This systematic review evaluated outcomes associated with arrest for domestic violence (DV), for both victims and perpetrators, considering both classic and modern research. A systematic search of 5 databases for quantitative reports resulted in 1,379 potentially relevant entries, of which 34 met the inclusion criteria. Studies were screened using prespecified criteria for the population (adults), outcomes (individual-level outcomes), study design (quantitative, including arrest for DV as a focal independent variable and a non-arrest comparator), publication type (peer-reviewed academic journal), study location (United States), language (English), and publication year (in or after 1984). Part I employs narrative synthesis to explore the impact of arrests by race/ethnicity, revealing gaps in reporting and a scarcity of analyses that consider race/ethnicity or its intersections with gender. Part II, a meta-analysis, indicates that arrest does not consistently reduce repeat violence and suggests variability based on the type of comparator used and the proportion of Black victims in a sample. The review finds that much of the research on the impacts of arrest is outdated and lacks diversity in data sources and outcomes, with few studies examining outcomes other than repeat violence. Future research should prioritize an intersectional approach and the perspectives and needs of survivors. Policymakers should consider the potential for disparate impacts and evaluate alternatives to mandatory arrest policies, with funding available for new data sources and related projects. Ultimately, policymakers must consider the context when evaluating the effectiveness and ethics of arrest policies.
BalduzziS.RückerG.SchwarzerG. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 22, 153–160.
2.
BerkR. A.BlackH.LillyJ.RikoskiG. (1991). Colorado Springs spouse assault replication project: Final report. National Institute of Justice.
3.
BerkR. A.CampbellA.KlapR.WesternB. (1992a). A Bayesian analysis of the Colorado Springs spouse abuse experiment. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 170–200.
4.
BerkR. A.CampbellA.KlapR.WesternB. (1992b). The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57(5), 698–708.
5.
BerkR. A.NewtonP. J. (1985). Does arrest really deter wife battery? An effort to replicate the findings of the Minneapolis spouse abuse experiment. American Sociological Review, 50(2), 253–262.
6.
BerkR. A.ShermanL. W. (1988). Police responses to family violence incidents: An analysis of an experimental design with incomplete randomization. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(401), 70–76.
7.
BinderA.MeekerJ. W. (1988). Experiments as reforms. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16(4), 347–358.
8.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111.
9.
BowlegL. (2008). When Black+ lesbian+ woman≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325.
10.
BroidyL.AlbrightD.DenmanK. (2016). Deterring future incidents of intimate partner violence: Does type of formal intervention matter?Violence Against Women, 22(9), 1113–1133.
11.
BurdaB. U.O’ConnorE. A.WebberE. M.RedmondN.PerdueL. A. (2017). Estimating data from figures with a Web-based program: Considerations for a systematic review. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(3), 258–262.
12.
BuzawaE. S.BuzawaC. G. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Sage.
13.
CatalanoS. (2013). Intimate Partner Violence: Attributes of Victimization, 1993–2011 (NCJ 243300). U.S.Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
14.
ChinY. M.CunninghamS. (2019). Revisiting the effect of warrantless domestic violence arrest laws on intimate partner homicides. Journal of Public Economics, 179, Article 104072.
15.
ChoH.WilkeD. J. (2010a). Does police intervention in intimate partner violence work? Estimating the impact of batterer arrest in reducing revictimization. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 283–302.
16.
ChoH.WilkeD. J. (2010b). Gender differences in the nature of the intimate partner violence and effects of perpetrator arrest on revictimization. Journal of Family Violence, 25(4), 393–400.
17.
CokerD. (2001). Crime control and feminist law reform in domestic violence law: A critical review. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4(2), 801–860.
18.
CokerD.MacquoidA. (2015). Why opposing hyper-incarceration should be central to the work of the anti-domestic violence movement. University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review, 5(3), 585–618.
19.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
20.
D’InvernoA. S.SmithS. G.ZhangX.ChenJ. (2019). The Impact of Intimate Partner Violence: A 2015 NISVS Research-in-Brief. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
21.
DunfordF. W. (1992). The measurement of recidivism in cases of spouse assault. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83(1), 120–136.
22.
DunfordF. W.HuizingaD.ElliottD. S. (1990a). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha Police Experiment. Criminology, 28(2), 183–206.
23.
DunfordF. W.HuizingaD.ElliottD. S. (1990b). Victim initiated warrants for suspects of misdemeanor domestic assault: A pilot study. Justice Quarterly, 7(4). 631–653.
24.
DurfeeA.GoodmarkL. (2020). Domestic violence mandatory arrest policies and arrests for same-sex and opposite-sex intimate partner violence after legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States. Criminal Justice Studies, 33(3), 231–255.
25.
DurfeeA. (2021). The use of structural intersectionality as a method to analyze how the domestic violence civil protective order process replicates inequality. Violence Against Women, 27(5), 639–665.
26.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463.
27.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.
28.
FeddersB. (1997). Lobbying for mandatory-arrest policies: Race, class, and the politics of the battered women’s movement. N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change, 23, 281–300.
29.
FelsonR. B.AckermanJ. M.GallagherC. A. (2005). Police intervention and the repeat of domestic assault. Criminology, 43(3), 563–588.
30.
GarnerJ.FaganJ.MaxwellC. (1995). Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11(1), 3–28.
31.
GartinP. R. (1995). Examining differential officer effects in the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. American Journal of Police, 14(3/4), 93–110.
32.
GodenziA.SchwartzM. D.DekeseredyW. S. (2001). Toward a gendered social bond/male peer support theory of university woman abuse. Critical Criminology, 10, 1–16.
33.
GómezJ. (2023). Cultural betrayal of Black women and girls. American Psychological Association.
34.
GoodmarkL. (2018). Decriminalizing domestic violence: Volume 7. University of California Press.
35.
HaddawayN. R.PageM. J.PritchardC. C.McGuinnessL. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18, e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
36.
HigginsJ. P.SavovićJ.PageM. J.ElbersR. G.SterneJ. A. (2024). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: HigginsJ. P.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM. J.WelchV. A. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.5 (updated October 2019). Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
37.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2007). The effect of arrest on wife assault recidivism: Controlling for pre-arrest risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(10), 1334–1344.
38.
HirschelD.BuzawaE. S. (2013). The impact of offenders leaving the scene on the police decision to arrest in cases of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 19(9), 1079–1103.
39.
HirschelJ. D.HutchisonI. WIII. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: The Charlotte, North Carolina experiment. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83(1), 73–119.
40.
HirschelJ. D.HutchisonI. W.DeanC. W.KelleyJ. J.PesackisC. E. (1991). Charlotte spouse assault replication project: Final report. National Institute of Justice.
41.
HoppeS. J.ZhangY.HayesB. E.BillsM. A. (2020). Mandatory arrest for domestic violence and repeat offending: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 53, e101430.
42.
JohnsonR. R.Goodlin-FahnckeW. (2015). Exploring the effect of arrest across a domestic batterer typology. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 66(1), 15–30.
43.
KadicA. J.VucicK.DosenovicS.SapunarD.PuljakL. (2016). Extracting data from figures with software was faster, with higher interrater reliability than manual extraction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, 119–123.
44.
KernicM. A.BonomiA. E. (2007). Female victims of domestic violence: Which victims do police refer to crisis intervention?Violence and Victims, 22(4), 463–473.
45.
KimM. E. (2013). Challenging the pursuit of criminalisation in an era of mass incarceration: The limitations of social work responses to domestic violence in the USA. The British Journal of Social Work, 43(7), 1276–1293.
46.
KimM. E. (2020). The carceral creep: Gender-based violence, race, and the expansion of the punitive state, 1973–1983. Social Problems, 67(2), 251–269.
47.
LaniyonuA.DonahueS. T. (2023). Effect of racial misclassification in police data on estimates of racial disparities. Criminology, 61(2), 295–315.
48.
LeemisR. W.FriarN.KhatiwadaS.ChenM. S.KresnowM.SmithS. G.CaslinS.BasileK. C. (2022). National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 Report on Intimate Partner Violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.
49.
LermanL. G.LivingstonF. (1983). State legislation on domestic violence. Response to Violence in the Family & Sexual Assault, 6(5), 1–28.
50.
LyonsV. H.KernicM. A.Rowhani-RahbarA.HoltV. L.CaroneM. (2019). Use of multiple failure models in injury epidemiology: A case study of arrest and intimate partner violence recidivism in Seattle, WA. Injury Epidemiology, 6(1), 1–9.
51.
MarciniakL. M. (2021). Do effects of arrest on recidivism vary by neighborhood? A contextual analysis of the Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment. Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing, 5(1), 40–66.
52.
MaxwellC. D.GarnerJ. H.FaganJ. A. (2002). The preventive effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: Research, policy and theory. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(1), 51–80.
53.
MearsD. P.CarlsonM. J.HoldenG. W.HarrisS. D. (2001). Reducing domestic violence revictimization: The effects of individual and contextual factors and type of legal intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(12), 1260–1283.
54.
MillerJ. (2003). An arresting experiment: Domestic violence victim experiences and perceptions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(7), 695–716.
55.
NagashimaK.NomaH.FurukawaT. A. (2019). Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 28(6), 1689–1702.
56.
PageM. J.MoherD.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.McKenzieJ. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(160):n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
57.
PateA. M.HamiltonE. E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment. American Sociological Review, 57(5), 691–697.
58.
PateA. M.HamiltonE. E.AnnanS. (1991). Metro-Dade spouse abuse replication project: Final report. National Institute of Justice.
59.
PaternosterR.BachmanR.BrameR.ShermanL. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163–204.
60.
PawsonR.GreenhalghT.HarveyG.WalsheK. (2005). Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(Suppl 1), 21–34.
61.
PiqueroA. R.PaternosterR.PogarskyG.LoughranT. (2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 335–360.
62.
PleckE. (1989). Criminal approaches to family violence, 1640–1980. Crime and Justice, 11, 19–57.
63.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice, 32, 373–450.
64.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.BlevinsK. R.DaigleL. E.MadensenT. D. (2006). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory—Advances in criminological theory (pp. 367–395). Transaction.
65.
RichieB. E. (2015). Reimagining the movement to end gender violence: Anti-racism, prison abolition, women of color feminisms, and other radical visions of justice [Speech Transcript]. University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review, 5(2), 257–273.
66.
RichieB. E.EifeE. (2021). Black bodies at the dangerous intersection of gender violence and mass criminalization. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 30(7), 877–888.
67.
RuttenbergM. H. (1994). A feminist critique of mandatory arrest: An analysis of race and gender in domestic violence policy. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2, 171–199.
68.
ShermanL. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. The Free Press.
69.
ShermanL. W.BerkR. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 261–272.
70.
ShermanL. W.CohnE. G. (1989). The impact of research on legal policy: The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. Law & Society Review, 23, 117–144.
71.
ShermanL. W.HarrisH. M. (2013). Increased homicide victimization of suspects arrested for domestic assault: A 23-year follow-up of the Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment (MilDVE). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(4), 491–514.
72.
ShermanL. W.HarrisH. M. (2015). Increased death rates of domestic violence victims from arresting vs. warning suspects in the Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment (MilDVE). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(1), 1–20.
73.
ShermanL. W.SchmidtJ. D.RoganD. P.GartinP. R.CohnE. G.CollinsD. J.BacichA. R. (1991). From initial deterrence to long term escalation: Short-custody arrest for poverty ghetto domestic violence. Criminology, 29(4), 821–850.
74.
ShermanL. W.SchmidtJ. D.RoganD. P.SmithD. A. (1992a). The variable effects of arrest on criminal careers: The Milwaukee domestic violence experiment. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 137–169.
75.
ShermanL. W.SmithD. A.SchmidtJ. D.RoganD. P. (1992b). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57(5), 680–690.
76.
SiegelR. B. (1996). The rule of love: Wife beating as prerogative and privacy. The Yale Law Journal, 105 (8), 2117–2207.
77.
StarkE. (1993). Mandatory arrest of batterers: A reply to its critics. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(5), 651–680.
78.
SteinmanM. (1990). Lowering recidivism among men who batter women. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17(2), 124–132.
79.
SterneJ. A.HernánM. A.ReevesB. C.SavovićJ.BerkmanN. D.ViswanathanM.HenryD.AltmanD. G.AnsariM. T.BoutronI.CarpenterJ. R.ChanA. W.ChurchillR.DeeksJ. J.HróbjartssonA.KirkhamJ.JüniP.LokeY. K.PigottT. D.HigginsJ. P. (2016). ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ, 355, i4919.
80.
SyersM.EdlesonJ. L. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(4), 490–502.
81.
ThomasJ.KnealeD.McKenzieJ. E.BrennanS. E.BhaumikS. (2024). Chapter 2: Determining the scope of the review and the questions it will address. In: HigginsJ. P.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM. J.WelchV. A. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.5 (updated August 2023). Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
82.
ThompsonW. H.WrightJ.BissettP. G.PoldrackR. A. (2020). Dataset decay and the problem of sequential analyses on open datasets. Elife, 9, e53498.
83.
TobyJ. (1957). Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 48, 12–17.
84.
TolmanR. M.WeiszA. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 481–495.
Van LissaC. J. (2017). MetaForest: Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis using random forests. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KHJGB.
87.
Van LissaC. J. (2020). Small sample meta-analyses: Exploring heterogeneity using MetaForest. In van de SchootR.MiočevićM. (Eds.), Small sample size solutions: A guide for applied researchers and practitioners (pp. 186–202). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429273872-16
88.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
89.
WilliamsK. R. (2005). Arrest and intimate partner violence: Toward a more complete application of deterrence theory. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(6), 660–679.
90.
WilsonS.JasinskiJ. L. (2004). Public satisfaction with the police in domestic violence cases: The importance of arrest, expectations, and involuntary contact. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(2), 235–254.
91.
XieM.LynchJ. P. (2017). The effects of arrest, reporting to the police, and victim services on intimate partner violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(3), 338–378.
92.
ZorzaJ. (1992). Criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970–1990. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 46–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
