Since the United States Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, the public's support for the judicial system looms as an especially important concern. Although studies have confirmed that the Supreme Court's reservoir of public goodwill has remained largely intact following the politically divisive decision, the status of public support for other American courts has received little attention. This reflects a broader trend in judicial politics scholarship toward placing inordinate attention on explaining public support for the U.S. Supreme Court while largely ignoring the courts where most of the policymaking in the nation occurs—state courts. We use a national survey to assess the factors influencing diffuse support for state courts. We find that although many considerations affecting diffuse support for state courts parallel the determinants of such support for the nation's high Court, important differences exist between explanations of citizen support for state courts and the Supreme Court. Most notably, judicial elections and concerns over judicial campaign contributions work to undermine citizens' support for their state courts.
Adamany, D., & Grossman, J. (1983). Support for the Supreme Court as a national policy-maker . Law & Policy Quarterly, 5, 405-437.
2.
Aspin, L., & Hall, W. (1987). Political trust and judicial retention elections . Law & Policy, 9, 451-470.
3.
Baird, V. (2001). Building institutional legitimacy: The role of procedural justice. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 333-354.
4.
Banner, S. (1988). Disqualifying elected judges from cases involving campaign contributors. Stanford Law Review, 40, 449-490.
5.
Baum, L. (1990). American courts: Process and policy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
Beavers, S., & Walz, J. (1998). Modeling judicial federalism: Predictors of state court protections of defendants' rights under state constitutions, 1969-1989 . Publius28, 43-59.
7.
Benesh, S. (2006). Understanding public confidence inAmerican courts. Journal of Politics, 68, 697-707.
8.
Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
9.
Bonneau, C. (2005). What price justice(s)? Understanding campaign spending in state supreme court elections. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 5, 107-125.
10.
Brace, P., & Langer, L. (2001). The Florida Supreme Court in the 2000 presidential election: Ambiguity, ideology, and signaling in a judicial hierarchy. PS: Political Science and Politics, 34, 645-650.
11.
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023.
12.
Brody, D.C. (2002). Criminal procedure under state law: An empirical examination of selective new federalism. Justice System Journal , 23, 75-95.
13.
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).
14.
Caldeira, G. (1986). Neither the purse nor the sword: Dynamics of public confidence in the Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 80, 1209-1226.
15.
Caldeira, G., & Gibson, J.L. (1992). The etiology of public support for the Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 36, 635-664.
16.
Cann, D. (2002). Campaign contributions and judicial behavior. American Review of Politics, 23, 261-274.
17.
Cann, D. (2007). Justice for sale? Campaign contributions and judicial decisionmaking. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 7, 281-297.
18.
Carp, R., Stidham, R., & Manning, K. (2004). Judicial process in America. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
19.
Champagne, A. (1988). Judicial reform in Texas. Judicature , 72, 146-161.
20.
Converse, P.E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
21.
Daniels, W.J. (1973). The Supreme Court and its publics. Albany Law Review, 37, 632-661.
22.
Dolbeare, K.M., & Hammond, P.E. (1968). The political party basis of attitudes toward the Supreme Court. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 16-30.
23.
Durr, R., Martin, A., & Wolbrecht, C. (2000). Ideological divergence and public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 768-776.
24.
Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
25.
Fagan, R.W. (1981). Public support for the courts: An explanation of alternative explanations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, 403-417.
26.
Flanagan, T., McGarrell, E., & Brown, E. (1985). Public perceptions of the criminal courts: The role of demographic and related attitudinal variables. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 66-82.
27.
Gibson, J.L., & Caldeira, G. (1992). Blacks and the United States SupremeCourt: Models of diffuse support. Journal of Politics, 54, 1120-1145.
28.
Gibson, J.L., Caldeira, G., & Baird, V. (1998). On the legitimacy of national high courts. American Political Science Review, 92, 343-358.
29.
Gibson, J.L., Caldeira, G., & Spence, L.K. (2003a). Measuring attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 354-367.
30.
Gibson, J.L., Caldeira, G., & Spence, L.K. (2003b). The Supreme Court and the U.S. presidential election of 2000: Wounds, self-inflicted or otherwise?British Journal of Political Science, 33, 535-556.
31.
Gibson, J.L., Caldeira, G., & Spence, L.K. (2005). Why do people accept public policies they oppose? Testing legitimacy theory with a survey-based experiment. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 187-201.
32.
Glick, H. (1993). Courts, politics, and justice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Grosskopf, A., & Mondak, J. (1998). Do attitudes toward specific Supreme Court decisions matter? The impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on public confidence in the Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 633-654.
34.
Hall, M.G. (2001). State supreme courts in American democracy: Probing the myths of judicial reform. American Political Science Review , 95, 315-330.
35.
Hibbing, J.R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Hibbing, J.R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Hoekstra, V. (2000). The Supreme Court and local public opinion. American Political Science Review, 94, 89-100.
38.
Hojnacki, M., & Baum, L. (1992). “New style” judicial campaigns and the voters: economic issues and union members in Ohio. Western Political Quarterly, 45, 921-948.
39.
Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Kritzer, H. (2001). The impact of Bush v. Gore on public perceptions and knowledge of the Supreme Court. Judicature, 85, 32-38.
41.
Kritzer, H., & Voelker, J. (1998). Familiarity breeds respect: How Wisconsin citizens view their courts. Judicature, 82, 59-64.
42.
Langer, L. (2002). Judicial review in state supreme courts: A comparative study. Albany: State University of New York Press.
43.
Latzer, B. (1991). State constitutions and criminal justice. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
44.
Lehne, R., & Reynolds, J. (1978). The impact of judicial activism on public opinion . American Journal of Political Science, 22, 896-904.
45.
Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2001). Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for paired comparison data under multiple judgment sampling . Psychometrika, 66, 209-228.
46.
Murphy, W., & Tanenhaus, J. (1968). Public opinion and the United States SupremeCourt: A preliminary mapping of some prerequisites for court legitimation of regime changes. Law and Society Review, 2, 357-382.
47.
Muthen, B.O., Kao, C., & Burstein, L. (1991). Instructionally sensitive psychometrics: An application of a new IRT-based detection technique to mathematics achievement test items . Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 1-22.
48.
Muthen, L.K., & Muthen, B.O. (2004). Mplus user's guide, Third edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
49.
National Center for State Courts. (1978). The public image of courts. Williamsburg, VA: Author.
50.
Nicholson, S., & Howard, R.M. (2003). Framing support for the Supreme Court in the after-math of Bush v. Gore. Journal of Politics, 65, 676-695.
51.
Olsen, S., & Huth, D. (1998). Explaining public attitudes toward local courts . Justice System Journal, 20, 41-61.
52.
Overby, L.M., Brown, R., Bruce, J., Smith, C., & Winkle, J. (2004). Justice in black and white: Race, perceptions of fairness, and diffuse support for the judicial system in a southern state . Justice System Journal, 25, 159-181.
53.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
54.
Reed, D. (2003). Social capital and the SupremeCourt: Civic participation's effects on popular perceptions of institutional legitimacy. Typescript.
55.
Rehnquist, W.H. (2000, June). Reflections on the history and future of the Supreme Court of the United States. Speech at the D.C. Circuit Judicial Conference. Retrieved August 15, 2007, from http://www.supremecourtus.gov/publicinfo/speeches/sp_06-16-00.html
56.
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2000).
57.
Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85-100). New York: Springer-Verlag.
58.
Schotland, R. (1985). Elective judges' campaign financing: Are state judges' robes the emperor's clothes ofAmerican democracy? Journal of Law and Politics, 2, 57-167.
59.
Slotnick, E., & Segal, J. (1998). Television news and the Supreme Court: All the news that's fit to air?Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 25, 173-180.
61.
Sullivan, A. (2000, December 25). More or less. The New Republic.
62.
Tanenhaus, J., & Murphy, W. (1981). Patterns of support for the SupremeCourt: A panel study. Journal of Politics, 43, 24-39.
63.
Taylor, S. (2000). Why the Florida recount was egregiously one-sided . The National Journal, 23, 52-53.
64.
Tyler, T.R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65.
Walker, D. (1977). Citizen contact and legal system support. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 3-14.
66.
Wenzel, J., Bowler, S., & Lanoue, D. (2003). The sources of public confidence in state courts . American Politics Research, 31, 191-211.
67.
Yates, J., & Whitford, A. (2002). The presidency and the Supreme Court after Bush v. Gore: Implications for institutional legitimacy and effectiveness. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 13, 118-136.
