Communicating With Local Elected Officials: Lessons Learned From Clean Indoor Air Ordinance Campaigns

Abstract

This article describes a study of the effectiveness of communication strategies used to influence policy makers to support local smoke-free laws in the Minneapolis—St. Paul metropolitan region. Twenty-seven of 41 members of three city councils and two county boards of commissioners were individually interviewed as were seven advocates who campaigned for the bans. Officials valued public health and economic data, public opinion polls, personally written e-mails, and dialogue with constituents. Phone banking messages indicated public support but were a nuisance. Officials felt that media ads were a waste of money and leafleting and other personal targeting were unacceptable. Advocates tended not to critically examine their own efforts for strengths and weaknesses and seemed unconcerned by public officials’ negative reception to some strategies. This case study suggests the need for reflection on the pros and cons of well-funded, highly orchestrated campaigns for public health policy, as these strategies may clash with the political process of building relationships.

Keywords

clean indoor air tobacco policy elected officials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens, D. , Uebelher, P. , & Remington, P.L. (2005). Evaluation of community and organizational characteristics of smoke-free ordinance campaigns in 15 Wisconsin cities. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2(3), A08.

American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. ( 2008a). Municipalities with local 100% smokefree laws: Currently in effect as of July 4, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from www.no-smoke.org

American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. ( 2008b). Summary of smokefree state laws and population protected by 100% U.S. smokefree laws. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from www.no-smoke.org

Gottlieb, N.H. , Goldstein, A.O. , Flynn, B.S. , Cohen, E.J. , Bauman, K.E. , Solomon, L.J. , et al. (2003). State legislators’ beliefs about legislation that restricts youth access to tobacco products. Health Education & Behavior, 30(2), 209-224.

Holm, A.L. , & Davis, R.M. ( 2004). Clearing the airways: Advocacy and regulation for smoke-free airlines. Tobacco Control, 13(Suppl. 1), i30-i36.

National Research Council. (1986). Environmental tobacco smoke: Measuring exposures and assessing health effects . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2002). Airliner cabin environment and the health of passengers and crew. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Reynolds, J.H. , Hobart, R.L. , Ayala, P. , & Eischen, M.H. ( 2005). Clean indoor air in El Paso, Texas: A case study Preventing Chronic Disease,2(1), A22.

Scollo, M. , Lal, A. , Hyland, A. , & Glantz, S. ( 2003). Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tobacco Control, 12(1), 13-20.

10.

Tsoukalas, T. , & Glantz, S.A. ( 2003). The Duluth Clean Indoor Air Ordinance: Problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1214-1221.

11.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. ( 1986). The health consequences of involuntary smoking: A report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.

12.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. ( 2006). The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: A report of the surgeon general-executive summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.