Complexity,Generality,and Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) offers researchers the opportunity to combine the intensiveness of case-oriented research strategies and the extensiveness of variable-oriented approaches in a single framework. QCA is specifically designed for a moderate number of cases, too few for variable-oriented research designs and too many for in-depth, case-oriented analysis. To illustrate QCA's applicability to moderate-sized data sets, we analyze data on forty-one villages in southern India reported in Robert Wade's (1988) comparative study of villagewide collective action, Village Republics. Using QCA, we show that Wade's explanation of village-wide collective action is incomplete. We complement his strictly ecological explanation with a sociological perspective and show that intervillage competition is an important condition for villagewide collective action.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amenta, E. A., Jane Poulsen, and Jane Duss. 1994. Where to begin: A survey of five approaches to selecting independent variables for qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods and Research 23 (1): 22-53.

Coser, L. 1956. The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press.

De Meur, G., and B. Rihoux. 2002. L'analyse quali-quantitative comparée. Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium: Academia Bruylant.

Drass, K., and C. C. Ragin. 1992. Qualitative comparative analysis 3.0. Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.

Durkheim, E. 1984. The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.

Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91:481-510.

Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248.

Hosmer, D. W., Jr., and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley.

Mendelson, E. 1970. Schaum's outline of theory and problems of Boolean algebra and switching circuits. New York: McGrawHill.

10.

Olson, M. 1971. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11.

Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Ragin, C. C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

13.

Ragin, C. C. 1994. A qualitative comparative analysis of pension systems. In The comparative political economy of the welfare state: New methodologies and approaches, edited by T. Janoski and A. Hicks, 320-345. New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Ragin, C. C., and Y. W. Bradshaw. 1991. Statistical analysis of employment discrimination: A review and critique. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 10:199-228.

16.

Ragin C. C., and J. Hein. 1993. The comparative study of ethnicity: Methodological and conceptual issues. In Race and ethnicity in research methods, edited by J. Stanfield II and D. Rutledge, 254-272. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

17.

Ragin, C. C., S. Mayer, and K. Drass. 1984. Assessing discrimination: A Boolean approach. American Sociological Review 49:221-234.

18.

Rapoport, A., and A. Chammah. 1965. Prisoner's dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

19.

Roth, C. 1975. Fundamentals of logic design. St. Paul, MN: West.

20.

Simmel, G. 1955. Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. New York: Free Press.

21.

Wade, R. 1988. Village republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India. New York: Cambridge University Press.