Little research examines the organizational and contextual dynamics that affect decisions to adopt evidence-based programs as well as the feasibility of implementation with fidelity to the original model when new users adopt established programs. To understand how promising strategies can be disseminated widely, this study examines the adoption and implementation of two sexual violence prevention programs in new settings. Interviews were conducted with stake-holders to investigate the factors and dynamics related to the adoption and implementation of these programs. Additionally, the research team worked with the program developers to create measures of the fidelity of implementation, which were then administered at each site. The findings suggest that adoption decisions were based on perceived fit between the program and the adopting organization's values, goals, and local setting. After adoption, new sites were able to implement the program with fairly high levels of fidelity, given moderate investments in training and technical assistance.
Ball, B., Kerig, P., & Rosenbluth, B. (this issue). Like a family but better because you can trust each other: The expect respect dating violence prevention program for at-risk youth. Special Issue, Health Promotion Practice .
2.
Bond, G., Becker, D., Drake, R., & Vogler, K. (1997). A fidelity scale for the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 40, 265-284.
3.
Blakely, C.H., Emshoff, J.G., & Roitman, D.B. (1984). Implementing innovative programs in public sector organizations. Applied Social Psychology, 5, 87-108.
4.
Blakely, C.H., Mayer, J.P., Gottschalk, R.G., Schmitt, N., Davidson, W., Roitman, D.B. et al. (1987). The fidelity-adaptation debate: Implications for the implementation of public sector social programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 253-268.
5.
Blechman, E.A. & Bopp, J.M. (2005). Juvenile offenders. In D. L. DuBois, & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Calsyn, R.J. (2000). A checklist for critiquing fidelity studies. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 107-113
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2002). Best practices of youth violence prevention: A sourcebook for community action. Atlanta, GA: Author. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/bestpractices.htm
8.
Dane, A., & Schneider, B. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23-24.
9.
Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W.B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237-256.
10.
Emshoff, J.G. (2008). Researchers, practitioners, and funders: Using the Framework to get us on the same page. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 393-403.
11.
Emshoff, J.G., Blakely, C., Gottschalk, R., Mayer, J., Davidson, W., & Erickson, S. (1987). Innovation processes in education and criminal justice: Measuring fidelity of implementation and program effectiveness. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 300-311.
12.
Emshoff, J.G., Blakely, C., Gray, D., Jakes, S., Brounstein, P., & Coulter, J. (2003). An ESID case study at the federal level. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 354-357.
13.
Fixsen, D.L., Naoom, S.F., Blase, K.A., Friedman, R.M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature . Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
14.
Glasgow, R.Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus A. (2003). Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy to effectiveness transition . American Journal of Public Health93, 1261-1267.
15.
Gonzalez, F.C., Barrera, M., & Martinez, C.R. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5, 41-45.
16.
Hall, G.E., & Loucks, S.F. (1978, March). Innovation configurations: Analyzing the adaptation of innovations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
17.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Report Brief. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
18.
Klein, K.J., Conn, A.B., & Sorra, J.S. (2001). Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 811-824.
19.
Klein, K.J. & Sorra, J.S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055-1080.
20.
Majahan, V., & Peterson, R.A. (1985). Models for innovation diffusion . Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
21.
Mayer, J. & Davidson, W. (2000). Dissemination of Innovation as Social Change. In J. Rappaport, & E. Seidman.Handbook of Community Psychology. New York: Kluwer.
22.
Mcgrew, J., Bond, G., Dietzen, L., & Salyers, M. (1994). Measuring the fidelity of Implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 670-678.
23.
Miller, R.L., & Shinn, M. (2005). Learning from communities: Overcoming difficulties in dissemination of prevention and promotion efforts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 169-183.
24.
Mowbray, C., Holter, M., Teague, G., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315-340.
25.
National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. ( 2002). Expect Respect: A School-based Program Promoting Safe and Healthy Relationships for Youth. Harrisburg, PA: NRCDV
26.
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review , 15, 241-265.
27.
Panzano, P.C., & Roth, D. (2006). The decision to adopt evidence-based and other innovative mental health practices: Risky business? Psychiatric Services, 57, 1153-1161.
28.
Panzano, P.C., Roth, D., Crane-Ross, D., Massatti, R., Carstens, C., Seffrin, B., et al. (2005). The innovation diffusion and adoption research project (IDARP): Moving from the diffusion of research results to promoting the adoption of evidence-based innovations in the Ohio mental health system . In D. Roth & W. J. Lutz (Eds.), New research in mental health (Vol. 16, pp. 78-89). Columbus, OH : Ohio Department of Mental Health
29.
Pentz, M.A., Trebow, E.A., Hansen, W.B., MacKinnon, D.P., Dwyer, J.H., & Johnson, C.A. (1990). Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: The Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP). Evaluation Review, 14, 264-289.
30.
Prevention First. (2008). Professional Development Tip Sheet. Project ALERT: Fidelity and Adaptation. Retrieved November 13, 2008, from http://www.prevention.org/ProfDev/documents/ProjectALERT-FidelityandAdaptation.pdf
31.
Rogers, E.M. (1983) Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
32.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2002). Finding the balance: Program Fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention. Washington DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and Center for Substance Abuse Prevention.
33.
Vaidyanathan,V. (2004). Looking beyond the adoption decision in innovation research: Investigating innovation implementation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
34.
Wandersman, A., Duffy, J.Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L. et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation . American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171-181.
