A review investigating the influence of nanofiller addition on the mechanical,thermal and water absorption properties of cellulosic fibre reinforced polymer composite

Abstract

Composite holds great promise for future materials considering its advantages such as excellent strength, stiffness, lightweight, and cost-effectiveness. Due to rising environmental concerns, the research speed gradually changes from synthetic polymer composites to natural fibre reinforced polymer composites (NFRPCs). Natural fibres are believed a valuable and robust replacement to synthetic silicates and carbon-based fibres, along with biodegradability, recyclability, low cost, and eco-friendliness. But the incompatibility between natural fibre and polymer matrices and higher moisture absorption percentage of natural fibre limitise their applications. To overcome these flaws, surface treatment of natural fibre and nanofiller addition have become some of the most important aspects to improve the performance of NFRPCs. This review article provides the most recent development on the effect of different nanofiller addition and surface treatment on the mechanical, thermal, and wetting behaviour of NFRPCs. It concludes that the fibre surface treatment and nanofillers in natural fibre polymer composites positively affect mechanical, thermal and water absorption properties. A systematic understanding in this field covers advanced research basics to stimulate investigation for fabricating NFRPCs with excellent performance.

Keywords

Natural fibre composite woven nanofillers mechanical properties thermal properties water absorption textile waste

Introduction

Composites are engineered materials comprised of two or more elements with distinct qualities, and their combination leads to such materials having desired properties. These properties include high strength, excellent stiffness, no catastrophic failure, low thermal expansion, resistance to the chemical and environmental factors, which of them to be used in a myriad of applications such as electrical equipment, transportation, construction, sports, defence and aerospace industries .^1–4 Generally, the fundamental constituents include matrix (binders) and reinforcement .^5,6 Reinforcement is the central strengthening part, and the mechanical properties of the composite mainly depend upon the concentration, size, shape, distribution, and orientation of the reinforcement which is generally in the form of fibres and particles .^7,8 The matrix is a polymer that acts as a binder; the main role of the matrix is to adhere and fix the fibres to maintain structural integrity. It also transfers the load between reinforced fibres and protects them from environmental damage .⁹ There are three classes of polymers used in a composite: thermosetting polymers, thermoplastic polymers, and elastomers .¹⁰ The most commonly used polymers are epoxy, phenolic, and polyester due to their excellent mechanical and thermal properties .^11–13 There are three different reinforcement classes, including particles, structures, and fibres, as given in Figure 1. In particle reinforced composites (PRCs), the particles are mixed with the matrix to form a composite. The PRCs are mainly dependent on the reinforced particles' types, size, shape, and concentration .^14,15 Particle reinforcement improves the strength and toughness of the matrix; the most common particles used are alumina, magnesia, silica, carbon, graphene, clay, iron, iron oxide, and zinc oxide .¹⁶ The PRCs are most commonly used for adhesives, coating, dentistry, electronics, and aerospace .^17,18 Structural composite is growing rapidly around the globe and is widely preferred in aerospace and marine application due to its high flexural modulus to weight ratio, good buckling resistance and low lateral deformation. Laminate and sandwich composite are two basic types of structural composite. In laminate composite, there are two or more plies of the same or different material stacked with the same and angle orientation .^19,20 Contrarily, in the sandwich composite, there is a core element of any material among the plies of high performing fibre. Sandwich composites are comparatively thicker than other types of composites .²¹ Polyurethane (PU), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polymethacrylimide (PMMI) are mostly used core foam materials for sandwich composite .^22–24

Figure 1.

Types of composites based on reinforcement and matrix.

Fibre-reinforced composites are frequently used due to their excellent mechanical properties, tailor-ability, remarkable resistance to corrosion and fatigue, functional strength and stiffness of the fibres .^7,25,26 Generally, there are two types of fibre; natural and manmade fibres .^27,28 Manmade fibres are mostly used as reinforcement for high-performance composite applications in construction, transportation, and aerospace .²⁹ Compared with natural fibre, manmade fibre is more robust, durable and has better qualities than natural fibres .³⁰ Extensive work has been carried out in which manmade fibre is used as a reinforcement for high-performance composite applications. As the world is more focused on environmental aspects and ecological safety, scientists, researchers, and industries are shifting to use natural fibres as reinforcement in high-performance composite applications. Figure 2 shows the number of publications searched in the Scopus database in the last 10 years with the keywords “Natural fibre composite”. The growing interest in this field is also evident from the trendline demonstrating huge interest in the use of natural fibre polymer composites (NFPC). The motivation behind this is that synthetic fibres are not reproducible and reusable and also creates severe health hazard and ecological problems for society.^31,32

Figure 2.

Number of publications in the year 2010–2020 with the keyword Natural fibre composite from Scopus database.

The various striking benefits such as low cost, low density, low emission of CO₂, nonabrasive to the equipment, reduced energy consumption, no irritation to the skin, less health risk, along with their nature-friendly features, makes natural fibres suitable for reinforcement in polymer composites .^33–36 NFPCs are also cheaper, sturdier, and environmentally friendly. To show the importance and promote natural fibres, 2009 was considered the United Nations year of natural fibres .^33,37 The natural fibres have a hydroxyl group (-OH) on their surface, which involves hydrogen bonding with the cellulose; and reduces the activity towards the matrix. Along with numerous advantages, natural fibres have shown few drawbacks: incompatibility between fibre and matrices, weak resistance to moisture, dimensional instability, and the tendency to aggregate during processing. The more fragile interfacial bond between water-loving natural fibres and water-fearing polymer matrix leads to a decline in polymer composite properties, which is not favourable for industrial utilization and structural application. However, many schemes and approaches have overcome these deficiencies, including introducing a coupling agent or various surface modification techniques. The surface of natural fibres can be modified by physical, chemical, and mechanical means.^38–40

The primary components of natural fibre are cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and lignin, with a percentage that varies from fibre to fibre. The water-loving nature of natural fibre is due to the existence of cellulose. Hemi-cellulose and pectin are amorphous polysaccharides that hold the fibres together, and lignin is the aromatics compound .^41,42 Figure 3 outlines the classification of natural fibre, and Table 1 enlists the properties of plant fibres.⁴³

Figure 3.

Classification of natural fibres.

Table 1.

Properties of natural fibres^{48,51,183,184}

Fibre type	Density (g/cm3)	Tensile strength (MPa)	Tensile modulus (GPa)	Elongation (%)	Moisture absorption (%)
Flax	1.40	800–1500	60–80	1.2–1.6	7–12
Jute	1.46	400–800	10–30	1.8	12–17
Hemp	1.48	550–900	70	1.6	8–12
Ramie	1.55	400–1000	24.5–128	1.2–4	8–17
Kenaf	1.40	250	4.3	2.7–6.9	9–12
Sisal	1.45	227–400	9–20	2–14	11–14
Banana	1.35	529–759	8.2	1–3.5	10–11
Abaca	0.83	418–486	12–13.8	2.9	14–15
Palf	1.44	413–1627	34.5–82.5	0.8–1	12–14
Cotton	1.60	287–597	5.5–12.6	3–10	8–25
Coir	1.25	220	6	15–25	10–13
Oil palm	0.7–1.5	80–248	0.5–3.2	17–25	10–13
Bamboo	0.91	503	35.91	1.4	11–17
Bagasse	1.25	290	11	-	8.8

Considering the growing environmental concerns, synthetic materials will soon be replaced with their natural counterparts .^44–48 Hence, NFRPC is expected to grow at a higher pace in which nanofillers play a vital role for comparable performance with conventional composites. Although many articles are covering most of the literature reported on composite materials, a review article comprising on the influence of nanofillers addition and surface-treated natural fibre-based composite is still lacking, which is of extreme significance considering the current requirement of NFRPC with high strength to weight ratio in which nanofillers and surface treatment are playing a key role. The authors felt a need to cover these topics considering the most significant studies reported. Improvement in the properties of NFRPCs of this review paper deals with various strategies such as chemical treatment, fibre structure and hybridization to improve the properties of the NFRPCs. Nanofillers deals with multiple types of nanofillers and their properties. The effect of nanofiller addition on the mechanical and wetting behaviour is given in Effect of nanofillers on the properties of composite and cellulose nanofibre as reinforcement in section 5. The applications of NFRPC are provided in Role of industrial textiles in polymer composite, and the summary and future recommendation are provided in Applications of Nanocomposite.

Improvement in the properties of NFRPCs

There are several ways to improve the interfacial bonding between the matrix and fibres for enhancing the properties of natural fibre reinforced polymer composite (NFRPCs), including chemical treatment of reinforced fibre, hybridization of reinforcement and addition of fillers.

Chemical treatment

The processing of natural fibres with different chemicals such as alkali, silane, acetylation, benzoylation, and sodium chlorite, changes the chemical composition, surface morphology and topography of natural fibres. Chemical treatment is needed to remove the non-cellulosic compound from natural fibre, improve the compatibility of natural fibre with matrix, improve surface roughness and thermal stability of natural fibres. Chemical treatments are usually low cost and easy to perform; hence, the process can be easily scaled up for commercial applications. Although there are many studies on various chemical modifications, this section discusses the most facile and commonly used chemical treatment. .^49,50

Alkali treatment

The alkaline treatment is one of the most employed and easiest methods for improving the fibre matrix adhesion properties in which sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is used to modify the cellulosic structure of the natural fibres, which increase fibre fragmentation and disaggregation. The alkaline treatment removed the oil, wax, lignin, and pectin from fibres. The surface becomes clean and free from dirt and impurities with functional moieties, helping improve the interfacial bonding between matrix and fibres .⁵¹ The chemical reaction occurring on the fibre surface in alkaline treatment is given in equation (1).

Fibre- O^{-} H^{+} + N a^{+} - O H^{-} \to Fibre - O^{-} N a^{+} + H_{2} O

(1)

Silane treatment

Silane is used as a coupling agent to stabilize the composite material by removing all hydroxyl groups at the fibre-matrix interface to improves adhesion properties. It is a two-step process; in the first step, the silanol is produced by using pre-existing moisture and then it reacts with the hydroxyl group of fibre at one end and matrix functional group at another end during the condensation process. The hydrocarbon chain of the silane coupling agent restrain the fibre swelling into the matrix .^51,52 The following equation (2) is the reaction mechanism of silane treatment.

R-Si-(O C_{2} H_{5})_{3} + H_{2} O \to R-Si- {(OH)}_{3} + 3 C_{2} H_{5} OH (Step-1) R-Si- {(OH)}_{3} + OH-Fibre \to R-Si-(OH)_{2} O-Fibre + H_{2} O (Step-2)

(2)

Acetylation

The acetylation of natural fibre is also known as the esterification method, used to plasticize the natural fibres. The acetylation treatment is carried out using acetic acid and acetic anhydride; the esterification occurs by reacting the acetic group (CH₃CO-) with the hydroxyl group (OH) of fibre. Acetylation treatment is very effective in improving the mechanical properties and reducing the moisture absorption of natural fibre .^53,54 The reaction scheme for the acetylation of natural fibre is given in equation (3).

Fibre-OH  +  C H_{3} COOCOC H_{3} \to Fibre-O-COC H_{3} +  C H_{3} COOH

(3)

Benzoylation

The principle of benzoylation is the same as acetylation, which reduces the hydrophilicity of cellulosic fibres to improve thermal stability and interfacial adhesion of fibres. Benzoylation is mostly performed on alkali-treated fibres because the alkaline treatment activates the hydroxyl group (OH) of cellulosic fibre. The benzoylation process is carried out by reacting benzoyl chloride with a hydroxyl group of natural fibre. In this reaction, the benzoyl group is introduced on the fibre surface, which improves the adhesion of fibres with the matrix material and increases the thermal stability of fibres .^54,55 The reaction mechanism of fibre with benzoyl chloride is given in equation (1) and equation (4).

Fibre - O^{-} N a^{+} + C_{6} H_{5} COCl \to C_{6} H_{5} OC-O-Fibre + NaCl

(4)

Other chemical treatment

Many other chemicals can be used to enhance the adhesion of the fibre matrix and reduce the number of hydroxyls on the fibre surface. Permanganate treatment in which potassium permanganate (KMnO₄) is reacted with the hydroxyl group of cellulosic fibre. Sodium chlorite treatment (NaClO₂) in which cellulosic fibre are bleached. These grafting, stearic acid treatment, isocyanate treatment, maleated anhydride treatment, and peroxide treatment are also used to alter the chemical composition, surface topography, and morphology of natural fibres .^51,52,54

In general, the chemical treatment improves the adhesive force between natural fibre and matrix while lowering water absorption by natural fibre reinforced composites. Surface treated fibre composites outperformed untreated fibre composites. Except for alkali, mixed surface modification produces excellent mechanical qualities. Surface modifications of natural fibres can eliminate contaminants such as lipids, lignin, and pectin.

Reinforcement form

Fibres in various structures are combined with resin for composite fabrication; these structures may be unidirectional, woven, knitted, braided, 2D or 3D, depending upon the end-use .⁵⁶ Woven structures are mostly used in the composite as reinforcement due to excellent strength to weight ratios, ease of moldability, excellent impact resistance and rapid processabilities .¹ Plain, twill and satin are the weave design in 2D woven preforms, and 3D woven preforms weave designs are orthogonal and angle interlock. In 3D woven preform, the binding of the layers is of two types first one is layer-to-layer binding, and the second one is through-thickness binding .^57,58 The perpendicular interlacement makes a 2D woven fabric of two sets of yarn. i.e. warp yarn (0^o) and weft yarn (90^o).

In plain 2D weave design, each alternative warp and weft interlace over each other, as shown in Figure 4. These features make the 2D plain weave more symmetrical, stable, with a high percentage of crimp, and has the same face and backside appearance. The typical example of a plain 2D weave is a 1/1 or 2/2 basket .^59,60 In a twill weave, each warp passes over and under the weft with a regular repeated pattern. It is smoother, has a low crimp, different face, and backside appearance, and has diagonal lines that appear on fabric surfaces having two directions. i.e. S-direction and Z-direction. The twill weave has more ends and picks per unit area than a plain weave. Twill weave also has fewer binding points and more coverage area than plain weave. The typical examples of the twill weave are 2/1 S-twill, 2/1 Z-twill, 3/1 S-twill or 3/1 Z-twill .^59,60

Figure 4.

(a) Plain weave, (b) 2/1 Z-Twill, (c) 2/1 S-Twill, (d) 3/1 Z-Twill, (e) 3/1 S-Twill, (f) 5-Ends Satin (move no 3), (g) 5-Ends Satin (move on 2), (h) 3D Orthogonal, and (i) 3D Angle Interlock.

In satin weave, warp yarn alternately crosses over and under the weft yarn, having a minimum number of intersections. It has either a warp or weft face weave, having no prominent weave structure with a longer float of one yarn over several of the other yarns on one side of the fabric. More thread density and more ends/picks per unit area are possible in a satin weave. It has less dimensional stability but has a smooth surface and has a low crimp compared to other 2D weaves. In satin 2D weave, the diagonal twill lines are broken, which is also called the broken twill. The main factor of the satin weave design is the “MOVE NUMBER,” which decides the point of intersection of each yarn in design repeat. Standard move numbers for specific ends satin are two or three for 5-ends satin and 2, 3, 4, and five for 7-ends satin .^56,60

3D woven fabric is formed by interlacing three sets of yarn sets: warp yarn, weft yarn, and through the thickness binder yarn. In 3D woven fabric, the direction of the interlacement of three sets of yarn is longitudinal (X) direction, vertical (Y) direction, and cross (Z) direction. 3D woven fabrics are mostly used for ballistic and impact damage resistance due to Z-reinforcement in the structure .⁶¹ For example, Z-pinning and stitching create Z-reinforcement. About 50% of the total cost in FRP composite manufacturing includes the cost of performing, moulding, and joining, followed by material cost, which is about 40%. In Z-reinforcement, the needle penetrates the woven structure, which will damage the high-performance yarn and textile performs. It also produces needle channels to accumulate the undesired resin. All these factors lead to a reduction in the mechanical properties of FRP .²⁹

In a 3D orthogonal layer-to-layer structure, warp ends are used to bind the adjacent layers. In a 3D orthogonal through-thickness structure, the warp ends separately, the weft picks in different layers, and two additional yarn (act as binder yarn) cross through the whole thickness of the structure and bind all the layers together .⁵⁷ In angle interlock layer-to-layer structure, the warp yarn travels up to some intermediate layer, then returns to the top of the fabric and binds all the layers. Nevertheless, in angle interlock through-thickness structure, the warp yarn moves from the top to the bottom and back to the top of the structure and binds all the layers together .⁶² Figure 4 shows the various weave design as has been previously discussed. In 3D weave design, there are four total yarns in the weft direction and eight total yarns in the warp direction (both warp yarn and binder yarn). The ratio of binder yarn to warp yarn is 1:1, the number of warp yarn layers is 3, and the number of weft yarn layers is 4.

The textile weave structure not only affects the reinforcement properties but also influences the mechanical properties of the composite. Among all 2D fibre architectures, the satin weave shows better properties as a reinforcement in polymer composite than plain and twill weave .¹ The reason behind this is the smaller number of binding points in the structure; the longer yarn float and lesser yarn crimp lead to a good composite performance because binding points within the resin-rich regions were found to be the damage initiation sites in all weave types under all loading conditions. In plain and twill structures, the binding points are more, making the structure hard and stiff and breaking quickly during loading .⁶³ In the 3D weave structure, there is an extra set of fibres in the through-thickness direction, which binds all layers together, provides strength in the thickness direction, and shows excellent performance properties compared to 2D fabrics. 3D reinforced laminates have higher delamination resistance than 2D, making them preferable for high impact and ballistic applications .^58,64

Hybridization

Hybridization is another way to improve the mechanical properties of composite material. Hybrid composite mostly has two or more fibres in the same matrix, but in some cases, it also has a blend of two or more polymers reinforced with the same kind of fibre. The main objective of hybridization is to overcome the limitation of one material by reinforcing another material having similar or better properties than the first one. Hybridization can be achieved by both natural and synthetic fibres .^65,66 The hybridization can also be done at the nanoscale to make a hybrid nanocomposite by mixing more than one type of nanofiller or nanomaterial in the same matrix .⁶⁷ Hybrid composite can be classified into three groups; interlaminar having layers of different types of fibres, intralaminar having different types of fibres sewn together to form a single layer, and the third is mixed .^65,68 The main parameters that significantly affect the properties of hybrid composites are the selection of material, production and preparation method and the interaction between reinforcement and matrix. Due to the unique properties of hybrid nanocomposites, they have been used in various applications more economically than conventional composites .⁶⁹ Figure 5 show the schematic diagram of the hybrid composite.

Figure 5.

Schematic of a hybrid composite.

Nanofillers

Adding fillers to polymer matrices is an alternative to improve the composite mechanical performance, processability, and material cost reduction. The incorporation of nanofillers affects the mechanical characteristics water absorption behaviour of the laminated composites because of the good dispersion of the filler in the matrix achieved through mechanical agitation. This leads to a good bond between the fibre and the matrix, and because of this, effective stress transfer takes place between the fibre and the matrix. Adding the filler may reduce the available free spaces and hence increase the stiffness of the laminates. The filler can link the matrix and the fibre, leading to enhanced interaction between the fibre and the matrix. Once the load has been applied, the stress can easily be transferred from the polymer matrix to the reinforcing fibre, thus improving their mechanical performance. Adding nanofillers above the optimal percentage can reduce mechanical properties; it may be to an increase in the filler’s percentage causes more particle-particle interaction rather than the interaction of the nanofillers with the fibre and the matrix. An increase in filler content may increase micro spaces between the filler and the matrix; also, the aggregation of nanofillers may weaken the interfacial bond with the matrix and thus reduce the mechanical properties of the manufactured laminates .^70–72 In the case of water absorption, the nanofillers act as a water barrier and slow down water absorption, preventing water molecules from penetrating through capillary action into the deeper region of the composite. Thus, when the nanofiller concentration increases, the water absorption properties diminish. The hydrophobic and water-repellent properties of the nanofiller added to the polymer composite also helps reduce water absorption (%) .^73,74 Filler activity in polymer matrices is influenced by the size, shape, distribution, surface area and surface chemistry .^70,75–78 Fillers are mostly particulates or short fibre having the size from micro to the nanoscale. The effectiveness of the reinforcing fillers and particles in composites is directly proportional to the filler surface area to volume ratio and inversely proportional to the size of the fillers .⁷⁹ Particle size is an essential factor affecting the utility of added fillers as a reinforcing agent. Smaller particle size has more surface area per unit weight than larger particles. Greater surface area enables more interfacial contact between filler and polymer, which improves the effectiveness of the reinforcement .^72,80 Nanofillers have a larger surface area than micro fillers, favouring the filler matrix interactions and enhancing the laminates' performance. Nanofillers also have lower width and high aspect ratio than micro fillers, applying unique dimensions to optical, mechanical, electrical and other characteristics to develop new promising innovative materials from an application perspective .⁸¹ Developing nanocomposite by incorporating the nanofiller using advanced manufacturing techniques has boosted the fibre and particulate composite material performance. Overall performance of the composite material can be improved by integrating nanotechnology in fibres and matrices by; matrix and fibre modification .^82,83 Nanofillers have a very high potential to improve the composite’s mechanical performance and thus extend their applications. Homogeneous and uniform nanofiller mixing accelerates the composite’s mechanical, thermal, and tribological properties .⁸⁴ Nanofillers are typically inorganic and sometimes organic. Inorganic nanofillers are alumina, magnesia, silica, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide and calcium carbonate. Synthetic clay, carbon black, carbon fibres, CNT and graphene, are organic nanofillers .^7,44,85–87 The quantity of nanofiller addition varies with filler type and matrix used for composite fabrication. The most commonly used quantity for nanofiller is up to 4–5 wt. %. Table 2 gives a summary of recently used nanofillers in NFRPCs. Nanoparticles are characterized by size, shape, surface charge and morphology by using advanced microscopic techniques such as Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Scanning Tunnelling Microscope (STM), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Wide-angle X-ray Scattering (WAXS), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) .^45,88–91

Table 2.

Types of nanofillers used in NFRPC.

Nanofiller type	Concentration (wt. %)	Reinforcement type	Matrix type	Ref
Nanoclay	0–1.5	Hemp	Unsaturated polyester (UP) + epoxidized methyl soyate (EMS)	[122]
	1, 2.5, 5, 10	Hemp	Poly (lactic acid)	[185]
	0, 5, 8, 10	Flax	Epoxidized soybean oil (ESO)	[109]
	0, 1, 3, 5	Bamboo	High density polyethylene (HDPE) + maleated polyethylene (MAPE)	[101]
	0, 1, 3, 5	Sisal	Epoxy	[99]
	0, 1, 3, 5	Sisal	Polypropylene	[73]
	1–4	Begasse	Polypropylene	[98]
	0, 2, 4	Begasse	Polyethylene	[100]
	0, 2, 4	Begasse	High density polyethylene (HDPE)	[74]
Cenosphere	—	Bamboo	Epoxy	[186]
Bacterial cellulose	Surface treated	Hemp, sisal	Poly (L-lactic acid) + cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB)	[104,187]
Bacterial cellulose	Surface treated	Sisal	Acrylated epoxidised soybean oil (AESO)	[103,105]
Oil palm	—	Kenaf	Epoxy	[188]
CNTs	0, 0.5, 1–4	Hemp	Epoxy	[189]
	0, 0.5, 1–2	Flax	Epoxy	[107]
	0.15	Bamboo	Epoxy	[119]
MWCNTs	0–0.6	Ramie	Epoxy	[117]
MWCNTs	0.1, 0.5, 1	Palm oil	Epoxy	[106]
Graphene	—	Begasse	Polypropylene	[114]
	0.3, 1, 3	Jute	Epoxy	[190]
	0.01–0.05	Palm oil	Epoxy	[108]
	0–5	Kenaf	Polypropylene	[115]
Alumina Al ₂ O ₃	0, 5, 10, 15 (um)	Jute	Epoxy	[191]
	10 (um)	Coir	Epoxy	[192]
	0–3	Flax/PLA	Epoxy	[116]
Titanium dioxide TiO ₂	0, 2	Begasse	Ethylene co-vinyl acetate (EVA)	[123]
	0–7	Flax	Epoxy	[118]
	Grafted	Flax	Poly (lactic acid)	[193]
	0–4	Jute	Epoxy	[110]
Zinc oxide ZnO	0–4	Jute	Epoxy	[110]
Zirconium oxide ZrO ₂	Grafted	Flax	Poly (lactic acid)	[113]
Exfoliated graphite xGnp	0, 1, 3, 5	Kenaf	Poly (lactic acid)	[194]
Silica SiO ₂	0, 5	Sisal	Polyester	[112]
	0, 2, 5	Begasse	High density polyethylene (HDPE)	[120]
	0, 1.5, 3	Flax	Polypropylene (PP)	[111]

Compared to microparticles, nanoparticles offer unique properties due to their large surface area and better interfacial interaction with the polymer matrices. Nanoparticles are considered the high-value filler materials for enhancing the fibre-reinforced polymer composite’s physical, mechanical, and thermal properties due to their high aspect ratio and specific surface area .^44,92 The particles may be in the form of nanoparticles, nanotubes, and nano-layers. For the development of nanocomposite, nano-fillers are added on a weight basis .^44,93,94

Polymer nanocomposite is one in which at least one of its dimensions is in the nanometres range. The nanocomposite structure is composed of matrix material with nano-sized reinforcement in it, and it is fabricated similarly to the fabrication of the conventional polymer composite .^86,95 In polymer nanocomposite, nano-fillers are the main components, and they may be of inorganic/inorganic, inorganic/organic, and organic/organic sources .⁴⁴ Polymer nanocomposite is categorized into three different types; intercalated nanocomposite, flocculated nanocomposite, and exfoliated nanocomposite .^96,97

Effect of nanofillers on the properties of composite

Tensile Properties

It is evident from previous reports ^98–100 that nanofillers have a substantial influence on the tensile properties of NFRPCs. For instance, the addition of nano clay up to optimum level increased tensile and stiffness properties due to intercalation of nano-clay particles in the matrix, which restricts polymer chain mobility under loading and improves the fibre matrix interface .^73,74 The graph in Figure 6 & Figure 7 indicates the tensile properties with different fillers and matrices. It is clear from Figure 6 (a) that the incorporation of nano-clay as a filler to thermoset and thermoplastic-based natural fibre (NF) composite leads to an increase in the tensile properties except for the Bamboo/HDPE+MAPE sample, which could be due to the presence of unexfoliated aggregates and voids and a lack of interfacial bonding .¹⁰¹ It is generally believed that increasing the filler percentage increases the tensile properties, which was not true in many samples. This could be due to detrimental effects of detrimental agglomeration effects on the tensile behaviour of the composite .^{73,74,98,100,102} Among other matrices, the nano-clay seems to have excellent interaction with the polypropylene matrix since the tensile strength increases with filler volume increases. The tensile modulus was also found to increase the filler percentage demonstrating toughening of the NFRC with nanofillers. The tensile strength of NFRC in which the fibres were treated with bacterial is given in Figure 6 (b). The incorporation of bacterial cellulose has a minor effect on the tensile behaviour of NFRPCs; instead of bacterial modified hemp, modified sisal has better tensile behaviour, as shown in Figure 6(b) and Figure 7(b). Considering matrix, PLLA has improved tensile properties than CAB and AESO .^103–105 The addition of CNT’s, MWCNTs, and Graphene as a filler in NFRPCs also shows a similar trend with nano-clay samples' improvement in tensile properties as in Figure 6(c) and (g). Figure 7(c) and (f) shows that increasing nanofillers' concentration (wt. %) has improved the mechanical properties up to an optimum level; above this will have a negative effect. The most commonly used concentration for CNTs and MWCNTs is in between 1 wt.% to 4 wt. % and for graphene is up to 0.5 wt.%. Numerous studies have been conducted on the effect of inorganic metal oxides such as Al₂O₃, TiO₂, ZnO and SiO₂ on the tensile properties of NFRPCs. It has been revealed that by increasing the concentration of inorganic metal oxides, nanofillers have improved the tensile strength and modulus of the laminates. The concentration of inorganic metal oxides nanofillers was optimized at which the laminates exhibit the higher mechanical properties, in the range in between 1 wt.% to 5 wt.%, depending on types of inorganic metal oxide nanofiller as shown in Figure 6(d), (e), (f) and Figure 7(d), (e), (f) .^106–108 These investigations conclude that adding nanofillers improves tensile qualities; nevertheless, the filler addition must be tailored for the fibre type and matrix.

Figure 6.

Tensile strength of NFRP nanocomposite (Replotted) [73,74,98,100,103–105].

Figure 7.

Tensile modulus of NFRP nanocomposite (Replotted) [73,74,98,100,103–105].

Flexural properties

Along with tensile properties, the nanofillers also significantly affect the flexural or bending behaviour of NFRPCs. In the presence of organic fillers such as nano clay, the highest value of the flexural strength and its modulus was achieved by adding 2% nano clay, as shown in Figure 8(a) and Figure 9(a). This is due to the formation of the hydrogen bond between the polymer and nano clay particles. However, further addition of nano clay has lower the flexural behaviour due to accumulation or aggregation of the particles .^73,74,80 Adding CNTs, MWCNTs and graphene to NFRPCs have also improved bending properties. Figure 8(b) and (c) and Figure 9(b) and (d) show that increasing the concentration (wt. %) of nanofillers has led to an improvement in flexural properties up to a certain optimum level. Enhanced flexural strength and modulus due to nanofiller’s addition prevent the spread of micro and nano cracks via crack bridging mechanism .¹⁰⁹ Metal oxide nanofiller like alumina, magnesia, silica, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide and zirconium dioxide can also enhance the flexural strength and modulus. The concentration of inorganic metal oxides nanofillers has been optimized where the laminates exhibit higher mechanical properties, in the range between 0 wt. % to 5 wt. % depending on inorganic metal oxide nanofiller types, as shown in Figure 8(c) and (e) and Figure 9(c) and (e) .^110–113 So, in general, surface energy and nanofiller stiffness determine how much they interact with the matrix. In addition, nanofillers have a higher surface and stiffness, leading to a more robust contact and hence a higher flexural strength and modulus.

Figure 8.

Flexural strength of NFRP nanocomposite (Replotted) [74,100,101,106,108,110,115,117,119].

Figure 9.

Flexural modulus of NFRP nanocomposite (Replotted) [74,100,101,106,108,110,115,117,119].

Impact Properties

The impact properties of the nanofiller incorporated NFRPCs give an ambiguous result largely dependent on the types of nanofiller. The high nanofiller concentration in laminates absorbs more energy before the break and ultimately has better impact strength than the lower concentrated laminates .^73,74 The inorganic nanofiller incorporated composite has better impact property than the organic nanocomposite. Along with impact, other mechanical properties were affected not only by the type and concentration of the nanofiller but also by the size, structure, and treatment method of fibre and matrix, as shown in Figure 10 .^32,98 The impact behaviour of the nanofiller incorporated nanocomposite was improved up to certain optimized levels similar to tensile and flexural behaviour. The concentration of nanofillers has been optimized where the laminates exhibit better mechanical properties, and their range is between 0 wt.% to 5 wt.% depending on nanofiller types, as shown in Figure 10(a) to (d) .^{110,111,114–116} Nanofillers more than optimize quantity in the matrix generates matrix discontinuity, which provides sites for crack initiation, resulting in decreased impact strength.

Figure 10.

Impact strength of NFRP nanocomposite (Replotted) [32,73,74,98,100,101,110,111,114,116,119,122,186,188].

Interlaminar Shear Properties

Interlaminar shear is a critical material property always affected by the through-thickness matrix hardening and is determined by the laminated composite’s short beam shear test. The most important factor causing the failure of FRP composite is delamination. Delamination is the failure phenomenon in which the adhesion between the composite stacked-layer starts to lose; it occurs when the matrix cracks and propagate to the interface direction .¹ The most common way to improve the delamination resistance is to use 3D reinforcement or nanofiller. Generally, increasing the nanofiller contents would cause the reduction of void fraction and improved the interfacial bonding between nanofiller and matrix that leads to enhancing the ILSS properties .¹⁰⁷ The addition of an optimized quantity of nanofiller and its uniform dispersion into the matrix had increased the degree of fibre-matrix adhesion. It bridges the cracks and slows down the cracks initiation and propagation process, thus enhancing the ILSS of nanocomposite .¹¹⁰ Figure 11(a) to (d) shows that increasing the concentration of the organic and inorganic nanofillers up to the optimized level in NFRP composite has improved interlaminar shear strength due to strong interfacial bonding between fibre and matrix .^117,118

Figure 11.

ILSS of NFRP nanocomposite (Replotted) [107,110,117,118].

Water Absorption Properties

The composite material absorbs moisture through three principal mechanisms, which include diffusion of water molecules within the micro gaps between polymer chains, movement of water molecules through holes and flaws at the fibre-matrix interface through capillary action, and transport of water molecules in the matrix micro-cracks during the compounding process .¹¹⁹ The water absorption of the laminates is usually determined by using ASTM D570 standard guidelines in which the mass and thickness of the composite specimens are measured before and after putting them into a water bath at regular intervals. The increase in weight percentage is calculated by equation (5).

M_{g} (%) = (\frac{W_{f} - W_{i}}{W_{i}}) \times 100

(5)

Where M_g (%) is the moisture gained, W_i is the initial weight (g), and W_f is the final weight (g) at a time (t) .^98,99 The decrease in moisture content (%) of the NFRPCs can be achieved in different ways, such as treatment of reinforcement and matrix and adding coupling agents and nanofillers. It is evident from Figure 12(a) to (c) that there is a significant decrease in water absorption of the laminates, which are fabricated with either added nanofiller or surface-modified fibres. Additionally, it can be noticed that as water exposure time increases, the thickness swelling values of composites increase. By prolonging the period that composites are exposed to water, a large amount of water is absorbed, resulting in fibre swelling. The swelling of the fibre increases stress on the surrounding matrix, resulting in micro-cracking and eventually catastrophic failure of the composite. As a result, the weak fibre–matrix adhesion impairing the dimensional stability of composites, particularly those intended for outdoor use .^114,120

Figure 12.

Water absorption of NFRP nanocomposite (Replotted) [73,74,98,99,114,119].

Composite materials include many voids, and the reinforcement fibres have many lumens, which operate as water reservoirs. The nanofillers act as a water barrier and slow down water absorption, preventing water molecules from penetrating through capillary action into the deeper region of the composite. Thus, when the nanofiller concentration increases, the water absorption properties diminish. The hydrophobic and water-repellent properties of the nanofiller added to the polymer composite also helps reduce water absorption (%) .^73,74

Fracture Toughness and Compressive Properties

Fracture toughness is the material’s ability to withstand crack propagation and is correlated with the material’s impact strength. The material’s toughness is determined by the interface between nanofiller and matrix and the bonding between reinforcement layers. The insertion of nanofillers into the polymer matrix enhances the composite’s toughness properties along with toughness. The way the nanofillers are integrated also affects the compressive properties of the composite .^107,117 As shown in Figure 13(a) and (b), as the amount of CNTs, TiO2 and ZnO increase toughness and compressive behaviour have been improved, but this improvement has been accomplished to optimize the amount of nanofiller as other mechanical properties discussed earlier, this is because the nanofiller matrix interaction decreases at a higher percentage of the nanofiller addition leading to interfacial debonding and sliding .¹¹⁰

Figure 13.

(a). Fracture toughness, (b). Compressive strength of NFRP nanocomposite (Replotted) [107,110,117].

Thermal properties

TGA is a critical technique for determining the thermal breakdown behaviour of polymeric materials intended for use in high-temperature applications. The weight loss of a substance is determined using TGA as a function of time or temperature. Weight loss occurs as a result of the formation of the volatile product during degradation. Thermal properties are critical in understanding the behaviour of both the raw material and the finished product. Any polymer matrix can be made more thermally stable by adding a modest amount of nano additives/nanofillers .¹²¹

Mahmoodul et al. ¹²² studied the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) for hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composite in the presence of nano clay. They found that the CTE decreased as the nanoclay content increased, which means the developed laminates underwent lesser dimensional changes. A similar trend was found in kenaf/polypropylene/graphene laminates, in which the CTE decreased with the increasing contents of graphene nanoplatelets (Figure 14(a)) .¹¹⁵ Another researcher, Vilakati et al. ,¹²³ studied the onset temperature (^oC) of the TiO₂ modified sugarcane bagasse reinforced ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) composite and Tshai et al. ¹⁰⁸ studied oil palm fibre reinforced epoxy composite in the presence of graphene, in which they have reported that onset temperature of nanofiller incorporated laminates are higher than the neat composite, which means the neat composites start to degrade earlier than the nanofiller filled composite. Prasob et al. ¹¹⁰ found out that the glass transition temperature (T_g) of jute/epoxy laminates increased as the concentration of TiO₂ and ZnO nanofillers increases (Figure 14(b)). In general, adding a trace amount of nano additives/nanofillers alters the thermal properties of the polymer matrix. Due to the inclusion of nanofiller in the nanocomposite, both the initial degradation temperature and T_max values are higher than those for the neat polymer composites. Besides, the addition of ultra-high electrically conductive fillers such as carbon fibres, graphene and CNT lead to electrical conductivity in the composite .⁸⁷ Generally, the mechanical, water absorption and thermal properties are vital for the applications in the composite industry, whereas the electrical conductivity have significance in electronic textiles .^124–126

Figure 14.

Thermal properties of NFRP nanocomposites (Replotted) [110,115,122,123].

Cellulose nanofibers as a reinforcement

Cellulose nanofibers (CNF) have also been demonstrated to be an ideal reinforcing nanofiller in recent years due to their outstanding physical features, which include high crystallinity, thermal stability, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and nontoxicity .^127,128 CNF is a favourable renewable nanomaterial that has the potential to replace non-renewable materials in the manufacturing of a wide variety of products, primarily as a reinforcement material in the fabrication of nanocomposite materials .^129,130 Plant-based cellulose particles have garnered considerable interest in the research community due to their widespread availability and cost-effective processing methods. Cellulose is widely accessible worldwide from plant sources; the cellulose content of plant sources varies between 20% to 90% depending on the type of plant .^131–135 The utilization of cellulose nanofibers and their application in nanocomposite materials have attracted growing interest due to their remarkable mechanical characteristics, high aspect ratio, low coefficient of thermal expansion, large specific surface area, environmental advantages, and low cost .¹³⁶ Many researchers reported that polymer nanocomposites based on cellulose nanofibers have a beneficial influence on nanocomposites' mechanical, crystallinity, water absorption, and thermal properties .^137–144

Role of industrial textiles in polymer composite

Fibrous textiles are among the most fundamental need of humans for survival and protection from environmental conditions. However, as the population grew rapidly, the textiles consumption, along with its waste, upsurges. The linear textile system has posed a severe problem of sustainable textile waste management .¹⁴⁵ Almost every mankind deals with textile products in the form of wearing, bedding, towels, curtains, carpets, tablecloths, rugs, and in cars, trains, planes, boats, and seat upholstery .¹⁴⁶ Statistical data state that the textile consumption per capita increased about 85% from 1992 to 2013, and it is predicted to be doubled by 2030 due to a decrease in textile utilization rate (number of times to worn before being discarded) which is directly related to waste generation .¹⁴⁷

Textile waste materials can be used in the production of nanocellulose and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) ,^148,149 microcrystalline cellulose ,¹⁵⁰ biogas ,¹⁵¹ thermal and sound insulation materials ,¹⁵² concrete and bricks ,^153,154 fibres, yarns, and fabrics development ,^155,156 paper making ,^157,158 and polymer composites .^159,160 Fibrous textile waste can be used as reinforcement in polymeric composites, in the form of waste fabric, shoddy (fibres obtained from waste textiles), converting to yarn, woven or nonwoven fabric, and producing micro or nanofillers .^161–166 Studies have shown that polymeric composites reinforced with textiles waste can be employed in building and construction .¹⁶⁷

So, industrial textile waste (both synthetic and natural fibres) will also be used as reinforcement in the polymer matrix to improve the end products' functional and structural qualities by changing the parameters such as combine fibres of diverse nature, chemical composition, and size. Natural fibres, primarily hemp, jute, flax, sisal, or cotton, have been incorporated into epoxy resins and polyolefins and biopolymers for use in aircraft and automobile structural applications as well as high-performance biodegradable products. When natural reinforcement was incorporated into cementitious matrices, sustainable buildings became possible. Synthetic fibres, glass and carbon, have been utilized in high-temperature environments, such as aeroplane interiors, military applications, and ballistic protection. These fibres have also been used in concrete materials to add mechanical strength to the roadway and building constructions.

Applications of Nanocomposite

Much work has been reported on the natural fibre reinforced polymer nanocomposite based on biomaterials such as cellulose, organoclay, polylactic acid, poly (L-lactic acid). Also, a few scientists have described research work on different types of nanofillers such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), Silicon dioxide (SiO₂), Zinc oxide (ZnO), Titanium dioxide (TiO₂₎, Aluminium dioxide (Al₂O₃), Zirconium dioxide (ZrO₂) and graphene. Food packaging, control release drug delivery, tissue engineering, aerospace, defence, automobiles industries, building sectors, and medical engineering are primary areas of application of these materials .^87,168–170

Nano clay composite has application in food preservation, packaging interior coating, membrane coating, and biomedical .^171–175 CNTs and MWCNT’s have been widely used in the electrical and electronics field, aerospace, and automotive industries .¹⁷⁶ Inorganic nanoparticles are also used in textile and cosmetics industries due to their antibacterial, UV blocking, UV absorber, superhydrophobic, anti-fungal, fire retardant, antimicrobial and antistatic properties .^177–180 Epoxy polymer incorporated with oil palm nano-fillers is a valuable alternative to steel, iron metal, iron/cobalt, and iron/copper/nickel alloys. They are being used in structural applications due to their dimensional stability at high-temperature variations, making them ideal for buildings, bridges, aircraft, boats, reservoirs, and pressure vessels .^181,182 Figure 15 is a pictorial representation of various applications involving nanocomposite.

Figure 15.

Applications of nanocomposite.

Summary and future perspective

Natural fibres are an attractive candidate for the automotive and aerospace industries due to their lightweight, low cost, low density, and abundant availability in nature. The biodegradability and sustainability of these fibres further validate their application in protecting the ecosystem from the detrimental impacts of manmade materials. Thus far, the research has established the feasibility of using natural fibres as a suitable reinforcement for polymer composite materials from a sustainable and ecological standpoint. However, numerous fundamental and technological issues must be tackled before full utilization of these fibres.

This article discussed recent advancements in using natural fibres and fillers in the production of NFRPCs and their potential uses. The usage of NFRPCs as a substitute material is justified because they exhibit comparable performance to their synthetic counterparts at a cheaper cost, weight, and less environmental damage. In determining composite behaviour, filler-matrix interaction is a vital factor, the more interaction, the higher the mechanical efficiency. Natural fibre can be properly treated to improve its interactions and successfully and inexpensively overcome its setbacks. Composites with the use of nanofillers may be further improved. However, aspects like size, loading, and form of fibres and fillers must be considered to develop an effective composite material with adequate dispersal.

This review also provides comprehensive information regarding nanofillers' effect on the tensile, flexural, impact, shear, thermal, compression, and water absorption properties of the NFRPCs. The analyses show that using natural fibres and fillers of various sizes can significantly increase the performance of composites. They could be used for a variety of purposes with future development. Protection products like safety helmets, sports guards, and riot shields would benefit immensely from the increased durability and lower density of NFRPCs. In addition, components in automobiles could benefit from NFRPCs' lightweight, impact-resistant, and low-cost qualities without losing performance by using correct nanofillers. The microwave absorption property of NFRPCs may also be used to create electromagnetic shielding, and adding conductive nanofillers can reduce dielectric loss, increase reflection and scattering sites for electromagnetic waves, and improve microwave resistance by creating impedance mismatches. The nano biocomposite can also be employed in biomedical applications such as restorative implants in living tissues and drug delivery.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for Fundamental Research Grant Scheme with Project Code: FRGS/1/2018/TK09/USM/02/4. One of the authors (Adnan Amjad) would like to thank the Higher Education Commission, Pakistan, for providing a PhD scholarship.

ORCID iDs

Aslina Anjang Ab Rahman

Mohd Shukur Zainol Abidin

Junaid Khan

References

Aiman

DPC

Yahya

Salleh

. Impact properties of 2D and 3D woven composites: A review. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics Inc., 2016. 19 October 2016. DOI: 10.1063/1.4965050.Epub ahead of print

Thakur

. Processing and characterization of natural cellulose fibers/thermoset polymer composites. Carbohydr Polym 2014; 109: 102–117.

Dana

Perronnet

Fréour

, et al. Identification of moisture diffusion parameters in organic matrix composites. J Compos Mater 2013; 47: 1081–1092.

Anbusagar

NRRRR

Palanikumar

Ponshanmugakumar

. Polymer-based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications: A Volume in Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering. Elsevier Ltd., pp. 27–73.Preparation and properties of nanopolymer advanced composites: A review

Wang

Pattarachaiyakoop

, et al. A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos B Eng 2011; 42: 856–873.

Cicco

Taheri

. Use of a Simple Non-Destructive Technique for Evaluation of the Elastic and Vibration Properties of Fiber-Reinforced and 3D Fiber-Metal Laminate Composites. Fibers 2018; 6: 14.

Karger-Kocsis

Mahmood

Pegoretti

. Recent advances in fiber/matrix interphase engineering for polymer composites. Prog Mater Sci 2015; 73: 1–43.

Behera

Dash

. Mechanical behavior of 3D woven composites. Mater Des 2015; 67: 261–271.

Akil

Omar

Mazuki

AAM

, et al. Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: A review. Mater Des 2011; 32: 4107–4121.

10.

Reddy

Vivekanandhan

Misra

, et al. Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: Current status and future opportunities. Prog Polym Sci 2013; 38: 1653–1689.

11.

Baghaei

Skrifvars

Berglin

. Characterization of thermoplastic natural fibre composites made from woven hybrid yarn prepregs with different weave pattern. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2015; 76: 154–161.

12.

Malkapuram

Kumar

Singh Negi

, et al. Recent development in natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 2009; 28: 1169–1189.

13.

Noguchi

Magario

Fukazawa

, et al. Carbon Nanotube/Aluminium Composites with Uniform Dispersion. Mater Trans 2005; 45: 602–604.

14.

Randolph

Palin

Leloup

, et al. Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 1586–1599.

15.

Alzraikat

Burrow

MFMF

Maghaireh

, et al. Nanofilled Resin Composite Properties and Clinical Performance: A Review. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 17–208.-T

16.

Jeyranpour

Alahyarizadeh

Minuchehr

. The thermo-mechanical properties estimation of fullerene-reinforced resin epoxy composites by molecular dynamics simulation - A comparative study. Polymer (Guildf) 2016; 88: 9–18.

17.

Liu

Fang

Yan

, et al. Superior flame retardancy of epoxy resin by the combined addition of graphene nanosheets and DOPO. RSC Adv 2016; 6: 5288–5295.

18.

Liu

Wang

, et al. A biomimetic approach to improve the dispersibility, interfacial interactions and toughening effects of carbon nanofibers in epoxy composites. Compos Part B Eng 2017; 113: 197–205.

19.

Campbell

. Structural Composite Materials, 2010, www.asminternational.org (accessed 5 July 2020.

20.

Ornaghi

Monticeli

Neves

, et al. Effect of stacking sequence and porosity on creep behavior of glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy hybrid laminate composites. Compos Commun 2020; 19: 210–219.

21.

Kus

Durgun

Ertan

. Experimental study on the flexural properties of 3D integrated woven spacer composites at room and subzero temperatures. J Sandw Struct Mater 2018; 20: 517–530.

22.

Feng

Aymerich

. Effect of core density on the low-velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich composites. Compos Struct 2020; 239: 112040.

23.

Salama

Mowafi

El-Kheir

, et al. Preparation and characterization of polyacrylic/keratin composites: Physicomechanical and biological properties. Life Sci J 2014; 11: 889–894.

24.

El-Gabry

El-Kheir

Salama

Mowafi

El-Sayed

, et al. Acrylic/keratin composite of enhanced dyeability towards cationic and anionic dyes. Color Technol 2016; 132: 83–91.

25.

Wong

Anwar

Debnath

, et al. A Review: Recent Development of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Nanocomposites. Jom 2021; 73: 2504–2515.

26.

Nayak

Panigrahi

. Effect of nano-fillers on low-velocity impact properties of synthetic and natural fibre reinforced polymer composites- a review. Adv Mater Process Technol 2021; 00: 1–24.

27.

Sanjay

Madhu

Jawaid

, et al. Characterization and Properties of natural fiber Polymer composites: A comprehensive review. Elsevier B.V. Epub ahead of Print 20, January 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101.

28.

Siakeng

Jawaid

Ariffin

, et al. Natural fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites: A review. Polym Compos 2019; 40: 446–463.

29.

Mountasir

Hoffmann

Cherif

, et al. Competitive manufacturing of 3D thermoplastic composite panels based on multi-layered woven structures for lightweight engineering. Compos Structures 2015; 133: 415–424.

30.

Brischetto

. A comparative study of composite structures reinforced with carbon, glass or natural fibers. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct 2017; 13: 165–187.

31.

Hasan

KMF

Horváth

Alpár

. Potential natural fiber polymeric nanobiocomposites: A review. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12, Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.3390/POLYM12051072.

32.

Saba

Jawaid

Alothman

, et al. Recent advances in epoxy resin, natural fiber-reinforced epoxy composites and their applications. J Reinf Plast Compos 2016; 35: 447–470.

33.

Zakriya

Ramakrishnan

Gobi

, et al. Jute-reinforced non-woven composites as a thermal insulator and sound absorber - A review. J Reinf Plast Compos 2017; 36: 206–213.

34.

Xiong

Shen

Hua

, et al. Finite element models of natural fibers and their composites: A review. J Reinf Plast Compos 2018; 37: 617–635.

35.

Kannan

Cheng

, et al. Effect of reinforcement on the mechanical and thermal properties of flax/polypropylene interwoven fabric composites. J Ind Text 2013; 42: 417–433.

36.

Yilmaz

Powell

Banks-Lee

, et al. Multi-fiber needle-punched nonwoven composites: Effects of heat treatment on sound absorption performance. J Ind Text 2013; 43: 231–246.

37.

Chung

. Carbon composites: composites with carbon fibers, nanofibers, and nanotubes. Elsevier 2016.

38.

Yang

Guo

Yao

, et al. Effects of Kevlar volume fraction and fabric structures on the mechanical properties of 3D orthogonal woven ramie/Kevlar reinforced poly (lactic acid) composites. J Ind Text 2018; 47: 2074–2091.

39.

Mahir

Keya

Sarker

, et al. A brief review on natural fiber used as a replacement of synthetic fiber in polymer composites. Mater Eng Res 2019; 1: 88–99.

40.

Khan

Mariatti

. The Influence of Substrate Functionalization for Enhancing the Interfacial Bonding between Graphene Oxide and Nonwoven Polyester. Fibers Polym 2021; 0: 1–11.

41.

Westman

Fifield

Simmons

, et al. Natural fiber composites: a review.

42.

Petinakis

Simon

. Natural Fibre Bio-Composites Incorporating Poly ( Lactic Acid ). Intech Open 2013: 41–59.

43.

Awais

Nawab

Amjad

, et al. Effect of comingling techniques on mechanical properties of natural fibre reinforced cross-ply thermoplastic composites. Compos Part B Eng 2019; 177: 107279.

44.

Saba

Tahir

Jawaid

. A review on potentiality of nano filler/natural fiber filled polymer hybrid composites. Polymers 2014; 6: 2247–2273.

45.

Khan

Jaafar

. Reduction efficiencies of natural substances for reduced graphene oxide synthesis. J Mater Sci. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-021-06492-y.

46.

Abdullah

Ahmed

, et al. A review on bi/multifunctional catalytic oxydehydration of bioglycerol to acrylic acid: Catalyst type, kinetics, and reaction mechanism. Can J Chem Eng 2021: cjce.24295.

47.

Din

Ghaffar

Najeeb

, et al. Potential perspectives of biodegradable plastics for food packaging application-review of properties and recent developments. Food Addit Contam - A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2020; 37: 665–680.

48.

Awais

Nawab

Amjad

, et al. Environmental benign natural fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites: A review. Compos C Open Access 2021; 4: 100082.

49.

Latif

Wakeel

Zaman Khan

, et al. Surface treatments of plant fibers and their effects on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites: A review. J Reinf Plast Compos 2019; 38: 15–30.

50.

Asumani

Paskaramoorthy

. Fatigue and impact strengths of kenaf fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: effects of fibre treatments. Adv Compos Mater 2021; 30: 103–115.

51.

Gholampour

Ozbakkaloglu

. A review of natural fiber composites: properties, modification and processing techniques, characterization, applications. J Mater Sci 2020; 55: 829–892.

52.

Godara

MSS

Godara

MSS

. Effect of chemical modification of fiber surface on natural fiber composites: A review. Mater Today Proc 2019; 18: 3428–3434.

53.

Bledzki

Mamun

Gutowski

. The effects of acetylation on properties of flax fibre and its polypropylene composites. Express Polym Lett 2008; 2: 413–422.

54.

Ferreira

Cruz

Fangueiro

. Surface modification of natural fibers in Polymer composites. Epub ahead of print: Elsevier, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102177-4.00001-x.

55.

Vinayagamoorthy

. Influence of fiber surface modifications on the mechanical behavior of Vetiveria zizanioides reinforced polymer composites. J Nat Fibers 2019; 16: 163–174.

56.

Two-dimensional

Bilisik K.

(2D) fabrics and three-dimensional (3D) preforms for ballistic and stabbing protection: A review. Textile Res J 2017; 87: 2275–2304.

57.

Zhili

. Tensile behavior of 3D woven composites by using different fabric structures. Mater Des 2003; 23: 671–674.

58.

Umair

Hamdani

STA

Asghar

, et al. Study of influence of interlocking patterns on the mechanical performance of 3D multilayer woven composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 2018; 37: 429–440.

59.

Gokarneshan

Fabric Structure and Design. New Age Int 2004.

60.

Adanur

. Hand Book of Weaving.Pdf. CRC Press, 2001, https://www-mendeley-com-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/catalogue/hand-book-weavingpdf/(accessed 14 February 2019.

61.

Gurkan

Pelin Gurkan

. 3D woven fabrics. Intechopen Epub Ahead Print May 2012; 18. DOI: 10.5772/37492.

62.

Bangalore Sridharan

. 3D weaving Possibilities on an 8 shaft loom, 2017, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289798777.

63.

Rouf

Denton

French

. Effect of fabric weaves on the dynamic response of two-dimensional woven fabric composites. J Mater Sci 2017; 52: 10581–10591.

64.

Dai

Cunningham

Marshall

, et al. Influence of fibre architecture on the tensile, compressive and flexural behaviour of 3D woven composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2015; 69: 195–207.

65.

de Araujo Alves Lima

Kawasaki Cavalcanti

de Souza e Silva Neto

, et al. Effect of surface treatments on interfacial properties of natural intralaminar hybrid composites. Polym Compos 2020; 41: 314–325.

66.

Pereira

Banea

Neto

JSS

, et al. Mechanical and thermal characterization of natural intralaminar hybrid composites based on sisal. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12, Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.3390/POLYM12040866.

67.

Abdellaoui

Raji

Essabir

, et al. Mechanical behavior of carbon/natural fiber-based hybrid composites. Mech Phys Test Biocomposites, Fibre-reinforced Compos Hybrid Compos 2018: 103–122.

68.

Devireddy

SBR

Biswas

. Physical and mechanical behavior of unidirectional banana/jute fiber reinforced epoxy based hybrid composites. Polym Compos 2017; 38: 1396–1403.

69.

Mochane

Mokhena

Mokhothu

, et al. Recent progress on natural fiber hybrid composites for advanced applications: A review. Express Polym Lett 2019; 13: 159–198.

70.

Manjunath

Renukappa

Suresha

. Influence of micro and nanofillers on mechanical properties of pultruded unidirectional glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite systems. J Compos Mater 2016; 50: 1109–1121.

71.

Hosseini

. A Review: Nanomaterials as a Filler in Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites. J Nat Fibers 2017; 14: 311–325.

72.

Ashok

Kalaichelvan

Damodaran

. Effect of Nano Fillers on Mechanical Properties of Luffa Fiber Epoxy Composites. J Nat Fibers 2020; 00: 1–18.

73.

Ibrahim

Jamiru

Sadiku

, et al. Impact of Surface Modification and Nanoparticle on Sisal Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Nanocomposites. J Nanotechnol 2016; 2016: 1–9.

74.

Samariha

Hemmasi

Ghasemi

, et al. Effect of nanoclay contents on properties, of bagasse flour/reprocessed high density polyethylene/nanoclay composites. Maderas Cienc Y Tecnol 2015, Epub ahead of print.

75.

Patel

Dhanola

. Influence of CaCO3, Al2O3, and TiO2 microfillers on physico-mechanical properties of Luffa cylindrica/polyester composites. Eng Sci Technol Int J 2016; 19: 676–683.

76.

Hemanth

Sekar

Suresha

. Effects of Fibers and Fillers on Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Composites, www.ijacskros.com 2014.

77.

Burger

Laachachi

Ferriol

, et al. Review of thermal conductivity in composites: Mechanisms, parameters and theory. Prog Polym Sci 2016; 61: 1–28.

78.

Alim

Abdullah

Aziz

MSA

, et al. Die attachment, wire bonding, and encapsulation process in LED packaging: A review. Sensors Actuators A Phys 2021; 329: 112817.

79.

Jordan

Jacob

Tannenbaum

, et al. Experimental trends in polymer nanocomposites—a review. Mater Sci Eng A 2005; 393: 1–11.

80.

Barrera

Cornish

. Processing and mechanical properties of natural rubber/waste-derived nano filler composites compared to macro and micro filler composites. Ind Crops Prod 2017; 107: 217–231.

81.

Saba

Jawaid

Asim

. Green Composites for Automotive Applications. Elsevier, 2018, pp. 145–170.Nanocomposites with nanofibers and fillers from renewable resources

82.

Stankovich

Dikin

Dommett

GHBB

, et al. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 2006; 442: 282–286.

83.

Eichhorn

Dufresne

Aranguren

, et al. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 2010; 45: 1–33.

84.

Hosseini

. A Review : Nanomaterials as a Filler in Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites A Review : Nanomaterials as a Filler in Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites. J Nat Fibers 2017; 14: 311–325.

85.

Bhattacharya

. Polymer nanocomposites-A comparison between carbon nanotubes, graphene, and clay as nanofillers. Materials; 9. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: 10.3390/ma9040262.

86.

Marquis

Guillaume É

Chivas-Joly C

, et al. Properties of Nanofillers in Polymer. Intech Open 2015; 2: 64.

87.

Khan

Momin

Mariatti

. A review on advanced carbon-based thermal interface materials for electronic devices. Elsevier, 2020.

88.

Hasan

. A Review on Nanoparticles: Their Synthesis and Types, 2015, www.isca.me.

89.

Camargo

PHC

Satyanarayana

Wypych

. Nanocomposites: synthesis, structure, properties and new application opportunities. Mater Res 2009; 12: 1–39.

90.

Pothan

George

Jacob

, et al. Effect of Chemical Modification on the Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Banana Fiber Polyester Composites. J Compos Mater 2007; 41: 2371–2386.

91.

Bhatia

. Epub ahead of print 2016. Nat Polym Drug Deliv Syst 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41129-3.

92.

Raza

Westwood

AVK

Stirling

, et al. Effect of boron nitride addition on properties of vapour grown carbon nanofiber/rubbery epoxy composites for thermal interface applications. Compos Sci Technol 2015; 120: 9–16.

93.

Bikiaris

. Can nanoparticles really enhance thermal stability of polymers? Part II: An overview on thermal decomposition of polycondensation polymers. Thermochim Acta 2011; 523: 25–45.

94.

Chrissafis

Bikiaris

. Can nanoparticles really enhance thermal stability of polymers? Part I: An overview on thermal decomposition of addition polymers. Thermochim Acta 2011; 523: 1–24.

95.

Biswas

Ray

. New Polymerization Techniques and Synthetic Methodologies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 167–221.Recent Progress in Synthesis and Evaluation of Polymer-Montmorillonite Nanocomposites Berlin Heidelberg

96.

Sinha Ray

Okamoto

. Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog Polym Sci 2003; 28: 1539–1641.

97.

Wypych

Satyanarayana

. Functionalization of single layers and nanofibers: a new strategy to produce polymer nanocomposites with optimized properties. J Colloid Interf Sci 2005; 285: 532–543.

98.

Nourbakhsh

Ashori

. Influence of nanoclay and coupling agent on the physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene/bagasse nanocomposite. J Appl Polym Sci 2009; 112: 1386–1390.

99.

Mohan

TPP

Kanny

. Water barrier properties of nanoclay filled sisal fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2011; 42: 385–393.

100.

Hemmasi

Ghasemi

Bazyar

, et al. Studying the Effect of Size of Bagasse and Nanoclay Particles on Mechanical Properties and Morphology of Bagasse Flour/Recycled Polyethylene Composites. Epub ahead of print May 2013; 31. DOI: 10.15376/biores.8.3.3791-3801.

101.

Han

Lei

, et al. Bamboo-fiber filled high density polyethylene composites: Effect of coupling treatment and nanoclay. J Polym Environ 2008; 16: 123–130.

102.

Awais

Nawab

Anjang

, et al. Mechanical Properties of Continuous Natural Fibres (Jute, Hemp, Flax) Reinforced Polypropylene Composites Modified with Hollow Glass Microspheres. Fibers Polym 2020; 21: 2076–2083.

103.

Blaker

Lee

K-Y

Bismarck

. Hierarchical Composites Made Entirely from Renewable Resources. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 2011; 5: 1–16.

104.

Juntaro

Pommet

Mantalaris

, et al. Nanocellulose enhanced interfaces in truly green unidirectional fibre reinforced composites. Compos Inter 2007; 14: 753–762.

105.

Lee

K-YY

KKC

Schlufter

, et al. Hierarchical composites reinforced with robust short sisal fibre preforms utilising bacterial cellulose as binder. Compos Sci Technol 2012; 72: 1479–1486.

106.

Handaya Saputra

Wahyu Purwanto

Wulan

PDKP

, et al. Mechanical Reinforcements Of Composites Made From Fiber Of Fruit Bunch Palm Oil By Adding Carbon Nanotube. Artic Int J Sci Technol Res 2014; 3: 377–382.

107.

Chen

, et al. Improved mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes-coated flax fiber reinforced composites. J Mater Sci 2015; 50: 1117–1128.

108.

Tshai

Khalili

Kong

, et al. Synthesization of graphene and its incorporation into natural fiber reinforced thermosetting nanocomposite. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 2016; 11: 121–127.

109.

Liu

Erhan

. “Green” composites and nanocomposites from soybean oil. Mater Sci Eng A 2008; 483–484: 708–711.

110.

Prasob

Sasikumar

. Static and dynamic behavior of jute/epoxy composites with ZnO and TiO2 fillers at different temperature conditions. Polym Test 2018; 69: 52–62.

111.

Awais

Nawab

Amjad

, et al. Fabrication and characterization of lightweight engineered polypropylene composites using silica particles and flax woven comingled structure. Lect Notes Mech Eng 2020: 403–410.

112.

Gowthami

Ramanaiah

Ratna Prasad

A V.

, et al. Effect of silica on thermal and mechanical properties of sisal fiber reinforced polyester composites. J Mater Environ Sci 2013; 4: 199–204.

113.

Boulos

Foruzanmehr

Tagnit-Hamou

, et al. Wetting analysis and surface characterization of flax fibers modified with zirconia by sol-gel method. Surf Coat Technol 2017; 313: 407–416.

114.

Chaharmahali

Hamzeh

Ebrahimi

, et al. Effects of nano-graphene on the physico-mechanical properties of bagasse/polypropylene composites. Polym Bull 2014; 71: 337–349.

115.

Idumah

Hassan

. Characterization and preparation of conductive exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets kenaf fibre hybrid polypropylene composites. Synth Met 2016; 212: 91–104.

116.

Amjad

Awais

Ali

, et al. Effect of Alumina Nanofiller on the Mechanical Properties of 2D Woven Biotex Flax/PLA Fiber-Reinforced Nanocomposite. In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer. Singapore: 383–391.

117.

Shen

Jia

Chen

, et al. Enhancement of mechanical properties of natural fiber composites via carbon nanotube addition. J Mater Sci 2014; 49: 3225–3233.

118.

Wang

Xian

. Grafting of nano-TiO₂ onto flax fibers and the enhancement of the mechanical properties of the flax fiber and flax fiber/epoxy composite. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2015; 76: 172–180.

119.

Kushwaha

Pandey

Kumar

. Study on the effect of carbon nanotubes on plastic composite reinforced with natural fiber. J Indian Acad Wood Sci 2014; 11: 82–86.

120.

Hosseini

Hedjazi

Jamalirad

, et al. Effect of nano-SiO2 on physical and mechanical properties of fiber reinforced composites (FRCs). J Indian Acad Wood Sci 2014; 11: 116–121.

121.

Takkalkar

Nizamuddin

Griffin

, et al. Thermal properties of sustainable thermoplastics nanocomposites containing nanofillers and its recycling perspective. Sustain Polym Compos Nanocomposites 2019: 915–933.

122.

Haq

Burgueño

Mohanty

, et al. Hybrid bio-based composites from blends of unsaturated polyester and soybean oil reinforced with nanoclay and natural fibers. Compos Sci Technol 2008; 68: 3344–3351.

123.

Vilakati

Mishra

, et al. Influence of TiO2-Modification on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Sugarcane Bagasse–EVA Composites. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 2010; 20: 802–808.

124.

Shathi

Minzhi

Khoso

, et al. Graphene coated textile based highly flexible and washable sports bra for human health monitoring. Mater Des 2020; 193: 108792.

125.

Khan

Metrani

Maiti

. Smart Textiles for Health Monitoring During Pregnancy. J Emerg Technol Innov Res 2019; 6: 836–842.

126.

Neves

AIS

Rodrigues

De Sanctis

, et al. Towards conductive textiles: Coating polymeric fibres with graphene. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 1–10.

127.

Tibolla

Pelissari

Martins

, et al. Cellulose nanofibers produced from banana peel by chemical and mechanical treatments: Characterization and cytotoxicity assessment. Food Hydrocoll 2018; 75: 192–201.

128.

Lin

Dufresne

. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J 2014; 59: 302–325.

129.

Wang

Yang

Wang

. Reinforcing linear low-density polyethylene with surfactant-treated microfibrillated cellulose. Polymers (Basel) 2019; 11, Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.3390/polym11030441.

130.

Fatah

IYA

Abdul Khalil

HPS

Hossain

, et al. Exploration of a chemo-mechanical technique for the isolation of nanofibrillated cellulosic fiber from oil palm empty fruit bunch as a reinforcing agent in composites materials. Polymers (Basel) 2014; 6: 2611–2624.

131.

Rol

Belgacem

Gandini

, et al. Recent advances in surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils. Prog Polym Sci 2019; 88: 241–264.

132.

Mascheroni

Rampazzo

Ortenzi

, et al. Comparison of cellulose nanocrystals obtained by sulfuric acid hydrolysis and ammonium persulfate, to be used as coating on flexible food-packaging materials. Cellulose 2016; 23: 779–793.

133.

Mohan

Kanny

. Nanoclay infused banana fiber and its effects on mechanical and thermal properties of composites. J Compos Mater 2016; 50: 1261–1276.

134.

Langhorst

Paxton

Bollin

, et al. Heat-treated blue agave fiber composites. Compos Part B Eng 2019; 165: 712–724.

135.

Haggui

El Mahi

Jendli

, et al. Static and fatigue characterization of flax fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites by acoustic emission. Appl Acoust 2019; 147: 100–110.

136.

Orts

Shey

Imam

, et al. Application of cellulose microfibrils in polymer nanocomposites. J Polym Environ 2005; 13: 301–306.

137.

Danh

Nakagaito

. Effects of cellulose nanofiber on the thermal, mechanical, and optical properties of triacetate cellulose nanocomposites. Express Polym Lett 2020; 14: 467–476.

138.

Jung

Kang

, et al. The fabrication of flexible and oxygen barrier cellulose nanofiber/polylactic acid nanocomposites using cosolvent system. J Appl Polym Sci 2020; 137: 1–17.

139.

Pandurangan

Kanny

. Study of curing characteristics of cellulose nanofiber-filled epoxy nanocomposites. Catalysts; 10. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.3390/catal10080831.

140.

Tibolla

Czaikoski

Pelissari

, et al. Starch-based nanocomposites with cellulose nanofibers obtained from chemical and mechanical treatments. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 161: 132–146.

141.

Pelissari

Andrade-Mahecha

Sobraldo

PJA

, et al. Nanocomposites based on banana starch reinforced with cellulose nanofibers isolated from banana peels. J Colloid Interf Sci 2017; 505: 154–167.

142.

Zhang

Huang

Zhao

, et al. Eects of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibers on the structure and properties of polyhydroxybutyrate nanocomposites. Polymers (Basel) 2019; 11, Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.3390/polym11122063.

143.

Yasim-Anuar

TAT

Ariffin

Norrrahim

MNF

, et al. Well-dispersed cellulose nanofiber in low density polyethylene nanocomposite by liquid-Assisted extrusion. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12: 1–17.

144.

Kamble

Behera

Mishra

, et al. Influence of cellulosic and non-cellulosic particle fillers on mechanical, dynamic mechanical, and thermogravimetric properties of waste cotton fibre reinforced green composites. Compos Part B Eng 2021; 207: 108595.

145.

Kamble

Behera

Kimura

, et al. Development and characterization of thermoset nanocomposites reinforced with cotton fibres recovered from textile wasteEpub ahead of print. J Ind Text 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1528083720913535.

146.

Patti

Cicala

Acierno

. Eco-sustainability of the textile production: Waste recovery and current recycling in the composites world. Polymers (Basel) 2021; 13: 1–22.

147.

Kamble

Behera

. Sustainable hybrid composites reinforced with textile waste for construction and building applications. Constr Build Mater 2021; 284: 122800.

148.

MMÁD

Maciel

Benini KCC de

Voorwald

HJC

, et al. Obtainment and characterization of nanocellulose from an unwoven industrial textile cotton waste: Effect of acid hydrolysis conditions. Int J Biol Macromol 2019; 126: 496–506.

149.

Prado

Gonzales

Spinacé

MAS

. Recycling of viscose yarn waste through one-step extraction of nanocellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 2019; 136: 729–737.

150.

Ling

Shi

Hou

, et al. Separation of waste polyester/cotton blended fabrics by phosphotungstic acid and preparation of terephthalic acid. Polym Degrad Stab 2019; 161: 157–165.

151.

Ismail

Talib

. Recycled medical cotton industry waste as a source of biogas recovery. J Clean Prod 2016; 112: 4413–4418.

152.

Islam

Bhat

. Environmentally-friendly thermal and acoustic insulation materials from recycled textiles. J Environ Manage December 2019, 251. Epub ahead of print 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109536.

153.

Binici

Gemci

Aksogan

, et al. Insulation properties of bricks made with cotton and textile ash wastes. Int J Mater Res 2010; 101: 894–899.

154.

Orasutthikul

Unno

Yokota

. Effectiveness of recycled nylon fiber from waste fishing net with respect to fiber reinforced mortar. Constr Build Mater 2017; 146: 594–602.

155.

Béchir

Mohamed

Béchir

. Industrial cotton waste: Recycling, reclaimed fiber behavior and quality prediction of its blend. Tekst Ve Konfeksiyon 2018; 28: 14–20.

156.

Haslinger

Hummel

Anghelescu-Hakala

, et al. Upcycling of cotton polyester blended textile waste to new man-made cellulose fibers. Waste Manag 2019; 97: 88–96.

157.

Opoku-asare

Yeboah

. Hand Papermaking with Waste Fabrics and Paper Mulberry Fibre. Online Int J Od Arts Humanit 2013; 2: 71–82.

158.

Ruoyuan

Teruo

Haruhiro

. Papermaking from waste silk and its application as reinforcement of green composite. J Text Eng 2010; 56: 71–76.

159.

Thambiraj

Ravi Shankaran

. Preparation and physicochemical characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from industrial waste cotton. Appl Surf Sci 2017; 412: 405–416.

160.

Sivakumar

Mohan

. Sustainable Solid Waste Management in Leather and Textile Industry. Text Leather Rev 2020; 3: 54–63.

161.

Salama

Hassabo

El-Sayed

, et al. Reinforcement of Polypropylene Composites Based on Recycled Wool or Cotton Powders. J Nat Fibers 2017; 14: 823–836.

162.

Huang

Tao

Ismail

, et al. Cellulose nanocrystals derived from textile waste through acid hydrolysis and oxidation as reinforcing agent of soy protein film. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12: 958.

163.

Baccouch

Ghith

Yalcin-Enis

, et al. Investigation of the mechanical, thermal, and acoustical behaviors of cotton, polyester, and cotton/polyester nonwoven wastes reinforced epoxy composites. J Ind Text January 2020, Epub ahead of print 23. DOI: 10.1177/1528083720901864.

164.

Meng

Fan

, et al. Recycling of denim fabric wastes into high-performance composites using the needle-punching nonwoven fabrication route. Textile Res J 2020; 90: 695–709.

165.

Taşdemir

Koçak

Usta

, et al. Properties of polypropylene composite produced with silk and cotton fiber waste as reinforcement. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 2007; 56: 1155–1165.

166.

Ramamoorthy

Persson

Skrifvars

. Reusing textile waste as reinforcements in composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2014; 131: 8569–8584.

167.

Textiles

Pohl G.

Polymers and Composites for Buildings. Elsevier, pp. 1–487.

168.

Wang

Sain

. Dispersion of soybean stock-based nanofiber in a plastic matrix. Polym Int 2007; 56: 538–546.

169.

Zimmermann

Bordeanu

Strub

. Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 2010; 79: 1086–1093.

170.

Alemdar

Sain

. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues – Wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 2008; 99: 1664–1671.

171.

Silvestre

Duraccio

Cimmino

. Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 2011; 36: 1766–1782.

172.

De Azeredo

HMC

. Antimicrobial nanostructures in food packaging. Trends Food Sci Technology 2013; 30: 56–69.

173.

Khan

Huq

Khan

, et al. Nanocellulose-Based Composites and Bioactive Agents for Food Packaging. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2014; 54: 163–174.

174.

Youssef

. Polymer Nanocomposites as a New Trend for Packaging Applications. Polym Plast Technol Eng 2013; 52: 635–660.

175.

Rhim

J-W

Park

H-M

C-S

. Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Prog Polym Sci 2013; 38: 1629–1652.

176.

Rao

Ogitani

Kohl

, et al. Novel polymer-ceramic nanocomposite based on high dielectric constant epoxy formula for embedded capacitor application. J Appl Polym Sci 2002; 83: 1084–1090.

177.

Luksiene

. Nanoparticles and their potential application as antimicrobials in the food industryEpub ahead of print 2016. Food Preservation 2016. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-804303-5.00016-x.

178.

Rai

Yadav

Gade

. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv 2009; 27: 76–83.

179.

Zhang

Peng

Huang

, et al. Facile preparation and characterization of highly antimicrobial colloid Ag or Au nanoparticles. J Colloid Interf Sci 2008; 325: 371–376.

180.

Dastjerdi

Montazer

. A review on the application of inorganic nano-structured materials in the modification of textiles: Focus on anti-microbial properties. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2010; 79: 5–18.

181.

Saba

Paridah

Abdan K

, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm nano filler/kenaf/epoxy hybrid nanocomposites. Constr Build Mater 2016; 124: 133–138.

182.

Saba

Paridah

Abdan

, et al. Thermal properties of oil palm nano filler/kenaf reinforced epoxy hybrid nanocomposites. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC, p. 050020.

183.

Faruk

Bledzki

Fink

, et al. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000-2010. Prog Polym Sci 2012; 37: 1552–1596.

184.

Peças

Carvalho

Salman

, et al. Natural fibre composites and their applications: A review. J Compos Sci 2018; 2: 1–20.

185.

Hapuarachchi

Peijs

. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes and sepiolite nanoclays as flame retardants for polylactide and its natural fibre reinforced composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2010; 41: 954–963.

186.

Jena

Pandit

Pradhan

. Study the Impact Property of Laminated Bamboo-Fibre Composite Filled with Cenosphere. Int J Environ Sci Dev 2012; 3: 456–459.

187.

Pommet

Juntaro

Heng

JYY

, et al. Surface Modification of Natural Fibers Using Bacteria: Depositing Bacterial Cellulose onto Natural Fibers To Create Hierarchical Fiber Reinforced Nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9: 1643–1651.

188.

Saba

Paridah

Abdan

, et al. Effect of oil palm nano filler on mechanical and morphological properties of kenaf reinforced epoxy composites. Constr Build Mater 2016; 123: 15–26.

189.

Longkullabutra

Thamjaree

Nhuapeng

. Improvement in the Tensile Strength of Epoxy Resin and Hemp/Epoxy Resin Composites Using Carbon Nanotubes. Adv Mater Res 2010; 93–94: 497–500.

190.

Sridharan

Raja

Muthukrishnan

. Study of the Effect of Matrix, Fibre Treatment and Graphene on Delamination by Drilling Jute/Epoxy Nanohybrid Composite. Arab J Sci Eng 2016; 41: 1883–1894.

191.

Tapas

Swain

. Physical and Mechanical Behavior of Al2O3 Filled Jute Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites Physical and Mechanical Behavior of Al 2 O 3 Filled Jute Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Int J Curr Eng Technol, Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: 10.14741/ijcet/spl.2.2014.13.

192.

Das

Biswas

. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Institute of Physics Publishing, 2016. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/115/1/012012 (Epub ahead of print 7 March 2016.Physical, Mechanical and Water Absorption Behaviour of Coir Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites Filled with Al2O3 Particulates

193.

Foruzanmehr

Vuillaume

Elkoun

, et al. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA composites reinforced by TiO2 grafted flax fibers. Mater Des 2016; 106: 295–304.

194.

Han

Karevan

Bhuiyan

, et al. Effect of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets on the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of poly(lactic acid) biocomposites reinforced with kenaf fibers. J Mater Sci 2012; 47: 3535–3543.