding the experiences of sexual victimization in men from minoritized ethnicities in the UK is crucial for the development of culturally sensitive interventions and effective support pathways. This rapid review is the first to investigate and synthesize research on Black and Asian male survivors in the UK by quantifying and qualifying the nature and scope of this public health problem and identifying knowledge gaps to inform practice, policy, and research. The review has the following objectives: (a) determining the prevalence of sexual victimization among Black and Asian men in the UK, (b) identifying the challenges faced by men from minority groups when disclosing their experiences of victimization and exploring the barriers they encounter while seeking help and accessing support services, and (c) examining the difficulties minority men experience when involving the criminal justice system regarding sexual victimization cases. By addressing these objectives, the review seeks to provide valuable insights to guide practice, shape policies, and inspire further research in this critical area.

Methods

A rapid review was undertaken within a 6-month timeframe. By accelerating and streamlining typical traditional systematic review processes, rapid reviews provide a timely and resource-efficient method of synthesized evidence to inform key decisions in healthcare policy and practice (Moons et al., 2021). However, rapid review methodology is variable, and a single validated approach does not currently exist. As such, this review has adopted recent Cochrane interim guidance (Garritty et al., 2021), which aims to support the conduct and improve the utility and robustness of rapid review results. This guidance includes specific recommendations to improve rigor at all stages of the review process including search strategies, screening, study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and synthesis. The review also draws from Rapid Evidence Assessment methodologies to provide a timely synthesis of the available evidence (Barnett et al., 2021) on the prevalence, disclosure, help-seeking, and criminal justice experiences of Black and Asian male survivors of sexual violence in the UK. To enhance transparency and reduce bias, a pre-registered review was published on PROSPERO (ID CRD42023407522) on March 15th, 2023.

Search Strategy

Searches were carried out across four databases in April 2023 (spanning January 1, 2000 to April 1, 2023): Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Gray literature searches were also carried out for leading specialist sexual violence organizations in the UK (Male Survivors Partnership, Survivors UK, 1 in 6, Rape Crisis, and ManKind UK), as well as the ONS, gov.uk research database, and British Library EThOS thesis database. Reference lists of included studies were also hand-searched to minimize inaccuracies from the database search and identify any other papers meeting the eligibility requirements.

Assessment of Quality

Citations were initially imported into EndNote software to remove duplicates and then uploaded to Zotero software to facilitate screening. As per Cochrane guidance (Garritty et al., 2021), one reviewer (SJ) screened all titles and abstracts. A second reviewer (KW) also independently screened 25% of abstracts and then screened all excluded abstracts. For full-text screening, one reviewer screened all included full-text articles, and the second reviewer then independently screened all excluded full-text articles. Disagreements were resolved by discussion between the two reviewers and consultation with the wider research group where consensus could not be reached. Notably, given the small number of relevant papers identified and the unsuitability of the excluded papers, the reviewers reached full agreement in their assessments. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram (Figure 1) details the search results and the process of screening and selecting studies for inclusion, including the reasons for study exclusion. Studies clearly not relevant were rejected without recording a detailed reason, but “near misses” were recorded within the PRISMA flow diagram. As per guidance, the relevant Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2024) was applied according to the design of the included study (cross-sectional, cohort, experimental, qualitative, or mixed methods). One reviewer (SJ) assessed risk of bias for each study, with a second reviewer (KW) providing a full verification of all judgments and support statements for each. All studies were included in the review irrespective of rating; however, implications of methodological flaws for review findings were discussed within the narrative synthesis.

Figure 1.

PRISMA flowchart.

Eligibility and Exclusion Criteria

Studies meeting the following criteria were included in the review: examination of the prevalence, disclosure/help-seeking behaviors, or experiences within the criminal justice system related to sexual violence against Black and/or Asian males in the UK context; publication in English from 2000 onwards. Studies based outside the UK were included only if deemed relevant to the UK context. All primary research study designs, including qualitative and mixed methods studies, were eligible for inclusion. Studies falling outside of the above timeframe and not focusing on Black/Asian male populations or not directly relating to prevalence, disclosure, help seeking, and criminal justice experiences were excluded. Additionally, non-empirical studies such as revies, editorials, and opinion pieces were excluded from consideration.

The search strategy employed Boolean operators, combining the core concepts of sexual violence, males, and the UK setting. Ethnicity was not added as a key concept to capture studies that did not explicitly focus on Black or Asian groups but did consider ethnicity within analysis. Searches for other databases were database-specific adaptations of these keywords and/or MeSH headings (See Supplemental materials for the Medline search strategy, which was adapted for other databases). As per Cochrane guidance, only English language papers were included. Searches focused on UK-based studies but included world literature where relevant to a UK context. A methodological filter for qualitative studies was not applied to enable mixed-method studies to be identified.

Study Selection

Studies were assessed for their eligibility according to inclusion and exclusion criteria specified in the pre-registered protocol. The Patient/problem, Intervention/exposure, Comparison/control, Outcome(s) (PICO) framework was adopted as it is suitable for mixed-method reviews composed of quantitative and qualitative lines of inquiry. Given the context-sensitivity of sexual violence policy and practice and ethnic minority experiences across countries, this review focused on UK-based studies. As a prior scoping review found few studies explicitly focused on ethnic minorities, study populations, assessments, and outcomes were broadly defined. No restrictions were applied in terms of research setting or length of study and included both published and unpublished studies. All primary research study designs were permitted. Reviews, case reports, editorials, news/opinion pieces, letters, comments, and purely methodological studies were excluded.

Data Synthesis

Due to the limited number of included studies and the heterogeneity of these studies, a comprehensive thematic analysis could not be conducted. Instead, a descriptive summary was conducted to present the characteristics of included studies. A narrative synthesis of findings from the included studies was then conducted to interpret the collective evidence fully. Synthesis was grouped across each of the three study aims (prevalence, disclosure, help seeking, and criminal justice system experiences) to synthesize current literature and highlight significant research limitations across each area.

Data Extraction

One reviewer (SJ) extracted all relevant data from each study using a piloted data extraction form in Microsoft Excel. A second reviewer (KW) checked extracted data for accuracy and completeness. As per Cochrane guidance, data extraction was limited to a minimal set of essential data items, including publication details (author, title, year of publication), research aim, recruitment procedures, data collection method (e.g., interview, focus group, face-to-face), study design, population (survivors, health professionals), sample characteristics (e.g., age, ethnicity, and religion) and size, outcome, as well as any author recommendations or conclusions based on findings (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Included Studies.

Article Name	Author Name (Year)	Methodology	Aims and Objectives
Child sexual abuse reported by an English national sample: characteristics and demography	Bebbington et al. (2011)	Cross-sectional survey, random sample of English household population (N = 7,353); Black male victims = 4.8% (5/105); South Asian male victims = 4.1% (7/170)	To establish sociodemographic distribution of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) in the general population.
Immaterial Boys? A Large-Scale Exploration of Gender-Based Differences in Child Sexual Exploitation Service Users	Cockbain et al. (2017)	Cross-sectional survey, Childhood Sexual Exploitation survivors from Barnardo’s national database (N = 9,042); Black male victims = 6%; Asian male victims = 5%	A large-scale empirical assessment of differences and commonalities between boys and girls accessing CSE support services in the UK.
Sexual abuse and HIV-risk behavior among black and minority ethnic (BME) men who have sex with men in the UK	Jaspal et al. (2017)	Cross-sectional survey of BME men who have sex with other men and accessed a Sexual Health Clinic (N = 432); Black male victims = 3.01% (13/432); South Asian male victims = 27% (103/432)	Exploring the relationship between sexual abuse experiences and sexual risk taking, predicting that this relationship would be mediated by victimization and maladaptive coping variables
Mental and sexual health outcomes following sexual assault in adolescents: a prospective cohort study	Khadr et al. (2018)	Prospective longitudinal study with attendees of a sexual assault referral center (SARC) in Greater London (N = 6 male survivors, of which two Black and one South Asian)	Examine the characteristics of adolescents accessing SARC services and the trajectory of their health and wellbeing after sexual assault.
Sexual offenses prevalence and victim characteristics, England and Wales	Office for National Statistics (2023a)	Random national sample of self-reported and police-reported sexual assaults in England and Wales based upon findings from the Crime Survey for England and Wales and police-recorded crime (N = 171/2,356 Asian/Asian British Men)	To estimate sexual offense numbers, prevalence, and victim characteristics, including breakdowns by type of incident, sex, victim-perpetrator relationship, and location.
“They Wouldn’t Believe Me”: Giving a Voice to British South Asian Male Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse	Gill and Begum (2023)	Qualitative study with CSA British Asian Survivors who accessed counseling organization in the Survivors Trust (N = 8)	To explore experiences of male survivors from British South Asian communities, with a focus on disclosure and help seeking.
Recovery Experiences from CSA among Black Men: Historical/Sociocultural Interrelationships	Myrie and Schwab (2023)	Qualitative study of Black CSA male survivors living in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States (N = 6).	Using critical race theory lens and transactional model of stress and coping, the study explores Black CSA survivors’ “experiences and their recovery journeys.”
Improving responses to the sexual abuse of Black, Asian, and minority ethnic children	Ali et al. (2021)	Qualitative study with professionals in the voluntary sector in England (N = 16) who worked with Black, Asian, and minority ethnic survivors of CSA.	To address knowledge gaps around professional practice in supporting children from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic backgrounds who are at risk of experiencing CSA.

Results

Literature Search and Description of Studies

The search identified 1,080 records after duplicate removal. After title and abstract screening, 321 records were retained for full-text screening. Thirty-nine gray literature reports were also identified for full-text screening. Ten studies relating to sexual violence of Black and Asian men in the UK met the inclusion criteria. Six of these related to prevalence and two related to disclosure and help seeking. No studies were identified related to Black and Asian men’s experiences within the UK’s Criminal Justice System. Study types included four cross-sectional surveys, three qualitative studies, and one prospective cohort design. Overall, very few studies were identified that aligned with review aims and inclusion criteria. Many studies were excluded due to limitations surrounding ethnicity, including a lack of reporting of ethnic makeup of sample, inclusion of White British only samples, inappropriate aggregate (BAME) or binary (White vs Non-White) categorization, or a lack of appropriate analysis making it unclear how salient findings are for Black and Asian groups specifically. Identified papers are analyzed and presented in a narrative synthesis below according to each key review question (a) prevalence, (b) disclosure and help-seeking, (c) criminal justice system), with core limitations and areas for improvement highlighted.

RQ 1: Prevalence

Five studies (Bebbington et al., 2011; Cockbain et al., 2017; Jaspal et al., 2017; Khadr et al., 2018; Office for National Statistics, 2023b) were identified that related to prevalence, one of which was the ONS dataset output on victim characteristics of sexual offenses. In the UK, official statistics on sexual violence are derived from two main sources (a) the CSEW and (b) police record crime. The CSEW is a representative household survey of the England and Wales population comprised of a face-to-face questionnaire that asks respondents to report on sexual violence experiences within the previous year. More recently, an anonymous self-completion survey was introduced to improve the reliability of estimates and reporting rates of sensitive disclosures, including sexual violence. While the ONS does produce regular outputs on victim characteristics of sexual offenses, ethnicity is neglected as a key feature in the main report (unlike age, gender, and deprivation measures). A supplementary table² does provide data on victim ethnicity; however, for Asian/Asian British and Black/Black British males, these are largely suppressed due to disclosure constraints. The only figure publicly available is an unweighted base estimate of 171/2356 (7.26%) for Asian/Asian British men. Unfortunately, ONS statistics on UK child sexual abuse prevalence in England and Wales (Office for National Statistics, 2020) also neglects to produce any data on ethnicity.

While lifetime prevalence studies do exist in the UK (Coxell et al., 1999; Coxell & King, 2010; Plant et al., 2004), most are outdated, and none explicitly include a meaningful analysis of sexual victimization across different ethnic minority groups. Alternative, less reliable indicators and sources of prevalence data identified by this review rely on the clinical characteristics of those in services or established British health research cohorts that collect and explore relevant sexual violence variables. However, these studies are limited and fragmented. For example, despite being the recommended treatment pathway for sexual offenses, sexual assault referral centers (SARC) do not currently publish routine data on service user characteristics. While regional and small-scale SARC audits and research studies have shown high prevalence of sexual violence experiences by ethnicity (McLean, 2007), almost none further broke this down by gender. Khadr et al. (2018) was the sole study identified by this review that examined the childhood sexual abuse (CSA) prevalence of a limited number of SARC service users, disaggregated by both ethnicity and gender. However, despite a diverse sample of nearly 50% non-White, this study only included six males (two Black and one South Asian male) compared to 141 females. Interestingly, compared with non-participants, participants were also significantly less likely to be of Asian ethnicity.

While some established British research cohorts collect relevant sexual violence and ethnicity variables (e.g., Chaplin et al., 2021), almost none have explicitly focused on the relationship except Bebbington et al. (2011). This study utilized data from the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (N = 7,353) in England to estimate child sexual abuse prevalence. This study estimated 8% of men (294/3,630) to have experienced sexual abuse of any description before 16; however, no significant differences were found in prevalence rates between White (5.4%), Black (4.8%), and Asian (4.1%) men. Jaspal et al.’s (2017) study had a specific focus on the lifetime sexual abuse prevalence of ethnic minority men who have sex with other men accessing a limited number of sexual health charities in the UK. Of 432 male participants, 143 reported sexual abuse (27%), of which 103 (23.84%) were South Asian and 13 (3.01%) were Black. Cockbain et al. (2017) assessed characteristics of individuals who had experienced childhood sexual exploitation on the Barnardo’s central register (a non-governmental organization and the United Kingdom’s largest provider of childhood sexual exploitation services). Of the 2,986 male service users, 83% were White, 6% Black, and 5% Asian, compared to youth population figures of 82%, 4%, and 9%, respectively. This may indicate an overrepresentation of Black and underrepresentation of Asian groups; however, formal statistical analyses were not carried out. It is important to note that the study explicitly stated that it “found no theoretical or empirical grounds to expect an association between service users’ gender and their ethnicity.” (p. 665) without offering further explanation as to the assertion.

RQ 2: Disclosure and Help-seeking

Only three studies were identified relating to disclosure and help-seeking of Asian and Black men survivors of sexual violence in the UK, two from the scientific literature (Gill & Begum, 2023; Myrie & Schwab, 2023) and one from the gray literature (Ali et al., 2021), all relating to CSA.

Gill and Begum (2023) focused specifically on the experiences of eight British South Asian males who had experienced CSA, focusing specifically on understanding the complexities of disclosure for men in these communities. Most Asian survivors in this study opted for disclosing to non-family members for fear of “letting down” the family and compromising the family’s standing in the community. Other Asian survivors in the study expressed doubt over whether family members would believe them, thus pushing survivors to protect themselves from a disappointing reaction to their disclosure.

Myrie and Schwab (2023) conducted a qualitative analysis of the experiences of six Black male survivors of CSA living in Canada, the United States, and the UK. They found that Black survivors were vulnerable to long-term mental health consequences; however, neglected to disclose their experiences and seek support. Black survivors reported concerns around protecting the family from outside judgment, given the shame and stigma attached to mental health in Black and minority ethnic (BME) communities in the UK (Memon et al., 2016). Relatedly, Black men reported a reluctance to disclose and seek support for fear of marginalization from their community, confirming the importance of cultural dynamics in shaping survivors’ experiences with recognition and help-seeking. Despite focusing specifically on Black men’s experiences, Myrie and Schwab call for caution on the transferability of their findings, due to a small sample of men from different countries. Indeed, only one participant was from the UK. Furthermore, the sample was recruited across multiple entry points, including community agencies, support groups, and counseling and therapy centers, thus potentially introducing a sampling bias.

Ali et al. (2021) focused on professional responses to child sexual abuse within general “BAME” groups. The study reports a series of cultural barriers that refrain BAME CSA survivors to disclose, including pressures to conform to gender roles, fear of being disbelieved, and familial pressures to maintain honor and prevent shame. Professionals also reported structural, societal, and organizational barriers to accessing support for minority CSA survivors in the UK, highlighting how agencies’s cultural insensitivity toward BAME survivors may enhance mistrust toward services. The study has many strengths, including a unique perspective on the experiences of CSA survivors from BAME community through the lenses of specialist service providers, an approach that is not uncommon in the male victimization literature, given the well-known challenges accessing these communities (Sivagurunathan et al., 2019; Widanaralalage et al., 2023). However, despite attempts to highlight findings specific to Black and Asian groups, the BAME focus does not allow for a clear appraisal of the extent to which the barriers and challenges for disclosure and help seeking are shared or unique. The publication is also not peer reviewed, so caution is needed in interpreting the findings.

RQ 3: Access to the Criminal Justice System

This review did not identify any eligible studies concerned with the experiences of Black or Asian male survivors within the criminal justice system. While a limited number of UK studies do exist (Jamel, 2010; Jamel et al., 2008) that demonstrate men’s poor experiences with disclosure of sexual assault to the police and the wider judicial system, these studies do not disaggregate analysis by ethnicity. However, both studies do highlight the need for greater training and dedicated support services sensitive to the intersection of sexuality and ethnicity in sexual assault.

Discussion

Our rapid review highlights substantial gaps in the literature on sexual violence against ethnic minority men in the UK. Despite recent calls for improving how ethnicity data is collected and acknowledged in healthcare research,³ the evidence base on male survivors’ experiences remains significantly limited across all levels of analysis, reporting, and inclusion of diverse groups. This rapid review identified a stark paucity of literature examining prevalence, disclosure, help-seeking, and access to the criminal justice system among Asian and Black male survivors. The sparse data available paints a concerning picture of unmet needs among these populations. Substantial research is urgently required to provide clarity on the true scale and nature of male sexual victimization among Asian and Black men in the UK.

The review highlighted how the UK male sexual violence literature is characterized by suboptimal consideration of ethnicity at inclusion, reporting, and analysis levels. Included studies also suffered from significant methodological flaws identified by recent reviews of male sexual violence literature (Langdridge et al., 2023; Thomas & Kopel, 2023) relating to inconsistency in definition, measurement, and sampling procedures. The studies included in this review provide limited and mixed evidence regarding the prevalence of sexual violence among Asian and Black men, with rates ranging between 5% and 6% (Bebbington et al., 2011; Cockbain et al., 2017). These figures are consistent with both historic (e.g., Coxell et al., 1999) and recent (ONS, 2021a, 2021b) data on prevalence of lifetime sexual victimization among all men in the UK, estimated at around 5% of the adult male population. Similarly, Jaspal et al.’s (2017) work with BME men who have sex with other men emphasize the increased rates of victimization among sexual minority found in other research on male sexual victimization (Hickson et al., 1994; Survivors UK, 2021), highlighting the importance of taking an intersectional lens to the study of sexual violence among these communities. However, caution is necessary when comparing these figures to data available for White male survivors, as significant heterogeneity in sample populations and measurement issues precludes meaningful comparisons.

Research on sexual violence is often hindered by the lack of consistency in defining these crimes (Bagwell-Gray et al., 2015), as was the case for this rapid review. Sources varied in focus, from CSA (Bebbington et al., 2011), adolescent sexual assault (Khadr et al., 2018), lifetime sexual victimization (Jaspal et al., 2017), and recent adult sexual victimization (Office for National Statistics, 2023a). Within each study, different definitions of sexual violence were employed, with varying degrees of inclusion of acts ranging from nonconsensual sexual contact (Jaspal et al., 2017; Khadr et al., 2018) to uncomfortable sexual talk (Bebbington et al., 2011). Sexual assault, as defined by the CSEW encompasses rape or assault by penetration (including attempts), indecent exposure, or unwanted sexual touching, whereas in police-recorded crime refers only to the sexual touching of a person without their consent (Office for National Statistics, 2023a). Police-recorded sexual offenses also cover a broader range of offenses than are measured by the CSEW.

Taken together, the findings of this review highlight an inconsistency in definition that is commonplace across the sexual violence literature, as reflected in the 2018 NHS Strategic Direction for Sexual Assault and Abuse Services report (NHS England, 2018), which includes forced marriage, honor-based violence, female genital mutilation, human trafficking, and ritual abuse in their definition of sexual violence. UK legal definitions further exacerbate this conceptual confusion, whereby the most recent 2003 Sexual Offenses Act only recognizes rape as penile penetration and, therefore, can still only be committed by men (Weare, 2020). This has potential implications for identification and self-report of rape, as well as perpetuating rape myths and stigma for male survivors (Hine, Murphy, & Churchyard, 2021). Challenges with recognition (both personal and institutional) affect self-disclosure and perpetuate stigma.

With no standardized prevalence measures, comparisons were precluded. Nonetheless, existing data indicates concerning vulnerability among ethnic minority males. Their underrepresentation likely reflects non-disclosure rooted in cultural factors like gender norms, fears of stigma, and familial reputation (Gill & Begum, 2023; Lowe & Balfour, 2015; Simkhada et al., 2021). More accurate prevalence estimations require addressing definitional and measurement issues, along with adopting ethnicity-focused sampling and analyses. As no singular validated assessment of sexual violence exists, measurement across studies is also highly variable. Self-report methods have been recognized as being likely to be more accurate for disclosure compared to face-to-face methods of inquiry (as evidenced by the CSEW). However, male disclosure is still limited by several established factors including gendered and cultural differences in what constitutes abuse (Gill & Begum, 2023; Widanaralalage et al., 2023). The understanding of ethnic minority male experiences is even poorer, particularly surrounding the influence of ethnocultural and other relevant factors in driving underrepresentation in prevalence data. Conceptual clarity and transparency within academic literature regarding definitions, measurements, and sample derivation are necessary to gain reliable insights into the prevalence and context of sexual violence experiences for ethnic minority males. An enhanced consideration of ethnicity in national statistics and established healthcare cohorts is desperately required to meaningfully examine scale of issue and address unmet needs of ethnic minority male survivors in the UK.

A notable finding in this review was an emergence of contemporary research exploring disclosure experiences of Black and Asian male survivors of CSA in the UK (Ali et al., 2021; Gill & Begum, 2023; Myrie & Schwab, 2023). Although significant gaps in knowledge remain, initial qualitative studies have identified a reluctance among British South Asian men to disclose CSA to family members due to concerns about bringing shame and dishonor to the family and damaging community standing (Gill & Begum, 2023). Research also indicates that cultural factors, like desires to protect family from judgment and marginalization, create barriers to disclosure for Black male survivors (Myrie & Schwab, 2023). However, small sample sizes and lack of UK-specific data limit the transferability of these findings. Broader examinations of disclosure among BAME survivors highlight cultural barriers related to gender roles, fears of being disbelieved, and familial honor, but lack ethnic specificity (Ali et al., 2021). Overall, existing studies suggest cultural factors pose significant challenges to disclosure for Asian and Black male CSA survivors in the UK, but more research is needed to strengthen the evidence base, particularly using ethnic-specific approaches. Examining the experiences of minority ethnic populations, rather than broader BAME categorization, will likely provide greater insight on the distinct disclosure barriers faced.

This rapid review sheds light on the current state of research on sexual violence against ethnic minority males in the UK, revealing its fundamental limitations and fragmented nature. The lack of comprehensive studies across various contexts, settings, perspectives, and methodologies underscores the urgent need to understand the experiences and unmet support needs within Asian and Black communities. One issue in the existing research is its narrow focus on CSA, neglecting the exploration of other groups, such as adult survivors, and other critical contexts where sexual violence may proliferate, such as chemsex environments (see Blomquist et al., 2020). These diverse experiences likely pose distinct barriers and necessitate separate considerations. Additionally, the lack of studies conducted in various service settings, including primary care, SARCs, faith groups, peer support networks, charities, mental health, and addiction services, is troubling, given the known risks for trauma exposure across minority groups (Motley & Banks, 2018, Widanaralalage et al., 2024)) and the likelihood of men attempting to gain access to support through different entry points.

To gain a more comprehensive understanding, comparative research explicitly contrasting different ethnic groups is essential. Such an approach would allow for the identification of both unique and shared factors that shape experiences, ultimately leading to a more nuanced understanding of the issue. Furthermore, incorporating viewpoints from both service users and professionals would offer invaluable insights into the barriers and facilitators to disclosure and help-seeking, providing a holistic view of the entire system. The male survivor literature itself already suffers from conceptual ambiguity, measurement inconsistencies, and dominance of female perspectives (Widanaralalage et al., 2022c). By neglecting the aspect of ethnicity, the visibility of the issue is further obscured, and intersectional barriers for minority groups are introduced. Therefore, it becomes imperative to address the ethnicity data gap in male sexual violence research, which is equally significant as the gender data gap previously highlighted by Cooper and Obolenskaya (2021). Calls for culturally competent and intersectional approaches to address the needs of marginalized male survivors have been made by organizations like the NHS England (2018) and the Male Survivor Partnership (2021). However, despite these calls, the evidence base remains fragmented. Furthermore, it is essential to consider how emerging issues such as online harassment and revenge porn (reference) intersect with ethnicity, as these, too, can have significant implications for minority groups (Ng et al., 2022).

Implications

The findings of this review have several implications for future research, policy, and practice for supporting Asian and Black minority men who experience sexual violence in the UK. Clearly, further prevalence research is needed to address the substantial gap in knowledge on the scope of this phenomenon. This should be achieved by moving beyond broad categorization of ethnic minority men under the umbrella term “BAME” and examining experiences of specific ethnic minority groups separately. Similarly, more research is needed to further understand the barriers to disclosure and help seeking beyond CSA, by recognizing the intersections of gender, sexuality, and ethnicity in shaping survivors’ post-assault experiences (Armstrong et al., 2018). This can be achieved by involving not only survivors but also professionals and immediate, informal support networks, known in the sexual violence literature to be key players in survivors’ recovery and engagement with formal services in the third and criminal justice sector (Widanaralalage et al., 2023). Furthermore, such efforts would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of barriers encountered by ethnic minority survivors, by examining a wider range of settings, from healthcare, criminal justice, and community.

Efforts to improve research practices and knowledge must be linked with efforts to improve policy, by, for example, mandating an improved collection of ethnicity data and reporting across national cohorts, healthcare, and criminal justice settings. Similarly, policies and training are needed across public services to improve responsiveness to the needs of minority male survivors. This would involve challenging stigma, raising awareness, and identifying cultural-specific barriers, which should be a policy priority to increase rates of disclosure by enhancing cultural competency in organizations serving minority male survivors and addressing the secrecy of sexual violence across Black and Asian communities in the UK. While specialist male support services exist in the UK, dedicated, tailored services and outreach may be required to engage Asian and Black male survivors who fear stigma. This would potentially help developing clearer referral pathways and connect mainstream and ethnic-specific services.

Limitations and Future Directions

The review provides the first attempt to comprehensively examining the existing literature on sexual violence against Black and Asian men in the UK context. It highlights major gaps in knowledge related to prevalence, disclosure, help-seeking, and criminal justice experiences. However, there are important limitations to be considered. As with any review methodology, some relevant studies might have been missed (Ganann et al., 2010). Our ability to conduct a quality appraisal and synthesis was limited by the small number of eligible studies. Furthermore, the sole focus on male survivors’ literature does not allow for complete integration with the broader literature on female sexual victimization. Nevertheless, more systematic reviews of the evidence are needed as the evidence base expands. It is also important to note that, by restricting its focus solely on UK-based studies, the review may have overlooked valuable insights from diverse cultural contexts an backgrounds, potentially limiting the generalizability of our findings. The exclusion of the international literature may have narrowed our understanding of the barriers that are unique to different cultural, social, and legal settings. Adopting a more inclusive approach in future literature reviews will be crucial for developing a comprehensive understanding of Black and Asian male survivors’ experiences of disclosure, help seeking, and access to service. In summary, while the review makes a compelling case for more research on this overlooked topic, its ability to draw firm conclusions is constrained by the limited evidence base. As the literature develops, more comprehensive systematic reviews will be needed. Key future priorities include prevalence research and qualitative inquiries to understand barriers faced by minority males across diverse settings and perspectives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this rapid review highlights profound gaps in the literature on sexual violence against ethnic minority males in the UK context. Existing prevalence data is extremely limited and hampered by inconsistencies, with rates for Asian and Black men ranging from 5% to 6%. Emerging qualitative evidence suggests cultural factors pose barriers to disclosure and help-seeking for these groups, but studies are few and methodologically flawed. No research was identified examining experiences within the criminal justice system. Overall, the review underscores the lack of rigorous evidence across all domains, precluding clear insights into the scale of the issue or service needs of minority male survivors. Substantial research is urgently required using consistent definitions and measurements, ethnic-specific approaches, and perspectives of both survivors and professionals. Alongside further research, enhanced ethnicity data collection and culturally informed training are needed across public services to improve responsiveness. A collaborative, system-wide approach is essential to address this overlooked issue. In summary, this review makes a compelling case for targeted research and policy efforts to elucidate and respond to the neglected experiences of sexual violence against ethnic minority males in the UK (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2.

Summary of Critical Findings.

Summary of Critical Findings

• Substantial gaps across all domains—prevalence, disclosure/help-seeking, criminal justice experiences.
○ Rates range from 5% to 6% but comparisons are difficult due to differences in definitions, measurements, and samples.
○ Emerging qualitative research identifies cultural barriers (e.g., family reputation, gender roles) that inhibit disclosure and help-seeking among Asian and Black male childhood sexual abuse survivors.
○ No studies identified examining experiences of Asian and Black male survivors within the UK’s Criminal Justice System.
• Sparse and fragmented evidence precludes clear insights into scale of issue or service needs of minority male survivors.
• Significant limitations in existing literature including inconsistent definitions/measurements neglect of ethnicity in analysis.
• More rigorous research urgently needed using ethnic-specific approaches and perspectives of both survivors and professionals.

Table 3.

Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice.

Implications for Research

• Future research should delve into the experiences of specific ethnic minority groups separately for a more nuanced understanding of the challenges and needs faced by different communities within the larger minority framework.
• Research should explore the complex intersections of gender, sexuality, and ethnicity and how they influence barriers to disclosure and help-seeking.
• Involving not just survivors but also professionals and informal support networks can provide insight into survivor recovery and engagement with formal services in various sectors.
• Research should extend its scope beyond healthcare and criminal justice settings to encompass a wider range of contexts, such as community organizations.

Implications for Practice and Policy

• Mandate improved data collection on ethnicity across national cohorts, healthcare systems, and criminal justice settings.
• Prioritize training and awareness initiatives to enhance the responsiveness of support services to the needs of minority male survivors.
• Dedicated, tailored support services and outreach efforts should be established to engage Asian and Black male survivors who may fear stigma.
• Community engagement to challenge secrecy surrounding sexual violence within minoritized communities to foster disclosure and access to professional mental health services.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: British Academy/Leverhulme Small Research Grants SRG 2022 Round: SRG22\220635

ORCID iD

B. Kennath Widanaralalage

Notes

Author Biographies

B. Kennath Widanaralalage, PhD, is a Lecturer in Psychology at King’s College London. His research focuses on sexual and intimate partner victimization in men and minoritized groups, examining disclosure, help seeking, and access to support and criminal justice services. Working with survivors, practitioners, and agencies, his research highlights the intersections of gender, sexuality, and ethnicity/culture in violence and victimization.

Stacey Jennings, PhD, completed her doctorate at Queen Mary University London, exploring alcohol use and ethnicity. Her expertise spans perinatal mental health, alcohol-related issues, and male survivors’ experiences of sexual violence. Her work led her to develop partnerships with medical services, substance use agencies, and domestic violence organizations to help shape research agendas and best practices for service provision.

Coral Dando, PhD, is a Professor of Psychology at the University of Westminster London and a Consultant Forensic Psychologist. Previously a London police officer, her research is centered on applying psychological science to develop evidence-based techniques to support vulnerable witnesses, victims, and survivors to recount their experiences and give “best evidence” to support the investigative and prosecution processes.

Jay-Marie Mackenzie, PhD, is a Reader in Psychology at the University of Westminster. Her research focuses on understanding how environmental contexts are important in suicide prevention. She is involved with several projects aimed at understanding self-harm by university students and how to support them. Her work also explores access and involvement of criminal justice services from victim and perpetrator perspectives.

References

1in6. (n.d.). 1in6 | sexual abuse of boys & men—Confidential support. 1in6. Retrieved 21 August 2023, from https://www.1in6.uk/

Abdullah-Khan

(2008). Male rape: The emergence of a social and legal issue. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Addis

M. E.

Mahalik

J. R.

(2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.5

Ali

Butt

Phillips

(2021). Improving responses to the sexual abuse of Black, Asian and minority ethnic children. Race, Equality, Foundation. https://www.csacentre.org.uk/documents/improving-responses-csa-of-black-asian-minority-ethnic-children/

Armstrong

E. A.

Gleckman-Krut

Johnson

(2018). Silence, power, and inequality: An intersectional approach to sexual violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 99–122.

Bagwell-Gray

M. E.

(2019). Women’s healing journey from intimate partner violence: Establishing positive sexuality. Qualitative Health Research, 29(6), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318804302

Bagwell-Gray

M. E.

Messing

J. T.

Baldwin-White

(2015). Intimate partner sexual violence: A review of terms, definitions, and prevalence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014557290

Barnett

Boduszek

Willmott

(2021). What works to change identity? A rapid evidence assessment of interventions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(7), 698–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12776

Bebbington

P. E.

Jonas

Brugha

Meltzer

Jenkins

Cooper

King

McManus

(2011). Child sexual abuse reported by an English national sample: Characteristics and demography. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 46(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-010-0245-8

10.

Blomquist

P. B.

Mohammed

Mikhail

Weatherburn

Reid

Wayal

Hughes

Mercer

C. H.

(2020). Characteristics and sexual health service use of MSM engaging in chemsex: Results from a large online survey in England. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 96(8), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054345

11.

Bows

(2018). Sexual violence against older people: A review of the empirical literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(5), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683455

12.

Bullock

M. C. M.

Beckson

P. M.

(2011). Male victims of sexual assault: Phenomenology, psychology, physiology. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 197–205.

13.

Chaplin

A. B.

Jones

P. B.

Khandaker

G. M.

(2021). Sexual and physical abuse and depressive symptoms in the UK Biobank. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03207-0

14.

Cockbain

Ashby

Brayley

(2017). Immaterial boys? A large-scale exploration of gender-based differences in child sexual exploitation service users. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29(7), 658–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215616817

15.

Cooper

Obolenskaya

(2021). Hidden victims: The gendered data gap of violent crime. The British Journal of Criminology, 61(4), 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa100

16.

Coxell

King

Mezey

Gordon

(1999). Lifetime prevalence, characteristics, and associated problems of non-consensual sex in men: Cross sectional survey. BMJ, 318(7187), 846–850. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7187.846

17.

Coxell

A. W.

King

M. B.

(2010). Adult male rape and sexual assault: Prevalence, re-victimisation and the tonic immobility response. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25(4), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681991003747430

18.

Davies

Walker

Archer

Pollard

(2010). A comparative study of long-term psychological functioning in male survivors of stranger and acquaintance rape. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 2(4), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.5042/jacpr.2010.0534

19.

Diefendorf

Bridges

(2020). On the enduring relationship between masculinity and homophobia. Sexualities, 23(7), 1264–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460719876843

20.

Dim

E. E.

Lysova

(2022). Male victims’ experiences with and perceptions of the criminal justice response to intimate partner abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15–16), NP13067–NP13091. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211001476

21.

Donnelly

D. A.

Kenyon

(1996). “Honey, we don’t do men”: Gender stereotypes and the provision of services to sexually assaulted males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(3), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626096011003009

22.

Dube

S. R.

Anda

R. F.

Whitfield

C. L.

Brown

D. W.

Felitti

V. J.

Dong

Giles

W. H.

(2005). Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(5), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.015

23.

Easton

Saltzman

Willis

(2014). Would you tell under circumstances like that?: Barriers to disclosure of child sexual abuse for men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 15(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034223

24.

Ellis

A. E.

Simiola

Mackintosh

M.-A.

Schlaudt

V. A.

Cook

J. M.

(2020). Perceived helpfulness and engagement in mental health treatment: A study of male survivors of sexual abuse. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(4), 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000313

25.

Ganann

Ciliska

Thomas

(2010). Expediting systematic reviews: Methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implementation Science, 5(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-56

26.

Garritty

Gartlehner

Nussbaumer-Streit

King

V. J.

Hamel

Kamel

Affengruber

Stevens

(2021). Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007

27.

Gilbert

Sanghera

(2004). A focus group exploration of the impact of izzat, shame, subordination and entrapment on mental health and service use in South Asian women living in Derby. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 7(2), 109–130.

28.

Gill

A. K.

Begum

(2023). “They Wouldn’t Believe Me”: Giving a voice to British South Asian male survivors of child sexual abuse. The British Journal of Criminology, 63(5), 1146–1164. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac097

29.

Gill

A. K.

Harrison

(2019). “I am talking about it because i want to stop it”: Child sexual abuse and sexual violence against women in British South Asian communities. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy059

30.

Gilligan

Akhtar

(2006). Cultural barriers to the disclosure of child sexual abuse in Asian communities: Listening to what women say. British Journal of Social Work, 36(8), 1361–1377.

31.

Harrison

Gill

A. K.

(2018). Breaking down barriers: Recommendations for improving sexual abuse reporting rates in British South Asian communities. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azx027

32.

Hickson

F. C. I.

Davies

P. M.

Hunt

A. J.

Weatherburn

McManus

T. J.

Coxon

A. P. M.

(1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541564

33.

Hine

B. A.

Murphy

A. D.

Churchyard

J. S.

(2021). Development and validation of the Male Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (MRMAS). Heliyon, 7(6), e07421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07421

34.

Hine

B. A.

Murphy

A. D.

Williams

Widanaralalage

B. K.

(2022). Listening to “leading voices”. Using expert insight to identify challenges to, and suggestions for the improvement of, rape investigation and prosecution in England and Wales. In E. Johnston (Ed.), Challenges in criminal justice (1st ed., p. 23). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003143321-9/listening-leading-voices-benjamin-hine-anthony-murphy-emma-williams-bimsara-kennath-widanaralalage

35.

Hine

B. A.

Murphy

A. D.

Yesberg

J. A.

Wunsch

Charleton

Widanaralalage Don

B. K. S.

(2021). Mapping the landscape of male-on-male rape in London: An analysis of cases involving male victims reported between 2005 and 2012. Police Practice and Research, 22(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1843458

36.

Hlavka

H. R.

(2017). Speaking of stigma and the silence of shame: Young men and sexual victimization. Men and Masculinities, 20(4), 482–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X16652656

37.

Home Office. (2021). Tackling violence against women and girls strategy. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-violence-against-women-and-girls-strategy

38.

Jamel

(2010). Researching the provision of service to rape victims by specially trained police officers: The influence of gender—An exploratory study. New Criminal Law Review, 13(4), 688–709. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.688

39.

Jamel

Bull

Sheridan

(2008). An investigation of the specialist police service provided to male rape survivors. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 10(4), 486–508. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2008.10.4.101

40.

Jaspal

Lopes

Jamal

Paccoud

Sekhon

(2017). Sexual abuse and HIV-risk behaviour among black and minority ethnic men who have sex with men in the UK. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 20(8), 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1414170

41.

Javaid

(2017). Making the invisible visible: (Un)meeting male rape victims’ needs in the third sector. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 9(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-08-2016-0248

42.

Javaid

(2018). The unheard victims: Gender, policing and sexual violence. Policing and Society, 30(4), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1539484

43.

Jina

Thomas

L. S.

(2013). Health consequences of sexual violence against women. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 27(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.012

44.

Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools | JBI. (2024). https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

45.

Khadr

Clarke

Wellings

Villalta

Goddard

Welch

Bewley

Kramer

Viner

(2018). Mental and sexual health outcomes following sexual assault in adolescents: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet. Child & Adolescent Health, 2(9), 654–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30202-5

46.

Langdridge

Flowers

Carney

(2023). Male survivors’ experience of sexual assault and support: A scoping review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 70, 101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2023.101838

47.

Lilley

Willmott

Mojtahedi

(2023). Juror characteristics on trial: Investigating how psychopathic traits, rape attitudes, victimization experiences, and juror demographics influence decision-making in an intimate partner rape trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 1086026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1086026

48.

Lowe

Balfour

(2015). The unheard victims. The Psychologist, 28, 118–121.

49.

Lowe

Rogers

(2017). The scope of male rape: A selective review of research, policy and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.007

50.

Lysova

Hanson

Hines

D. A.

Dixon

Douglas

E. M.

Celi

E. M.

(2020). A Qualitative study of the male victims’ experiences with the criminal justice response to intimate partner abuse in four english-speaking countries. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(10), 1264–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820927442

51.

Male Survivor Partnership. (2021). Evidence from the male survivors partnership: Home office spring 2021 call for evidence on “tackling violence against women and girls” in England and Wales. https://malesurvivor.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Male-Survivors-Partnership-submission-to-2021-VAWG-call-for-evidence.pdf

52.

Mayor of London. (2022). The mayor’s violence against women and girls strategy 2022-25 | LGOV. https://www.london.gov.uk/mopac-publications/mayors-violence-against-women-and-girls-strategy

53.

McLean

I. A

. (2007). Re-audit of clients from ethnic and local communities in Greater Manchester attending St. Mary’s Sexual Assault Referral Centre. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 14(3), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.03.008

54.

Memon

Taylor

Mohebati

L. M.

Sundin

Cooper

Scanlon

Visser

R. de

. (2016). Perceived barriers to accessing mental health services among black and minority ethnic (BME) communities: A qualitative study in Southeast England. BMJ Open, 6(11), e012337. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012337

55.

Messinger

A. M.

Koon-Magnin

(2019). Sexual violence in LGBTQ Communities. In O’Donohue

W. T.

Schewe

P. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention (pp. 661–674). Springer International Publishing.

56.

Monk-Turner

Light

(2010). Male sexual assault and rape: Who seeks counseling? Sexual Abuse, 22(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366271

57.

Moons

Goossens

Thompson

D. R.

(2021). Rapid reviews: The pros and cons of an accelerated review process. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(5), 515–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvab041

58.

Motley

Banks

(2018). Black males, trauma, and mental health service use: A systematic review. Perspectives on Social Work: The Journal of the Doctoral Students of the University of Houston Graduate School of Social Work, 14(1), 4–19.

59.

Myrie

Z. E.

Schwab

M. G.

(2023). Recovery experiences from childhood sexual abuse among black men: Historical/sociocultural interrelationships. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 32(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2022.2155599

60.

Widanaralalage

Buchanan

Coopamootoo

(2022). Cybercrimes in the aftermath of COVID-19: Present concerns and future directions. Journal of Concurrent Disorders, 5(2), 35–53.

61.

NHS England. (2018). Strategic direction for sexual assault and abuse services. https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/strategic-direction-for-sexual-assault-and-abuse-services/

62.

NHS England. (2022). Supporting male victims/survivors accessing a sexual assault referral centre: Good practice guide. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/B1313_Supporting-male-victims-survivors-accessing-a-sexual-assault-referral-centre-good-practice-guide-Februar.pdf

63.

Office for National Statistics. (2020). Childhood sexual abuse in England and Wales: year ending March 2019. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/childsexualabuseinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2019

64.

Office for National Statistics. (2021a). Nature of sexual assault by rape or penetration, England and Wales. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/natureofsexualassaultbyrapeorpenetrationenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2020

65.

Office for National Statistics. (2021b). Sexual offences victim characteristics, England and Wales. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/sexualoffencesvictimcharacteristicsenglandandwales/march2020#ethnicity

66.

Office for National Statistics. (2022a). Domestic abuse prevalence and victim characteristics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/domesticabuseprevalenceandvictimcharacteristicsappendixtables

67.

Office for National Statistics. (2022b). Ethnic group, England and Wales: Census 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/bulletins/ethnicgroupenglandandwales/census2021

68.

Office for National Statistics. (2023a). Crime in England and Wales: Year ending March 2023. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2023

69.

Office for National Statistics. (2023b). Sexual offences prevalence and victim characteristics, England and Wales [dataset]. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/sexualoffencesprevalenceandvictimcharacteristicsenglandandwales

70.

Pearson

Barker

(2018). Male rape: What we know, don’t know and need to find out—A critical review. Crime Psychology Review, 4(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2019.1591757

71.

Peterson

Z. D.

Voller

E. K.

Polusny

M. A.

Murdoch

(2011). Prevalence and consequences of adult sexual assault of men: Review of empirical findings and state of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.006

72.

Plant

Miller

Plant

(2004). Childhood and adult sexual abuse: Relationships with alcohol and other psychoactive drug use. Child Abuse Review, 13(3), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.845

73.

Rehal

Maguire

(2014). The price of honour: Exploring the issues of sexual violence within South Asian communities in coventry. https://www.crasac.org.uk/app/uploads/2022/05/the_price_of_honour_full_report.pdf?x17144

74.

Rosenstein

J. E.

(2015). Military sexual assault prevention and male rape myth acceptance. Military Behavioral Health, 3(4), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2015.1038404

75.

Rumney

P. N. S.

(2008). Policing male rape and sexual assault. The Journal of Criminal Law, 72(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1350/jcla.2008.72.1.478

76.

Sable

Danis

Mauzy

D. L.

Gallagher

(2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162

77.

Sawrikar

Katz

(2017). The treatment needs of victims/survivors of child sexual abuse (CSA) from ethnic minority communities: A literature review and suggestions for practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.021

78.

Simkhada

Vahdaninia

van Teijlingen

Blunt

(2021). Cultural issues on accessing mental health services in Nepali and Iranian migrants communities in the UK. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(6), 1610–1619. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12913

79.

Sivagurunathan

Orchard

MacDermid

J. C.

Evans

(2019). Barriers and facilitators affecting self-disclosure among male survivors of child sexual abuse: The service providers’ perspective. Child Abuse & Neglect, 88, 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.08.015

80.

Smith

S. G.

Chen

Lowe

A. N.

Basile

K. C.

(2021). Sexual violence victimization of U.S. males: Negative health conditions associated with rape and being made to penetrate. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP20953–NP20971. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211055151

81.

Smith

S. G.

Zhang

Basile

K. C.

Merrick

M. T.

Wang

Kresnow

Chen

(2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 data brief—Updated release (cdc:60893). https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/60893

82.

Sorsoli

Kia-Keating

Grossman

F. K.

(2008). “I keep that hush-hush”: Male survivors of sexual abuse and the challenges of disclosure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.333

83.

Stoltenborgh

van Ijzendoorn

M. H.

Euser

E. M.

Bakermans-Kranenburg

M. J.

(2011). A global perspective on child sexual abuse: Meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreatment, 16(2), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559511403920

84.

Struckman-Johnson

(1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. Sex Roles, 27(3), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290011

85.

Survivors UK. (2021). Silenced survivors: Understanding gay and bisexual men’s experience with sexual violence and support services in the UK. https://www.survivorsuk.org/press_media/new-report-into-gay-and-bisexual-mens-experience-of-sexual-violence-published-by-survivorsuk/

86.

Thomas

J. C.

Kopel

(2023). Male victims of sexual assault: A review of the literature. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040304

87.

Thompson

Bennett

(2015). Measurement of masculinity ideologies: A (critical) review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038609

88.

Torazzi

Merelli

Barbara

Kustermann

Marasciuolo

Collini

Cattaneo

(2021). Similarity and differences in sexual violence against adolescents and adult women: The need to focus on adolescent victims. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 34(3), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2020.11.018

89.

Turchik

J. A.

Edwards

K. M.

(2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023207

90.

Vanderwoerd

J. R.

Cheng

(2017). Sexual violence on religious campuses. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(2), 1–21.

91.

Walker

(2004). A study of male rape survivors. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Lancashire] UCLan Repository. https://clok.uclan.ac.uk/8726/

92.

Walker

Archer

Davies

(2005). Effects of male rape on psychological functioning. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(3), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X52750

93.

Weare

(2020). The Penetrative Offence in Section 4 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003: Offenders, victims, and outcomes after detection. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(4), 930–948. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz084

94.

Weare

Hulley

Craig

(2024). “Nobody believes you if you’re a bloke”: Barriers to disclosure and help-seeking for male forced-to-penetrate victims/survivors. International Review of Victimology, 02697580241238768. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580241238768

95.

Widanaralalage

B. K.

Hine

B. A.

Murphy

A. D.

(2022). Male victims of sexual violence and their welfare in the criminal justice system. In Tarrant

Ladlow

Way

(Eds.), Men and Welfare. Routledge.

96.

Widanaralalage

B. K.

Hine

B. A.

Murphy

A. D.

Murji

(2022). “I didn’t feel i was a victim”: A phenomenological analysis of the experiences of male-on-male survivors of rape and sexual abuse. Victims & Offenders, 17(8), 1147–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2069898

97.

Widanaralalage

B. K.

Hine

B. A.

Murphy

A. D.

Murji

(2023). A qualitative investigation of service providers’ experiences supporting raped and sexually abused men. Violence and Victims, 38(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-2022-0084

98.

Widanaralalage

B. K.

Murphy

A. D.

Loughlin

(2024). Support or justice: A triangulated multi-focal view of sexual assault victim support in a UK sexual assault referral centre (SARC). International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 18(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-024-00631-z

99.

Widanaralalage

B. K.

Reed

S. M.

Lobo Antunes

M. J.

DeJong

Pinchevsky

G. M.

Lovell

Cummings

C. E.

(2022). Distorted reality: A commentary on DiMarco et al. (2022) and the question of male sexual victimization. Sexuality & Culture, 26, 2122–2137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09988-0

100.

Willmott

Rafique

Widanaralalage

B. K.

Agneswaran

(2024). Investigating the role of psychopathic personality traits, gender, and ethnicity in Rape Myth Acceptance. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2314000

101.

Willmott

Widanaralalage

B. K.

(2024). Male rape myths: Examining the role of victim empathy and socio-demographics in a cross-sectional sample of UK adults. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 76, 100645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100645