The logic of democracy rests on the assumption that policymakers respond to public preferences, which, in turn, respond to policy developments. We address the question of how policy might affect public opinion by analyzing public opinion before and after the 1996 U.S. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. We hypothesized that changes made by the legislation would have improved opinions of welfare recipients. Using U.S. surveys from 1994 and 2001, we find that public opinion was more positive postreform and that the change was because of the enactment of welfare reform itself, not any perceived program success.
Bartels, L.M. (1994). The American public's defense: Spending preferences in the post cold war era. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 479-508.
2.
Bullock, H.E., Williams, W.R., & Limbert, W.M. (2003). Predicting support for welfare policies: The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality. Journal of Poverty , 7, 35-56.
3.
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29-40.
4.
Chong, D., Citrin, J., & Conley, P. (2001). When self-interest matters. Political Psychology, 22, 541-570.
5.
Cook, F.L., & Barrett, E.J. (1992). Support for the American welfare state. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Edelman, M.J. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: Illinois University Press.
7.
Erskine, H. (1975). The polls: Government role in welfare. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 257-274.
8.
Fiorina, M.P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Gusmano, M.K., Schlesinger, M., & Thomas, T. (2002). Policy feedback and public opinion: The role of employer responsibility in social policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 27, 731-772.
11.
Hasenfeld, Y., & Rafferty, J.A. (1989). The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state. Social Forces, 67, 1027-1048.
12.
Kluegel, J.R., & Smith, E.R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
13.
MacLeod, L., Montero, D., & Speer, A. (1999). America's changing attitudes toward welfare and welfare recipients, 1938-1995. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 26, 175-186.
14.
McGraw, K., Best, S., & Timpone, R. (1995). "What they say or what they do?" The impact of elite explanations on policy outcomes on public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 53-74.
15.
McGuire, W.J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 136-314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Page, B.I., & Shapiro, R.Y. (1982). Changes in Americans' policy preferences, 1935-1979 . Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 24-42.
18.
Page, B.I., & Shapiro, R.Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago.
19.
Pereira, J.A., & Van Ryzin, G.G. (1998). Understanding public support for time limits and other welfare reforms. Policy Studies Journal, 26, 398-418.
20.
Quadagno, J. (1994). The color of welfare: How racism undermines the war on poverty. New York: Oxford University.
21.
Schlesinger, M., & Heldman, C. (2001). Gender gap or gender gaps? New perspectives on support for government action and policies. Journal of Politics , 63, 59-92.
22.
Schneider, S.K., & Jacoby, W.G. (2005). Elite discourse and American public opinion: The case of welfare spending. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 367-379.
23.
Schram, S.F. (2005). Contextualizing racial disparities in American welfare reform: Toward a new poverty research. Perspectives on Politics, 3, 253-268.
24.
Sharp, E.B. (1999). The sometime connection: Public opinion and social policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25.
Shaw, G.M., & Shapiro, R.Y. (2002). The polls-trends: Poverty and public assistance . Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 105-128.
26.
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldier and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
27.
Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review, 93, 363-380.
28.
Soss, J., & Schram, S.F. (2007). A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review, 101, 111-127.
29.
The 2000 campaign: Exchanges between the candidates in the third presidential debate. (2000, October 18). New York Times, p. A26.
30.
The 2000 campaign: Transcript of debate between Vice President Gore and Governor Bush. (2000, October 4). New York Times, p. A30.
31.
Valentino, N.A., Hutchings, V.L., & White, I.K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review , 96, 75-90.
32.
Weaver, R.K., Shapiro, R.Y., & Jacobs, L.R. (1995). The polls-trends: Welfare. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 606-627.
33.
Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 981-1000.
34.
Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
