Political Cynicism And Third Party Support In American Presidential Elections

Abstract

Recent scholarship on American voting behavior contends that political cynicism prompts citizens to support a third party candidate. I maintain this research fails to consider an alternative direction of causality between political trust and third party support. Using an exogenous measure of political trust, one uncontaminated by candidate preference, analysis demonstrates that political cynicism is shaped by preference for an American third party rather than being causally prior to that preference. Students of American electoral behavior must consider the possibility that major third party candidacies shape supporters’ political orientations and concerns in much the same manner as the major political parties do.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson, P., Aldrich, J. H.Paolino, P., & Rohde, D. W. (1994, September). The problem of third-party and independent candidates in the American political system: Wallace, Anderson, and Perot in comparative perspective. Paper prepared for delivery at the 1994 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.

Abramson, P. R. (1983). Political attitudes in America: Formation and change. San Francisco: Freeman.

Asher, H. (1995). The Perot campaign. In H. W. Weisberg (Ed.), Democracy’s feast: Elections in America (pp. 153-175). Chatham, NJ: Chatham.

Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F. D., Jr. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and Black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 377-393.

Brody, R. A., & Page, B. I. (1972). The assessment of policy voting. American Political Science Review, 66(2), 450-458.

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E.Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley.

Citrin, J., & Green, D. P. (1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 431-453.

Franklin, C. H., & Jackson, J. E. (1983). The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review, 77(4), 957-973.

Ginsberg, B., & Weissberg, R. (1978). Elections and the mobilization of popular support. American Journal of Political Science, 22(1), 31-55.

10.

Gold, H. J. (1995). Third party voting in presidential elections: A study of Perot, Anderson, and Wallace. Political Research Quarterly, 48(4), 751-773.

11.

Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 791-808.

12.

Hetherington, M. J. (1999). The effect of political trust on the presidential vote, 1968-96. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 311-326.

13.

Jackson, J. E. (1975). Issues, party choices, and presidential votes. American Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 161-185.

14.

Jacoby, W. G. (1988). The impact of party identification on issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 32(3), 643-661.

15.

Markus, G. B., & Converse, P. I. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1055-1070.

16.

Miller, A. H., & Borelli, S. (1991). Confidence in government during the 1980s. American Politics Quarterly, 19(2), 147-173.

17.

Peterson, G., & Wrighton, J. M. (1998). Expressions of distrust: Third party voting and cynicism in government. Political Behavior, 20(1), 17-34.

18.

Rosenstone, S. J., Behr, R. L.Lazarus, E. H. (1996). Third parties in America: Citizen response to major party failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

19.

Zaller, J., & Hunt, M. (1995). The rise and fall of candidate Perot: The outsider versus the political system—Part II. Political Communication, 12(1), 97-123.