Scholars have long recognized that national activity influences both the substance and the timing of state policymaking. This article examines whether the content of national legislation affects the state-level enactment of policy innovations even if it does not mandate their adoption or provide a financial incentive for state lawmakers to enact them. It uses event history analysis on pooled, cross-sectional data to examine the diffusion of three innovations in human services policy: individual development accounts, family caps, and medical savings accounts. Its results suggest that national intervention affects the likelihood that state lawmakers will adopt an innovation by altering the strength of the obstacles that prevent innovation or by providing resources to help overcome these obstacles. National intervention that does not affect these determinants of innovation seems to have no significant effect on state officials’ decisions.
Allen, M. D., Pettus, C., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2004, Fall). Making the national local: Specifying the conditions for national government influence on state policymaking. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 4, 318-344.
2.
Annie E.Casey Foundation. (1999). When teens have sex: Issues and trends. Baltimore: Author.
3.
Arsneault, S. (2000, Winter). Welfare policy innovation and diffusion: Section 1115 waivers and the federal system. State and Local Government Review, 32, 49-60.
4.
Balla, S. J. (2001, May). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29, 221-245.
5.
Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998, October). Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1260-1288.
6.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990, June). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395-415.
7.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1992, August). Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 715-742.
8.
Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (1998, January). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-1993. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 327-348.
9.
Box-Steffensmeier, J., & Jones, B. S. (1997, October). Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 1414-1461.
10.
Bunce, V. C. (1998a, February). The basics of medical savings accounts. Association Management, 50, 85-90.
11.
Bunce, V. C. (1998b, July). Snapshot: What are medical savings accounts?CAHI Policy Brief, 2, 1-4.
12.
Bunce, V. C. (2001). Medical savings accounts: Problems and progress under HIPAA. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
13.
Canon, B. C., & Baum, L. (1981, December). Patterns of adoption of tort law innovations: An application of diffusion theory to judicial doctrines. American Political Science Review, 75, 975-987.
14.
Center for Social Development. (2001). IDA policy in the states. St. Louis, MO: Author.
15.
Conlan, T. (1998). From new federalism to devolution: Twenty-five years of intergovernmental reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16.
Dye, T. R. (1966). Politics, economics, and the public: Policy outcomes in the American states. Chicago: Rand McNally.
17.
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Goodman, J. C., & Musgrave, G. L. (1992). Patient power: Solving America’s health care crisis. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
19.
Gormley, W. T., Jr. (1989). Taming the bureaucracy: Muscles, prayers, and other strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Gray, V. (1973, December). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174-1185.
21.
Gray, V. (1974, November). Expenditures and innovation as dimensions of “progressivism”: A note on the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 18, 693-699.
22.
Grupp, F. W., Jr., & Richards, A. R. (1975, September). Variation in elite perceptions of American states as referents for policy making. American Political Science Review, 69, 850-858.
23.
Haider-Markel, D. P. (2001, Spring). Policy diffusion as a geographical expansion of the scope of political conflict. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 1, 5-26.
24.
King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000, April). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
25.
Kousser, T. (2005). Term limits and the dismantling of legislative professionalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Lieberman, R. C., & Shaw, G. M. (2000, June). Looking inward, looking outward: The politics of state welfare innovation under devolution. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 215-240.
27.
Light, A. R. (1978, April). Intergovernmental sources of innovation in state administration. American Politics Quarterly, 6, 147-166.
28.
Mintrom, M. (1997, July). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 738-770.
29.
Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
30.
Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998, February). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics, 60, 126-148.
31.
Mohr, L. B. (1969, March). Determinants of innovation in organizations. American Political Science Review, 63, 111-126.
32.
Mooney, C. Z. (2001, March). Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 103-124.
33.
Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M. (1995, August). Legislative morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 599-627.
34.
Morgan Quitno Corporation. (1998). Health care state rankings (6th ed.). Lawrence, KS: Author.
35.
Nice, D. C. (1994). Policy innovation in state government. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
36.
Nichols, L. M., & Blumberg, L. J. (1998, May/June). A different kind of “new federalism”? The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Health Affairs, 17, 25-42.
37.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
38.
Sapat, A. (2004, March/April). Devolution and innovation: The adoption of state environmental policy innovations by administrative agencies. Public Administration Review, 64, 141-151.
39.
Savage, R. L. (1978, February). Policy innovativeness as a trait of American states. Journal of Politics, 40, 212-224.
40.
Sherraden, M. (1991). Assets and the poor: A new American welfare policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
41.
Squire, P. (1992, February). Legislative professionalization and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17, 69-79.
42.
Stark, S., & Levin-Epstein, J. (1999). Excluded children: Family cap in a new era. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
43.
Tweedie, J. (1994, August). Resources rather than needs: A state-centered model of welfare policymaking. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 651-672.
44.
Urban Institute. (2001a, June). Assessing the new federalism state database. Retrieved June 15, 2001, from http://www.urban.org/Content/Research/NewFederalism/Data/StateDatabase/State-Database.htm
45.
Urban Institute. (2001b, June). Welfare rules database. Retrieved June 15, 2001, from http://www.urban.org/Content/Research/NewFederalism/AboutANF/AboutANF.htm
46.
U. S. Department of Commerce. (2001, June). Regional accounts data. Retrieved June 15, 2001, from http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/spi/
47.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program: Second annual report to Congress. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.
48.
Vestal, C. (2005, July). States try new approaches, feds cool. Retrieved July 26, 2005, from http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=136&languageId=1&contentId=44968
49.
Walker, J. L., Jr. (1969, September). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880-899.
50.
Weaver, R. K. (2000). Ending welfare as we know it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
51.
Welch, S., & Thompson, K. (1980, November). The impact of federal incentives on state policy innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 715-729.
52.
Yamaguchi, K. (1991). Event history analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
