Graphene oxide and graphene fiber produced by different nozzle size,feed rate and reduction time with vitamin C

Abstract

The processing conditions of graphene oxide and graphene fibers are important for final fiber properties. The effect of different processing conditions such as feed rate, nozzle size (length and diameter), and reduction time by vitamin C on fiber properties such as morphology, mechanical properties and electrical conductivity has been analyzed. It has been observed that at the constant feed rates, increase in nozzle length results in higher mechanical properties. For the samples produced with long nozzle, thinner nozzle results to higher mechanical properties than thicker one. Decrease in nozzle length and increase in feed rate and reduction time by vitamin C resulted in an increased crimpy structure of fiber surface. Higher fiber strength was observed when the reduction time was decreased. The increase in the feed rate resulted in an increase of fiber linear densities (tex). All fibers experimented were in the semiconductor range. In this study, it has been seen that short, thin nozzles with 10 ml/h feed rate and reduction with 2.5 h provided better mechanical properties along with electrical conductivity.

Keywords

Graphene oxide fiber coagulation nozzle size reduction time vitamin C

Introduction

Graphene with its nano scale thickness, high thermal and electrical conductivity, and high surface area, attracts great interest, since it can be used in a wide range of application such as energy, catalysts, electromagnetic shielding, lightning, strike protection, chemical purification, sensor, wearable electronic textile, etc. [1]. Compared to other carbon-based continuous fibers such as carbon nanotube fiber, it can be produced with inexpensive and safe methods. It can be produced continuously with pure graphene structure without any need of coating or blending with other polymers. However, there are very limited studies on continuous graphene or graphene oxide fiber by coagulation method (wet spinning). The first studies have started in 2011, and thus this fiber with such importance needs to be studied more in order to contribute to the limited number of literature.

Instead of processing graphene directly, graphene derivatives are preferred in fiber production. Thus, graphene oxide (GO), which can be dispersed in water, is processed into fibers [2,3]. However, GO has low electrical conductivity that requires an additional process such as annealing or reduction.

In the literature, there are very few researches on GO fibers and these studies especially focused on the effect of nozzle length, diameter, feed rate and reduction time on fibers’ parameters. Huang et al. investigated the properties of graphene supercapacitors produced from wet-spun graphene fibers, and compared the effect of hydrazine (N₂H₄) reduction and hydroiodic acid (HI) reduction on resultant fiber properties. Lower fiber diameter and tighter cross section with wrinkles were observed in HI reduction (35 µm), whereas N₂H₄ reduction resulted in a larger fiber diameter (100 µm) and holes through the cross section of the fiber. Capacitance and electrical conductivity were found to be higher and oppositely internal resistance was lower in the case of HI reduction [4]. The effect of nozzle diameter and GO dope concentrations (5, 8, 10, 22 mg/ml) on wet-spun HI-reduced graphene oxide fibers was experimented by Cong et al. [5]. They have found that the increased dope concentrations and nozzle diameters resulted with increased fiber diameters. In addition, due to the removal of the oxygen-containing groups, HI reduction was experimented to reduce the fiber diameter (from 53 µm to 43 µm) and improve the tensile strength and Young’s modulus [5]. He et al. [6] analyzed the effect of fiber draw ratio of wet-spun NaAlg/GO composite fibers. They have observed that the inner diameter of the nozzle directly affects the fiber diameter. The increased GO content resulted as a definite stripe structure on the surface of the fiber. The tensile strength and Young’s modulus of composite nano fibers increased up to 4% GO loading; however, further GO addition resulted in decrease of both properties. Improved tensile stress and oppositely decrease of elongation at break were obtained with increased draw ratios. Sharper stripes along the fiber surface were observed [6]. Wet-spun GO fibers produced from large through small surface area GO sheets with different nozzle diameters and spinning parameters were compared by Chen et al. [7]. By changing the nozzle diameter, GO fibers with controlled alignment in planar direction with various fiber diameters (45–150 µm) were obtained. The nozzle diameter and orientation were found to be inversely proportional to the orientation, and reduction in capillary diameter resulted with increased orientation, thus higher tensile strength, modulus, and electrical conductivity. Use of large area GO sheets heighten the viscosity, improve the mechanical strength and lower the fiber diameters [7]. Dong et al. used a single-step method to produce GO sheets and Fe₂O₃/GO composite structures and concluded that the pipeline configuration (length and inner diameter) can be varied to change the fiber diameter. An increase in inner pipeline diameter and GO concentration in suspension was observed to increase the graphene fiber diameter [8].

Studies on reducing of GO by vitamin C (ascorbic acid) which is an environmental friendly reducing agent (to reduce functional groups) are very limited compared to studies on more toxic reducing agents such as hydrazine or hydroiodic acid. One of the first studies was conducted by Zhang et al. [9] by investigating the solution-based chemical reduction of GO sheets by using l-ascorbic acid (ι-AA), which is one of the forms of vitamin C. Their observation was that the oxygen-containing groups of GO sheets can be reduced by ι–AA which gave rise to the thought that ι–AA can replace the hazardous solvents used in the reduction of GO sheets [9]. In another study on the use of vitamin C, Fernandez-Merino et al. compared the deoxygenation efficiency of various reducing agents such as vitamin C, pyrogallol, and sodium borohydride along with heating to replace the use of hazardous hydrazine. Among the three, only vitamin C proved to be an effective reducing agent for GO sheets not only with the use of water, but also with other solvents such as DMF (dimethylformamide) [10]. Dua et al. experimented to obtain inkjet printed sensors of reduced GO and used vitamin C instead of hydrazine as the reducing agent, in which single-step reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide film was achieved [11].

The study performed in this article has been carried out to improve the material properties through process parameters such as feed rate, nozzle dimension, and reduction time, and also since the studies about these process parameters in the literature are very limited. Application of vitamin C, which is not as hazardous as other chemical such as hydrazine that is often used for reduction of GO in the literature, is also very limited. Furthermore, available literature related to reduction by vitamin C was mostly performed on film, instead of continuous fiber/filament. There is also no study available on the effect of reduction time on fiber properties. Studies performed on nozzle size were mostly on change of nozzle diameter, instead of nozzle length which can be important for alignment of GO flakes that affects the mechanical properties. Moreover, most of the limited literatures on change of nozzle diameter mostly focused on the effect of nozzle diameter on fiber diameter, instead of other properties such as mechanical and electrical conductivity. Thus in this study, studies are mostly focused on the area which has scientific importance and which has not been investigated and reported before, in order to contribute the current literature in this developing unique field which has very wide potential in application areas such as batteries, catalyst, sensors, electronic textiles, etc. Thus, wet-spinning was conducted with different feed rates and nozzles with different inner diameter and length, and vitamin C, which happened to be an environmental friendly alternative to hydrazine-based reduction. Two different processing times were selected for reduction process. The effect of all these parameters such as nozzle length and nozzle diameter, reduction time and feed rate on mechanical and morphological properties and electrical conductivity was investigated and some original results were concluded.

Materials and methods

Materials

Graphite flakes (50–100 nm thickness and 44 µm diameter) were supplied from Grafen Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Grafen Co. Ankara,Turkey). Sodium nitrate (NaNO₃) was purchased from ZAG Ltd. Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) (30 % by wt) was obtained from Carlo Erba Reagents. Potassium permanganate (KMnO₄), sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) (95–98% by wt.), hydrochloric acid fuming (HCl) (37% by wt.), ethanol (C₂H₅OH), and granular calcium chloride (CaCl₂) were purchased from Merck, Ltd. Vitamin C for the reduction process (l-ascorbic acid) was derived from Scharlau Chemicals.

Methods

Graphene oxide dispersion production by Hummer’s method

Graphene oxide suspension was produced according to Hummer’s method [2,3,12,13]. Natural graphite flakes, NaNO₃ and H₂SO₄ were mixed and stirred uniformly in an ice bath with a magnetic stirrer for 5–10 min. Afterwards, KMnO₄ was added gradually and carefully to the mixture. After several heating, cooling and dilution processes, distilled water and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) were used in order to stop the reaction. The color of solution changed to yellow. The diluted solution was decanted and spitted into centrifuge tubes evenly. Graphene oxide solution was washed with 1 M HCl solution three times at 5500 r/min in centrifuge (Nüve, NF800R) to remove impurities. The pH of the graphene oxide solution was optimized by washing until a pH of 5–6 was reached in the Nüve, NF 800 R centrifuge. The concentration of the graphene oxide solution was adjusted to 20 mg/ml. A mechanical homogenizer (WiseTis Homogenizer, HG-15D) was used to disperse the graphene oxide solution. Wet-spinning method involving three coagulation baths was performed to produce graphene oxide fibers (Figure 1). The assembly mechanism of the GO sheets into macroscopic fibers was started in the first coagulation bath which was present at the output of the nozzle. The first coagulation bath contained CaCl₂ 5% by wt. and ethanol:water solution (30:70% by volume). The second and third coagulation baths contained ethanol–water mixture (1:1.5% by volume) and (1:1% by volume), respectively. The fibers that were in the range of 30–35 cm in length were fed into first coagulation bath and after a few minutes were transferred to the second and third coagulation baths by tweezers, respectively. Fibers stayed for approximately 2 min in each coagulation bath. Afterwards, the fibers were kept in room temperature for drying. Vitamin C reduction was performed by immersing the graphene oxide fibers in the 0.1 M vitamin C solution at 90℃ for two reduction periods which were 2.5 h and 5 h. The processing conditions for both graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide fibers are given in Table 1. The short, thin nozzle used was 19 gauge with an inner diameter of 0.69 mm. The long, thin nozzle was 20 gauge with an inner diameter of 0.6 mm, and the long thick nozzle was 17 gauge with an inner diameter of 1.07 mm.

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of coagulation of fiber. (a) Syringe with GO dispersion, (b) nozzle, (c) GO fiber. DW: distilled water.

Table 1.

Classification of graphene oxide fibers produced in different conditions.

Sample abbreviation	Nozzle type	Feed rate	Vitamin C reduction
SThin10	Short, thin nozzle	10 ml/h	–
SThin20	Short, thin nozzle	20 ml/h	–
SThin30	Short, thin nozzle	30 ml/h	–
LThin20	Long, thin nozzle	20 ml/h	–
LThick20	Long, thick nozzle	20 ml/h	–
SThin20R2.5	Short, thin nozzle	20 ml/h	2.5 h
SThin20R5	Short, thin nozzle	20 ml/h	5 h

Characterization of graphene oxide fibers

Properties of graphene oxide fibers were investigated by the following devices and methods. The effect of vitamin C reduction was also observed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) (PerkinElmer, Spectrum Two) analysis with a wavelength range of 4000–500 cm⁻¹ and spectra were measured in ATR mode with 5-s scan and 0.5 cm⁻¹ resolution.

Surface morphology

The surface morphology of GO fibers was analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, QUANTA FEG 200) in ESEM (Environmental SEM) mode. Samples were coated with Au/Pd by sputtering (Quorum, SC7620) under vacuum conditions (2 × 10⁻² mbar) for SEM.

Mechanical properties

The mechanical properties of the fibers were determined by using Usel UNF 15 Tensile Tester according to the ASTM D3822-07 standard. The gauge length was set into 10 mm and crosshead speed was set to 1 mm/min. Twenty measurements were conducted for each sample and average values were taken.

Electrical conductivity

The conductivities (S/cm) of the fibers were calculated depending on the electrical resistance values measured by a two probe Microtest 6370 LCR meter. At least 20 measurements were conducted for all tests and averages were taken. The calculation of electrical conductivity coefficient was performed with the following equation

ρ = L / (A * R)

(1)

where

ρ

is coefficient of electrical conductivity (S/cm); R is electrical resistance (ohm); A is cross-sectional area (cm²); and L is length (cm).

Results and discussion

Morphology of GO fibers

As can be seen from SEM images in Figure 2, increased crimped surface structure was observed with the increase in the feed rate from 10 ml/h to 20 and 30 ml/h. This may be due to increased coagulation, i.e. leaving more water from GO dispersion suddenly into coagulation bath. Additionally, surface crimp decreases as the nozzle length is longer. This might be due to increased time and forces for orientation, flattening and compactness of the GO flakes in the longer nozzle. When the reduction period was raised, more crimped surface structure was also observed. The removed oxygen groups causing deterioration in carbon plane and gaps [1] may increase surface crimpness.

Figure 2.

SEM images of GO fibers. (A) Longitudinal fiber, (B) an image taken from cross section ((a) SThin10, (b) SThin20, (c) SThin30, (d) LThin20, (e) LThick20, (f) SThin20R2.5, (g) SThin20R5)).

Fiber linear densities and dimensions of GO fibers

As can be seen in Table 2, when the feed rate (SThin10, SThin20 and SThin30) and nozzle diameters increased (LThin20 and LThick20), larger fiber linear densities were experimented. Even though constant feed rate from syringe pump is available for the sample LThin20 and LThick20 (20 ml/h), increased nozzle diameter will allow accumulation of more materials at the outlet of nozzle which results as larger fiber linear density. Additionally, when longer nozzles are used, the orientation period will be longer and more oriented fibers may cause lower fiber linear densities. Fiber linear densities are given in tex form which is the weight (grams) of 1000 m of sample. With the reduction of the fibers (SThin20and SThin20R5), the fibers with lower linear densities, since the functional groups drifting apart after reduction [13], lower the mass and volume, thus reducing the fiber linear densities.

Table 2.

Tex values and dimensions of the fibers.

Sample abbreviation	Fiber linear density (Tex)
SThin10	9.59
SThin20	14.17
SThin30	17.51
LThin20	11.44
LThick20	35.26
SThin20R2.5	11.32
SThin20R5	10.27

Conductivity results of GO fibers

The data at the Table 3 (electrical conductivity) belong to graphene oxide fibers coded as SThin10, SThin20, SThin30, LThin20, LThick20 and reduced graphene oxide fibers coded as SThin20R2.5 and SThin20R5. Reduced graphene oxide fibers had 10,000 times higher electrical conductivity coefficient than graphene oxide fiber, even though there was no clear difference between graphene oxide fibers. All fibers including reduced graphene oxide fibers and graphene oxide fibers are in the semi-conductor range. The reduction process improves the electrical conductivity because of the removal of oxygen groups which results to an increase of the C/O ratio. [14]. Increasing the reduction period from 2.5 h to 5 h did not result in a distinct increase of electrical conductivity.

Table 3.

Electrical conductivities of GO fibers.

Sample Abbreviation	Average Conductivity (S/cm)	Coefficient of variation (% CV)
SThin10	16.54 × 10⁻⁴	14.36
SThin20	8.88 × 10⁻⁴	12.29
SThin30	1.17 × 10⁻⁴	14.89
LThin20	3.74 × 10⁻⁴	11.23
LThick20	2.27 × 10⁻⁴	25.91
SThin20R2.5	4.80	8.31
SThin20R5	6.18	15.41

Tensile properties of GO fibers

As can be seen from Table 4, higher feed rates resulted in a decrease of strength and modulus, and increased elongation (SThin10 and SThin30). This might be resulted from the more crimped and porous surfaces occurred with increased feed rates, as can be seen from the SEM images. Additionally, increase in the feed rate with constant collector speed might in some cases cause accumulation of GO dispersion at the end of the nozzle. This accumulation might cause unevenness along the fiber length and breakages at thin places, and increase in elongation while reducing the strength. For breaking strength, the differences between 10 ml/h and 20 ml/h and also between 10 ml/h and 30 ml/h were found to be significant according to t-test (for two tailed, 95% confidence) while there was no significant difference between 20 ml/h and 30 ml/h.

Table 4.

Mechanical properties of GO fibers.

Sample abbreviation	Breaking strength (cN/tex)	Coefficient of variation (CV%)	Elongation (%)	Coefficient of variation (CV%)	Initial modulus (N/mm²)	Coefficient of variation (CV%)
SThin10	3.40	14.46	1.83	19.98	2555.23	23.02
SThin20	1.64	12.83	2.39	27.79	1087.77	20.14
SThin30	1.57	14.56	3.88	30.64	992.03	19.31
LThin20	2.85	15.23	2.19	28.44	1860.49	16.19
LThick20	1.16	31.69	3.95	30.15	1490.27	28.01
SThin20R2.5	2.99	15.25	7.78	25.99	992.98	21.39
SThin20R5	1.76	20.91	2.75	20.88	1078.50	22.82

Longer needle provides higher breaking strength and low breaking elongation, due to higher shear force, orientation and compactness of GO flakes through the longer and thinner nozzle. For breaking strength, the differences between longer and shorter needles were found to be significant according to t-test (for two tailed, 95% confidence) while there was no significant differences on breaking elongation between the longer and shorter needles. Increase in the nozzle diameter resulted in a slight decrease on the fiber strength and slightly increased the breaking elongation. The effect of nozzle diameter on breaking strength and breaking elongation was significant according to t-test (for two tailed, 95% confidence)

Vitamin C reduction for 2.5 h almost doubled the strength and tripled the breaking elongation and reduced the initial modulus. The reduction in voids and compactness between GO flakes might be the reason behind the change in mechanical properties [15]. On the other hand, increased reduction time resulted in decrease of strength and elongation, and elongation got close to the values before reduction. For breaking strength and breaking elongation, the differences between 2.5 h reduction and 5 h reduction and also the differences between 2.5 h reduction and no reduction were found to be significant according to t-test (for two tailed, 95% confidence) while there was no significant difference between 5 h reduction and no reduction.

FT-IR results

As can be seen in Figure 3, the 3200 cm⁻¹ wavelength peak observed in the reference material belongs to the O–H hydroxyl group, the peak observed at 1611 cm⁻¹ wavelength belongs to the C = C carbonyl group, the peak observed at 1375 cm⁻¹ wavelength belongs to the C–O carboxy group, and the peak observed at 1148 cm⁻¹ wavelength belongs to the C–O alkoxy group [10].

Figure 3.

FT-IR spectra of GO fibers: (a) SThin20R2.5, (b) SThin20R2.5, (c) SThin20.

No peaks were observed in fibers reduced with vitamin C which was due to the removal of the oxygen functional groups after reduction process [15].

Conclusion

In this study, as a contribution to the current literature, the effect of capillary diameter and feed rate had been observed separately and the effect of capillary length has been investigated. In addition, the role of reduction time in vitamin C reduction process has also be analyzed. The main conclusions of the study are listed below.

For the short and thin nozzle, when the feed rates were compared, better mechanical performance was obtained from fibers with 10 ml/h feed rate compared to fibers with 20 ml/h and 30 ml/h feed rates.

At the same feed rate, longer nozzle resulted in higher mechanical properties. For long nozzle, thinner nozzle resulted in higher mechanical properties.

Shorter reduction time (2.5 h) with vitamin C resulted in higher fiber strength compared to longer reduction duration (5 h).

Increased crimped surface structure was observed with the increase in the feed rate. Surface crimp increased with the decreased nozzle length and increased reduction time.

No clear difference was observed on the electrical conductivity between GO fibers. All fibers experimented were in the semiconductor range.

The vitamin C reduction, which was proved with FT-IR spectroscopy, clearly improved the electrical conductivities of the fibers.

According to this study conditions, among all samples, fibers produced with short, thin nozzle with 10 ml/h feed rate and reduction period of 2.5 h can be suggested for getting better mechanical and electrical properties.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study is supported by TUBITAK (project no. 114M524).

References

Pei

Cheng

. Carbon 2010; 50: 3210–3228.

Sun

Zhao

et al.

Adv Mater 2013; 25: 188–193.

Xiang

Young

Wang

et al.

Adv Mater 2013; 25: 4592–4597.

Huang

Zheng

Kou

et al.

RSC Adv 2013; 3: 23957–23962.

Cong

Ren

Wang

et al.

Sci Rep 2012; 613: 2012–2012.

Zhang

Gong

et al.

Carbohyd Polym 2012; 88: 1100–1108.

Chen

Chai

Qiang

et al.

Nanoscale 2013; 5: 5809–5815.

Dong

Jiang

Cheng

et al.

Adv Mater 2012; 24: 1856–1861.

Zhang

Yang

Shen

et al.

Chem Commun 2010; 46: 1112–1114.

10.

Fernandez-Merino

Guardia

Paredes

et al.

J Phys Chem C 2010; 114: 6426–6432.

11.

Dua

Surwade

Ammu

et al.

Chem Int Ed 2010; 49: 2154–2157.

12.

Hummers

Offeman

. J Am Chem Soc 1958; 80: 1139–1139.

13.

Pei

Zhao

et al.

Carbon 2010; 48: 4466–4474.

14.

Jung

Dikin

Piner

et al.

Nano Lett 2008; 8: 4283–4287.

15.

Hung

Tsou

De Guzman

et al.

Chem Mater 2014; 26: 2983–2990.