Experience With a New Process—Condition T—for Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death in a University Emergency Department

Abstract

Background:

In the United States, organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) determination is increasing among those who are removed from life-sustaining therapy but is rare when death is unexpected. We created a program for uncontrolled DCD (uDCD).

Methods:

A comprehensive program was created to train personnel to identify and respond quickly to potential donors after unexpected death. The process termed Condition T was implemented in the emergency department (ED) of 2 academic medical centers. All ED deaths were screened for uDCD potential. Eligible donors included patients with preexisting donor designation who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation, failed to respond, and were pronounced dead.

Results:

Over 350 nurses, physicians, perfusionists, organ procurement personnel, and administrators were trained. From February 2009 to June 2010, a total of 18 patients were potential Condition T candidates. Six Condition T responses were triggered. Three donors underwent cannulation, and 4 organs were recovered (3 kidney and 1 liver) from 2 donors. Time from Condition T trigger to perfusion with organ preservation solution ranged from 14 to 22.3 minutes. Perfusion duration was 197 and 221 minutes. No recovered organs were transplanted because biopsies showed prolonged warm ischemia.

Conclusions:

It is feasible to create a process to rapidly intervene in the ED for uDCD. However, no organ transplants resulted. The utility and sustainability of an uDCD program in this particular setting are questionable.

Keywords

organ donation donation after circulatory determination of death organ transplantation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Koostra

Daemen

Oomen

. Categories of non-heartbeating donors. Transplant Proc. 1995;27(5):2893–2894.

Alvarez

del Barrio

Arias

. Non-heart-beating donors from the streets: an increasing donor pool source. Transplantation. 2000;70(2):314–317.

Matesanz

Dominguez-Gil

. Strategies to optimize deceased organ donation. Transplant Rev. 2007;21(4):177–188.

Bair

Sills

Schumacher

Bendick

Janczyk

Howells

. Improved organ procurement through implementation of evidence-based practice. J Trauma Nurs. 2006;13(4):183–185.

Institute of Medicine. Non-heart-beating Organ Transplantation: Practice and Protocols. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2000. ISBN 0-309-06441-7.

DeVita

Snyder

. Development of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center policy for the care of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death following the removal of life support. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993;3(2):131–143.

Roberts

Bramhall

Mayer

Muiesan

. Uncontrolled organ donation following prehospital cardiac arrest: a potential solution to the shortage of organ donors in the United Kingdom? Transpl Int. 2011;24(5):477–481. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01230.x.

Light

Barhyte

Gage

Sasaki

Aquino

. Long-term graft survival after transplantation with kidneys from uncontrolled nonheartbeating donors. Transplantation. 1999;68(12): 1910–1911.

Hoogland

Snoejis

Winkens

Christaans

van Heurn

. Kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death: uncontrolled versus controlled donation. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(7):1427–1434. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03562.x.