Purpose: To analyze the anatomical characteristics of arch aneurysms and evaluate the anatomical feasibility of 4 next-generation stent-grafts with either branched or fenestrated configurations. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 213 patients (mean age 75.0±7.1 years; 179 men) with arch aneurysms treated using total arch replacement or zone 0 or 1 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) from 2007 to 2017 at 2 Japanese hospitals. Anatomical analyses were performed using the centerline of flow technique on a 3-dimensional workstation. The anatomical feasibility of the Zenith A-branch, TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE), Terumo Aortic Relay Plus Double Branched (DB), and fenestrated Najuta stent-grafts were evaluated based on the instructions for use (IFU). Results: The mean lengths from the sinotubular junction (STJ) to the innominate artery (IA) and from the IA to the left common carotid artery were 114.9±15.9 and 12.8±5.6 mm, respectively. The mean aortic diameters at the STJ and IA were 31.3±3.4 and 34.1±5.3 mm, respectively. In terms of feasibility, 5.2% of patients were within the Zenith A-branch IFU, 40.8% for the TAG TBE, 24.9% for the Relay Plus DB, and 13.6% for the Najuta. Significant (>50% circumference) thrombus/calcification at the sealing zone affected nearly half of the patients, but there is currently no standardized definition or evaluation method for “significant” thrombus/calcification. Conclusion: Only 5% to 41% of arch aneurysm patients are anatomically suitable for TEVAR using any one of the next-generation branched or fenestrated stent-grafts. Furthermore, a definitive method of evaluating the thrombus/calcification burden needs to be established in future IFU.
RanneyDNCoxMLYerokunBA, et al. Long-term results of endovascular repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:363–368.
2.
HinchliffeRJKrasznaiASchultzekoolL, et al. Observations on the failure of stent-grafts in the aortic arch. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34:451–456.
3.
MakaloskiVTsilimparisNRohlffsF, et al. Endovascular total arch replacement techniques and early results. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7:380–388.
4.
AndrasiTBGrossmannMZenkerD, et al. Supra-aortic interventions for endovascular exclusion of the entire aortic arch. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:281–297.e2.
5.
MartinGRigaCGibbsR, et al. Short- and long-term results of hybrid arch and proximal descending thoracic aortic repair: a benchmark for new technologies. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:783–790.
6.
VoskresenskyIScaliSTFeezorRJ, et al. Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using aortic arch chimney stents in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:9–20.e3.
7.
GlorionMCoscasRMcWilliamsRG, et al. A comprehensive review of in situ fenestration of aortic endografts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52:787–800.
8.
MurphyEHStanleyGAIlvesM, et al. Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in the management of aortic arch pathology. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26:55–66.
9.
TsilimparisNDebusESvon KodolitschY, et al. Branched versus fenestrated endografts for endovascular repair of aortic arch lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64:592–599.
10.
HaulonSGreenbergRKSpearR, et al. Global experience with an inner branched arch endograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1709–1716.
11.
KolbelTBosaeusLTsilimparisN, et al. Fenestrated TEVAR using a guidewire fixator for anchoring in aortic arch target vessels. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25:40–46.
12.
KurimotoYMaruyamaRUjihiraK, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for challenging aortic arch diseases using fenestrated stent-grafts from zone 0. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:24–32.
13.
AlbertaHBTakayamaTSmitsTC, et al. Aortic arch morphology and aortic length in patients with dissection, traumatic, and aneurysmal disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50:754–760.
14.
MalkawiAHHinchliffeRJYatesM, et al. Morphology of aortic arch pathology: implications for endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17:474–479.
15.
ShinIYChungYGShinWH, et al. A morphometric study on cadaveric aortic arch and its major branches in 25 Korean adults: the perspective of endovascular surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008;44:78–83.
16.
BerkoNSJainVRGodelmanA, et al. Variants and anomalies of thoracic vasculature on computed tomographic angiography in adults. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:523–528.
17.
FujimuraNKawaguchiSObaraH, et al. Anatomic feasibility of next-generation stent-grafts for the management of type A aortic dissection in Japanese patients. Circ J. 2017;81:1388–1394.
18.
JakananiGCAdairW.Frequency of variations in aortic arch anatomy depicted on multidetector CT. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:481–487.
19.
O’NeillSGreenbergRKReschT, et al. An evaluation of centerline of flow measurement techniques to assess migration after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1103–1110.
20.
MazzaccaroDSciarriniMNanoG.Analysis of origin of the supra-aortic trunks from the aortic arch. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:399–408.
21.
GutscheJTCheungATMcGarveyML, et al. Risk factors for perioperative stroke after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1195–1200.
22.
HosakaAMotokiMKatoM, et al. Quantification of aortic shagginess as a predictive factor of perioperative stroke and long-term prognosis after endovascular treatment of aortic arch disease. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:15–23.
23.
ShijoTKurataniTTorikaiK, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for degenerative distal arch aneurysm can be used as a standard procedure in high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50:257–263.
24.
RajaniRRJohnsonLSBrewerBL, et al. Anatomic characteristics of aortic transection: centerline analysis to facilitate graft selection. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:433–436.
25.
SugawaraJHayashiKYokoiT, et al. Age-associated elongation of the ascending aorta in adults. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:739–748.
26.
ChengSWTingACHoP, et al. Aortic aneurysm morphology in Asians: features affecting stent-graft application and design. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:605–612.
27.
MasudaEMCapsMTSinghN, et al. Effect of ethnicity on access and device complications during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:24–29.
28.
GorogDAYamamotoJSarafS, et al. First direct comparison of platelet reactivity and thrombolytic status between Japanese and Western volunteers: possible relationship to the “Japanese paradox.” Int J Cardiol. 2011;152:43–48.
