Most explanations for the increased effect of partisanship on voting for the U.S. House focus on the polarization of parties at the elite levels of politics. It remains unclear, however, just how the two phenomena are connected. In this study, we find that partisans near the extreme of their respective party's prevailing ideology have largely been responsible for the change in voting behavior, because it is these voters who have experienced the greatest increase in relative ideological closeness to the party at the same time that the ideological component of party identification has become a more powerful determinant of electoral choice. There is little support, however, for the idea that partisan realignment by moderately liberal Republicans and moderately conservative Democrats in response to perceptions of growing divergence between the parties has been the mechanism behind elevated party-based voting.
Abramowitz, A.I., Alexander, B., & Gunning, M. (2006a). Don't blame redistricting for uncompetitive elections . PS: Political Science and Politics, 39, 87-90.
2.
Abramowitz, A.I., Alexander, B., & Gunning, M. (2006b). Drawing the line on district competition: A rejoinder . PS: Political Science and Politics, 39, 95-97.
3.
Abramowitz, A.I., Alexander, B., & Gunning, M. (2006c). Incumbency, redistricting, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics, 68, 75-88.
4.
Abramowitz, A.I., & Saunders, K.L. (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634-652.
5.
Abramson, P.R., Aldrich, J.H., & Rohde, D.W. (2006). Change and continuity in the 2004 elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
6.
Aldrich, J.H. (1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of party politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Bartels, L. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 35-50.
8.
Carmines, E.G., & Layman, G.C. (1997). Issue evolution in postwar American politics: Old certainties and fresh tensions. In B. E. Shafer, with J. H. Silbey, M. Barone, C. O. Jones , A. Ehrenhalt, E. G. Carmines, et al. (Eds.), Present discontents: American politics in the very late twentieth century (pp. 89-134). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
9.
Carsey, T.M., & Layman, G.C. (2006). Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 464-477.
10.
Carson, J.L., Crespin, M.H., Finocchiaro, C.J., & Rohde, D.W. (2004, September). Linking congressional districts across time: Redistricting and party polarization in Congress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association , Chicago.
11.
Collie, M.P., & Mason, J.L. (2000). The electoral connection between party and constituency reconsidered: Evidence from the U.S. House of Representatives, 1972-1994. In D. W. Brady, J. F. Cogan, & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Continuity and change in House elections (pp. 211-234). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
Fiorina, M.P. (2002). Parties and partisanship: A 40-year retrospective . Political Behavior, 24, 93-115.
13.
Fiorina, M.P., with Abrams, S.J., & Pope, J.C. (2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
14.
Fleisher, R., & Bond, J.R. (1996, April). Why has party conflict among elites increased if the electorate is dealigning?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
15.
Fleisher, R., & Bond, J.R. (2000). Congress and the President in a partisan era. In J. R. Bond & R. Fleisher (Eds.), Polarized politics: Congress and the President in a partisan era (pp. 1-8). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
16.
Fleisher, R., & Bond, J.R. (2001). Evidence of increasing polarization among ordinary citizens. In J. E. Cohen, R. Fleisher, & P. Kantor (Eds.), American political parties: Decline or resurgence? (pp. 55-77). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
17.
Hetherington, M.J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95, 619-631.
18.
Jacobson, G.C. (2000a, September). The electoral basis of partisan polarization in Congress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
19.
Jacobson, G.C. (2000b). Party polarization in national politics: The electoral connection. In J. R. Bond & R. Fleisher (Eds.), Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era (pp. 9-30). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
20.
Jacobson, G.C. (2007). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York: PearsonLongman.
21.
Layman, G.C., & Carsey, T.M. (2002a). Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 786-802.
22.
Layman, G.C., & Carsey, T.M. (2002b). Party polarization and party structuring of policy attitudes: A comparison of three NES panel studies. Political Behavior, 24, 199-236.
23.
McCarty, N., Poole, K.T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
24.
McDonald, M.P. (2006a). Drawing the line on district competition. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39, 91-94.
25.
McDonald, M.P. (2006b). Re-drawing the line on district competition. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39, 99-101.
26.
Oppenheimer, B.I. (2005). Deep red and blue congressional districts: The causes and consequences of declining party competitiveness. In L. C. Dodd & B. I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (8th ed., pp. 147-154). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
27.
Polsby, N.W. (2004). How Congress evolves: Social bases of institutional change. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Pomper, G.M. (2001). Party responsibility and the future of American democracy. In J. E. Cohen, R. Fleischer, & P. Kantor (Eds.), American political parties: Decline or resurgence? (pp. 162-183). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
29.
Stonecash, J.M., Brewer, M.D., & Mariani, M.D. (2003). Diverging parties: Social change, realignment, and party polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview.
30.
Theriault, S.M. (2006). Party polarization in the U.S. Congress: Member replacement and member adaptation. Party Politics, 12, 483-503.
31.
Tierney, J. (2004, June 13). A nation divided? Who says?The New York Times, pp. D1, D4.
