By truncating service, term limits create massive turnover in some state legislatures where they exist, bringing flocks of newcomers into office. With less time to get to know each other and to develop expertise and influence, how do legislators know who to consult and whose advice to rely on? We explore this and other questions about three relationships (influence, friendship, and policy consultation) with a longitudinal study of the Michigan House of Representatives, a highly professionalized body with stringent limits on legislative terms. We found that term limits lead to a more pronounced regional component of friendship, greater concentration of influence among caucus leaders, consulting networks with more prominent hubs that could control the flow of information, and a decline in relationships across party lines. We argue that these effects of term limits bode poorly for bipartisan negotiation and consensus-building among legislators representing diverse constituencies.
BienenstockElisa J.1990. “New Models for Exchange Networks: A Research Proposal.” Paper presented at E. Conference on Social Networks, University of California, Santa Barbara.
3.
BienenstockElisa J.BonacichPhillip F.OliverMelvin. 1990. “The Effect of Network Density and Homogeneity on Attitude Polarization.” Social Networks12: 153–72.
4.
CaldeiraGregory A.ClarkJohn A.PattersonSamuel C.. 1993. “Political Respect in the Legislature.” Legislative Studies Quarterly18: 3–28.
5.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.. 1998. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly23: 271–300.
6.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.. 2003. “Term Limits in the State Legislatures: Results from a New Survey of the 50 States.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
7.
CarsonC.1998. “Public Policy Dispute Settlement: A Best Practice Model.” Presented at the Dispute Resolution Study Circle, Mediating Theory, and Democratic Systems, Detroit, MI.
8.
FaraceRichard V.MongePeter R.RussellHamish M.. 1977. Communicating and Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
FarmerRick. 2002. “The Future of Political Parties in Term-limited State Legislatures.” Spectrum: The Journal of State Government75: 14–7.
10.
FrancisWayne L.1962. “Influence and Interaction in a State Legislative Body.” American Political Science Review56: 953–60.
11.
FrancisWayne L.1985. “Leadership, Party Caucuses, and Committees in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly10: 243–57.
12.
FrancisWayne L.1989. The Legislative Committee Game. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
13.
GranovetterMark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology81: 1360–80.
14.
GranovetterMark. 1974. Getting a Job. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
HammKeith. 1982. “Consistency between Committee and Floor Voting in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly7: 473–90.
16.
JewellMalcolm E.WhickerMarcia L.. 1994. Legislative Leadership in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17.
KingdonJohn W.1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. 3rd ed.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
18.
KnokeDavidKuklinskiJames H.. 1982. Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
MoncriefGaryThompsonJoel. 2001. “On the Outside Looking In: Lobbyists' Perspectives on the Effects of State Legislative Term Limits.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly1: 394–411.
20.
MooneyChristopher Z.1991. “Information Sources in State Legislative Decision Making.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16: 445–55.
21.
OrrShannonRaderEricFalettaJean-PhilippeSarbaugh-ThompsonMarjorieElderCharles D.ThompsonLykeStrateJohnEllingRichard C.. 2000. “A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment in the State: Research on Term Limits in Michigan.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly1: 443–5.
22.
PattersonSamuel C.1959. “Patterns of Interpersonal Relations in a State Legislative Group: The Wisconsin Assembly.” Public Opinion Quarterly23: 101–9.
23.
PorterHubert Owen. 1972. “Legislative Expertise in Michigan: Formal and Informal Expertise over Time.” Ph.D. diss. University of Michigan.
24.
PorterHubert Owen. 1974. “Legislative Experts and Outsiders: The Two-Step Flow of Communication.” Journal of Politics36: 703–31.
25.
PriceDavid E.1978. “Policy Making in Congressional Committees: The Impact of ‘Environmental’ Factors.” American Political Science Review72: 548–74.
26.
RayDavid. 1982. “The Sources of Voting Cues in Three State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics44: 1074–87.
27.
Sarbaugh-ThompsonM.ThompsonLykeElderCharles D.StrateJohnEllingRichard C.. 2004. Political and Institutional Effects of Term Limits. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17: 69–79.
29.
TrpovskiJovanSarbaugh-ThompsonMarjorieStrateJohn. 2001. “Conflict and Control in a Term Limited Legislature.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
